ML20006C525

Expresses Appreciation in Assuring That Promised Info Re Listed Action Items,Received by 900215,to Support Preparation of Rept Documenting Accomplishments of Project

ML20006C525
Person / Time
Issue date:	01/30/1990
From:	Dennig R NRC OFFICE FOR ANALYSIS & EVALUATION OF OPERATIONAL DATA (AEOD)
To:	Will Smith NUCLEAR ENERGY INSTITUTE (FORMERLY NUCLEAR MGMT &
References
NUDOCS 9002080167
Download: ML20006C525 (2)

Text

hh 2hasi kN g-

, ]M@l 1

UNITED STATES.

4 9

W

-n1 NUCLEAR RE2ULATORY COMMISSION f,

J ' Jt p

wAsHmoToN, D. C. 20666

.t L

~Mr.' Walter Smith i

R_

-Operations and Management Support Services

. Nuclear Management Resources Council

~

-1776 Eye Street, N.W.

Washington. D. C. 20006-2496 l

m-

Dear Mr. Smith:

5 m~

l,

' Below'is a list of. action ite.ns agreed upon by individual ' utilities in the Maintenance Indicator Demonstration Project.

Li (1)-

Southern. California Edison Company (SCE) will review the specific list.

l u

L<,

of equipment monitored by the NRC staff's proposed maintenance indicator.

f'

'for. San Onofre Units 1, 2, and 3 and designate those components that based on SCE's RCM, would be maintained by corrective maintenance only L'

'and would result in a-degraded failure report to NPRDS.

o

+

P

-(2)

.SCE will' provide the component selection methodology and scarch strategy for CFAR analysis.-

.(3)

Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation (RG&E) will prepare a list of.

M equipment, based on their experience with reliability-centered maintenance,:that'in_their veiw should'be monitored with the NRC's

+

proposed maintenance ~ indicator'during the 18-month trtal period.

(4)

. RG8E will1 furnish. two years.of component data for-each of the twelve systems' analyzed toidate within the Ginna Reliability-Centered

~ Maintenance Program.-

(5)-

Duke Power Company will provide information.on their maintenance r

organization (responsibilities for equipment classes), examples of.

failure' trend reports and FAT output, and a method for using CFAR as a trending tool.

'(6)

Although the matter was only discussed during our meeting with Duke Power, we also need. descriptions of the corporate and site maintenance 1

and-maintenance' support' organizations from the other five utility-

_ participants.

In this sense, the.. term " maintenance" refers to the broader definition stated in'the Commission's Maintenance Policy Statement (e.g., shows the relationship to engineering).

y V

YY i</

((

9 ER 6

i mem ess c0W fY r

yy w

'S' s

utwc.

ne;g r.

-r

'JAN 8 01990 i

ur 4

l 10 2-r.

h.

',LWe would appreciate your assistance in assuring that we receive. the promised -

q informatien;by February 15,.1990 to support preparation of our report

- docunenting = the. accomplishments of 'the project..

Sincerely yours, n

Robert L. Dennis, Chief Trends and Patterns Section Trends and Patterns Analysis Branch

+

Office for Analysis and Evaluation s

'of Opc-rational Data-cc:

Tom Tipton,-NUMARC Nikel'Rodin, SCE Thomas.Marlow, RG&E Paul Kuhel, Ceco-Joel Dimmette, SERI o.

' Tom Dente, Northeast Utilities 1

Wayne-Hallman, Duke Power-Jay Wells, INPO Gary Fader, INP0

.\\

Distribution:

' Central File-

.TPAB RF' TNovak VBenaroya MW1111ams RDennig-o

~ PO'Reilly; l

PDR

.x 3

i k...h

'0FC :TPA Q:T

.NAME]: PORE 111y:gep:RDennig

,DATEL: 1/3990'

.:i/)e/90 OFFICIAL-RECORD COPY

[-

2 _..