ML20009B076
| ML20009B076 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Callaway  |
| Issue date: | 06/24/1981 |
| From: | Heishman R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20009B070 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-483-81-10, NUDOCS 8107140738 | |
| Download: ML20009B076 (2) | |
Text
Appendix A s
NOTICE OF VIOLATION Union Electric Company Docket No. 50-483 As a result of the inspection conducted on May 5-7, 1981, and in accord-ance with the Interim Enforcement Policy, 45 FR 66754 (October 7, 1980),
the following violations were identilled:
1.
Failure to Provide Appropriate Procedures for II/I Raceway Inspection 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V requires that activities affecting quality shall be prescribed in documented procedures..., including quantitative or qualitative acceptance criteria.
Contrary to the above a.
WP-03, Revision 2, " Field Fabrication and Installation of Seismic II/I Supports and Block Walls" Paragraph 4.3 and WP-301, Revision 9,
" Installation of Electrical Raceway Supports," Paragraph 3.19 cross reference each other for installation of II/I raceway supports, but neither procedure provides the actual instructions for the instal-lation.
b.
WP-03, Rev. 2, Paragraph 4.3.6, requires the inspection of III/I Raceway Supports using Bechtel Dwg. E0R-8900 " Raceway Notes, Symbols and Details."
Dwg. E0R-8900 does not provide appropriate acceptance criteria for determining satisfactory accomplishment of the activity.
c.
WP-03, Revision 2, Paragraph 4.3.6, requires that II/I Raceway Support inspections be documented on Exhibit A in WP-301.
Exhibit A does not provide space on the form to address inspec-tion results, instructions, or signature block for Engineering Inspector.
d.
Neither WP-03, Revision 2, nor WP-301, Revision 9 address the in-spection of bolted connections on the raceway or the attachment of the raceway to the associated supports.
8107140738 810624 PDRADOCK05000p8 G
Appendix A.
The above are multiple examples of a Severity Level V violation (Supplement II, Paragraph E).
2.
Failure to Follow Procedures for II/I Raceway Inspections 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V requires that activities affecting quality be accomplished in accordance with prescribed documented pro-cedures.
Contrary to the above:
a.
WP-03, Revision 2, Paragraph 4.3.1, requires the Project Electrical 2ngineer to mark Work Assignments (WA) as II/I for II/I support installation.
The NRC inspector identified that five out of nine WA's inspected did not indicate that the supports were II/I. Therefore, the II/I inspections were not performed.
b.
WP-03, Revision 2, Paragraph 3.1, requires training and documenta-tion of authorization by the Project Discipline Engineer for all Engineering Inspectors.
The NRC inspector identified seven WA's that were signed off by individuals for there was no training or authorization documen-tation available.
The above are examples of a Severity Level V violation (Supplement II, Paragraph E).
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, you are required to submit to this office within thirty days of the date of this Notice a written statement or explanation in reply, including for each item of noncompliance:
(1) cor-rective action taken and the results achieved; (2) corrective action to be taken to avoid further noncompliance; and (3) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Under the authority of Section 182 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, this response shall be submitted under oath or affirmation. Consideration may be given to extending your response time for good cause shown.
o /-
JUN 2 4 1981
/J/
Dateo V."F. Heishman, Acting Director Division of Resident and Project Inspection
.