IR 05000160/1989005

From kanterella
(Redirected from ML20006B562)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Partially Withheld Insp Rept 50-160/89-05 on 890914-15, 18-19 & 27 (Ref 10CFR2.790 & 73.21).Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plans,Procedures & Reviews,Fixed Site Physical Protection of SNM & Repts of Safeguards Events
ML19324B327
Person / Time
Site: Neely Research Reactor
Issue date: 10/25/1989
From: Mcguire D, Penny C, Todd G
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML19324B322 List:
References
50-160-89-05, 50-160-89-5, NUDOCS 8911060052
Preceding documents:
Download: ML19324B327 (2)


Text

{,

y

1 T

,

,

!

-

NDIRlgewrJrtDHentners M,

+

.

'

j'pe nseo\\

J

.-

- -.. - _,,

f;g.

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION y

,

REGION ll

e 101 MARIETTA STREET.N.W.

'

.

,f<

)

ATLANYA, GEORGI A 30323 k*.

.a

.

.

Report Nos.:

50-160 l

Licensee: Georgia Institute of Technology i

225 North Avenue

'

E Atlanta, GA 30332

'

Docket No.:

50-160 License No:

R-97

'

,

r

>

Facility Name: Georgia Tech Research Reactor l

?

Inspection Conducted: September 14-15, 18-19, 27, 1989 l

,

h, h. b

, Safeguards Inspector

/NI'87

' Inspectors:

'

Ms..Cynthi D. Pgny Date Signed

.

N.

9142/M[

/o0 5-8T

'

d6Mr. Gregory

. T@d, Safeguards Inspector Date Signed

"

Approved by:

u

_

/d-4 Nf7 David 1. McGuire. Chief, Safegaurds Section Date Signed.

Nuclear Materials Safety and Safeguards Branch

,

-Division of Radiation h fety and Safeguards

"

SUMMARY

'

' Scope:-

^

-This ' routine inspection was in the areas of plans, procedures, and reviews; fixed site physical protection of special nuclear material of moderate

-

s strategic significance; reports of safeguards events; and material control and accounting, c

~

,

Results:

P/

.six violations were identified in the areas of physical barriers, detection aids, assessment aids, locks and keys, audits, and safeguards event reporting.

Five inspector follow-up items were identified in assessment, power supply,

-

[..

audit, and procedure adequacy (2).

'

l '.

Violation - Failure to maintain assessment equipment in operable e

condition and failure to properly position assessment equipment (two separate examples),

,

2.

Violation - Failure to secure a conteo11ed access barrier.

,

3.

Violation Failure to maintain the alarm system in operable

-

condition.

'

4.

Violation - Failure to change keys as committed.

8911060052 891026

'

mr y

,

. hDR ADOCK0500gO y

g

,

,

.k

--

~

- - -. -

.

-

.

.

')

l

!

,

WAt[ RIAL TRANSMliffD NfRfmTH

,

.

.

l

-

j.. '

CONT 4ths F,793 ggfoRMAf ton

,

e..'

,

'

'

p 5.

Violation - Failure to control keys as committed.

6.

Violation - ta11ure to establish and naintain a safeguards event log.

,

7.

Inspector Follow-up Item - Assessment equipment alignment requires adjustment.

8.

Inspector Follow-up Item Procedural enhancements for physical

-

security program, p:

-

'

9.

Inspector Follow-up Item - Failure to audit the implementation and performance of the security program.

10.

Inspector Follow-up Item - Emergency power load testing,

r f

11.. Inspector Follow-up Item - Procedural enhancements for material

'

control and accounting.

.

7 o

k k

'

e 1'

l CONTAINS 2.790 tNFoRMA1CNWATE

H

-

.-

--