ML20009H069
| ML20009H069 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 06/08/1981 |
| From: | Brown R, Whitesell D NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20009H062 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900373 NUDOCS 8108050410 | |
| Download: ML20009H069 (4) | |
Text
-
VENDOR INSPECTION REPORT U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND CNFORCEMENT REGION IV t
Report No.
99900373/81-01 Program No. 51400 Company:
Cooper Energy Services En-Tronic Controls North Sandusky Street Mt. Vernon, Ohio Inspection Conducted:
May 18-21, 1981 Inspectors:
d O
Ross L. Browa, Contractor Inspector Date Components Section, Vendor Inspection Branch Approved by:
Il et/d///
D. E. Whi tesel f,' Chief, Date Components Section, Vendor Inspection Branch Summary Inspection on May 18-21, 1981 (99900373/81-01).
Areas Inspected: Management meeting and implementation of 10 CFR Pat't 50, Appendix B including change control and action on previous inspection findings. The inspec-tion involved 22 inspector hours on-site by one NRC inspector.
Results: No nonconformant.es or unresolved items were identified during this inspec-tion.
8108050410gojg{,
_j
DETAILS SECTION A.
Persons Contacted
- R. C. Harris, QA Coordinator
- R. E. Miller, Manager, Project Engineering
- G. W. Mizer, Manager, Technical Services and Quality Assurance
- Attended Exit Interview.
B.
Vendor Activities Cooper Energy Services (CES) management stated that they presently have 4 contracts for 12 engine / generators. These contracts are scheduled for completion by the fourth quarter of 1981.
C.
Change Contro]_
l.
Objectives The objectives of this area of the inspection were to verify that the program provides for the review, approval and distribution of changes I
to quality related documents.
2.
Method of Accomplishment The preceding objectives were accomplished by a review of the following documents and discussion with cognizant personnel.
a.
CES - Quality Assurnace Manual, Revision 3, dated May 4, 1981 (QAM)
Section 6, " Document Control," to detennine if the program provides for document change control.
b.
Engineering Procedures Nos. EE-132 and EE-163.
c.
Di-Electric and Insulation and Check Test Procedure.
d.
Bills or Material (B/M) for S0-0391, S0-0531, and S0-0420, e.
4 Avoid Verbal Orders From 35 (AV0),
f.
Engineering Log Book, g.
Five Internal Audit Reports dated 9/5/80, 10/10/80, 10/6/80, 10/7/80, and 10/9/80, and h.
Discussions with auditor a'nd engineering management. To verify con-formance with the established requirements.
. 3.
Findings a.
No nonconfonnances or unresolved items were identified in this area of the inspection.
b.
The following information was obtained:
(1) The QAM, Section 6, states that, " Measures have been provided to assure that design documents, including changes, are prepared, reviewed for adequacy, and approved for release by authorized personnel within the engineering department."
CES management stated that, it is the vendors intent that all quality related procedures, instruction, etc. be handled in the manner described in-the manual section, however, the manual section will be reviewed and revised as necessary to clearly provide for a review and approval of quality related pro-cedures/ instructions that are issued by departments other than engineering.
The inspectcrs review of three procedures showed proper approval sign-off.
The internal audit reports dated October 7 and 10, 1980, indicated that procedures issued by QA and Manufacturing had been properly signed-off for approval.
(2) Engineering Procedure; No. EE-132, Rev. 2 has been issued for use.
The inspector reviewed the AV0's, Engineering Log Book and Internal Audit Report dated, October 6, 1980, and verified that change control (including shop initiated changes) is in conformance with the engineering procedure.
(3) The inspector observed that approval of the original and changes to five Bills of Material (B/M) for Shop Orders 0391, 0351, and 0420, are in conformance with CES commitment and the QAM, Section 6.2.
D.
Action on Previous Inspection Findings 1.
(Closed) Deviation A (IR No. 99900373/79-01). The inspector verified that the referenced memo (CES letter dated October 15,1979) had been issued and approved test procedures were issued.
2.
(Closed) Deviation B (IR No. 99900373/79-01). The inspector verified that acceptance limits for the di-electric and megger checks had been included in the Factory Test Report Document No. 290 and Test Check Off List for Shop Order 0391, in accordance with CES letter dated October 15, 1979.
.... 3.
(C?osed) Deviation C (IR No. 99900373/79-01). The inspector verified that the original and changes to five B/M's were approved in accordance with the commitment in the CES letter dated October 15, 1979.
4.
(Closed) Deviation D (IR No. 99900373/79-01). The inspector verified that Engineering Procedure EE-132, Rev. 2 had been issued and that the control of shop initiated changes (Form 35) is in conformance with the procedure.
5.
(Closed) Deviation E (IR No. 99900373/79-01).
The inspector reviewed three procedures that were properly signed signifying approval.
The inspector also reviewed the Internal Audit Reports, dated October 7 and 10, 1980 that indicated procedures issued by QA and Manufacturing had been properly signed for approval.
E.
Exit Interview The inspector conducted an exit meeting with the Cooper Energy Services Management representatives at the conclusion of the inspection.
In addition to the persons indicated by an asterisk in paragraph A.,
Mr. C. E. Richardson, Operations Manager was in attendance.
The inspector discussed the scope of the inspection and the details of the findings during the inspection.
The CES Management comments were generally for clarification only.
. _ _ _.