ML20009G870

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notifies That Util Will Revise Existing Procedures to Comply W/Reg Guides 1.58,Revision 1 & 1.146,in Response to Generic Ltr 81-01 Dtd 810504 Re Qualification of Insp,Exam & Testing & Audit Personnel.Clarification Encl
ML20009G870
Person / Time
Site: Limerick  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 07/31/1981
From: Kemper J
PECO ENERGY CO., (FORMERLY PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC
To: Eisenhut D
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
RTR-REGGD-01.058, RTR-REGGD-01.146, RTR-REGGD-1.058, RTR-REGGD-1.146 GL-81-01, GL-81-1, NUDOCS 8108050164
Download: ML20009G870 (5)


Text

- .

}

l 1

' k PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY l 2301 M ARKET STREET P.O. BOX 8699 OOI~IOUI PHILADELPHI A. PA.19101 JOHN S KEMPER

<2isi e4i.4 so2 JUL 31 IfB1 VIC E PRESIDE NT ahesneaseehG amo maseam(H Docket No. 50-352 50-353 l  %

Mr. Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director ,b h i I-Division of Licensing C Office of Nuclear Peactor Pegulation i [

Unitr eStates Nuclear Regulatory Ccmnission 2 3 0 C O b .g it*"'

p '4.

Washington, D.C. 20555 p ,,. g [ce

~< g

Subject:

Lurerick Generating Station Units 1 & 2 /,f Qualification of Inspection, Examination and '@ /g . p Testing and Audit Personnel 'eneric Letter 81-01) k 'f

Dear Mr. Eisenhut:

'Ihis letter is in response to your letter of May 4,1981 which requested Philadelphia Electric Ompany to address Regulatory Guide 1.58, Revision 1, " Qualification of Nuclear Power Plant Inspection, Examination, and Testing Personnel" and Regulatory Guide 1.146, August 1980, " Qualification of Quality Assurance Audit Personnel for Nuclear Power Plants."

Philadelphia Electric Cmpany will emply with the above Regulatory Guides as described in the attached Appendix.

'Ihe qualifications of Inspection, Examination, and Testing Personnel will be in accordance with the attached Appendix by March 31, 1982.

Existing procedures for the qualification of PECO QA organization audit personnel will be revised to reflect the guidance of Regulatory Guide 1.146 as nodified by the alternates described in the attached Appendix. 'Ihe revised procedures will be implmented by July 1,1982.

Current personnel not meeting the qualification requirments of the revised procedures by July 1,1982 will continue to be considered qualified under the provisions of ANSI N45.2.12 - 1r// until eligible for qualification in accordance with the revised procedures. New audit personnel assigned to PECO QA organizations will be qualified in accordan with the revised procedures.

- 0 8108C 50164 810731 d4 PDR /20CK 05000352 A PDR

.... - = _.

l-7 l

Mr. Darrell G, Eisenhut, Director Page 2 Division of Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulatica United States Nuclear Regulatory Ca mission i.

1 1

Should further infonnation be newssary, do not hesitate m contact uS.

i l

i Very truly yours, S. -

i.

l 6

i f

{

I i

J i

I 4

l J

l b

i

.wn. . ,-.. -,---r,- y- , -~ ,, --- ~ m-w .. ,, . n,- --en. ,,, , - - - . - - - . ,

APPENDIX 1 Alternates and Clarifications to .

Regulatory Guide 1.58, Revision 1 and  ;

[

Regulatory Guide 1.146, August 1980 Regulatory Guide 1.58, Revision 1, " Qualifications of Nuclear .

Power Plant Inspection, Examination, and Testing Personnel."  ?

Endorses ANSI N45.2.6 - 1978.

Philadclphia Electric Company will comply with Regulatory Guide 1.58, Revision 1 and ANSI N45.2.6 - 1978 cxcept for the following clarification and .sternates:

a. Regulatory Guide 1.58, Revision 1, Section C.1 and ANSI N45.2.6 - 1978, subscction 1.2 states that the standard applies to " personnel who perform inspections, examinations, and tests." Philadelphia Electric Company personnel who inspect equipment as part of routine plant maintenance, in other than a quality control function; and plant staff personnel (as defined in the PBAPS Technical Specifications),

who approve test procedures and test results and direct or supervise the conduct of individual tests, will be qualified in accordance with ANSI N18.1 - 1971 in licu of ANSI N45.2.6

- 1978.

b. Regulatory Guide 1.58, Rovision 1, Section C.4 and ANSI l

N45. 2. 6 - 1978, subsection 1.5 discuss the applicability of l documents referenced in the standard. In lieu of the latest revision of Regulatory Guides and ANSI Standards, PECO l

commitments are contained in the Peach Bottom FSAR, Section 17.2, " Operational Quality Assurance Program."

c. ANSI N45.2.6 - 1978, subsection 3.5 presents experience recommendations for candidates. Experience in maintenance, modification, and operating activitics is considered related cxperience since such experience provides training in the safety aspects cf the facility.

Rcoulatory Guide 1.146, August 1950, " Qualification of Quality Assurance Program Audit Personnel for Nuclear Power Plants" l Endorses ANSI /ASME N45.2.23 - 1978.

1 Philadelphia Electric Company will comply with Regulatory Guide 1.146, August 1980 and ANSI /ASME N45.2.23 - 1978 cxcept for tho l following alternates:

! a. Regulatory Guide 1.146, August 1980, Section C.1 and ANSI /ASME N45.2.23 - 1978, subsection 1.5 discuss the 1, , '

f

[ '

p

applicability of documents referenced in the standard. In .

lieu of the latest revision of Regulatory Guides and ANSI Standards, PECO commitments are contained in the Peach Bottom PSAR, Section 17.2, " Operational Quality Assurance Program."

b. ANSI /ASME N45.2.'23 - 1978, subsection 2.3 states requirements for qualification of auditors. In lieu of the stated requirements, PECo will qualify perconnel in accordance with the requirements presented below. These alternate requirements will provide PECo with sufficient flexibility to qualify competent personnel with initial technical experience in a more effective manner. The proration of credits between initial experience requirements and additional experience gained as an assistant to a Lead Auditor assures that highly qualified personnel will be available as audit personnel in a more timely fashion.

Labstitute the following for paragraph 2.3.1 of ANSI /ASME N45.2.23 - 1978: -

2.3.1 Education and Experience. The prospective Lead Auditor shall have verifiabic evidence that a minimum of ten (10) credits under the following scoring system have been accumulated.

2.3.1.1 Education (4 credits maximum). Associate degree from an accredited institution score one (1)

. credit or if the degree is an engineering, physical sciences, mathematics, or quality assurance, score two (2) credits or,

  • a bachelor degree from an accredited institution score two (2) credits or if the degree is in engineering, physical sciences, mathematics, or quality assurance, score three (3) credits; in addition score one (1) credit for a master degree in engineering, physical sciences, business management, or quality assurance from an accredited institution.

2.3.1.2 a) Initial Experience Prior to Assignnent (6 credits maximum).

Technical experience in engineering, manufacturing, construction, operation, maintenance, or quality assurance related to the aforemontioned activitics, scorc one (1) credit for cach full year with a l

-- ,-w r--,-- ,-n-,, , , , - - , , , , , , , . - , , - - , . , , - - - - - . , , , . , , . ~,

7 .

(,', maximum of five (5) credits for this ,

aspect of experience.

If two (2) or more years of this experience have been in the nuclear field, score one (1) additional credit.

2.3.1.2 b) Additional Experience (after assignment) (4 credits maximum).

Experience in quality assurance, score one (1) credit for cach full year (2 credits maximum) or, Experience in auditing, score two (2) credits for cach full year (3 credits j maximum) or, Experience in nuclear quality assurance, score one (1) credit for each full year (3 credits maximum) or, Experience in nuclear quality assurance auditing, score one (1) credit per every six months (4 credits maximum).

2.3.1.3 Other Credentials of Professional Competence (2 credits maximum). Certification of competency in engineering, science, or quality assurance specialitics issued and approved by a State Agency, or National Professional or Technical Society, score two (2) credits.

2.3.1.4 Rights of Management (2 credits maximum). The Lead Auditor's employer may grant up to one (1) credit for other performance factors applicable to auditing which may not be explicitly called out in this standard such as l leadership, sound judgement, maturity, analytical ability, tenacity, and past performance, plus one (1) credit for i satisfactory completion of Lead Auditor training program. -

r , - - - - - - - c - ,- ,