ML20008D469
| ML20008D469 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Seabrook  |
| Issue date: | 05/24/1989 |
| From: | Federal Emergency Management Agency |
| To: | |
| References | |
| OL-I-MAG-101, NUDOCS 9003020312 | |
| Download: ML20008D469 (116) | |
Text
---
- ,Nhb 4 ffQ lQl l
Fe(Icral Emergency Management Asi9li49 k
oTe Eo- ~
!g C W
g$ - M id r"4.)l j I
83 GFC!CE XPJ 00CMEi
- rOF SECHEIARY g [Hvict.
Ok j 00 s
f l i
EXERCISE EVALUATION r y
METHODOLOGY (EEM)
}
\
! i i
MUCLEAR So -W3 -o4- REGULATORY COMMISSION t Dxket No.50 -W9'-N-Omtial Exh. No.IO! i fn the matter et.fch&&se Grmy af hg?d:5.h Staff _
4p'icant __ 10EGI!FIED 2 2 6 0 3 h RECEIVED lZ,60 8.
Intervec:r M d _ _ EEJECTED _
Cant'g Offr Contrattar
, Other DATE _ 2Y Witness Reporter _.
/
L -
l oi _- _ - - - _ . , . . . . ~ ~ ~ ^ ^ ~ ^ ' ' ' ' ~ ~ ~
F utm a t'-
M4 1968 I ..
1 J >
Federal Emergency Management Agency l
~
l-r EXERCISE EVALUATION -
METHODOLOGY (EEM)
I .
DetBEMscr1GE 101351: IEP EEggrre magistrIGs BEmrinrunct '
f I. hurtrprotsul asuf Ptarpose 1he Ber:rcise Evaluation R?:hodology (IIIBE) sigplants the 1983 Stochalar 7tuneet for Radiologimi Buergency Prtsmaredness avuilustiere of exercises for tremercial reaclear power plants. 1he development of tSim EBE began alaprtaciastely one arxl one half years ago with the development of maintenom stemorasukas (GO) EX-3, "Maraging Pre-Benacisse ActJlvities and Pest-Bearcise Steetiny". In additiera to providing gialstanta est the esercise pennema, W EK@ intrattisced a ruar set of 36 standard exercise cbjectives. A 37 tit etrjective (Utility Offsite ResponsG Organisations) uns arktart try an asunthunt to Gt E!-3 dated 3/7/98. 1his etr)ective ,
i addrummes sitanations dere State awayer local goversuments decline to particirate in energency plasudsup and '
etarr-fema, as arp1minnett in IEEEEHI654/FWWHE!P-1, Itevision 1, Sigspleasant 1. The insummmmestal differunne _
i
- bettesti the new EIBt mai the 3enrhalar ybrunt is that the EIgl is an etrjective-based evalustian, as cypened to te .
i tMse geogragtnical/furrAlenal-etxhale 3enrhiar Freunst. evalustian (e.g., meergency operating omnter, Field Activity) used in !'
- I 1hm ERM ye
- 91 des a anthod for Fluteral evoluetors to une in evolusting ammacises oorsta+ met leursuant to 44 j
GR 350,10 GR 50, and the IEEFFBR 30muoranthet of thuterstanding (50 PR 15435) dated 4/18/35. - 1he EIBE is provided try FEBR Headtpaartars'to ensure tenifonnity of Itagional use in IEP camarcise edmarvatim and
- evaluation. 1t> assure that the EEBE is used consistently by all Etegions, no extifications shonald be used . .
l without prior cons:urrunce frue FEBR lanarkymerters.
4 II. IEP Buurcise themal - '
1he REP Beercise starasal provides ataquehensive and miform gialdance for all esearcise activities in Wtidt F1BR is involved.
post-essercise tasks. Phrt one of the sessani presents a detailed dutunology of all pre-emercise, exercise, and into the duranology. All relevant gialdence frtse Glaidence stemoranda and other sources has been incorporated Other mar +irmus of PIntt One of the sternaal incliste the Regulatory Basis for the IEP l
l Progreen, Bearcise Gzjectivss, Drills, Acrersyne, and a Glausmary of 1teruss. In the sectim are "IDeercise Objectives," the fo11 citing inforumtlen is provided for ends of the 37 etyjectives: Stas ==mmst of the objective, Intent, context, Definition of 1ternus, Plarming oansiderations, Ctyjective ne-rmutrutien criteria arms Application. Part 1tso of the Musant will be a final versim of the EIBE, dtidt will consist of 37 i developeint Perus Evaluation of both(1parts per objective). Argonne Hetional fahnratory has pruridad contract sigiport ihr the '
i l
of the Hermaal.
I III. conosytual Fr====*
t As ausstioned, the E350 le an otr)ective-based method of evaleasting IEP exercises. The fessulation for the EIBE i i
1
- is the set of ftsictional evaluation criteria set forth in IEEEEMMiS4/PIBgHEP-1, Revision 1
- "oriterie for the Pruparaticri and Evaltaatle of Radiological Lyd.y Response Plans and Ptuperskuess in Styport of l Nuclear Power Plants." Frtun these criteria, 36 essercise &jectives have besse derive S Waida are exercise
+
v s , _ . . - . - _ . , _ . _ , . . _ .. _ _ _ _ ~ - . . . , . . . - _ _ , . _ _..,--
t demonstrable the guidance on and observable Offsite r+ activities and ftmetions. 1he 37th exercise otrketive has been derived fr ;
- 1. Organizaticru set forth in NUREG-0654/PTE-NP-1, Revision 1, siqqntement i' Becmase the first step in plannirq any REP exercise is the selection of @)ectives to be demonstrated (per Qt EX-3), exercise evaluation haeart on objectives is natural.
In order to estisfy organizatim(s) unantand one of these mamamattally ds-rwistrate. 37 &jectives, there are a :m=her of capabilities the rempanse l G un.61 .t.icn criteria. 1hese capabilities are referred to as &jective f These anpabilities, tahan together with relevant Federal policies amut guidance, as well as previouscbjectives the -ac,u,.uruj anarcise aequ'rience, have beenhave met.been samari to create evalustian foms that clearly tout Winther l
The con &act of exercises maramma that ende ceganizatien's '
esmergency plan has bears reviewed, is adegante and in many cm===, approved by Mpek. As made, the purpose of an exercise is to test es& organizatien's ability to implesment its emergency plan and proomeiros. 1he !
l afirst part plan of the EBE Ipaluatien implesmentaticri gaestion.7tn for ends &jective contains ahort ansuur/chjective-type gamations asul t I
0654/7954-5EP-1 reference. 1hm marvwid W ryamatirmi in this part of the Evolustier Form is tied to a MEWG- I follcaring informatim: part of the EDI Evalustian Fura for enda drjective amks for the If the &jective was met; a narrative dancription of hair the drjective was dserwistrated; identified imma==. and essercise immann (Deficiencies, ARCH's, and ARFI's) and recommendations for uuman11 rug an i
. I i IV. Use of the Beurrima Buelustion Beettuo&alogy l i
! i All objectives in the otsplete EBE are riot likely to be used for any givert esercise. Rather, a atmet of the 37 ev ~mtim focus will nummily be used for a giveri esercise. As usettiened above, etyjective 37 has been arernari plannisug and so evaluate activities diere state antyar loomi goversuments decline to participate in emmergency esercises.
It requires stamristration of utility offsite response organizatians and liaisons with mes==mrt state and local govervaunts, thanups the use of control cells and evalustors. Otrjective 37 should only be used in sus sitaastions.
addreamart for any relevant activity, Wiether facility or field-heaart.The EBE is struebated so that any giveri etrje!
haaart evaluation forms at actnes geographic bowuk; and can be used for all activities.In other words, these ckrjective-In all 37 evaluation foms of the EBI, responses avellable to the evaluator are tailored to em.si gemati "
in terms of diedting items, providing linfocustion, and annueriruJ gaestian with 'YES 'm
Miem rarys=*mri infomation is not sartare
' ' ~
'No', 'vA', and 'wo'. 'rEs' indiate. a positi,e re.po,,,e e, sed c,, ace,,1 %,,,off or writteri-in there are i negative resparse haanrl on actual r*maarvatimi. 'N A' reans 'not applicable' ,
Wildi fruticates that the listed activity did reat need to be dserwistrated at a givers exercise because an organization did not have se=.rn61bility for the functiers as reflected in its plan, or, the organization had responsibility for the k______ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ ~ _ - _ _ _ . _ - -e..
_ _ - . . . _ _ _ . . . < _ - . - - . --.,.-..--v-~~'
activity but soonerlo events were sum that the activity was not repaireti to be rhermestrated. 'aq/O' noans
'notbe r*==rved',
mode. Itthe esercise activity was riot r*==rved by the evalustor, therefore no ewelestive response can should be noted that these responses are anstually esclusive, only me shandd be daar*mes i
for a given qtamation. !
on the last page of the evaluation form for amm objective, evalustors are mahare to prwide their roomumendation as to deather the etyjective was ' met', 'not met' or ' partially ast'. ' stet' ismas,=*== that li the for. performance of the organization was satisf-L=f for all activities the organization uma respassible
'Isot amt' indicates that performance of the organizatiert was not J 8=' 0-- y for asuy of the :
activities the organization was regensible for. 'Iertially met' indiates that the parermummene of t$un j
organization was entisfactory only for omrtain msgar+= of the organization's resqmnsibilities and j
unsatisfr L-i for others. Sheme estumminations are drjectivuMyecific and apply only to the drjective i being evalianted, not. the antire facilit.y or field activity. Also, the i -f. g battind thems rootzumendations should be reflectest in the 'Iturrutive mammary' section era the last page of estet drjective.
itaile in most comes time sunluator's reocumuradation will stand, the FEBR Itagional Assistance Ousmittee (IUC)
Chair may alter this r=r==mummutatisms based on the total emercise sherzustratics and current FBR policies. !
i In the 'IIntrative Summary' ==r+ laws of time evaluation form the evalustor shrmald provide a turief overviser of how the objective was demusistrated and inclease apprtguriate hitptll<psting of positive ampacts of the amorcise i-
' rherzustration as well as problems. Encia eveltantor dumm1d ideratify any recommusuted essercise i===== with r====t to the established r-Emmelficutlans: Deficiency, Area Iterpairing Corrective Actiers (JWICE) and Area
! i j
N for Inputpaeumont (AIIFI). As defined in Glaidence femmorancham EX-1: 3Ggdagde are sammer=ustrated i and r*==rved Asiartarpner-lam that womald osume a finding that offsite existguncy preparvuksess tem seat misspante
- to provide a reasonable amourence that appropriate protective =====es een be tahan to protect healtti asut l
safety of the emergency. p611c living in the vicinity of a nuclear power facility in tSam event of a radiological
- sinrum=== of the potertial impar + cf deficiencies an emergency pregustueuses, they are repaired to be promptly cortur+mre thatzsps agertguriate x==vmei=1 actions incleading r===tial aumer-i , skills or other actions.
l AIE1's are demonstrated and reumorvest irimeterramr lam of state assi loon 1 governmost (or estility
- offsite response organization) perforunnae, and althaups their correctiese is respaired enrisig tsee neset actiareniert safety.
biennial esercise, they are not considered, by timumpives, to adversely impact geblic health and p elic healthAIErI's andare pr21em areas dimerved during an emarcise that are not considered to adversely impact safety.
leille not respairett, correction of these would estaunta are organizatiest's lamel of l emergency pruperetbaums. As with the evalianter's reatmumendatics as to diether the objective ten met, 1
evalustar INicns of exercise inseems will be revleued by the IWC Oasir for eacts aumecise. At the a
IUC Onnir's discretion, the evaltancor's rur6cri muy be used or not used, depending ess the specific organization's res=rmustration within the total framework of the exercise.
1he evalustor should, in the space prwided, rurrummarut an aggiroach for cmm t.ing arry esercise issues identified (i.e., plan changes, reunedial exercises or other methods).
1 i
_4 m - _ . . _ _______ - . _ _ _ -_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _- .J
1 V. mencise 7b11cualp completed evaluaticri forums should 'on =*=itted by entd the evaluation of an exercise.
sjectives.
evalustor to the prtper tesen Imadur ahortly after
=*=it ocupleted evaluatiers foram for all anskytod She tems Imador will revient the completed evoluution formse and qtsestions are completely aremmered, ba# cn the evaluator's <*=marvations. t evalustcr/partin-iM escit intervient Infornmution prwidad diaring the i section of the evaluation fonum. armould be consistent with that pewsdad in the ' Narrative enummmy' j Houever, . recommmuidations relative to exercise lamamma made oss the evaluation intervient forms are not to be pewidart to participants during the exit 2ntervier. i identify exercise deficiencies, ARTS and ARFI' sis .
==========1t to prwide participants of strusagths with a ,preliminary and weaknemmesThe vint to purpose ;
i VI. yhtam i l
l i gtsalifying, hall-participation aumer-iman in June 1988.De carrant version of theamEBE ha
( for implementing the EBf for all other PEP essercissus. Per M Ex-3, a timeframa cf 120 days is provided i Regie s is July 5, 1988. Que t-pi. data for luplementation in all the {'
an=hars and other involved organizations will begin est this date.E sist month interianase period to i
! == par += Also per W EK-3, objective 9 and some
! until Jarnaary of the1989.
inge:; tion espossue pattemmy objectives (i.e., !
27-30) are not rumpaired to be demoruserstad i responsibility in these areas to amend their response plans and preparienksess.Uite pu!'
s i VII. Referusions >
! (1)
! I Preparedness, (48 PR 44332,' 9/28/83)FBR rule, 44 GR 350, Revier and Appewal of Sta (2) 3 (3) FDR rule, 44 GR 351, Radiological Buergency P1 arming and %-s4. !
4 (4) letC rule,10 GR 50, amargency Planrdrup, (45 FR 55402, 8/19/30, and T * , (48 Mt 19758, 3/11/82) ;
l A ammsteennts)
{ Response Plans and Prigieruukumus in Support of Misclear State and Iccal goversuments) (for licanages and Pauer Plan ?
- l (5) !
j ENED0654/FW8 HEP-1, Sipp.1, Criteria for Preparation and Braluation of Radiological j
i utility offsiteResponse Bmergency reqxsue Plans and Preparedness in Sigport of feiaclear Power Plants,11/87 organizatims) (for (6) Guidance Memorandian Ex-1, Damedial meercises, 7/15/85 !
(7) l Guidarice (8) Guidance Messorandian EK-3, Annaging Pre-Deercise psamnrandtem EX-3 Amarutment, 3/7/88 Activities and Post-Deercise , 2/26/88 Meetings }
[
(9) i
} ISOC-FBR Memorandian of thuderstanding Relating to Radiological Duergency Plannirag and Preparedness, (50 PR 15485, 4/18/85) j 4 (10) REP Deercise Marmaal (tsider developunent) i
) . !
I M em
' (
. _ ~_ __ __ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ .
~ - - - _
~
L 4.
EURII5trIGE h 1WWE ID@ER SFIE ENCIE ASSIGOEDff EWlWICUS d -
j EUhlim10R _
' otD ca7eCrtvt f(s) :
i ospecrrys 1: seestageCf GJWSIFIGEFIGE IEUEIS ,
nounstrate the ability to annitor, understand arut use energency classification levels ;
(sc4 throu@a the appegrlate implementation of smanpuncy functions and activities uo.. . - %sg to sc/s as rumpaired by the sounmrio. The four sc/s are: 30atification of UW====1 Event, Alert, site Aree amargency and General asergency. ;
l
~
YES HD IyA 3%C MuguG REF PODftS OF BEUIEBf D. 3.- 1. Did the organization taae the aumergocy classification levels of this l
objective? -
D.3. 2. were staff notified of,sCL's?
By ediet organization? \
l D.3. 3. Murn was your location notified of the followiruy BCt/s? [Specify the tbme staff were notified and not the time that the BCL was i declared by the utility. Also, specify if these notifications were i verified (if ringaired).]
P TUE IGNIFIED WE 183f1FICATIGS VERIFIED? (IF m )
E. -
t Isotification of UrnmmM Event ,
Alert i Site Area F- - p y l
3 l
General Duergency D.3. 4 Here the Bc/s pruninently displayed? f
. D.4.
[
D.3. 5. Mere the staff aware of the carrent Ect2 !
i ;
l ..
-my- ~ . . - .,-- s .- .c , +, -e- - . -,- ,-ws. ... . . . , - .-m+ -_ _ _ _ _ , . . - .--._.._._____i.__mm______s-___
_ _ _ _ _ __ m. w w e m,
I i E i E I I 3, l I !
?
lf.8; i
W a
j l l i
l .!
$ y 1 l I
.1 i :
&$ ),
) E i \
J ,3, !
s !
' ; iI3 s #
yy ;
55 3 :
l l Il :
l1 -
!a -
)lIl[18
) . .
.=-
't t.. .
1, l-l e I E p 4 ;g 1, s;.l~ g'I ,,,,,, 4
- ($
5b 'b' w
I I
~
I' (; ' .
Ll k
?
=
1 E .
t
.I 6
i l3 i
- s. 1 l 1? O s
5 =. j" >
g
.= k
- 1 i 1 .E i
u E !
$ W ~,
a ya 4
l m ,
g . .
l
-j
.i -
) .
- l. gl..
8
' ,l L l l
(,
l
S l-l E
I' l- sun 6
- l. 8 l2 !
- . l
. J
[' g
- L l ,
e :
l ,
g I
z e
_I a E ..
b .. .
L l =
8
.1 a
.4 g !
!E !I
, . - - - - y- - e- - ,
.e -
EUMARTIGi MEWE EVMINIUR 1DWI IEADER SITE tRTE ASSIQc etr H EVla s AIKR? YES 38) j .
i.
OED OB71K37VE f(s)
OEUBCr1VE 2: DOREIJZNTIGE OF IDE!BGBECE R!RStBGEL noenrustrate the ability to Bally alert, mobilize and activate personriel for both facility and field-based i
emergency fuructiores. (See (2pjective 34 for 24-hour, contismaatas staffing fwictiers within a six-year time fraum). .
peJHBG REF: ICINIS OF IEVIDf YES ISO Iq/A , 34/ O -
. E.1. 1. During tenst time period tsere calls / contacts unde to notify offsite ~i response organizations as required by the plan?
start: . Ocupleted: I leio unde the calles/ contacts? ,
E.1. 2. letat method (s) was tased to notify otipanizations?
If a written call list was tased, were staff runes and telephone 1
rumbers aartent and correct?
E.2. 3. Here reglaired staff alerted in a timely manner?
E.2. 4. tharing tenat time period were facility staff activatet%fdeployed?
l Start: Otmpleted: g l E.2. 5. List all staff who were present at your location:
t t
o O
4
, 2.1
-. _ -. . . . . . _,_ .. - _ - . . . - . . . - . ~ _ .
. . _ . _ . . _ _ _ . . . - . . _ .. - . _ . .-.-._-_.~~__.__..__-_..._
I i ! 1 . ;i e I.
- 2. ~
O I .
_. u, n
- e. 2 -
SE Y O 2 .
/
)
N -
s
( -
f A .
? E y I
R V I -
E I
A T -
K 0 _
E M 3 R .
~
G O S
I V
E D E R E Y P
O n .
?
l l a
r f u p t
B i y 9 p n m a
G e l I
J r p w-S f ay J i c -
nn i e 6
8 s g s 3 n dr t M o i ee t ni i
i t
us ne w ,
a hc e n o M
I E c t e n is l F 1 o a 6 e 'n l
o t R l p I l
po f B
I t
r i s D mi o d F it t M O a o U s f sz n E e o ei E i d i
i t
m e D T
ip t
v i
d E
l i
i t is t o n
L c ce F
I E a r aht i
t S f i S E e d a
(
h z S
I B
G std nh ati i
p R u n sw n
Y a ot w C t o f i r i 0
3 f te e de a ct h G t ns ui t
i s fs y RE M dt e n i A
D B a p s . to nc W
E F e T. a n:
s h F vs?
I M
O I D
i d
t t
A T
S l
eiw -
is ae lp r A M I f s et -
E I V f i rat r xA F eth==
1 W
l a -
j t J
7 I t s
l h e --
2 F o trr r t-u O e s ep op .
v T U
S r
e f en rnd n
d I
1 5 I F W I ean Wma fn '
9 I a t D 0 : D .
1 F 6 7 2
R A E :
L A V F V
I E ,
T R . .
E C 12 ..
B G 12 U B EE EE E R O U N
c, t
'I I
b.
e, i Ia '
1 i .!
l 5 :
1.
s .
.2 .
2 L .
$ I i i si a
E E .
=
t .: .
'S 1% -
E r -
l !.,_j. '
)
.1-
- I
,t
~
[$
e- + ,
E , ,
h I
w 6 t a :
Ia !
p i
i i
ses l .
5 g E 5 l .
l .
I I "E1 2
i c c 8
3 .. _
8 8
, g -
g 3 l "$ ni 1 l.
5] ll
- a':
4 4
EVAllstrIN RBWI DfAIDA'IOR TEAff IEADER SI1E DPrTE ASSIG96fr REVIOUS ASER? . YE5 DE, OED CIUBCTIVE 8(s)
OEUBCTIVE 3: DDECTIM ABID UBrt900 Demonstrate the ability to direct, coordinate and control up.cy activities.
NUtEG REF: IODirS OF IIEVIN YES IID fyA If/O A.I.d. 1. Was an individtaal effectively in dwerge of the amergency response?
A.I.d. 2.
If so, name this individtaal (include title and organization):
A.I.b., 3. Were periodic briefings held, to ugxiate ctaff on situation?
A.2.a. - -
A.I.b., 4.
A.2.a.
Were staff (as.agpropriate) involved in decision making?
A.I.b., S. Was a copy of the plan available for reference?
A.2.a.
A.2.a. 6.
Were message logs kept for all incoming and outgoing N .1nd transsaissions?
Here e<= ages reptvvhamad and distrubuted, if arptupriate?
A.2.a. 7. Did the facility use an internal WIing systaa?
If so, was inforination provided to staff in a prtspt manner?
If so, was a record kept of intermt messages thtungh logs or file copies?
A.I.d. 8. Were pretective action decisiotts armi implementation of these decisions coordinated effectively with all appropriate organizations?
A.I.a., 9. Here the relevant functions and activitics implemental in a A.1.b.,
manner that is consistent with the or9inization's energency plan A.1.d., and MM.mes?
A.2.a.
. 3.1 h.-.e.ms.--------- ' - - ."'"---
a n-B E
ll 88 18 a
e f a
I -
1 1 $
l =
1 e
_a o
- 8 Y .
l l 3..
k
$1 1
)
l Ie I I w s e l l l
'N 9 r 9
~~
(J (
t, - ,
m I
- a c ; 4 6
I a
o, 5
E
_i _
i .!
l 1$.
l ,,, ,a~. .
3 g[ .i .!
t &
1 '
5 .F i
8 .I 1-a
{ 15 -
t .
1 -
.. +
l l
l
.!j e
l y ..
L i
i ili i -
' = g b !!
L t
L
,e V i- ?,
w -
1 I]e 8.
I i
I .,
E k y i
n -
k l .
s l 1 i ir l
r :
i ::
l' E s .
y . 5 y
'~ '*
F ,
g 1 5 g 5 g
,ti, g i
u 1
s - - - y - .- - - - - - - - .
=.: - . .,
EVMJRTIGE REWE
, EVA11R10R Waft IEADER ,
. SIW. IWIE AssioWewr aqEyIotas agatg7 ygg _ gg3 OEUBCTIVE 4: ONOtITGES OED OEUBCTIVE 8(s)
~,
n=nnstrate ability to crammaticate with all agpropriate locations, organizations
, _ and field persarmel.
IEJ5tRG IEEF: ICINT.I OF IEIVII5f YES 30 94/A Iq/O F.1.b., 1.
F.1.d., Identify -stications systa== rt=nristrated durirg the exercise:
F.2. .
Otsumercial telephone, specify rs=dwr of lines avaliable:
' Conferencing capability '
Celltriar telephone in vehicle i Itadio systmas,1%uncify type of systems: ,
RAGS 'Y-- ice (wohmteer pcaiable ham owed.or) -!
Otmputer link, 81*arribe systen: i Facsimile amadnine ,
Other (speclfy) ;
i F.1.b., '2.
F.1.d., Identify organizations that this facility had ommuunication links with:
F.2.
i F.1.b.
- 3. !
Were primary without undue omammications delays? systems 'able to handle canuunication flow F.1.b. 4.
that was the average delay for the primity consuunications systeus? !
Systen Averaoe Dalav (Mirstes) -
4.1 >
g l, --
c- -
! . 4 w EURIARTIGO PGGE EVA11Ric
.4 1EApt IEADER SPIE DME ASSIGGENT HIEVIGS AIK27 i -YES _
IO -
otD OEpsetTVE f(s)
ORIBCTIVE 4:' GBOMEIOtt1GS l
IENIEG IIEF: ' FOINIS OF IEVIEN i
YES le Iq/A F.1.b., 5.
N/D Were bade.:n systsuma dserwistrated?
F.1.d. -
_. .i If so, did they function preperiv?
F.1.b., 6.
b F.1.d. Did any of the,ocumenications systa== break down?
If so,
. ibe the W with respect to sent evn=Ted; the Primary or badap systen;' the. length of time; imar+
ning; steps talen to correct problem and a'ny use o '!
F.1.b., 7.
F.1.d., Were the relevant functions and activities' implemented in a F.2. uanner and prn wheres? that-is consistent with the organization's emergency plan 4
i If not, ard explain dry the organization did not follow its energency plan prucodures: 1
.i a
i 7 ..
4.i , .
_ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ , _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - . - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - . _
e,
~
,Y .;
'A gc t
'b 1
, s . .
ir e ,
= o.
- g ,
^pl m
i aq, .q
~
h.et .
5 c-
=3 q 2
,< k l-- .
t
.5 g,
T _l ,E J .
i o
y] .,
, a,=0 -
s
~
=
' xg .
- f. l j ..
8 I
1 .
i l-a- -
t
- r. '
a Ia l
g s 5 g E 5 1
i ,r r o .
E D 8 8 l
s v : '
s ax' B
j
s
, t _
6 .
EVA11RFIGE REWS '
EVAI1WIOR ' 'ITAM IEJOER S11E .[WIE-
~
ASSIQeENT IREVIGIS AlER? YES' IE)
. CID OEDECITVE ' f(s) -
OEDBCFIVE 13:
AIERP, BUITFIOtITGE AfD BEN;IgeCY INREWWITGE- IDENJC IIHFIEK. T IGE ~
PRJRBG REF: . IDINIS OF REVIBf YES ND 3(/A - l(/O ~
If not; describe the nature and extent of the coortfination problems:
G.4.a. 8.
Did staff prwide amwate and timely .inforetion to the public? ,
G.4. 9.
W e authorized releases of infore tion to the public? U E.6. 10. !
Was a log mintained of all releases disseminated to the public?
Were copies of all rel- kept and accessible to all staff?
E.6. 11.
Did-staff monitor radio and television broadcasts to keep track of inforation prwided to the public? ,
Joll. 12.
If ingestion naamares were . tested, was the cagebility to disseminate preprinted information and instructions to predetermined individinals and businesses -iated with the food dein ph within the -
50-mile ingestion pathway EPZ demonstrated'in a. timely u nner?
q G.4. 13.
Met information managsupat system was used for ocordinatirq the ~
fonatalation and dicemination of inforntion and instructions?
Mtaltiple Joint Information Centers Joint 1%lic Information Center- .;
Other (Specify)
.e
-13.3-
.. .. . _ - . . _ -._ ._.=.-.w- . , _
. r m.
EURTIRTIGE FUWI
~
EVA111A1DR . 'ITJM IFADER
=c
~STIE. IR1E1 ASSIQeerr IEEVIOUS M? ~ YES- IE)l ots ca7BCTIVE f(s)
ORIBCrIVE 13: AlfRF, 90tTFIOtrIG8 JM) E9EEENCY IIIRNORTIG6- IUIEJC IltmRICTIGE '
NUREG REF: ICINIS OF IEEUIEBf ,
YES HD : II/A ' 3(/O Did the information managesment systen provide for the effective and timely coordination of the' form 11ation and dissemination of energency information and' instructions?
If not, describe prtbleums:
,.s. 14. Was there a retum flow of .infot1mation to the EDF and BOC's, so that staff at these ~ locations were aware of what infonnation had been given to the media?
.2 15, Were press releases and results of press interviews entanged with other apr*=, -i= =i.-?
- 16. Ilow was information em: hanged?
E.S., 17. Here the relevant functions and activities implemented in a E.6.,
manner thatis consistent with the organization's emergency plan E.7., and procedures?
c.4.,
Go4.a.,
If not, explain why the orgnization did not follow its emergency plan G.4.c. and procedures: -
- , , . - , - - + - - - ~ w, ;-- = - - ;---'- ~-
~
--~ -~" ~ * ~" ~
13.4
~ ~ * ~ ~ '
-r 7
'a-I m.
L'
=
,- l ' C: ,
s s*
' pe '
i g
Ee O t
^
l
_ _ l
!i .!
s- jE -
ll! -i y '
-5 s E ll Egag
=
8 E i
W c-k*
m -
y 3
Ld e
h k .
g ..
E l =
)i .!. j y ...
g . ..
5 y
- - . 1
ab ..
1 4
s, .
.)
1 h
7 -
' o.
b i
g:
l9 e
1 k-_
- 5,
~
i i
l u i
2 r r s<
U 2 C '
Il h 8 S
,, j g: .. -
8 5 i n ..
1 a .8.,
E g !Il E .$ N ame M M E
'h . Mj
_ _O
y f. .. .--
-m ,
- -~
7- _
p F s. ..a;
. .=: .
..k' EVATERTKN E0566
. EVAlllNIOR. 'IEAff IEADER SPIE IWFE ASSIGefNP IREVIOLE An? YES - pat) .
OnJHCrivE.15: OED OETEXTIVE $(s).
AIBtr, BUFIFICRTICIf AfD BERG 3ent INF0EWRTIGG- iR9t'R Cuff!BDE, ~
e Desnonstrate the ability to establish and operate rumor curirut in a coordianted and tinuely fashion .
NUREG REF: FOINIS OF REVIDi YES NO N/A G.4.c. N/O
- 1. . Was a namor control systesa activated?
^
G.4.c.
- 2. - Mut organization (s) was responsible for providity this function?
G.4.c. 3. Mut telephone rp (s) was used for namor control?
i G.4.c. 4. How was the number (s) publicized? .
Press briefings ERS wm v Public informtion btuchures and postirgs Other'(specify)
S.
G.4.c.
Ilow seny telephone lines were available for incomirg calls? i G.4.c. 6.
How many lines were available for cutgoiry calls (for call-backs or to obtain inforination)? 1 G.4.c. 7. ,
Ilow many staff were utilized for the nanor control-operation?
G.4.c. 8.
Did rumor and timely control infonnation? operation staff have access to current, accurate IM -
___.__________m.__.-
_ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _.._______m___ .__...____.s_mm___ _ _ _ _____m.__ ____.____m _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ - _ _ _ _ _ _ -- - ______-._m.._m, . _ _ . _ __ =_ _ _ __ _ . .<. $
y - y -- - -
7 g
[.;,.
~
. ~ - -
s
~31 [
~
EVAt1RTIGS Rett
-EVAIUNIOR 'IEAM IEADER SrIE' IR1E
~
ASSIQaefP IR5NIOUS ARCH?. 'YES~ ^ II()
OED OEUBCTIVE 8(s) osuecTIvE 15:
AIMi 30MFICRrts AND IDE5K250CY TAEU59trIN- IE9ER (IBmIDE, IR.lRBG REF: 10INIS OF HEVIEBf YES' MO DE/A II/O G.4.c. 9.
Describe how emergency nuor control staff secured current inforation on response: .
G.4.c. 10.
L Did namor contro1lstsff pruride accurate, resgarsive informtion l to callers in a p m yt manner?
G.4.c. 11.
les authorized rel- of informtion to the public?
G.4.c. 12.
Here the relevant functions and activities implemented in a manner and prwwbres? that is consistent with the organization's esmergency plan If not, and explain *y the organization did not follow its esmergency plan procedures:
+
m.__-- _ _ ,.m__-. _ - _ . . . _ _ _ _ _ .i..m._-_ _____.l. _
.__...i_.
7--
',i:,
- .,.,, p- i .. p b^ * , 1 -
4,, . --F
'Q. ,
L;
- w >
M
,g. .
e g d
g.g l 1
hA
@ 5 e
(
4 M .
.k '\
>, t
- E: -
.s .
.- y .-
E E
$ .I I 3
f $-
E- -y g 3
(
-[
- m .
$ y- '. .
! >,- ; i-
! 3 Q, i
l q
L n j' !
%' .g b 1.m '
m 6 ,
1: :[
- w
- ,u _,
g_' ] 5 r ;l[s ~
v -;i;-- . . , .j g
j ', .. 7 ,
- 885%
+
- e. y I
,e , e
.d g ,
s 4 .
~$ ,
g g .
.5
}
l 1
l g 4
! I i i=rE.o r ,
.o i- C 3i. 8 3 8
1!i m
- l[ E 't g 9
t
- a .: x a .-
g: 2 -
e a .e.,
la a,
-lj a
- [j l
-. 1'
'. 4
y- c ,
.eN l
EVAII& frig 6 RN56
, ; EVAIJR10R : 1EAM IEADER STIE: Dh1E ASSIGOENT IREVI0tB AVR? -
YES _ 100-OEUFCTIVE 16: IEE OF IE OID OEUBCTIVE f(s)-
hacert radiolodine ret e .-
on predetsamined criteria,'as well as to distribute pu,yand einistn=nnstrate workers arrt institutionalized persons the ab er it once the decision is e, if parwe=ltated by, ~
, HUREG REF: . 101NTS OF REVIEN T*ES NO N/A J.10.e., 1. N/O J.10.f. Did authorizing official (s) make decision to reamnend use of KI?
mat officibi(s) e the decisiorus? ,
men was the decision M ?
W en were instructions to use KI transmitted?
For *Jnat group?
-amergmcy workers?
- )
-Institutional 1 zed . populations?
J.10.f. 2. ;
l Was thyroid? the decision unde to use'KI' based on projectai or actual dose to -
Projected Actual 3.
)
Was the decision to use KI made on the basis of FIR PAG's?
J.10.f. 4. ~.m
- Were the affected energency workers / institutions informed of this decisiorg/ instructions'in a timely manner? ..
i For energency workers? ,
When? ._
For institutionalized populations?
l When?
,1C-1
___.__._______m__
- _______1____- . . . ,. --
. ~ . . - , - . - . .._# r - ----,,,----4 . . - -
- p *;=',
V
~
~
_ ~ ~
. ~.
+ c ; u:,
INAt1RTIGE MI59 _ _ S-;
y, EVAfDATOR 1EAM LEADER SI1E DA1E ASSIG#Dft' IREVIOUS An? YES ,H0 _
OED ORTECTIVE 5(s) 4 OB7EorIVE 16: . IEE OF KI :
NURBG REF: ICINES OF RENIEN YES ~NO N/A J.10.e., S. N/O _
J.10.f. Did personnel responsible for direct administratiory'use of KI follow
' instructions given these by authorizing official (s)?
. Fbr, w v ay workers?
For institutionalized populations?
J.10.f. 6.
Was the KI according to distributed decisions?-in sufficient quantities and in a timely manner For m p a,y workers?
Wen?
For institutionalized' populations?
When?
1 J.10.e., 7.
J.10.f. If the ackninistration (i.e.,-ingestion) of KI was sinanlated, was the date, time, and dose for the use of KI for each individual re v>rded?
J.10.e. , 8.
J.10.f. Were the relevant functions and activities implemented in a manner and that. is consistent with.the organization's energency plan.
procedures?
If not, and explain why the organization did not follow its emergency plan procedures:
. a , . _ __ . -
16.2
s 9 , - - a n.
5
-d ~tj ;
.-t,
~
w ,
TA .
N 1 ,
S 0
h l 1,
- k.
- i f
5 1 3
[: [g '2 5
a a t
-$ . E i
+g
.$-) '
yg 4 7 .
Y{ '
I '
i
$ W A
% .!h.
y
=
- j. El m
5 y
-2 l
ll L y
.. l .
g -]
2; S .
l J
.b
. i
$. i r
8 .
l9 I
e g 7 a
l
$ \
u i
S l
E ..
I z n C C 8
8 5
'~ 5 3 g I sl. - -
g g
5 3 l ,,
~
3
.e u 1,
- -5
-@ d e
b
~ >
.[;_ ~
'W~ ~
- _ 1 - ~
. y- ,
- f - ' q
- . -
~
.-- s-n
~
- EVAIIRTIGt RHf EVAI11A10R 1EAN IDd)ER SITE ' IM1E ~ ASSIGGENT FREVIOUS ARCA? ' - YES 'm'
'OED OIDECTIVE f(s) ~
i-OEUBerIVE:17: IEE OF KI- GEIERAL RMUtJtrIGE f
Demonstrate the ability to make the decision, l'f the State plan so specifies, to r=,rumand 'the use of KI' for generalL ,
- public, hamad on predetermined rmr*=sitated by radioiodine relaaapa. criteria, as well' -
as to distribute and administer it once the decision is nada, if NUREG REF: ' IOMIS OF REVIEN ~
YES NO N/A N/O
'J.10.e., 1. Did authorizing official (s) make the' decision to rectannend use J.10.f. of KI' for the general public?
- a. Wat official (c) mada the decision?
- b. When was the decision nada?
c.
m en were instructions to use KI transmitted? -
i J.10.f. 2.
Ws the decision to use KI. based on projected or actual dose to thyroid? :
Projected Actual J.10.f. 3.
Ws the decision to use KI made on the basis of HR PAG's?
~J.10.f. 4.
Was the public informed of this decisiorVinstructions in a timely manner?
__ o J.10.e. 5. Did persu. sel r @--oible for direct administratiorVuse of KI follow instructions'given them by authorizirg official (s)?
f
, J.10.f. 6. Was the KI predistributed to the public?
'If not, 'was the KI distributed in sufficient' quantitlesland in a timely manner?
J.10.e., 7.-
Was the. public advised'of possible side Etla'ts ar.1 @at;, actions '
J.10.f. to take: i f they appeared? ~ '
'* _ _ _ _ - . _ . '. a _1.-= _ _ _ _ _ s-__ -'
. _ _ _ -__._e t.m_.__ _ _ -_ _ _a: _- __ i.-..__+m_ _ _+_ _
1 -- __.___m _:u1.__am.__e-___ m__-_.232m _ - _ _ - __--_e _____.____m__.2= __ *
- m ,
_, ; ~.
- y m
m-
- ., 3.p;ym. .y 4
- m. . -
, f
- EURIERTIGE - fUgg iv
. . . . .EVALIR10t. 1EAM IEAEER :
SI1E" .DME- - ASSIGGENT MtEVIOLE AHCR? 'YES
-.;310
- OED. OEUBCTIVE ' f (s) -
camerivE 17:, IEE OF KI- GHESWE ICIUERFIcet PRJREG REFA- ICINFS OF HEVHW
'YES NO Iq/A - Iq/O J.10.e., .
J.10.f. ' 8. ~ Herre the relevant functions ard activities implemented in a manner and that is consistent.with the organization's wpcy' plan prrvweires? -
a If not, and explain prrrwhares: W the organization did not follow its s p cy plan I O
e b
4 k
b
?-
d
. _ , _ , , ~ _ _ . , , . .._.-, . .:.,. _ , _ . . . _ . . - ; , - _ .. __, , . _ _ _ - . . . 17. 2 = ~. . -
2 f
yw I
N I
5 g
s$
O i
eq ag
>, Y ,
- 5
.G JJ ]
g y .-
g, 8.
1 2 r o g i I .,
1 g y . q g ,% !
s
- i o S 1
E w -
l C
- j g , . <
j u.
b
$k ,
L y ..
i
.m I -
s W -
= g b 1!
w- >
W l ,
,,c, 2 *
\
C g
y .
E
-=
Os c
3 1
pg i l 9-2
~0 E ,
E.
-5 w
-E E
=
a i
l -
'l . .]
g g g C c ,
C 8 8 l
.. \
, .. .8 .
8 4
= .8 8 7
= g g
yl .g -
ng g
m n.
y .
-a g - a
- ( . ~. .
l t.
v - - - - -
^; . . . .f_
~ ,
, u EVAf1RTION REWE EVAtUATOR: 1EAM IEADER
. SrIE 1 ER1E. ASSIG9ENF IHEVIOUS ARC 2? YES ~ NO
- OED OBJBCrIVE- f(s) or11 scrive 18:-
IfrIDENDtFION OF PRDIBCr1VE ACrJONS- PIIDE: ITZ transient ' plume EFZ population (incitding transit-dependent perwo, Demonstrate institutionalized persons).
the ab artpermanentand) special needs pquiations, handicagped persons . ard '
NUREC REF: FOINIS OF REVIEW ,
-YES NO N/A Pt/O -
J.10.d., 1.
'. J.10.g., Were staff at'your assigned location respc.nible for implementing J.10.h. protective actions for any of the grotps listed in this objective?
~
If so, answer the. following questions and provide the requested information.
J.10.d., 2.
J.10.g., Identify the special' groups for whicit staff at your location were J.10.h. respu.mible (one 'or more group any be identified):
Transit-dependent Special-needs HandicM-- '
t l Institutionalized Were permns?
there up-to-date lists of special needs and institutionalized 'l J.10.d., 3.
l J.10.g., During what. time interval were staff working with this gruup(s)? -
l J.10.h. Start: Otmpleted:
J.10.d. , 4.
J.10.g., l# tat special method (s) was'used by the.ottjanization to contact these groups? (other than sirens)
J.10.h.
Telephone calls
'Ibne alert. radios l
Route alerting j Other (Specify)'-
J.10.d. , S.
J.10.g., If telephone calls were used,. were Uie names and telephone rumbers J.10.h.
called current and conect? /
~
_ _ _ .__ u ,_ n _ _ . , - , . . . . _ ., __._..;._-
- g. - -
EURt19&IGt REGE --
EUAfIm1DR - 1EAh IEAM R S11E ' IR1E ASSIQeGir IREVIGE AIEA7 ' YES 30 0 OED OBJBCTIVE.8(s)
ORIBCTIVR 18: DRBENDEFIGE OF HURETIVE ACTIGG- PUWE EPZ M.lREG REF: POINIS OF REVIFA YES NO Iq/A 3(/0 J.10.d., 6.
J 10.g., Identify rearmroes secured and provided for special gtugs:
J.10.h. Ta-wiation ~
Antallances Other (Spacify) 7.
Were these resources adequate for special grups?
J.10.d., 8.
J.10.g., Specify the protectim actions indicated for and implesmenteri by the special groups:
LJ.10.h. ..
- Sheltering Evacuation .
KI Ad hoc respiratory protection Other (Specify) '
j J.10.d., 9.
J.10.g., If special groups were evacuated, did the organization transport the J.10.h.
special groups to the appropriate relocation center (s)?
4
'J.10.d., 10.
J.10.g., Did the organization desmonstrate appropriate and timely actions, J.10.h.
measures, and support for-the specia1'grups?
J.10.d., '11. Here the relevant ftmetions and activities implemented in a
.J.10.g.,
'J.10.h. manner that is consistent with the organization's emergency plan and piTucexkares? [
If not, and explain why the organization did not follow its emergency plan procedures:
h a
. t
- - . _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ._.____-_-____-._-_____a _-_:__.-_.-__-__--__a__-
- ~ - * ' ' -
< - -- -.- a 1 v W, u vn -w"
1) y 5,
b t
- n. y l5 :
$ $jd l
. t g . .
t W .!
o g y ,
E S t 5 .
%n .
- g- 5 5
= E&
a 1 t g= ,g .
1i **4 o S .
E y .
j ..
1
$k el s:
, g- ..
m
.g B
'~
. E.
. 9mp s
4 g- I 4:
h w
'5 ,
p.
1
, .. . , . v.
Es
_E9 i
e y '
E _
5 g E 5 l
i
- 2 2 i
E C
.\ \ ,
8
.. 8
. 8 L 5 E il .E 5 3
- l. i "
.1 A
.E
.4 I-
!I !I
y-i EVMIDtrim REWt EVMUMUR TEAM IEADER SPIE DME ASSIGFDfr PREVIOUS ARR? YES' M)
OLD OEuscrIVE 9(s)_
otuacrIVE 20: 1RMTIC OtBFINE ; .
evacuated and sheltered areas.Dmonstrate the spizational ary to ability controland resources traffic evamation i fl w and to control arvwuam NURBG REF. POINIS OF REVIBf .
YES NO N/A J.10.j. 1. M/O Were traffic access points?controllers deployed to >=4dermined t~ affic control / .
If so, answer the questions below. ~
J.10.j. 2.
How many traffic control / access points were established?
How many staff were assigned to these locations and by what organizations?
Organization Ntaber of Staff '
J.10.j. 3. i i During what assigned time period did traffic controllers arrive at their locations?
4 i
(
Were manner?
timely t'affic controllers deployed to the assigned locations in a J.10.j. 4.
Did the traffic controllers have accurate knowle& J e of their role in tin w,gency ruspu.* and exercise play for the followirg:
- a. Protective actions (i.e., shelterirq and evacuation)?
- b. Planning areas and special facilities evacuated?
- c. Evacuation routes? '
- d. Incation of relocation centers?
- e. Access control? -
~ .
EVAI15tFIG8 REWE EVALUATOR 1EAM IEADER SI'IE DFGE ASSIGGGFT PREVIGE M7, pg)
YES ,
OED OBJBCFIVE $(s)
OnrecrivE 20: 'M WFIC Om mtX. .
NUREG REF: 50DFTS OF REVIDF ,
YES NO Iq/A ' Iq/O J.10.j. . 5.
Wem agpropriate actions implemented to contml all types of access ,
to the areas affected by protective action decisions? ;
Traffic contml points activated?
W control points activated?
Air traffic rerouted?
Water traffic st<3 = wt?
Rail traffic st ;;+:?
J.10.j. 6. Did traffic uusibullers have the capability to receive instructions ~
frtsa BOC staff? ' -
If so, eldt EDC?
J.10.j. 7. Were protective actions dianged during the exert:ise after the traffic controllers were deployed?
If so, was arrurate and timely infonnation on these changes prtwided to traffic uu..bullers?
Did traffic controllers have correct knowledge of eat different actions were required of ~ then by these changes?
J.10.k. 8. Did traffic umbullers have to iv=.puid to simaalated impediments to evacuation? i If so, describe these impediments:
'i
- L
<<f -
J.10.k. 9.
Did the traffic contmllers demonstrate the capability to respu.d -
apprtpriately and in a timely manner to these impediments? i i f- 20.2 y -
, c , , h-+ , ..
.mw<- ,r p , .- -
EVAIIRTIGf IUDI EVA11R10R TEAM IFR IR SITE- IR1E ASSIGOENT PREVIGE Am? , YES NO-OEUBCr1VE 20: 'IRAFFIC GEMEN, OID OEUECTIVE f(s). .
i NUREG REF: POINFS OF REVIDi YES NO II/A
~J.10.k. 10.
BW Did the traffic controllers request resource sp (e.g., tow .
trucks) frein EDC staff to re@ond to these impediments?
l If so, were these roarserces provided in a tiwly manner?
J.10.j., 11.
J.10.k. Did the traffic controllers "--otrate the capability to effectively carry out their assigned role in an effective and i
timely manner?
J.10.i., 12. .
J.10.k. Were the relevant functions and activities implemented 'in a menner and procedures?that is consi' stent with the organization's s.-.rpcy plan l
If not, and explain prrrwbres: why the organizaion did not follow its c.apey plan !
s a
1 I
... . - _ . . . _ _ . 20. 3 .. . ..
4
.h R.
E I e .
=
N I i
n ,
ie
_i _
E .!
g E
ya ',
>, t g = '
l k'
'f-I .r i
~
a h g~
~
1i i, :
! M
- y E
~
l 5 t L g 1 l:
I aj L y ..
h g ..
$ E 7 l
s i
9
'g l-
~
I i
gg ?
l
_ i 5
~l $
1
! 5 E 2 2 1 C c E 8 5
- 5 g g g g l n l"%
F l%
y 1.
~. 2:'
EVAIDA'IUR 'IEAM IEADER S11E tR'IE ASSIG9ENT PREVIOUS Alt [1? - YES 90 0 '-
OED OEDEFIVE f(s)
OEUBCTIVE 21:
REEDNFIN GNIHtS- RERHSHIRTIN, DEBfIltRDIG, AfD IEutEmWIDStrIW Demonstrate radiological the a"--M monitoring and of decontmination prwwwtwes, facilities, of evacuees. equip = it. ard persomel for the registration ,
NURBG REF: IOINTS OF REVIN YES NO N/A ' N/O -
J.12. 1.
ht time did staff arrive at the rWlon center?
Wat time was the reception center set up and activated?
J.12. 2.
Wat agency is responsilsle.for coordinating'the reception center?
What other agencies are represented at the acq,t ion center and dat are their roles?
Anency 4
Role J.12. 3.
Were sufficient staff available for registration of evacuees?
J.12. 4. Briefly describe registration suc.aiores:
J.12. S. Were evacuees checked for radiological contamination?
J.12. 6.
If so, indicate the rumber of staff on the monitoring team and describe the equipment and gucedores da=,ducated.
4 Ntaber of staff: , . -
_ , _ _ _ . , _ 4+. * . , . - .4- w - .-%. . , 4 - s- .
_.v. g
~
~-.
EVARIUNIGE REWE -
EVAIUNIOR 'EAM IEADER SPIE IRTE ASSIQeqENT IREVIOUS ARCR?. YES~ 90 0 +
OED OEUBCITVE f(s) _
OEUECITVE 21:
REEDOtfIGt GNMRS- RBGISBRITGG, PUtrRRING, AND IBO[EfDWED5ttTGt '
NURBG REF: 110DFIS OF REVIDi YES NO IVA Iq/O Equipment and g.. Lores:
J.12. 7. Was guy =r use of equipment demonstrated?
How long did it take to atmitor one pct =usi?
Time for one person: -
l Range of times, if more than om person:
J.12. 8.
If an evacuee was found to be contaminated, would that person be
--s-d mainated at this location? -
J.12. 9.
If not, where would they be sent for decontamination?
l l
J.12. 10.
Was there a separate area with showers for perforiaing decontamination?
J.12. 11. q Here contaminated, uncontandnated, and uranonitored evam- kept separate? i J.12. 12.
l l
Delbe the procedures and equipment used for decontandnation:
- i I
(
l J.12. 13.
Once pezauro have been monitorecydeuununninated, were they prtwided with .
appropriate ' identification so they could gh to the reuepi. ion center?
l -
f- 21.2
. . _ , ,_. - . _ _ = , . _ a~. n. . .. __. .. ~ ~ .
.y- a.
r e.
EVAIINEI N MEM EVAL 1)A*IOR 1EApf IEADE3t SI'IE DME- - ASSIGOENT EREVIOUS ARCH?
.YES DE)l OEUBCTIVE 21: OED OEL7BCFIVE 8(s)
IEIDCNFIW GNHRS- REGISHut1TW, DEBfI1GtDC, ABE) IEOGfDWIDGNIW NUREG REF: IDINTS OF REVIBf
.Yes No 8(/A Iq/O If evarman ruwdsd a change of clothirg, how ms it to be obtained?
4 h
J.12. 14.
Wat mmld be done'with ocrtaminated clothing and other possessicrr?
Were people and Wiens of contamination? - handled in sudt a way as to prevent spread J.12. 15.
Was adequate parking available for cars until they could be monitored?
J.12. 16.
Is ticawiation to the vu..pagate cam center available for those idiose vehicles am contaminated?
J.12. 17.
Here the relevant functions and activities implemented in a a manner that is consistent with the organization's ww y plan and pru dures?
- If not, plan andexplain Wiy the organization did not follow its ww.y g ucaAires: -;
i i
s 1
a s
21.3'
. - - . . __ _ . _ _ - _- _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ . _ _ _ _ - - _ _ - _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - - - - _ _ - _ - - - _ _ _ - _ - _ - _ , _ _ _ _ _ = _ . _ _ - _ , . - - _ - _- .~
O.
N. 4 0
1 -
2 S
E Y _
) .
s
( -
_ f E
?
A
_ C V
I
_ R T .
A C
. E _
_ S J -
_ U B .
_ O O _
_ I _
_ V D _
_ E I O
N I
r f
_ B O _
G I ) _
S S w .
e A i
- v 8 t e _
4 e r _
/
_ N m _
M '
f _
y o _
8 l _
G E l
a t s .
I T
I i n _
R W I
t r
i o
l a p l p A q V
E s i _
_ d _
u
_ l _
t c _
n ei E
I
_ I' t ,
S o e
- n v i
t c
_ j e 4 b
t o mfo e O
R y E
D l a .
A p E :
_ I s e M
a b A w i
_ E 1 i I
' 2
. e tw
. v (
i t
_ c :
e Y j R R b R O O 9
_ I 9 N : 1 S
U N I
A O E
. V I
T V I
E R T I A t R
_ n v H A
E N
1 i
~
i g i
.~
' I 1,
(
L l ll ;
1 L
1 i
M I
I L !
i F rr 0 0
r s
L t
(, 8 8 I n
$ a 11 5 E U 4; @
l e .
4 R :.;- ,E ;; .g, - n a i i a
- 1
. w.
~
EUAt1BGTGt REM i
- EVAIDATOR 1ElWf IEADER SI'IE DME . ASSIGOGrr t IREVIGE ARCR? YE5 m)
' OID OR7BCTIVE f(s) .
OEUBCTIVE 22: REEDOtrIGE GNH!RS - GMEEEME OWE Demonstrate the
^--wy of facilities,. eqtaipment and personnel for congregate care of em .
HUREG REF: ICDFFS OF REVHN YES NO Jo10.
. IVA 30,
- 1. ,
Ww) notified the congregate care unnager to open the facility and at' Wnat .
time was he/she notified? ~
Hw)? Wiat time?
Jolo. 2.
What agency is responsible.for managing the vu .g+te care center?
What other agencies are represented at the center and what are their roles?
Ataency Dole J.10.h. 3.
Here shelter personnel aware of how many evacuees were expected to arrive?
J.10.h. 4.
How many evacuees could be h ted at this shelter?
o J010.h. 5.
According to shelter staff, what measures would be taken in the event that shelter capacity was exceeded? '
L
, 22.1.
d "-
_ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _.__________.____________J_-_m_--_- -i__ 'A__.-- -'" ' -_*'- _ . _ _ _ _ _ s -__ _ -_ "P "
>" _' 'a - f._ _+ e 5 % N--
- T s- et + 'aw ? g- et'"w*%- -v' * = W"+
y _
af m EVARIRTIG8 REGI -
- EVAIJ1ATOR '!EAM IEADtR STIE IR1E ASSIGMENT PREVIOUS ARCR? -
YES _ HDI -
OID OIDECTIVE f(s)
OEUBLTIVE 22: REtiXXt'IGS GNITRS - GBGEERIE OME ,
NURBG REF: ICINIS OF REVIEN YES MD Iq/A" ' Sq/O J.10.h. 6. Did shelter have enautp:
Sleepirq htions ready or available within 24 hrn?
'Ibilets..(one per 40 pecple?)
Drinkirg water? '
Sectare storage?
Parking?
J.10.h. 7.
Mnat food supplies were available imunediately?
If food to prtwide styplies were not food sqplies available, were auaseds in place to or meals?
J.10.h. 8.
Was the shelter staffed ard eqtalgped to handle handi% W evacuees, as those in wheelchairs, if apprtpriate?
J.10.h. 9.
Was there a capability to prtwide crisis counselirg?
J.10.h. 10. Did the facility have a raarsirg station established?
J.10.h. 11.
Was there quick access to hospital care (i.e., an astmalance stationed at the facility or. ability-to radio for an ambulance)?
J.10.h. 12.
Here measures taken to ensure gx61ic safety (e.g., energency phone numbers on hand)?
Describe the measures:
J.10.h. 13.
Was there an information source' and procedure to keep evacuees informed as to "what's happening in tius affected area"?
7.
~
- m. . . ____..,_.s
21 EVAt1RTIM FU M 1EAM IDOFR S11E DME ASSIQ9ENT PREVIOUS M ? IfES 'HO EVAI11NIOR
' OED OBJECTIVE 8(s) l OEUBCTIVE 22: REtOOG1W GNIT3tS - GBUWENIE GRE YES NO 1(/A - Iq/D IRJREG REF: ICINIS OF REVIDi
- J.12. 14. If registratim and monitoring of evacuees occurs at a separate locatim: -
Were evan- decked for registratim cards at the door? l i Describe the procedure for guce:ssing evacuees arriving at the un.pqte care who have already been registered at the rcu_ytion center:
What procedures would be followed in the event an evacuee arrived without registratim ?
l J.10.h. 15. Were the . relevant functions and activities implesnented in a J.12. manner that is consistent with the organization's escrgency plan j
and procedures? ~ ,
If not, explain why the organization did not follow its einergency plan and procedures.
4 b
o e
h 22.3
_ ___ -_ -_______________-___ _______-___ ____. .. . _ .. _- - ,__ -______ _ _ _ _ _ - . , - - -_. . - . -__ - _ _ . . ~
e k
s eum 1#
si ia ?
I
, 1 .
g ya '
5 >. t-L 5
- g i jia a
b E 1~
a
$g m y3
.Y at
@ t' g ..
E IA
>. I aj y ..
11 8-E
- =
7 5
o O 2 2
N K
)
(
s f
G E V
I D
I T A C E
S J U B O O I
V D E I R O I
T N
E e
Q I ,
S S
A I _
W _
U F
i G
I E
1 _
T A R
I E
I A _
V _
E _
E I I
'. I r
s F
R F
R A A A A C - C R R A A R -
I d
1 F
I
- y y M c c A E n n E G e e -
1 v I T
R i
i c
f i
i c
f M e e D D E : :
N n n 0 o : i o
R 0 H
n i
t n t O 2 a o a T 2 R o i i l A # i
-m : t s D D : t p I E N 1 p 3 2 i
i-A V A i .
E r -
V E r .
U cs n cs E S U cu S S e
l x
t b
N I
S S
S I D e E S
I D h O I
0
.EVAtlMFIGE RIM .
1 YES ND m
' DNIE ASSICNENT ~ fHEVIOUS ARCR?
1EAM IEADER Si1E EVAIUNIOR otD OBJECITVE 9(s) ,
Otutx.TiVE 24: IEDIGL SERVICES - FACILITIES ^
i=L*.re, in*,. ;
Desnonstrate the artarynacy of medical facility's erpipment, prooeckus and W-w.isl for hand 1119 uu.
or exposed individuals.
YES NO IVA N/O NUREI3 REF: . IDINIS OF REVIDf ,
L.1. 1. Was proper use of monitorirg ecpigment dencxw-trated? (i.e., appropriate ;
scale equipnent, correct motion, etc.) ,
L.1. 2. Were proper steps taken to avoid possible spread of contamination?
L.1. 3. Were physical facilities available for hitaminatirn the patient? !
1 t
was this function satisfactorily demonstrated?
L.1. 4. Was a health physicist or Radiation Safety Officer gwiesit, or available on short notice, to advise hospital staff?
L.1. 5. Were the relevant functions and activities implenented in a manner that is consistent with the organization's energency plan arri procedures?
If not, explain why the organization did not follow its energency plan and procedures:
l 24.1
~ -- .. - . . _ _. . . . , _ . - . - . _ . . . , . .
P t
s :- O 4
- s. -
II il l9 f l
5 .?
l 1!
>0 5 3j -
5 f8.I I i
~
~
o
, g ig -
=
1.i 1
,T E
t
> I aj
.I -
y.
g I!a i ll
^aam.
4
- ~
~
g.
s-i1 l9 i
i l
5 g l 6 l
l 1
! l l 2 2 I l
i x' i i!
h U I
U U
N U 8 ..
8 .. I 8 8 g< .
l g a a .-
g a
ul 3 W M $ l N I el!)
5
) !I l
1
v-. .=
a-EVAtlRTIGE fuel ASSIQeerr IREVIOLE AIE17 YES 6
'IEAM IEADER SITE IWIE EVAIUNIOR OID OBJBCTIVE 9(s)
ORIBCTIVE 25: IRININEDGtr1G4
-f+-- :mi..= tion of squargency Demonstrate the adequacy of facilities, equipment, supplies, puuedures and persun sel for workers, equipment and vehicles and for waste disprwal.
YES NO N/A N/0 NURBG REF: IUDFFS OF REVIEW K.5.a. I.
Was the facility large encamp to acconenodate the rumber of _pcy ,
workers expected (within 2-3 hours)?
K.5.b. 2. Was there adequate parking at the facility for contaminated and i uncontaminated vehicles?
Are these parkirg facilities separate to prevent the contamination or i
recontamination of " clean" cars?
K.S.a., 3. Was a systema in place to keep the potentially contaminated personnel K.S.b. and equipment separate froun " clean"' equipment?
K.S.a. 4. Was a trigger point for the need for devus.*imination u known by the personnel operating the facility?
"l K.S.b. 5. Were the preper monitoring instrtaments tred (in accord with the plan?)
K.S.a., 6. Was an acceptable monitoring puvi=ss for both personnel and vehicles ;
K.S.b. demonstratal, i.e., not too fast a scan speed, proper distance, etc.? -!
Personnel?
Vehicles?
K.S.a. 7. Were records made when contasnination, above the trigger point, was identified?
K.5.a., 8. Was the decontamination sucxdure in accord with the plan?
K.S.b. ,
K.5.b. 9. Were.persu,=nel aware of the muue:ss whereby irdivirknals would be referred to a medical facility for further assistance? . . _ . _
25.1L
. EVAIIstrIG6 REWE YES 10 '
IR1E ASSIGGENT IHEVIGE AIK17 TEfft IEADER STIE ..
EVAllm1Y)R OED OEUBCTIVE f(s)
I OEUECTIVE 25: IEGBfDGEDERFIGE IO . Iq/A Iq/O '
YES NURBG IEF: MDirS OF REVIDS K.S.a., 10. Were the relevant functions and activities implemented in a K.S.b.
sanner that is consistent with the organization's energency plan and procedures?
If not, explain W y the organization did not follow its -pcy -
plan and procedures: -
U s
.d f
1 25.2:
3 .
5 2
O S
E ,
Y
)
(
s O .
I ,
E .
?a V I
C R T .
A C E
J E B G
I O e V D E L .
R O I
T N .
E -
W -
Q I )
S w S e A i v
E t
e e r
W m f U
I y o l
M l s E a t C
I I i n T t i W r o R
I I
a p
p I g A n V i E d l
u -
t c
' e n
. E m i I
T t ,
S o e n i v .
t c
j e e b
t o e f s
o R y E l a
D p A :
E I s e a b M w i r
e A E
I 5
2 e
v h
(
i t
c ;
j e Y R
b E R O T 0 B 1
A : S D N E I O A I T
V V I T
E W A I
f R A R V A E N
M >
E p
S 1
l9 .
1 s
1 e
L l h l
I i gr c rz 1 C 5 8 8 ..
lt as i
8 :
l 2 5
~
8 5 j !
, a1 ; l g
l 5E I j 5j j :
n
@a -
,e.
C BfAIIRTION FGUE IREVICtB ARCR? YES- NO-IR1E ASSIGetENT
'IEN( IEADER SI1E .
DTAIDA'IOR OED OEUBCTIVE f(s)
OEUBCTIVE 26: SUFFIRBfDWOf ASSISBNCE (FEMRAlvUllER) t agencies' assistance.
Ew strate the ability to identify the need for ard call W Federal ard uG er outside M--M YES NO Iq/A fi/O -
NUROG REF: IDINIS OF REVIEN C.1.a. 1. Was federal assistance requcsted?
(
If so, did an authorized official make this request? .
Identify this official.ard his/her organization 2.
Which federal agency (ies) taas N vi to request assistance?
C.1.a.
Col.a., 3.
Met Federal assistance taas requestal ard tihen was it expected C.1.b. to be provided?
Mw!n Expected?
Assistance i
4.
What actions and resources were required by the requestin)
Col.c.
organization (s) to stgport the . Federal response? ._
m O
(
. . _, . _ . _ . , - . . . . . , . _ .~ . . , ._ _ ___
) ) , _
, ! l i ' f ;:
. n _
2 _
0 6
.D . 2
- -M _
O .
/ -_
. N .
5 E
- Y
) A s
(
/
q I .
f .
E I D .
T N
?mV S
C BJ
~
U B S O O E I 1 V D Y -
E L R O I
?
d _
t e .
r ce de F ?
se n D p e M x h G
l a
cr e w dt -
I r u s d u S e o e n E S d s t a A e e r F r u se h
n l o cr M o u s G n r
a e r u F
e o m
c d s E
? o n n .
G I
E T de f r
a a l a
T A t e r R D d i d s c e I r e i s n de t a I
A o s s F V r p e a t s -
E u i n
)
se q d s o .
R e e s n E
i cr r t a n _
? se
(
r E
i r
t u d e
m s a
u r
y o o =
f 1
I I s d l r w w S R e i r r se d R r o e E d u
r u s ?s )s o t s
n p el rau (n r e H
E a u u to cs
(
n e n iid io i
q e
T k .
avi t
a l r e
H a y ed z a s c t e cn i r a n D h ni n e a R S s t a a d w? t E I n tr g e ed s D S o e so r F- ce i A S i r i o nt s A t e ss n ac s E c w sn hc o tspe A-I i a ao n N D y i i ix M N I e h rt h t a se P
E I V se w ea w h s 1 N E , hz w ati E R h t ti ,
D F t
o ona o s m t as e n sg o mwa I O r P r e f ar f F
P U
SI H I Wo I S N I .
6 7 R :
C I
5 01 6 A 2 :
D I E F A V E V i r
R E ; .
G .
z B 4 4 t 4 u R C t U C C O N
9 ?.t EVMIRTIGI REWE PREVIGE AR3? YE3 HD SI1E DME ASSIGGert DTAllJA10R 1EAM IEADER ots osuscrivE 8(s) osura;uvE 26: MPPIBermRY ASSISIME (MBat/URER)
YES 10 M/A . N/O HURm REF: PODirS OF REVIEN C040 8.
ht actions arri resources were required by the requestirry organization (s) to support non-Federal avsse?
,4 I
Were these actions taken and resources prwided?
If not, dry were they not prwided?
C. lob., 9. Was wupriate assistance and resources requested frtza Federal ,
i C.4. . and/or non-Federal sources?
Was this assistance requested-in a timely manner?
C.I.a., 10. Were the relevant functions and activities implesmented in a manner C.1.b., that is consistent with the organization's emergency plan and c.1.c., and procedures?
C.4.
If not, explain Wy the organization did not follow its emergency plan and pro dures:
~
26.3'
._ - . ~. _, . ~, _ :_. . _ _ _ _ ,. . . . _ ,
i Y'
IB l9 .
I i !
l 1}
>0 5 3g E
'k 5g a '
l E r
g 1E 1i 1 -
o E I
o l #
E l ..
L l xj y ..
ri
. .l y.
I.. - 5 y b E Q 5 !.!
6 to 'i k
B I y u 1l 8 '
l9 i 9 l :
s
,5 1 E
a m j .
l 4
e 1 ii u
.2 l
c w 8 ..
3 .. !
8 ..
8 i
l= E .! 1 ! $+
,g .g 1 a .%
5W 5 } !I I L
l 5E-l I
l f I' l1 'I f!(ljifiltll)\l\ ;!
l> .
,1A.h. ,
1_..
1 o
7 o
R 2
s; 9
a B s
e v
)
M -
A
(
s , /
t f
f E f o
?m v 0 u f e f C
se 0 9
s B l p
s U u
E m a S o O s E mE D Y f
a O o n t
) t ed e n
e m
?n o sr r
r r p i o io t i o
n tt s
i u ar t
e q u G
r s
mt r
aru e d a
i g
1
- g s a g h f e
r s n r ? n i a oa i e s s o c
l p
w o
ie tr l
p a e l e l m E
U ca e
m a t p i c a s
l o
s m f G l e e a r P I lh ot n h s t e
t a e c o t m h 8 k s G o i t l o t I
r u rt o
t a n i e g M f t r a fs t e
e m
m o B u p d t H
A e a.
p r
e v
i u
n a
n e - n o
/
D iw di n
d q
e r e i t
s a
n i
t ce e t u n l t s e vr a a a n k l G ui n w o a l o
D a(
p l
o c t c
s l
o i g s
- n L W td s t r a t r i
s u r e g sr i d
i t m n o 8
f S
ae f r e d l
a a r
e m
f t i r a t f d
- nl r
a si ga r r m a e _
eam c e o o n s t Y mi l et s c f e se a in g
pa l
o f
bnl ncb oe i v
e v t k
a m r
t s
m r
q o ase i n e
t n n t
N edn fa h
t e iti cllda c t ni g esorn t
e n
i r i m
p p
s l
e p
o i?
tr o
m s
e n
w n
r E
E o r ee e
va l ai ei llttr t e r m aad o -
a R st opaau c cmsa l
a e a s
d iwa s?
e rs i
t a
y-r r G uaw i h ri e e r
ue r t F
N e, D e s cof gme y n
v a ca eu t
dl l tetn ektl m E t I a a h ci ep igotl cm SvSWmMI-oenaieb au
. ay V e 4.l t i anta f aa oa u E thiin y r 8 ir e f G =l t R e
ateie l edrr b e u ua rs p
T ,
PMIWA i h s s g I
S uu aop O F h r t er el d
E t cs d e
r ri re d e es ei E
D mt,S rr i D D e i D W Wu Wf
~
ee D n h e t m C . . .
5 o 7
- I 1
2 3 4 m 2 e ,
un v
E V
t a pFER a
8 as I 8 8 8 E T 8 C G I I I I E d E I o R D
I O
mo r f UI D _
W f
EVAIDA10R i EVAIARr10Bf 5000t EAM IEADER 1 S11E {
L- MIE j
ASSIGOENT OluBCrlVE 27: 1 IHEVIOUS ARCA? 1
, _ YES __ _ 900
' IssGE;rHEI EK10GLNEE FftBIBSW - Sassyrmc; ,
NUROC; REF:
OED OtUECuVE 8(s) _
1 EOlins OF REVIEW
- _i I.8. '
6.
I.8. 7 Ws the tm able to fini the - YE3 NO N/A aling location promptly? N/O I.O. 8.
ms proper techniqtse shown ,in sample collection?
I.C. 9.
ms a standant operating pronarnwe followed? _ _
Here field samples properly logged _
location and other pertinent infonmatiand on? labeled with time, date, _
Nho (staff /ortyanization) took th e field samples? _ _
I.8. _
10.
I.O. Were samples transported to a labo
- 11. ratory for analysis?
If milk samples were transported to _
taken to assure preservation of thesa laboratory (ies), were steps _ _
_ Describe measures taken to assure pree samples during transport? _
servation of milk c=ples: _ _
I.8.
- 12. -
that Were is the relevant consistent firm-i. ions and acti i i procedures?
with the ottjanization's emerryency plan andv t es implemented in If not, an=3 explain procedures: why the ortjanization did _ ,__
not follow its emenjency plan _
k
.e-.--.
.. . . . . . . '~~--......- .-. .- ..-..-. - -... ..-..--. - . --.--__----
~
n t g
I '.
l . .
e a. )
I'l '
9 :
i i :
1 1
,i l ,!5 5 s{
! 5[IL
. E 'E 1
1 '
H 1l 1,h s e 11.
g ,,
l5 l nI y
1..
t l i
.s ..
11 il .
l9 :
i l -
E g -
l 5 I
! E I i r a :
r
)
E ..
8 Y ..
8 h 3 .! 4 !
g i "
.% 1 a .1 l
!3 A !I
EVA115EIGE PGUE PREVIOUS AIICh? TI!5 flD STIE tR1E ASSIQWEENT EVA11R105t 1TJWE IEADER 4
OED OIRJBCTIVE f(s) i OIUBCTIVE 28: Det2STIGE EIGUEREE MEN 95K - IAIB OR!BWEIGS d creps, Denonstrata the agpropriate lab operations and prrww. tares for measurisup arut analyzirup samples of . _ , ^ !
milk, meet. prunitry, water and animal fasut= (indigerw=== to the area and storest).
l YES 38D IVA WO ;
l NURBG REE: ICINIS OF MEVIDt l j- J.11. 1. test types of samples were taken to a laboratory and analyzed? !
.~
Air particle filter , ,
l Vegetation samples Pbod crops .
Milk Meat samples ! i Poultrf tomter Animal faark .
Other (Specify)
{
i J.11. 2. If milk samples were transported to a laboratory (ies), were steps taleen to assure preservation of these samples at the laboratory (les)?
1 Describe measures taken to assure preservation of allk samples: i i
J.11. 3. that laboratory (ies) were used for the analyis of the samples identified above?
- J.11. 4. Did the laboratory (ies) follow its sample analysis /m_.i _
prn wwhwes?
. ._ _ .. _ . - . _ _ _ _ _ . . . _ . _ _ . . . . . _ , . . . . . . _ . . _.,..._.,._. .._ .. . .. .- _3. ) .
/
EVAIDtrim FGUI EVAIDA1Ut M IEADER SFIE tytIE AssIgggger PIEy1Gs AIK37 TIls 30
. CED OBJETIVE f(s)
ORIBCTIVE 28: DGSFIM EMIGREE!: MtII55W - IAII crggutrfG5 NUREE REF: PODFIS OF BEVIHf YES Im Eq/A Iq/O J.11. 5.
Irdicate the results of the laboratory analysis:
i J.11. 6.
Did the laboratory (les) perforin analysis ard measuremment functions properly and in a timely manner? - - i J.11. 7.
4 Did the laborato' ry(les) prtrijde its results to other organizatiors? -
If so, identify the organizations. f J.11. 8.
Is the Isbus# tory (ies) certifled by NRC or ETA (& fs 1 state)?
If not, is there evidence that irstnament calibrations are traceble to National Ikareau of Standards?
J.11. 9.
i Does the laboratory (les) have the followirn analysis capability?
(' -
%1.nma (Germanitan(Lithitsu) or high purity Gerinanitsu)
Il<pid Sciriti11ation Strontitan
. J.11. 10. Are there amuptlately calibrated cxmantity geometries for various sample coniiguratiors?
25.2 . l
.e EVAI15trIGt Inst NM M IEAMR s13 IWttE AsgIG e g gr m my g.
OEUBCTIVE 28: INGSTIGE EMIGENEC NERIB5W - IAIB OR5Utr7GE MJRBG REF: POINIS OF IEVIBt YE5 - IE) I$fA 19 0 J.11. 11.
1 Does the laboratory (les) follcat agpttpriate entry, cortminatierVcrees costamninetion and labellrug procedures for samples delivered frten the field?
i J.11. 12. Were the relevant Ranctions and activities iglemented in a aanner that is consistent with the organizations -ry plan and prnnerharms?
If not, explain Wry the organization did not follow its energency plan 4
and procedtares: ~ ,
t i
i i -
o I
i i
l t
28.3 ,
R -
O i
l! . .
.E ll E
E9 i
i 1 1 15
, s-E .E i
g IS a
1.i 5,
f i
l ..l I.4 g "
sI "
h .i i
g
- I 5
w l E l
. 9
. R B .
?
1.
4 I
i i
ll
~
1
! l E l .
i r r i ::
( E E
) l l N k .!
l l M
.$ l A .4 k
lIl l1 i i1 i
/
EVAI13 tris PGGE EVAUJA*IUR 'IT1H IEJOER SIE IRE ASSIGGENT FIEVIGE ABER? YES Bett OED OEUR2IVE f(s)
OEUBCrIVE 29: IMESFIM EXICERNE F5tH95W - DOSE ASSES 9BFF protective -wes haamrt on field data, FIR PfC's as.J other relevant factors. Demonstrate the !
NUREE REF: FODfrS OF REVIDf YES ND Iq/A Sq/O I I.10. 1.
Was the area of concern identified frtas both projections and actual "
i measurements (projected first and confired by measurements)?
J.9. 2.
Were dietary intake factors considered in meltirg PAR's? ,
J.11. 3.
Was radionuclide build-tp considered, if agpttpriate, in foodstuffs?
J.11. 4.
Were laboratory analyses of foodstuffs available in a timely manner?
'J.9., 5.
J.11. Were protective action rMions for condesmation of food hamart on actual measurunents in the fewvktuff ard not on a projection frtan the media?
J.9. 6.
Weredietary and the protective factors?action recousnendations based on apptepriate PfG's l
J.11. 7.
Were the areas of ccm, i.e., need for condesmatim, need to hold for decay and unlimited release,. g=%-ly deterimined?
I.10., 8.
J.9., Here the relevant functions and activities implesmented in a manner J.11. that is consistent with the ortpanization's apq plan and procedures?
If not, and explain W the organization did not follow its energency plan procedures: -
ift 1
.. - _. + - - ~ ~ - * - - ' ~ ^ - - ^ ^ * ' ~ ^
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ^ ^~
E ,
5, Ai l- , !
s l
> , 4 li -
l i
_i _
I- 1
,t E
5 g
jg lI i :
s SI ;
1i l
l
. ig i ~0 h
l ..
1 -
I sj a
3 I-i 8 !.l g
1 1
si
'2 -
9 m
s S.
- li i
I 5
ll .
.g- ,
t l . .
i r r 5
5 5 5 U 3
- 0, =1 1 ai 5
E E
g N]
- j -]
l
l .
EVAH5tFIGt REWE DfAHWIUR *IDWf IFADER Si1E DME ASSIQWENT IEEVIGE ABER7 YES- -
IID Oa1EicrivE 30: Otn osmicrTve f(s)
IEEESITGt EMIUEWIE HM980f - INDIWCF14E ACFIG8 IWOWWWWWFIGE D+-otrate the ability to implesment both g-milve and -- wny gd--Aive action -
s for Irwy== tion pattuumy hazards.
NUREG REF: ICINTS OF REVII3f YES 30 0 Iq/A - . Iq/O
, J.11. 1.
het organizations for ingestion demonstrated laplementation of protective actions hazards?
3A 4 .
i .
J.11. 2.
i Identifyhazards.
pathway gvod.ive protective actions ruxzenended for ingestion Place milk animals within i Ocver open wells and cisterns miles (specify) of plant on stored feed '
Wash contasninated fresh fruit and vegetables Osbargo of harvested food products ,
i Storage of contaminated milk products to make deese after sufficient decay of radionuclides ,
l, other (Specify) ,
1 j J.11. 3.
Identify upmy protective actions rm m aksi for ingestion pathway hazards: ,
i Interdict measures contaminated food products and institute control Condeurution Other (Specify)and destruction of contaminatal food products J.11. 4.
Were any food products or water declared safe for htsman constaption?
n1 m _ _ _ _ ___ _- . _ _ _ _ ___ _ _______ ____.-__ .-_ -
___-__m._ _ - . _ - - - - . - . _ . __ .__ _ _ - . . . ___ .
_ _ -_- _- . _ _ -_ _ _ ~ _ . . - . . . . . . - - . _ . _ _ . . . - ~ .
EVAUWtrIGE REWE DrAIIJA10R *ITAM IEADtR SFIE IWIE ASSIGOENT REVIGS M7 YE5 - N OED OEUBCTIVE f(s) mmcrivE ao:
Incesrfm EMIOSURE HMBmY - RUIECrtVE ACTIM IERIB9EBEr.? IGE NUREG REF: ICINIS OF REVIEN YES 30 N/A J.11. 3(/O 5.
Were twsumamded protective actioss implemented in a timely manner?
J.11. 6.
Ws appetpriate and accurate information on food prodtacts and water indigenous to the area available to:
Dnergency Personnel?
General felic?
If so, was the information used?
J.11. 7.
Identify specific agrio11tural information used at the locations of:
4 Dairy farms Meat and poultty producers Fisheries and fruit growers Crain producers Food g w ing plants i Wter intake points
! other (Specify)
Identify specific agricultural informtion needed that was not !
available or used pttperly:
l Informtion Available Jnformtion Not Used Properly l
i
+
30.2
_ _ _ . . . . . . _ . _ _ . _ . . _ - - ~ _ _ _ _ . . _ . _
i.
p 1
.I i l l 8 li a ia i
I i
.i i i
.s s . -
g E ,j :
Y a 5 g !L g l 5 I,! T i
l l5 35 v ?
IIi (.
5 g h v
=
y[ 3 :
gg l 11 i lllI-l I 5 I!! vd 5
>- l *ghh 01 1
g gn ll4 , ,
E 3l R1 0
.a N -
1 s
1e 1
1 Q .! i E
I 1 e*3 !
e % 1 g ~3 .5 ,
E l 2 ;
.:li l 1
a 1 i
,Td E
I t .
s e -
5 ,,
1 -
l 8 1-l
? 1
=1 #l s
ll
g '
- j R ;
w m
=
be i
I 1
i >
1 I i
l .
t i r r 5 E 5 5 -
l .g g r g
I l % A
.4 5
l1 -lj ll
- a'
,--rg, - .-- - - - - - - - - - .- ~ v
,e EURIREtrIGE UUWE EVAI11A10R TEAM IEADDt S11E IR1E ASSIGOENT M uWTORB AltI2 ? YES N0 ospecrivE at: CtB oIURCTIVE f(s) surxmsrt, wamor ano sumcorrane - somt macrarias Exmsusus asrnstrz D.--
o^aate the ability to estimate total F--dation exposures.
i after the exercise.) (A rwport should be ahnitted 30 to 45 days atter MUREG REF: ICINTS OEP REVIE5f YES 90 IVA M.4. 1. 39/ O Was a detenmination of total population exposure made?
Meen?
M.4. 2.
Identify source of data traed in determinisg location and extent of radiation. i~
4 Initial pliane pathuey EPZ projectiers Plunne n=Uw.sey EPZ =ammwenents j Ingestion F-U.--i EPZ projections
- j Irgestion pathue Gruundshine ma==y EPZ measurement i
i pathuey EFZs wenent within aruyor beyond pitane and ingestion i M.4. 3. ,
- Identify sources of data and infonnation used in determinisg population eXPosum.
i Incation of perimons with respect to passisg pitane i length of exposure of perimons to pitane l Incation with rumber of persons affected by the irgestion EPZ :
i Evacuation measures (Wat sections /gecial facilities evacuated !
i and timme durirq esercise play) '
Incation with rumber of persons affected by the reentry, 1
resettlanent and relocation decisions M.4. 4. i t
Provide an estimate of the total population exposure.
i e i
M.4 - 5.
j Were the relevant functions aruf activities implanented in a .
I annner that is consistent with the organization's enertpency plan and h uvez.hnres?
31.1 t
~
! 'M N
,, n 4
- i. g
\
I I, i f
E l l:
R E
1%f 7 S
I 1
B l1 i l
l 1 ;
3 i l V 5 l 1
c) 3 a 1 l
}
L , 1 a E y i .s -
=
=
\
? II=1 e
1 h
i J
E 1 n
.a f"I 1
O I .l I
i 1 l 1$
h C 11 11 s a b E i
g 1$
a 1!
1 T
I t s e g a l j
)- '
I I i.
g
I s
- i,l I
i I
z z "O
'O 8 8 h ..
5 "
.M .- .,8
- 1 1 5
ll;$JI ,;
T n l5 r 1
- a i
Y
~.-
EVARIRFIW REM EVAIDAPDR 1EAM IEADER STIE INIE ASSIQ9ENT REVI0t5 An[R7 YES MD OED OBJBcrIVE f(s)
OEUHCTIVE 32:
NBGNUtY, IEEBftRE AfE) IE100 trim - EEm55mstrIGE OF AFRORtIJtIE BE9 SEES 4
population exposure, available EPA PAG's and other relevant factors. Demonstrate hamari en est Amated the total ability i
1 NUREG REF: ICINIS OF REVIDi YES MD 3(/A Iq/O
- M.1. 1.
If evacuation was ordered, were aia was made to semre the areas? i M.4. 2.
Did the organization nahe prtper caletalations for the " maximally egosed individtaal" for areas impacted by the pitmes for use in protective action decisiorunakisg and implementation? '
I M.1. 3. __ ,
Were policies and guc=Jkares develged for -a.lat personnel t i to reenter evacuatal areas? i Were policies and procedures developed for the relocation of non-evaaanted population?
__ t Here policies and procedures developed for the resettelement of evacuated population? i 1 4. .
i Identify bases for established reentry, resettlement and relocation policies and procedures.
1 Estimated annual dose for "smaximally exposed irutividual" PAG levels (specify levels used)
Other (specify)
M.I. 5.
M.4. Were the relevant functions and activities implemented in a mwmer that is consistent with the organization's energency plan and Hucimkares?
I If not, plan andexplain Way the organization did not follow its apoy procedures. I l
4
~ _ . _ _ _ __ _ . _ ____ __________ _ _-
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ = _ _ _ _ . . . . _ . ~ . _ . . . ._ . . . _ . _ . _ . _ _ . _
32.1
1 I '
Q .
n.
I * '
1 l
N 1 E ;
_I '
l
'l .T.,
I ~v J 5 :
h l
l 1ae i 5
4 1 .i.g I
v ,
E )
hb l l njta )
.f.
i t .
! 5 l
, .E. ,
i 1
I
f
, Yl:
s
. 1 T
a ~
I :
i i
i i
! l E .
h 4
t E C E 8 5
g j
2 g t 5
" 3 ._
3 g .# N 1 l bb 1 l$b i
,~ a m .e 6 a--- - mse -ewam um - n
.R B ~
iI,
. 4 1
k i 3 I'ls i a ili I
li !f'k i
iriv
}1 15.!
l' I in i I I lk$ 1 I '
or is
.i is
'dal
}$ $ I$
llll{l p
)
i 3 8 g a s e; lia 13 !I 1 E i ld u
v EVAIIBtrIm PGUI DTAIIJA"IUR 1DM IEADER STIE tR1E ASSIQ9 err HEVIGE AKR7 YES 30 OEUECTIVE 33: OID OEUBCTIVE f(s) IWKI)UERY, IE!DtINY AfD BE!IDOtITm - JpWYBENDtFIm s NUREG REF: 10DirS OF HEVIDi YES MD IVA nelocation N/O Imd organization ! When initiated M.1., 2. . . 1 M.3. Did reentry planning and response give attention to:
- a. Decision-makirg?
- b. Medical support?
- c. Ihysical re16 cation?
- d. Accident amW? ,
- e. Agricultural products handlirg?
1
- f. Anim1 h?>_bandry?
- g. Handlity of displaced persors?
i
- i. Highway alternate routes?
- j. Causmanications problems? t
- k. Public Works problesas? .
f 33.2
'e f VAI19U1 5 REWE DrM1WKR TEAM IEADER S11E IRTE ASSIG#eNT PsEVERS ARCR7 _ YES 90 OtB OBJBCITVE f(s) onmerivE 33: seawear, lenwner Ano sexocarzm - narrausnurrost
{ NURBG REF: FOINIS OF IEEVIfti YES 10 M/A I(/O . M.1., 3. i Mo3. Did resettienent planning ard response give attention to:
- a. Decision-snaking?
- b. Medical stqport?
c.19:ysical relocation?
- d. Accident assessment? .
- e. Agricultural products handling?
i.
- f. Animal fundwandry?
j
- g. Hardling of displaced pcx.w.o?
! i. Ifighway alternate ruutes?
- j. Omenanications problems?
- k. Public Mxts problems?
M.1., 4. M.3. Did relocation planning and i@te give attention to: 1
- a. Decision-snaking?
i i
- b. Medical styport?
) c. 11rysical relocation?
- d. Accident assessenent?
- e. Agricultural prolucts handling?
4 33.3
. . . . , ,. . _ . . . , . . . _ . . , , ,. . . . . .. - - - . . , - , _ . , . , , , _ . _.,..,_.m.... , , . . . _ _ - - , .-
EVAIARTIGE REWE EVAIM70R 'IERM IB OER SFIE DME ASSIGOENT HEVIG5 AN27 YES 30 OID OIUBCTIVE f(s) ORIBCTIVE 33: NEINEEY, N!HfERY JWO BEEDOLTIM - DEUBE5fENFIGE NUME REF: MINIS OF REMN YES 30 Iq/A iqs
- f. Animal fundwandry?
- g. Handlirq of displaced pea-o?
4
- 1. Hicfassy alternate routes?
- j. numamications problems?
- h. 14 11c Works problems?
s. M.1. 5. Was relaxation of protective actions besed ort monitor data indicatirg 4 safe levels of radioactivity? M.3. 6. Were me.my, resettlement and relocation decisiers avammmicated promptly to all appropriate reganse organizations? M.3. 7. Were arrangements made to provide wpy pan-..el with inforinatfori concernirg: ! i Access control p d e ? ! i Radiation exposure infonnation? ! Ibssible health effects frtan low-level exposure? Need for personnel dosimetry? other (Specify) t i M.1. 8. Were the relevent functiers and activitics implesmented in a manner that is consistent with the organization's cuergency plan and procedtsres? 33.4
. _ ... . _ , _ . -, . . _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ . - . . _ . - . . _ . . . _ _ . ~ . , . . ~ , _ . _ . . . _ , ~ . . _ . . . _
E' ?
,Nl m g.
l} } . c.
, w l
I-i;' . g
.Q [
E .}m R i i# .w g
.5 e
h' w y
- n. .
x s
- j l + j .
. ,1 .
o s h h-8 [ g.i. a . e # i t I i l 9 l
r-f
-- k 9,
A i e l
?
Ia l I .! : I 1
,w E
5 .$ . h 'y
, a g E r
E 5.{ n .g:. g
'N :
~
~ E .
#y .
~
t l' .. to I k j n y .! g M EEt s E f
=
-h 1, . :
N S ,. b
' ff
- p. '
2 l 'j , Y 4 1> _l L I 5 y 1' 1 ( . t; g g g 2 4
*C 2 .
*d .
j 5 5 R D D i^ ~ E E g l " 3
?'
N 3 1 2
,B.
l l%
- l e
V ly'
- n. n
^
BfAftRTIGf MEWI EVAIDA1DR 'IEArt IEADDR SI1E. tR1E ASSIQ9 err IREVIGE AIER?. YES 91 0 , - OED OEUBCTIVE f(s) OEUELTIVE 34: 90BILIZATfGE OF DEEDICY IYR9GGEL (24-twum , otzstituaans basis) th-otrate the ability to maintain staffing on a snit.inuous 24-hour basis by an actual shift dienge . NUREG REF: IUIlfIS OF REVI! YES DIO II/A 95/ O A.4. 1. Did the ortJanization de -[ o^ucate a shift diange? A.4. 2. men did tM shift change occmar? (give a rarne of time if the shift change was staggered) A.4. , 3. Was the second shift fully staffed? A.4. 4. Were incomisq staff appropriately briefed by the outgoing staff? - - A.4. 5. Did the second shift staff demonstrate agpttpriate knowledge and capabilities of their c. _iwicy rwxnuse rules ard functions? A.4. 6. Was 24-hour staffirg capability demonstrated?
'Ihrouch two 12-hour shifts?
1hrough three 8-hour shifts? _ Other (specify): A.4. 7. Were the relevant functions and activities implemented in a manner that is consistent with the ortyanization's emertjency plan and pwc=xkres? i If not, and explain why the orryanization did not follow its enertyency plan procedures: I I . l l l L34.1 l__ . .
..,s- A
- 4 N
$~
B ; a sum l
.l 9
_i _ I I 1 s t 5 .
? g .E 6. 'E = a a !! I ,
i
<; g I .!
1i o E a t t E (n hwy
*f h , _
is .. 3
- 5 k
g
I. f* - I fl J t'j L ;!; . e l f '. i . t l o n
+ ,
1 1 1 - i. t C
.. $ 1
- 8 r i
-0 ,,
8 W" 3 i g r p g
.I' 9 u i 1-
y- 7, 7, EVAttRTIGE FGUI EVAIUNIOR 'IEAM IEXXR l SI'IE IRTE ASSIQ9 err HtEVIGE ARCR? YES 90 OED OEUBCr1VE f(s) .,_ OrUBCTIVE 35: EVNIRTIGE OF GEI'IE 16GG001 , ty, wd. rate the ability to coordinate the evacuation of onsite pcim..el. - NUROG REF: ICINIS OF REVIDi _ ' YES NO N/A J.2. 1. N/O. Was evaaaation of onsite individuals h oiaated? J.2. 2. If so, was it: Promptly activated? - Well organized? ' J.2. 3. , Didonsite of the licensee contact offsite authorities to ocordinate evacuation individuals? - ' 1 J.2. 4. Was tmopni.ation arrahged for all onsite pewv...sl to be evacuated?- J.2. 5. Was an evacuation t ate specified? 4 J.2. 6. ~ ll Was a suitable anad.lon location specified, if agpropriate? J.2. 7. Was monitoring and decontamination prtwided for, if qvtuptlate? J.2. 8. i Here the revelant functions ard activities implemented in a manner that is consistent with the organization's emergency plan and pouveshires? If not, and explain why the organization did not follow its emergency plan pruoedurus: I e 35.1
, - ~ _. - . _. - . _. , . ~ - _ _ . _ . . . _ , _ . . . - .
8 '
.y N;
- h. -
I ami ! 6* -.. t 5 _i _ I ya : s t
?-
l -$ .
.E 1
g I.I ! 1i -
$yE -
3 .. E
~
1-4e l . p- .E y .. El"m 5 b _E
?
"t I 9 R.
, +<1 2
w r, s i 1 e g I w l l + -~ - t ' 2 2 { D E 8 8 ee a 8 , 8 m 'g
-O g I ,g I
", .]
H l l & " E
,1 a
g g~ g~ a;,)
,a 1 -
*-4_m_m- ,. -ayep -.
n . . - 2 -1
, e. .
EVAllRFIGS REWI EVA11M70R 1EAM LEADER STIE -IWIE ASSIGOENT FREVIOUS ARCH? 'YE5 MD OED OBJECTIVE 8(s)' . OBJBCTIVE 36: IBGWSKR503D afb OFF-I0 tnt 3 NURBG REF: ICINIS OF REVIDi N.1.b. YES 30 N/A N/O - 1. Was the drill or exercise unannounced (i.' e., the drill exercise was prurided to the players)? a 7-day window for initiating N.I.b. 2. Was the-drill or exercise conducted durirg off-hours (i.e., spy L staff were alerted and mobilized between 6pm and 4am or durirg the weekend) ? , At what time was the drill or exercise initiated? E.1., 3. E.2., Were all organizational staff alerted to'stan@y status? N.I.b. If not, identify who was not alerted? 4 E.1., 4. E.2., During what time frame were staff alerted? N.I.b. Start Ocuplete1 E.1., S. E.2., itat method Telephone (s) was used to alert staff? H.1.b. Pager System i other (Specify) If telephone calls were usal, was followiry inforination curret:
- Staff Names?
Telephone Nted)ers? _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ . _ _ _ - - - _ -_-_:,_____.- - -__.=____-- =
- u. c ~
1 EVAllRTJGI RNE - EVAIDATOR TEAM LEADDI SIE tR"IE ASSIGGENT PREVIOUS art 1? YES ' NO . OED OEL7BCITVE f(s) ' OBJECTIVE 36: 15IMSOtBIOD AND OFF-fERNES NUROG REF: POINIS OF REVIDf-YES ND' .IVA. ' N/D E.1., 6. E.2., Here all appropriate organizational staff mobilized? (Agnup.iate staff N.I.b. includes all BOC personnel who are deployed frun the BDC.) If not, identify staff who were not mobilized: - E.1., E.2.,
- 7. During what time period were staff mobilized?
N.1.b. Start Ocupleted _ E.1., 8. E.2., Did the organization fully alert and nobilize all of its appropriate staff in a timely manner? N.I.b. E.1. 9. E.2., Did director of BDC establish causuunications with aignylate BDC's N.1.b. (appropriate BJCs are those specified in the organization's plan and procedures for decision making, ocumunications linkages ancyor generel coordination of emergency functions and activities.) N.I.b.
- 10. At what time was the drill or exercise terminated?
E.1., E.2., 11. Were the relevant' functions and activities implemented in a manner N.1.b. that is mnsistent with the organization's emergency plan and
. procedures?
i
$If not, explain why the organization did not follow its wpmy plan procedures.
36.2
':;k:- ,
; i t
- , !! ! 4
.2 -w W ,
- o.
- r .
l9 1 L i k x t
- g :
4 Lg
-l. .
g 1,a-i o g
". m f .i m
I l
., I M
- l 8 w
,O :
i k Q .. 1 l xj 1 ! i y .. i
*m a ..
E I l l i
~ '
,,.i-t .
E g .
- 4,,
l9 .
,i I
1
- s. .
I
.g ,
l l
? 9 3 ~! w 2 2 r
E c 8 :
# y b -
.h e, .5 .y g 2 .4 at ~~ 4' l
W a
-l a;.. -
\
i . z ' k . EVAllRTION RMI
.IVAIUNIOR 'ITAN IEADER S11E - 'IRTE ASSIGN GFr RtEVIG5 AIER? - YES- -50
.OtD CIUILTIVE f(s)
Ot17EETIVE 37: IfrILT'IY OFFSFIE IEESFGGE GERIIIZNrIGS e arul local gcm._As through their mobilization and prtwision of.. advice and assistz=mx. rup State 4 NUREE REF: ICINFS OF REVIEN YES NO N/A N/O .
- 1. Identify utility offsite response organization liaisors g A, at your assigned location, their function (e.g., traffic control) and the asstaned -
State or local official (s) they worked with. Liaison - control cell " C.S. 2. ' N.1.b. At what time did the liaisons arrive at their assigned duty station? ' Liaison Time of Arrival
- C.S. 3.
l N.1.b. Did liaisons request legal authority frun control cell to enable utility . offsite respnoe organization personnel to take specific actions? If yes, indicate the nature and time of the request: . Nature of Beauest Control Cell Time of Recanest
~
37.1
-_ - . . _ _ ~. . . _ . . _ . _ , _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _______ ___
1EVAllRTIGO FGUI EVAIDA10R 1EAM IEADER S11E IEEE ASSIQeeft IREVIGE ARCH? ' YES' ' 10 0 DEDIETIVE 37: OED OEUB2IVE f(s) UTIIXIY OFFSFIE RESIDGE GE2fffZATIGE i NURBG REF: ICINIS OF REVIDi r}
-YES Im C.S., 4. M/A' II/O N.1.b. Did liaisons prwide advloe and inforation to the control cell?
If yes, indicate the nature of the advice and inforation prwided. Nature of Advice / Assistance control cell I C.S. 5. Did the liaisons prwide aamrate and timely inforation, if appropriate? C.S. 6. N.1.b. . Here the relevant functions an activities implesmented in a manner that is consistent with the organization's w w procedures? ..y plan and~ t i If not, and explain procedures: why the organization did not follow its apay plan
.I L!
i
'l
'l I
^
37.2
,, s~--, , .m, .. . . , . . . , , . . _ . . , . . . ;..-
E n i E
.s be .
E 1e i em yi I ,t i' i 1 1 i y b i
. m yg l 1
i i 1 *f . g e E k lk j ... I !! e 5 l ',:;
~
L
?
l - ,-- 4;! i1 t S I_ l l9 1 4 1 h h r L i >- i er2 r I E 2 ' C E 8 5 5 5
- j. p l
g a g a t l-i W H N7j l8
-c l >
C. 4
, , i
.gz ,
2 gl 4 . _ ~. W. 4 A. y g a
~
a j w 8 - 8'
- 8 1 n' E o n E 8 -
8- ,
~ ,
i L: r 8 E ll l w a 5' i: E w
. t, e
N SWWum _4IEuuppb . m . 5 e - m. 5 g o- ,, p ____ g
*l 5 'd 's I l esg .. .
34
- w D -
= zl o
M 3 ! $ g - w a b ._ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
F p 1 I , i I; q g . w d m
~
l2t; vi = 5 2 8 ; -
-3 ; o-
~ w g- x ,
E o - X. t
. .e w
I a 4 1
~
B i: B. W G , t. 4 O g . ~ h a ; I" 5 l
~. .
~ ~ *~~ ~
O
~l 5 *; i O
@ =
< g g :: :
5 - a I ggg ==
-w 8
N
=
~}}