ML20009A774
| ML20009A774 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Arkansas Nuclear  |
| Issue date: | 06/26/1981 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20009A771 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8107140184 | |
| Download: ML20009A774 (2) | |
Text
-
(
f.
~
/
'o UNITED STATES E
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 3
E.
es.,...../
SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION SUPPORTINf; AMENDMENTS NOS. 58 AND 25 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSES NOS. DPR-51 AND NPF-6 ARKANSAS POWER & LIGHT COMPANY ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE, UNITS NOS. 1 & 2 DOCKETS N05. 50-313 & 50-368 Introduction By letter dated January 30, 1981, Arkansas Power & Light Company (the licensee or AP&L) requested amen.dment of the Technit:al Specifications (TSs), Appendices A and B, appended to Facilit~y Operating' Licenses Nos.
DPR-51 and NPF 5 for Arkansas Nuclear One, Units Nos.1 and 2 (AN0-1&2).
The amendments would reflect a change in the AP&L organization structure.
Discussion and Evaluation' The proposed change in organizational structure would change the title of Vice President, Generation & Construction, to Senior Vice President, Energy Supply, and the title of the Director, Nuclear Operations, to.
Assistant Vice President, Nuclear Operations. The proposed change would involve no change in the function of these two officers relating to the operations of ANO-1&2. The proposed change is administrative in nature and would not involve a decrease in the margin of safety or an increase in the'orobability or consequences of accidents.
Therefore, we find the proposed amendments: acceptable.
Environmental Consideration We have detertnined that the amendments do not authorize a change in effluent types or total amounts nor an increase in power icvel and will not result in any significant environmental impact. Having made this catermination, we have further concluded that the' amendments involve an action which is insignificant from the standpoint of environmental impact and, pursuant to 10 CFR 551.5(d)(4), that an environmental impact statement, or negative.
declaration and environmental impact appraisal need not be prepared in connection with the issuance of these amendments.
l l
l l
l 0107140184 810626 l
PDR ADOCK 05000313 P
3 2
Conclusion We have concluded, based on the considerations discus:ed above, that:
(1) because the amendments do not involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of accidents previously considered and do not i'nvolve a significant decrease in a safety margin, the amendments do not involve a significant hazards consideration, (2) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, and (3) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the' Commission's regulations and the issuance of these amendments will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.
Dated: June 26, 1981 s