ML20008F147

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards QA Program Insp Rept 99900730/80-01 on 801203-05. No Noncompliance Noted
ML20008F147
Person / Time
Issue date: 01/09/1981
From: Potapovs U
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To: Andrea Johnson
DOOR-MAN MANUFACTURING CO.
Shared Package
ML20008F148 List:
References
REF-QA-99900730 NUDOCS 8103120388
Download: ML20008F147 (2)


Text

,cdsu?Ktc%,

UNITED STATES p.p) 4 #'g i

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 3 J' '

a f REGloN IV k

[

611 RYAN Pt.AZA DRIVE. SulTE 1000

[

..,g ARUNGToN, TEXAS 76011

\\\\

N(Lub. } ' A 0 9 JAN 1931 k

I b',nR0 6 wau Jy

~'

Docket No.

99900730/80-01 g

v.$'[8 6 R. V. Harty Co., Inc.

Division of Door-Man Manufacturing Co.

Attn: Mr. A. P. Johnson President 505 E. Ten hile Road Royal Oak, Michigan 48067 Gentlemen:

This refers to the QA program inspection conducted by Mr. Ross L. Brown of this office on December 3-5, 1980 of your facility at Royal Oak, Michigan associated with the manufacture of shock doors and frames and to the disCJssion of our findings with you and members of your staff at the conclusion of the inspection.

This inspection was made to confim that, in the areas inspected, your QA p.ogram, is being effectively implemented. The inspection effort is not des 1g'.d to assure that unique quality requirements imposed by a custocer are being implemented; nor to assure that a specific product, cor.ponent or service provided by you to your customers, is of acceptable quality.

As you know, the NRC requires each of its licensees to assume full respon-sibility for the quality of specific products, components or services pro-cured fran others. You should therefore not conclude that the NRC's inspec-tion exempts you from inspections by an NRC licensee or his agents nor from takinn affective corrective action in response to their findings.

Areas examined during the inspection and our findings are discussed in the l

enclosed report. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of an examina-l tion of procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observations by the inspector.

Within the scope of this inspection, we found no instance where you failed to meet NRC requirements.

In accordance with Section 2.790 of the Comission's " Rules of Practice,"

Part 2, Tit'3 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter together l

l 3h 8108120

R. V. Harty Co., Inc.

Docket flo.

99900730/80-01 with the enclosed inspection report will be placed in the Commission's Public Document Room.

If this report contains any information that you believe to be proprietary, it is necessary that you make a written appli-cation within thirty (30) days to this office to withhold such inform: : ion from public disclosure. Any such application must include a full statement of the reasons on the basis of which it is claimed that the information is proprietary, and should be prepared so that the proprietary information iden--

tified in the application is contained in a separate part of the document.

If we do not hear from you in this regard within the specified period, the report will be placed in the Public Document Room.

Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased to discuss them with you.

Sincerely, V

vbJ2db>-4

[(W Uldis Potapovs, Gief I Vendor Inspection Branch Enclosure Inspection Report No. 99900730/80-01 i

j l

l 1

.