ML20006A366
| ML20006A366 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Seabrook  |
| Issue date: | 01/23/1990 |
| From: | Tompkins B NRC ATOMIC SAFETY & LICENSING APPEAL PANEL (ASLAP) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20006A367 | List: |
| References | |
| CON-#190-9715 2.206, OL, NUDOCS 9001260179 | |
| Download: ML20006A366 (2) | |
Text
N
w Q. p A.1, l DOCKETED USNRC UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR' REGULATORY COMMISSION 30 JMi 23 N0:00 ATOMIC. SAFETY-AND LICENSING APPEAL BOARD Administrative Judges:
[g(( M CgyQ A
BRANCH Alan S. Rosenthal, Chairman January 23, 1990 Thomas S. Moore Howard A. Wilber SERVED JAN 231990 l
)
In the Matter of
)
J l'
i PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF
)
Docket.Nos. 50-443-OL l
NEW HAMPSHIRE, _e_t _a_l.
)
50-444-OL'
-(Seabrook Station, Units 1
-)
.and 2)-
)
)
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Wecare in receipt of the January 11, 1990, letter of j
Patricia Pierce-Bjorklund, enclosing a copy of a July 11, 1989,-letter from-the Board of Selectmen of the Town of Essex, Massachusetts, to the NRC's Advisory Committee on
...e-1 Reactor Safeguards - (ACRS).
Representing that'she had j
I
-prepared the Essex letter, Ms. Pierce-Bjorklund requests i
that "the reactor safety issues cited therein be addressed
=[and] resolved prior to licensing the Seabrook Reactor."
i
?
We are not empowered to grant that relief.
Among other b
L things, Ms. Pierce-Bjorklund (1) is not now a party to the adjudicatory proceeding involving the licensing of the L&
Seabrook facility; (2) has not attempted to satisfy the p
L requirements for obtaining party status at this late date li (see 10 C.F.R. S 2.714 (a) (1)) ; and (3) sirailarly has made no 1
9001260179 900123 ADOCK0500ggg3 I
DR MP u
m
';d 3
- s #.,
2
, o endeavor to" meet the criteria governing motions to reopen L
- records /to consider new issues (see 10 C.F.R. S 2.734).
The Commission's Rules of Practice do, however, authorize "[a)ny person" to. request'the NRC Executive Director for Operations (EDO) to institute a proceeding "to modify, suspend, or revoke a' license,.or for such other action asimay be, proper."
10 C. F. R.'. S 2. 206 (a).
The EDO "will refer the request to the Director of the NRC Office with' responsibility,for the subject matter of the requent l
for1 appropriate action."
Ibid.
That. official must in' turn either act favorably upon the request or advise the person 1
J
- submitting the request of the reasons why such action =ic not j
being.taken.
10 C.F.R. S 2.206 (b).
l In the circumstances, we will treat Ms.-Pierce-
~
Bjorklund's letter as, in effect, a section 2.206 request.
j
.It.is, therefore, referred to the EDO for disposition under
)
i' that section'.
i-p i
It is so ORDERED.
1 L,
FOR THE APPEAL BOARD
)
A_
q, _d Barbara A. Tompkins Secretary to the Appeal Board
,