ML20005F337

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Comments on SALP Repts 50-334/88-99 & 50-412/88-99 for June 1988 - Aug 1989.Formal Human Performance Evaluation Sys Implemented for Systematically Evaluating Human Performance Problems
ML20005F337
Person / Time
Site: Beaver Valley
Issue date: 01/03/1990
From: Sieber J
DUQUESNE LIGHT CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
NUDOCS 9001160191
Download: ML20005F337 (2)


Text

I[

s, ver V; hey Power S tion Shippmpport, PA 15077 0304 i

  • =

a Vic Pta n Wesear Group January 3, 1990 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission l

Attn Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 l

Reference:

Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit No. 1 and No. 2 BV-1 Docket No. 50-334, License No. DPR-66 BV-2 Docket No. 50-412, License No. NPF-73 i

Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance (SALP) l Report Nos. 50-334/88-99 and 50-412/88-99 Gentlemen:

On December 12, 1989 a SALP meeting was held to discuss the NRC SALP Board assessment report ~for Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit 1

and Unit 2.

The SALP report, dated November 24, 1989, assessed station activities for the period June 1, 1988 through August 31, 1989.

Attached are our comments concerning the report and our plans

.to improve performance as discussed at the SALP meeting.

If you ~have any questions concerning this matter, please contact my office.

Very truly yours, b

h.

D.

Sieber l

Vice President Nuclear Group

' Attachment cc:

Mr. J.

Beall, Sr. Resident Inspector Mr. W. T. Russell, NRC Region I Administrator Mr.

P. Tam, Sr. Project Manager Mr. R. Saunders (VEPCO) 9001160191 900103 PDR ADOCK 05000334 1

Q PDC g g e

...n-g a

DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY Nuclear Group a"

Beaver Valley Power Station Units 1 and 2 Reoly to SALP Report NRC SALP Report Nos.

50-334/88-99 and 50-412/88-99 dated November 24, 1989 provided the SALP Board assessment of activities at Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit 1 and Unit 2 for the period of June 1,

1988 through August 31, 1989.

The Summary of Results on pages 3

and 4 of the SALP Report provided an overview of our program strengths and weaknesses.

As summarized, "The challenge for the licensee is to reduce the number of unplanned trips and transients by reducing the number of personnel errors.

Also, the licensee needs to strengthen management oversight and self-assessment capabilities in the area of radiological Controls."

The following plans to improve our performance have been completed or are expected to be completed during 1990:

We have implemented a

formal Human Performance evaluation System for systematically evaluating human performance problems.

We have completed a single-point failure analysis which will be used to reduce reactor trips through enhanced tagging, maintenance, testing or operating procedures.

We are evaluating methods to highlight critical procedural steps which have the potential for producing reactor trips or ESF actuations.

The Operations Department is being re-organized to strengthen the areas of operational support and assessment.

We have evaluated Operations' staffing levels against similar dual-unit facilities and find that our shift staffing levels are adequate.

However, to ensure that there are sufficient qualified personnel for the future, we are planning to start a new class for licensed operator training during 1990.

We will review our Radiological Control supervisory staffing prior to the Unit 2 refueling outage scheduled for September

1990, to determine if staff assignments can be changed to provide more direct Duquesne Light Company supervisory oversight.

We will evaluate the feasibility of implementing " Rad Con Quality Assessors" to provide Duquesne Light Company supervisory oversight of critical tasks.