ML20009G410
| ML20009G410 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 07/07/1981 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20009G409 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900105 NUDOCS 8108040224 | |
| Download: ML20009G410 (2) | |
Text
-
l I
Fisher Controls Company Docket No. 99900105/81-01 NOTICE OF NONCONFORMANCE Based on the results of an NRC inspection conducted on May 18-22, 1981, it appears that certain of your activities were not conducted in accordance with NRC requirements as indicated below:
Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 states:
" Activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures, or drawings, of a type i
appropriate to the circumstances and shall be accomplished in accordance with these instructions, procedures, or drawings.
Instructions, procedures, or draw-iras shall include appropriate quantitative or qualitative acceptance criteria for determining that important activities have been satisfactorily accomplished."
Nonconformances with these requirements u e as follows:
A.
Paragraph 4.2.1.b of the ASHE accepted Quality Assurance Manual states in part, "The SDR Committee ensures completion of either Specification and i
Design Review, Form 2820, or all of the following forms:
... o. Open Items Report for SDR Meeting, Form 3113...."
Paragraph 4.2.1.d. states, "The Specification and Design Review Form 3119 shall not be signed off by' the Technical Consultants until all SDR open items have been resolved.
Contrary tc the above, Specification and Design Review Form 3119 was signed off by the Technical Consultants for Project 78P174, although the Summary cf Resolution Section of Form 3113 had not been completed to denote resolution of design open items.
B.
Paragraph 2.2.12 in Section 2 of the QA Manual states in part, "The Certifica-tion Clerk has the responsibility for verifying certified material test reports in accordance with the ASME Code,Section III, Division 1...."
Contrary to tne above, the Certification Clerk did not verify the conformance of Oklahoma Steel cen,ified material test reports for six inch ASME Section i
III Class 2 SA-352 LCB control valve bodies, Fisher Purchase Order No.
S000947R, with the weld repair and postweld heat treatment requirements of Section III of the ASME Code, as evidenced by:
Subarticle NC-4620, which is referenced by Section III, Subsection NC (1974 Edition through Summer 1974 Addenda) as applicable for postweld heat treatment of weld repairs in castings, permits postweld heat treatment above the temperature range specified in Table NC-4622.1-1, i.e.,
g l
1100-1250 i for SA-352 LCB materials, only if the weldirig procedure specification (WPS) and weld filler r.aterial have been qualifiea at the higher temperature.
8108040224 810707 PDR OA999 ENVFISC 9990010" PDR.
Fisher Controls Company 2
Review of the vendor documentation for the castings showed that heag treatment had been pgrformed subsequent to weld repair at both 1560 F and in the 1100-1250 F temperature range specified by Table NC-4322.1-1, withgut qualification of either the WPS or the weld filler material at the 1560 F temperature (See Details Section ?!, C.3.a.(1)).
C.
Paragraph 15.3.1.f in Section 15 of the QA Mancil states with respect to Machine Routing (traveler) operation sign off, "The signature of the operators on the form signifies that those operations have been properly performed and completed in accordance with the drawings and t.rocedures/
revisions indicated."
Contrary to the above, the signature of the welder for a Machine Routing hardfacing operation on a four inch ASME Section III, Class 1 Vee-Ball (Operation No. 20-1, Valve S/N 5909452, Heat and S/N D353/SN116), did not i
signify proper completion of hardfacing in accordance with drawings and procedures / revisions indicated, in that the operation was signed off after completion of only 50% of the required hardfar ing (See DetailsSection II, paragraph C.3.a.(2)).
1 l
l s