ML20006E333
| ML20006E333 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak |
| Issue date: | 06/26/1989 |
| From: | NRC |
| To: | |
| References | |
| CON-#190-9876 A, NUDOCS 9002220686 | |
| Download: ML20006E333 (2) | |
Text
_.
- ~
l y
.c a ea 4
Fodsmal Regnator<( Vot? 54. No.121 /M Afuhe SB.ine Notlees
' '~'
28885.' M As a reach af the cruesamenassas of 7
'Ihe conciusionof tie atysl IM centro 5sd belletC ( 1 this settlementMiraement,thestaKA asJouowet..
- W t
<&,9001 board, addning aN anembas af tw Bieditc o' l
this Notice.haraby cosgieles ian aeview Priar to the ant! trust eel nt armes>eiet? hh
- N,n*,*,,,,
,,,, s,. E
- $n0@ pi p& k of this enetter.
,q,: ~., m n.. iret v before the Nuclear Regulstary aks*% WIwpww'4 N j
Deted et Radvme. Maryland.this10th day l (NRC). competitson for%pechase M
p erwomask i '
l.
of tune 195B.
m*--.%
power and entrity end AneEl
%eMa y amehlag poww syansas Se.
For the Nuclear Reguletory Commission.
pn sm individualmands of Alamit,M ' N t
etter i
Dan. A.w ah..
tr,,,,,u,n Th s wr maae c'
A*****.'* O***' L'~
--<-u
.a t
4 Acting Chief. Policy Deva 14pment and '
has semained u.asce lor many P
- '*V'L '**PM "d I"** *'*0* q * +. '
a V
l 7>chnrcelSapport R:ench. Program notwinkstamling the faa that same t d N"M*"P " @"' 8"#8" '
I Afanagement.PoficyOs.b..,. :and entitles doingbusiness on the perimeter m Aydsrism, 'f.Ofseeo/Nudeer7tesceer the state of Texas as we3 as some systems projects beeiwithis and estelde the state.
- "1 Amo&ses Sard
,,.., a
.m :... s.
within the ante have exp:rssed knarest in
' Die r-y ofIsaureen planes ad M '
P'"W dB b""."as pos"ser'eme"ssm'a. '.
[FR Doc 89-tsett Fued 6-4340t sq.
Interstate bulk power trenesetbne fora is F 8 88 new one for most Ten
.,ca number of yeare,. 70though the Texas bulk u
salmes coes mom i
s pamaer ade has emmisurd prunesey m Although the movemealpa==um o,;.I. (f cooperation and capeWee is etW la ha j,,,
letrastate ta namre. there have been seiera]. embryonic atages in Texas. Siis movement.
- L.*e * " '
cheoges staae the NRC settW-m ma tage that have proceded osapeettwe sumuk to this was contemplated by and provided for in the - gi
.n 2,
antitroc settinnent agreementbefore both.,; p
- Teras tJttmles Doctric Co.et al; No madet.
Significant Antitrust Changes and The change that has had the gre the Nacim Regulatory Conanission and the J
.i y,
g Fedet Energy Regetuary Comunashin.mie 1
Time for filing Requesta for been the implementation of the joint sew agmemet psostdes lernquem Reevaluation 1,
settlement egnement, t.e before the NRC '
for sapeaity harsaaes and aw===ane The Diiector o.f the 00'sae of Nacient and the Federal f'nergy Regulatory T
purchases in the DC interties at intervals af
~.
Reactor Regulation has enade a (mdang Commission. This setiement egreement m every 3 years beginning in k.no of 1986 and in acx:crtlance erith section 305$) of the requimd ni scarm. tal to make seir lasting untu June of 2cos.)1t is anticipated r
transmismeon facihtato unore eiettable to that this movement toward inoroesud Atosa m Energy Act af 1954, as a needed, powersystems de Teams and sharetry promote', Cooperstem and a y=ad*== wel aussiam,. < * ',
that suo sigmficant (antitmst) changse in competstxm hetween animetete and asterssate among intrestate 9e wer systeem utthma the liamsees'aminties erproposed
. powerayssama much the ccustrucuan of two Texas and alee terween smessene passer
..t
.c aetMtiee have ocourred subsequant to -
DC transmasion lines. Although both of the
- systems weeking to eagers is psiat peeser the antitrust construction penna review direct currena (DC) transmission ties with the supply planning and power supply of Unit 1 of the Consanche Asak Stammt Southwest Power PoollSWPP) have not been transaction acmas state borden.., c,.j,,,,g t-Electric Station by the Attorney General completed.the Narth tie hn been completed... Although there ate stiD pbysical, q - *<td end the Caramisman. The faschsgis as
' and the Central and somh h opmting
'. : innpedanese ao omapiese W39
+
9 '- <i' O* i"' i,'; ; systenu em exchanging power and enetyy operehans betsmesa most haas penser W1. 4g foGones' i -
Section 105c(1)Wthe Atomic Enetsy Ae' td., o.erilms tie. plans have been developed to entities and systems outsideaf Teaanda. c<t e t
expand the North tie las centeplated en the -
there are no majar alterse laag cumust
..cd 4 'signia' met agreouvati to =rm==iastste a. ; interconnadions batwenn ER 1954, as a mended, ymades for en antitreet seeth
- review of an appbce tamm ist an operstag cant power transferby a Teams oe.-
,. SWPP. the settlement provi8ed '.
.m
...w.y power sy' sten s Inalde exas. as useD as in,3 [
~ licemmeof theComemomantietenemesabat
- i generating aatgy.
,,.t, signincent chasses is the hoensee's actiesties Capadty (15 parcentj in both DC interties surrouneng states, the p6-a., to 2
or proposed acunnes hew ocouned fI bas been reserve,llor non ewners wno wish
. exchange power and energy and engage subsequens to the prewmus constraction
^ to engage in firmpower transactions in the
. bulk poww assasastiana...,- ei e W q j
. permW review, The Cosamission has..,.,,.w.,.; -Interstate market.htoreover, whosEng to,
= De staff views the settleasat agreement -
as a major first step in opening up power d.M delegated the authority to make the N,,4 from or over the DC intertree is new wn
- significimt change" determtnetion to die available op6an to meer power eyetems in
'suppty options to a broad spectrum of power ' q,-
Direcaot, Omce of Nudeer Reacter n " 1.:. Teams..
t LJ 1 analysis of the changes in the barnsees' en
^
Regulation.Bened spor.eneaandashen d ' "
To remanly a powing riend to isubsethans g..
. the e=ents suur theinumanceof the - MW9 power from co-generetors concentrated ta actinties since the anaerust va#A=-et has 33 P, a
. _ ; Comanche Ibak Steen Electnc Statusa i > s W L industrialised podets in the state, the Teams ; not idemuGedany chastgedeeWeety9 e 4:34
- constructios persmas se TU 3har Co. etaf ; Public Utihty Commuasion pmonubeted suise envisioned by fhe t'W"= set farth Ja 3 1i
. and the cenawamaham of the mattlement n ; requiring math tory transs maan or -
wheeling of co generated powerin7emas., frj '"its Suauner Aacinian r'annar==Q u
.,p agreementbefore theComraisalac.the staHs,, ) These ruleshave enabled corporate enuties.g; ~
' recommends tha! no amnnativa significant of thePolicyDevelopment and7echnical
. Support Branch. Oma of Nudear Reactoru,, I which heretofore have not participated in the ' theapphcadenfaranspemtinglicano
, @j J
~
Regulation and the Office of the General.. hToxas bulk power me ket, toirarket their by.
- Urdt 1 of the C Ceaneel, hetesfler retened to as *stof!*.hese" product yewer and energy, Le., benise h
' ' ' Station.
- T d '*W' WAW e/
r '
" ~ -
. Jointly coo:t ded, etter consukation w0th Guo a entry tuto the priectiam and sale dbelk ' *
- r r4*
1 Departmentaf tasars.that ein changesthat. ' power in Texas have been krwnrod as a
.r Based upon the staNaaalysis,it is siy have occurred sirice the consernamn permit,.reeuit of the newly adopted wbadmag ridea.
t - finding that there haee beenrio wr.: A*
review are not af the amtem de seguise a #wq,i Incrassed osardaantion and coopernhan 4 l "signsfxaat dianges"la the boe
?
second actitrast revirw ar the ssmettag a,g),among bulk powersuppliars bas sesultedin a,. activities or proposed activitiao almce. 4 qin licenseptage aHhe =#=H= g,,,;.,g,.,g more open math!In thestate afTexas. 7JU,
the counpletion c(the pteetess astitrustm,iM In reaching this conchanon, the stpff... Electric has implemented numeroue
,,yg,w, M, N b q,b, W N,i
,,m
,n oif,, pgwo j 88 consedered the strucsore af the eientrac
,' $c'h
$1 d a y,
M ety dp orw
. utility industry in northennesem and
- v. ' eystems to dep for themetive poseer W provided trunvmbston and modnsboaemkus'O Mi
. north central Texas, the events rehment to the Coswindie Peak constructsee.na J. throughout the meeiem yertran dthe wete?
.apan r.9
..e.ertut.
t awit dam w4,p M. /.ww gr.1.mwnr e nnW ; c=====5 se.,-===ma. ems en teensW p permit review and the endstrust, e.c.,p g %
awds m.a.. * ' c.i.ed br.io.
.isnire.n ch.ns mww.but mar. W e
. w r
me moperar <* ===r swa== so the 1.3
- setilement embeequent to the...a.,r Jp 4 a.c.,wp%.,wM,;.en. m 4
r
. ommi.
e y
..c p w p.,,,.rvy,$,.m i ? be enore =ppnsprw W toen cone.xt w e M-;
constructionpennstreview., y -i n cw rhanes seracea-m essurwane he.am -
-,r
=dw.
e m e **'
9002220686 890626 fu._
PDR ADOCK 05000445 M
~
=
22:
- -- -- g gg.
.m 13 o.
7.s i 90006..? N. m Jediscal Register / Vcl.i 54,4No.m /' Monday, June 26,4989 / Noticeam W k H.m na.%
d
.n i
.u 1
Signed on June 16.1989 by homas 'CM leolation" are separated into two > *,ch Any person who has Illed a petition for s
- co.a Murley, Director of the Office of Nuclear sections, one for Primary Containment.
leave tointervene or who has been * * -
and one for Secondary Containment admitted as a party may amendthe -
Rasctor Reguladon.
Any person whose interest may be isolation functions.. %.. - !., petition without requesting leave of the-
. affected by this finding, may file, with-
. Revisions to table entries, table ;
,t Board up to fifteen (15) days prior to the notations and nomenclature are made to first prehearing conference scheduled in,
~ full particulars, a request for.
+=
reevaluation with the Director of the' either more clearly reDect the plant the proceeding. but such an amended l
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, configuration, remove duplication or petition must satisfy the specificity U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ambiguity, or reflect the new section of '
requirements described abov's. '
. Washington, DC 20555 within 30 days of the table. Provisions have been included Not later than fifteen (15) days prih t'o the initial publication of this notice ln -
to allow routine testing of the Reactor-the first prehearing conference.. '.. -
4 i
~
the Federal Register. Requests for.
Water Cleanup system without.
i'- scheduled in the proceeding, a petitioner reevaluation of the no significant change necessitating removal of the pystem.
shall file a supplement to the petition to determination shall be accepted after -
from service. In addition, the definition intervene, which must include a list of
)
the date when the Director's finding.
of ChanneMalibration is revised to -
the contentions that are sought to be.!, g
.becomes final, but before the issuanoe better reDect standard industry practice,.. litigated in the matter, and the bases for 1
of the Of. onif tf they contain new 7. J. Prior to issuance of the proposed " -. each contention set forth with' e-information, such as information about " license amendment, the Commission -
reasonable specificity. Contentib's shill s
n facts or events of antitrust significance - will have made findings required by the be limited to matters within the scope of, that have occurred since that date, or.
Atomic Energy.Act of 1954, as amended the amendment under considerationcAi.
i
' nformation that could not reasonably..
(the Act) and the Commission's g.C~. petitioner who fails to file such at ,5 i
'"~
have been submitted priot to that date, regulations.
supplement which satisfies these i
By Juh 26, M, de ken' us ma%
requirements with respect to at least one i
s Dated at Rockville, Maryland. this 19th day a request for a hearing with respect to contention will not be permitted to
@ 1ese, issuance of the amendment to the participate as a party, L.*
For'Ihe Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
subject facilit operating license and arties to the proceedm.nterven.e becom Th.ose permitted to i any person w ose interest may be
- g. subject to any Acting Chief. Pohey Development and affected by this proceeding and who fimitations in the order granting leave to i
i Techruco/SupportBmach.Pmgmm -
wishes to participate as a party in the.
intervene, and have the opportunity to Management.Pulicy Developmentand d
t fil writt "
't A8"IN88'0/l',Offico/Meer Aeodor fgy,'ar'im and a petition for leo
[articipate fully in the conduct of the -
l earing, in,cludmg the opportunity to
,Regu M on.
.,,j m -
I.
intervene. Requests for a hearititions for leave to intervene %and -
present evidence and crow-examine
,o Rummary Statement"7 '
l all be Director's findings-khe Director of ed in accordance with the. ' _.C...
wi[es,,q est for a hearin's orht n.
i Commission a ' Rules of Practice,for.. Domestic Ucensing Proceedings the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation l
change" regarding the antitrust aspects CFR Part 2. lf a request for a hearing or'. the Secretary of'ory Commissio
. has made a finding of "no significant '
Nuclear Regulat b N '[.
of the licensees' application in Docket : " Petition for leave to intervene is filed by Washington DC 20555, Attentio sy d
jt ere d thi da s th da of j. Atom ety a d U e a
t l
'publica,ti,on in the Federal. Register. '"
i ed the se on or bythe Document Room,2120 L Street, NW.,'
, "l
[
[FR Doc.80-15o34 Filed 6-23-80; a:45sm)
Ucensing Board Panel, will r e on the Washington, DC, by the above date.
M8.coor removes 2,Q,,, ',[,,,.,. - request and/or petition, and the Where petitions are filed during the last Secretary or the designated Atomic
, ten (10) days of the notice period,it is.
" ~
, Safety and ucensing Board willissue a requested that the petitioner promptly so I
~
I
.k h,.we,.do. *.i,5,n, ;w notice of hearing or an appropriate inform the. Commission by a toll. free -
telephone call to Westem Union at 1-L Detreet Edison Co.; Wolverine Power -
-order.
/.'
w "
.s m;'
- 800-325 6000 (in Missouri 1-a00-352g
. As required by to CFR 2314, a ; ?* p 700).%e Westem Union _ operator.. ;,
Supply Cooperative,Inc. Notice of 6
Petition for leave to intervene shall set r
Conalderation of lasuance of
'" i '
' :the petitionerin the proceeding and ho.. ; should be given Da forth with particularity the interest of -
^
Amendment to Facility Operating Number 3737 and the following message.
Ucense and Opporturdty'for Hearing' '1 'that interest may be affected by the w
results of the proceeding,%e petition '.' uddressed to Lawre
.c
' Petitioner's name and telephone '
%e United States Nuclest Regulatory."
, Commission (the Commission)is should specifically explain the reasons number; date petition was mailed: plant,.
i ' <. 'considering issuance of an amendment' s wh[ intervention should be permitted ~, name; and pu 4,,
'~
R ' number of this Federal Register notice.
I'..'
to Facility Operatirig Ucense No. NFP '
wit particular reference to the -
.v j;}'
43, issued to the Detroit Edison W.6 -following factors:(li nenature of the '" A copy of the petition should else be i;
i
^
N Company %nd Wolverine Power Supply e petitioner's right under the~Act to'be'-F W sent to the Office'of the General *7'
- u
( ! %-LCooperative,Inc. (the limnsees), for
?.m.made a party to theproce'sding;(2),the + CounsellU.SiNucle'ar Regulatbry 'T :
~coperstion of Ferml-2,localed irrMonroe 6 :. nature and extent of the petitioner'sM.Commissios. Washington.DCM,']3 if ?
- t
'l'
.: County, Michigan.* m M -
'e-property, financial, or other interest in and to John Flynn. Esq, Detroit Edison In accordance with the licensees' the proceeding; and (3) the possible. ',9. Company,2000 Second Avenue, Detroit. :
- ie application for amendment dated ' 1. effect of any order which may be
- . ;.c.,. Michigan 48226. attomey for the'
,., y December 22,'1988, the amendment '
entered in the procseding on the cg -t3 licensee. ? m wyN11hmH @
Jj would revise the Technical Specification ' petitioner's interest.'ne petition should Nontimely filings of petitions for leave
- y to intervene, amended petitions-"7108 -
Tables.The table entries previously ;l', also identify the specific aspecth) of the " ' supplemental petitio cSection 3/4.3.2 and the associated
. subject matter of the proceeding as to -
listed in a section entitled " Containment which petitioner wishes to intervene.
-for hearing will not be entertained " m >
t t
i
~~ -
j.
L.
- J
'