ML20006D653

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Provides Followup to Re Facility SALP Process & Regulatory Process Associated W/Final Licensing Decision. NRC Concludes That Issues Raised Have Been or Being Adequately Addressed.W/O Stated Encl
ML20006D653
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak Luminant icon.png
Issue date: 02/05/1990
From: Taylor J
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO)
To: Garde B
ROBINSON, ROBINSON, PETERSON, BERK, RUDOLPH, CROSS
References
NUDOCS 9002140174
Download: ML20006D653 (3)


Text

.

u.

u..

.m 4-n,

'o b

' c e

)

9H4 y-0 9

f, g(,j

+

o UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

]

5 t

W ASHINGT ON. D. C. 20$65 1

s J

l

'% o.. /

FEB 51990 o

Docket No. 50-445 i

i Ms. Billie Pirner Garde Esq.

Robinson, Robinson, Peterson, Berk, Rudolph, Cross and Garde i

103 East College Avenue lAppleton, Wisconsin 54911

Dear Ms. Garde:

This is in followup to my letter of December 8,1989 regarding your letter of November 20, 1989, in which you outlined concerns you had with the Comanche Peak systematic assessment of licensee performance (SALP) process and the I

regulatory process associated with the final licensing decision.

The unsigned memorandum from "NRC Staff Inspectors" to Chainnan Carr of j

October 4,:1989 was handled as a staff Differing Professional Opinion, A panel'of three senior managers was established to review the issues and make 1

appropriate recomendations to the Director of the Office of Nuclear Reactor l

Regulation. The panel has completed their review of the SALP process at Comanche Peak, including the coments in your November 20, 1989 letter. The panel reviewed the development of the SALP report, and conducted interviews with some SALP Board members. As a separate initiative, the staff members.

involved with the Comanche Peak inspection program were requested to provide any comments they might have on the SALP report. They were told these coments could be provided anonymously. The results. of the survey were also reviewed by the panel. Based on the survey comments, several minor changes to the SALP report were recomended by the NRR Associate Director for Special Projects.

l The panel has concluded that the SALP process for Comanche Peak was conducted consistent with agency guidance, and recomended that the'SALP report (as modified by Special Projects) be issued. Enclosed for your information is a copy of the panel's report and the Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation's disposition of this matter.

l As I-previously discussed in my letter to you of December 8, 1989, a decision L

on the issuance of an operating license is separate from the SALP process and e

'will not be made until the necessary licensing and inspection efforts are

~ completed, and the ORAT inspection is completed.- Although the insights derived from the SALP process are used as an input to the NRC's determination of fuel I

load readiness, the findings from the licensing and inspection activities pro-l vide a more current assessment as a basis for a licensing decision. The SALP process is retrospective and therefore the performance sumary provided to the utility in the SALP report is to a large extent historical in nature.

S 9002140174 900205 ADOCK0500g45 l

PDR C

Q l.

O.

'" h Ms. Billie Pirner Garde 2

l l

The anonymous memorandum also asserted that NRC inspection reports and other

?

documents had been edited to create an inaccurate characterization of the I

utility's performance.

This matter has been referred to the Office of the Inspector General.

In summary, we have reviewed the comments in the anonymous memorandum and the concerns voiced in your letter regarding the SALP evaluation process and have concluded that the issues raised have been or are being adequately addressed.

Sincerely, Original Signed By:

James M. Taylor James M. Taylor Executive Director for Operations

Enclosures:

1.

Menorandum F. Miraglia to T. E. Murley, dtd 1/30/90,

" Anonymous Differing Professional Opinion (DPO) on Comanche Peak" 2.

Memorandum. T. E. Murley to J. M. Taylor, dtd 2/1/90,

" Differing Professional Opinion

Concerning Comanche Peak's Fuel-Load Readiness and SALP Report" cc

See next page Distribution:

JMTaylor

-TEMurley JHSniezek FMiraglia DCrutchfield FGIl1espie CGrimes

.LPlisco Central File PDR.

ED0 r/f 2h l

A 0FC.:NRR

NRR:ADSP
N g :NRR:
N R

(

N D
EDO
... i........:..

lNAME :LPl

CGrimes
DCrutchfield:FM a

S zdk

EMurley
JMTaylor i.....:............:...........:............:..

L....

2/ //90
2///90
2/ /90 2///90 lDATE':1/31/90.
2/1/90
2/(/90 0FFICIAL RECORD COPY Document Name: GABRIEL 154

qV e

Ms. Billie Pirner Garde L

(.

CC:

Mr. Robert F. Warnick Jack R. Newman, Esq.

Assistant Director.

Newman & Holtzinger for Inspection Programs 1615 L Street, NW Comanche Peak Project Division Suite 1000 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.

20036 P. O. Box 1029 Granbury, Texas 76048 Chief. Texas Bureau of Radiation Control Texas Department of Health 1

Regional Administrator, Region IV 1100 West 49th Street L

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Austin, Texas 78756 L

'611 Ryan Plaza Drive. Suite 1000 Arlington, Texas 76011 Honorable George Crump County Judge Glen Rose Texas 76043 Mrs. Juanita Ellis, President j

Citizens Association for Sound Energy Mr. W. J. Cahill, Jr.

1426 South Polk Executive Vice President Dallas, Texas 75224 TU Electric 400 North Olive St., L. B. 81 Dallas, Texas 75201 1

E. F. Ottney P. 0 Box-1777 Glen Rose, Texas 76043 i

Mr. Roger D.-Walker Manager, Nuclear. Licensing 1

Texas Utilities Electric Company 400 North Olive Street, L. B. 81-Dallas. Texas 75201 Texas Utilities Electric Company c/o Bethesda Licensing 3 Metro Center,-Suite 610 Bethesda, Maryland 20814 William A. Burchette, Esq.

Counsel for Tex-La Electric Cooperative of Texas Heron. Burchette, Ruckert & Rothwell 1025. Thomas Jefferson Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20007 L

l

. GDS ASSOCIATES, INC.

t' Suite'720 1850 Parkway Place Marietta, Georgia 30067-8237 t

- --