ML20005B809

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Suppl 2 to Environ Rept,Ol Stage
ML20005B809
Person / Time
Site: Perry  
Issue date: 08/27/1981
From:
CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20005B808 List:
References
ENVR-810930, NUDOCS 8109020292
Download: ML20005B809 (40)
v • d • e


Text

. _

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMIS O

l PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNITS 1 & 2 i

$NVIRONMENTAL l

O l

OPERATING LICENSE STAGE SUPPLEMENT 2 SEPTEMBER 1981

" ' C "" * " " "'C" C '"""" #"" #

O l

D D

00 40 l

C PDR l

' THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMIN ATING COMPANY P o BOX 5000 e CLEVEL AND. OHIO 44101 e TELEPHONF,216) 622-9800 e ILLUMIN ATING BLDG e 55 PUBLIC SOUARE Serving The Best Location in the Nation Dalwyn R. Davidson vtCE FHE SIDENT Sv5fE M ENGINE E R AG AND CONSTRUCfiON August 27, 1981 Mr. Robert L. Tedesco, Assistant Director for Licensing Diviaton of Licensing Of fice of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.

20555 Perry Nuclear Power Plant Docket Nos. 50-440; 50-441 Response to Revised ER-OL Review Questions

Dear Mr. Tedesco:

This letter and the enclosed forty-one (41) copies of PNPP ER-OL f-s

(\\ '

Supplement 2 are submitted in response to your letter dated July 31, 1981 concerning the Environmental Report - Operating License stage review.

Also enclosed is an af fidavit that direct distribution of copies of t

Supplement 2 to the Environmental Report - Operating License Stage has been made.

Very truly yours, Dalwy R. Davidson Vice President System Engineering and Construction DRD:jcs Enclosures cc:

G. Charnoff, Esq.

D. Hauser, Esq.

NRC Resident Inspector O

1

O Dalwyn R. Daviason who, being duly sworn, deposed and said that (1) he is Vice President, System Engineering and Construction of The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company, (2) he is duly authorized to execute and file this report on behalf of The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company and as duly authorized agent for Duquesne Light Company, Ohio Edison Company, Pennsylvania Power Compsny and the Toledo Edison Company, and (3) the statements set forth therein are true and correct to the best of his knowledge, information and belief.

$wynR.Davidson O

27 l AUGUST

,1981.

b day of Sworn to and subscribed before me, this U6 vv J059H C. 5ZWEJKCWSK!

Notary rutilir $bte et Onie %ya. at,.

My Commission Empires July 14. 1986 O

~-

i O

sore'zaENT 2 INSTRUCTION SHEET PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNITS 1 AND 2 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT OPERATING LICENSE STAGE The following listed pages and figures of the Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company's Environmental Report Operating License Stage for the Perry Nuclear Power Plant are to be removed and replaced, where applicable, with revised sheets 9/1/81.

i O

J O

PNPP ER/OL, Sup. 2 9/1/81

Section Remove Pages Insert Supplemental Pages

(

2.1 2.1-6 2.1-6 2.1-24 2.1-24 to 2.1-24a 2.1-25 to 2.1-29 2.1-25 to 2.1-29 Q&R Q&R i QER i to Q&R 11 Q&R 2.1 Q&R 2.1-8 to 2.1-22 i

Q&R 2.6 Q&R 2.6-1 to 2.6-8 Q&R 3.4 Q&R 3.4-1 to 3.4-2 Q&R 5.5 Q&R 5.5-3 Q&R 6.2 Q&R 6.2-2 O

! (^)

PNPP ER/OL, Sup. 2 9/1/81

2.1.2.3 Transient Population O

Transient populations within 10 miles of the plant are primarily the result of local, seasonal fluctuations of people at various parks and camps.

Large recreational areas such as Township Park near Madison, and Headlands State Park, 7.5 miles west-southwest of the plant, offer a variety of facilities that also attract visitors from outside the 10-mile radius.

Table 2.1-2 gives ae annual attendance figures for significant parks and camps near the site.(43)

Lake County has approximately 275 vacant and seasonal cottages, about 190 of which are located west of the site.

These totals are assumed to be relatively static, although no current figures are available.I44)

Geneva-on-the-Lake, in Ashtabula County, has 1,330 housing units, 783 of which are rental structures. (45)

The Neff-Perkins Corporation, located 3,000 feet west-southwest of the PNPP, employs a work force of 130 persons.(46)

()

The average residence time at work is 45 hours5.208333e-4 days <br />0.0125 hours <br />7.440476e-5 weeks <br />1.71225e-5 months <br /> per week for each I47) employee.

This includes a 40-hour work week and approximately 5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br /> per week for lunch and miscellaneous time at the work site.

Formerly, the IRC Fibers Company was the only other manufacturing facility located in close proximity to PNPP employing a work force exceeding 100 people.

The company discontinued operations August 31, 1980, and now employs only two individuals.(48) 2.1.3 USES OF ADJACENT LANDS AND WATERS 2.1.3.1 Use of Land Immediately Adjacent to the PNPP This section describes land and water uses adjacent to the PNPP.

Figure 2.1-3 is a topographic map of toe site and adja-( cent area. It shows key water-and land-use features, the PNPP ER/OL, Sup. 2 2.1-6 9/1/81

References for Section 2.1.2.3 ER/OL Update 5-81 O 37. Personal communication, Jim Schmidt (Ohio Geologic Survey, Well Log Division, Columbus), September 26, 1978. 38. Personal communication, Art Waldorf (Coastal Zone Program, Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Columbus), September 29, 1978. 39. Personal communication, Stanley J. Prazer (Bureau Chief, Bureau of Water, City of Erie, Pennsylvania), March 3, 1980. 40. Personal communication, Ralph Vanzant (Chief, Division of Parks and Recreation, Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Colubmus), October 5,1978. 41. Waterborne Commerce of the United States, Calendar Year (} 1976, Part 3, " Waterways and Harbors - Great Lakes," U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg, Mississippi. 42. Personal communication, Katie Crowell (Ohio Geological Survey, Well Log Division, Columbus), Cctober 4, 1978. 43. Personal communication between R. Webster, Lake County Planning Commission, and R. Smyth, NUS Corporation, February 25, 1901. 44. Personal communication between R. Webster, Lake County Planning Commission, and R. Smyth, NUS Corporation, May 26, 1981. 45. Personal communication between L. Carter, Village Clerk, Geneva-on-the-Lake, and R. Smyth, NUS Corporation, May 27, 1981. O PNPP ER/OL, Sup. 2 2.1-24 9/1/81

i 46. Personal communication between R. Pohl, Meff-Perkins Corporation, () and R. Schlegel, NUS Corporation, May 27, 1981. 47. Personal communication between R. Elley, Vice President, Neff-Perkins Corporation, and R. Uleck, NUS Corporation, November 16, 1979. 48. Personal communication between T. Robinson, IRC Fibers Company, and R. Schlegel, NUS Corporation, May 26, 1981. 49. Personal communication between P. Vichosky, Headlands Beach State Park, and R. Smyth, NUS Corporation, May 26, 1981. O o PNPP ER/OL, Sup. 1 2.1-24a 9/1/81

TABLE 2.1-1 O TOWNS AND CITIES WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE PNPP 1980 Distance (miles) Direction From Town / City (Ohio) Population (a) From Plant Site Plant Site 0-5 MILES FROM PNPP North Perry 897 1 E Perry 961 3 S 5-10 MILES FROM PNPP Madisor. 2,291 6 ESE Painecville City 16,391 7 SW Fairport Harbor 3,357 8 WSW Grand River 412 9 WSW 10-20 MILES FROM PNPP Geneva-on-the-Lake 1,634 11 ENE Geneva 6,655 11 E Mentor-on-the-Lake 7,919 14 WSW Kirtland Hills 506 15 SW g' Mentor 42,065 15 SW Chardon 4,434 16 SSW Aquilla 355 18 S Ashtabula City 23,449 18 ENE Rock Creek 652 18 SE Willoughby City 19,329 18 SW Waite Hill 529 19 SW Eastlake 22,104 19 SW Lakeline 258 19 WSW Timberlake 885 19 WSW l 20-30 MILES FROM PNPP Jefferson 2,952 20 ESE Willowick City 17,834 21 SW Willoughby Hills 8,612 22 SW Burton' 1,401 23 S Kirtland 5,969 23 SW Wickliffe 16,790 23 SW Gates Mills 2,236 24 SW l Kingsville Township 2,146 24 ENE Middlefield 1,997 24 S Orwell 1,067 24 SE O PNPP ER/OL, Sup. 2 2.1-25 9/1/61

TABLE 2.1-1 (continued) TOWNS AND CITIES WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE PNPP 1980 Distance (miles) Direction From Town / City (Ohio) Population (a) From Plant Site Flant Site 20-30 MILES FROM PNPP (con't) Euclid 59,999 25 SW Highland Heights 5,739 25 SW Richmond Heights City 10,095 25 SW Mayfield 3,577 26 SW North Kingsville 2,939 26 ENE Hunting Valley 786 27 SSW Chagrin Falls City 4,335 28 SSW Lyndhurst 18,092 28 SW Moreland Hills 3,083 28 SSW Pepper Pike 6,177 28 SW South Euclid 25,713 28 SW South Russell 2,784 28 SSW Beachwood City 9,983 29 SW Bratenahl 1,485 29 SW East Cleveland City 36,957 29 SW University Heights 15,401 29 SW Woodmere 772 29 SW 30-40 MILES FROM PNPP Bentleyville 381 31 SSW Cleveland Heights 56,438 31 SW Shaker Heights 32,487 31 SW West Farmington 563 31 SSE Andover 1,205 33 ESE Cleveland 573,822 33 SW North Randall 1,054 33 SW Warrensville Heights 16,565 33 SW Bedford Heights 13,214' 34 SW Hiram 1,360 34 S Solon City 14,341 34 SSW Bedford City 15,056 36 SW Glenwillow 492 36 SSW Maple Heights 29,735 36 SW Reminderville 1,960 36 SSW Garfield Heights 33,380 37 SW Garrettsville 1,769 37 S Newburgh Heights 2,678 37 SW Oakwood 3,786 37 SSW Cuyahoga Heights 739 38 SW Macedonia 6,571 38 SSW Mantua 1,041 38 S p Twinsburg 7,632 38 SSW ( \\./ I PNPP ER/OL, Sup. 2 2.1-26 9/1/81

TABLE 2.1-1 (continued) () TOWNS AND CITIES WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE PNPP 1980 Distance (miles) Direction From Town / City (Ohio) Population (a) From Plant Site Plant Site 30-40 MILES FROM PNPP (con ' t) Walton Hills 2,199 38 SW Valley View 1,576 38 SW Brooklyn Heights 1,653 39 SW Cortland 5,011 39 SE Independence 8,165 39 SW Windham 3,721 39 S Town / City (Pennsylvania) 30-40 MILES FROM PNPP Linesville 1,198 39 ESE Town / City (Ohio) 40-50 MILES FROM PNPP Streetsboro 9,055 41 SSW (_, Seven Hills 13,650 41 SW Linndale 129 41 SW Brooklyn 12,342 42 SW Lakewood 61,963 42 WSW Warren 56,629 43 SSE Boston Heights 781 43 SSW l Brecksville 10,132 43 SW l Newton Falls 4,960 44 SSE Sugar Bush Knolls 201 44 SSE Hudson 4,615 44 SSW Broadview Heights 10,920 44 SW Parma 92,548 44 SW Parma Hoights 23,112 44 SW Rocky River 21,084 44 WSW Orangeville 223 46 SE Ravenna 11,987 46 S l Brady Lake 470 46 SSW Peninsula 604 46 SSW North Royalton 17,671 47 SW Fairview Park 19,311 47 WSW Niles City 23,088 48 SSE Craig Beach 1,657 48 S Silver Lake 2,915 48 SSW () PNPP ER/OL, Sup. 2 2.1-27 9/1/81

l TABLE 2.1-1 (continued) TOWNS AND CITIES WITHIN 50 MILES OF THE PNPP 1980 Distance (miles) Direction From Town / Cit.y (Ohio) Population (a) From Plant Site Plant Site 40-50 MELES FROM PNPP Richfield 3,437 48 SW Middleburg Heights 16,218 48 SW Brook Park 26,195 48 SW Westlake 19,483 48 WSW North Olmsted 36,486 48 WSW Bay Village 17,846 48 WSW Yankee Lake 99 49 SE Munroe Falls 4,731 49 SSW Berea City 19,567 49 SW Mcdonald 3,744 50 SSE Strongsville 28,577 50 SW Avon Lake 13,222 50 WSW Town / City (Pennsylvania) 40-50 MILES FROM PNPP ) Springboro 557 41 E Conneautville 971 41 E Albion 1,818 42 E Cranesville 703 43 E Jamestown 854 43 ESE Platea 492 44 ENE Lake City 2,384 45 ENE Girard 2,615 45 ENE Conneaut Lake 767 46 ESE Greenville 7,730 48 SE Fairview 1,855 49 ENE (a) Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1980 Census of Population and Housing, Final Reports: 1. PHC80-V-37, Ohio 2. PHC80-V-40, Pennsylvania ) PNPP ER/OL, Sup. 2 2.1-28 9/1/81

j i TABLE 2.1-2 MAJOR CAMPS AND PARKS WITHIN 10 MILES OF-THE PNPP 1 Approrf. mate Peak Transient Distance Park or Camp Population (miles) Direction North Perry Park 50 (a) summer 1 ENE Perry Township Park 50(a) summer 1 WSW Parmly Park 50(a) summer 1 WSW Camp Roosevelt 150 (b) summer 1.4 WSW Lake Shore Park 50 *I I summer 2 ENE CYO Camp Issac 350 (c) summer 2.5 ENE Camp Wingfoot 50(a) summer 2.5 ENE Township Park, Madison 60,000 (d) 6 ENE Headlands Beach St. Park 1,110,000(0) 7.5 WSW (a) Small parks for which no attendance records are kept; a mating the total peak. g tion of 50 is assumed for esti-summer weekend peak po (b) Estimated 150 per 4-week camping period during summer.(43) i (c) Estimated 350 per 1-week camping period during summer. (43) l (d) 1978 estimated annual attendance, no recent figures available.I44) (e) 1980 annual attendance.I49) l l (O l PNPP ER/OL, Sup. 2 2.1 29 9/1/81 i l

QUESTIONS AND RESPONSES (Q&R) (} INDEX NRC Q&R QUESTION TOPIC SUPPLEMENT PAGE NO. Request for Additional Information, June 9, 1981 1 240.00 Hydrologic Engineering 240.01 1 2.1-1 to 2.1.2 240.01 1 5.2-1 240.02 1 2.4-1 to 2.4-4 240.03 1 7.1-1 290.00 Terrestrial Resources 290.01 1 3.9-1 290.02 1 2.1-6 to 2.1-7 290.03 1 C.1-12 to 5.1-13 290.04 1 5.1-14 290.05 1 5.1-15 290.06 1 5.5-1 to 5.5-2 290.07 2 6.2-2 290.08 2 5.5-3 290.09 2 3.4-1 to 3.4-2 291.00 Aquatic Resources 291.01 1 2.2-1 to 2.2-2 291.02 1 2.1-3 to 2.1-5 f~%) 291.03 1 3.4-1 s_/ 291.04 1 2.2-3 291.05 1 2.2-4 291.06 1 2.2-5 to 2.2-6 291.07 1 2.2-7 to 2.2-8 ?19.00 Socioeconomic 311.01 2 2.1-8 to 2.1-10 310.02 2 2.1-11 to 2.1-18 310.03 2 2.1-9 to 2.1-22 310.04 2 2.6-1 to 2.6-7 310.05 2 2.6-8 320.00 Need for Power, Alternatives and Cost Benefit Summary 320.01 1 1.1-1 320.02 1 1.1-2 320.03 1 1.1-3 320.04 1 1.3-1 320.05 1 1.3-2 320.06 1 1.3-3 320.07 1 1.1-4 320.08 1 11.2-1 1 320.09 1 1.1-5 l 320.10 1 1.1-6 l (2) 1 PNPP ER/OL, Sup. 2 i 9/1/81

--= QUESTIONS AND RESPONSES (Q&R) INDEX (Continued) NRC Q&R QUESTION TOPIC SUPPLEMENT PAGE NO. Request for Additional Information, June 9, 1981 451.00 Meteorology 451.01 1 2.3-1 451.02 1 5.1-1 i 451.03 1 5.1-2 to 5.1-5 451.04 1 5.1-6 to 5.1-11 451.05 1 6.1-1 451.06 1 6.2-1 O i i i i I PNPP ER/OL, Sup. 2 11 9/1/81

310-01 Update the population forecasts in Figures 2.1-9 to (]) (2.1) 2.1-17 OL/ER, using the 1980 perliminary census count. Using the 1980 census count, update the population centers within 50 mile radius of PNPP, as found in Table 2.1-1 in OL/ER. In addition, update the transient population estimates found in Table 2.1-2 and Section 2.1.2.3, OL-ER. , Response The population forecasts reflected in Figure 2.1-9 ER/OL are considered to be reasonably comparsble to (within 10 percent of) the 1980 final census data. This conclusion is based on attached Tables A and B. In light of this data, updates of projected population estimates in Figures 2.1-9 to 2.1-17 are deemed to be unnectssary. Updates of the population centers within a 50-mi'e radius of {)T PNPP, as found in Table 2.1-1 ER/OL, were perforn.4 d usirig the 1980 final census count. In addition, specif1. transient popula-tion estimates found in Table 2.1-2 and Sectica 2.1.2.3 ER/OL were brought up to date. (These pages are revised in Section 2.1) l O PNPP fr./OL, Sup. 2 Q&R 2.1-8 9/1/81

Table A (} Comparisons of County Population Data ER/OL 1980 County (Ohio) Projections 1980 Census % Difference Astabula 111,922 104,215 -6.9 Cuyahoga 1,556,439 1,498,295 -3.7 Geauga 68,607 74,474 8.6 Lanc 201,556 211,801 5.6 Lorain 272,455 274,909 0.9 Mahoning 306,186 289,487 -5.4 Medina 107,004 113,150 5.7 Portage 134,184 135,856 1.2 Summit 508,454 524,472 3.2 Trumbull 241,270 241,863 0.2 Total 3,508,077 3,469,522 -1.1 County (Pennsylvania) Crawford 88,844 08,869 0.03 O' Erie 280,031 279,780 -0.09 Mercer 132,002 128,299 -2.8 Total 500,877 496,948 -0.8 O PNPP ER/OL, Sup. 2 Q&R 2.1-9 9/1/81

Table B Population Distribution (Based on Towns and Cities from Table 2.1 PNPP ER/OL Update) Estimated i 1975 Population Radius (mi.) ER/OL 1980 Population % Difference 0-5 1,877 1,858 -1.0 5-10 23,067 22,451 -2.7 10-20 129,143 130,774 1.3 20-30 285,031 268,921 -5.7 30-40 906,320 839,792 -7.3 40-50 623,338 610,398 -2.1 O i O PNPP ER/OL, Sup. 2 Q&R 2.1-10 9/1/81

310.02 Update the OL-ER Figures 2.1-18 and 2.1-20, which (2.1) provides zoning designations and actual and future land use plans for a 10 mile radius of the plant. Identify any changes in these land use plans that may affect the pattern of population growth.

Response

Figures 2.1-18 and 2.1-20 provide land-use information out to 5 miles. Land-use data for the entire State of Ohio are available from the State Department of Natural Resources. A computerized mapping system (OCAP: Ohio Capability Analysis Program) provides land-use according to level 2 of the Anderson system (U.S. Geological. Survey Circular 671). The user specifies the center and radius and the computer prints a map describing all of the land use within the specific area. For the purpose of this question, the center is Perry and the radius is 10 miles. The computer also presents summary statistics for the areas chosen. The data for OCAP have been obtained from 1972 USGS topographic \\sse maps (and in some cases more recent survey flights); the results give a general idea of the predominant land uses in the vicinity of the plant. The data are shown on Figure 310.02A. Table 310-02A presents the 1972 summary statistics for the area. The largest portion, 63 percent, was devoted to cropland and pasture. Nearly 19 percent of the area was forested and about 17 percent was developed. Assuming that Lake County is following national trends, the percentage of land in agricultural uses ( has declined while the urban area has increased since 1972. l This assumption is reinforced by the more recent information provided in the 1980 Census Advance Counts. Between 1970 and 1980, the number of housing units in Lake County increased by 30.8 percent, from 57,485 to 75,166. Concord Township, the north eastern portion of which is within 10 miles of the PNPP, ( experienced the highest rate of increase. (See Figure 310-02B I 1 l PNPP ER/OL, Sup. 2 Q&R 2.1-11 9/1/81

and Table 310-02B.) During the decade the number of housing (} units rose by 115.3 percent, from 1,552 to 3,341. In general, the number of housing units in the townships and incorporated areas increased at a faster rate (or decreased at a slower rate) than population. This corresponds to the national trend of decreasing household size. A number of townships experienced a decrease in population, including Painesville Township, directly to the east of the plant. The number of housing units also declined in this township from 4,753 to 4,512 (-5.1%). Perry Township, the site of the plant, had a moderate population increase. The housing figures for the townships within Ashtabula and Geauga Counties within 10 miles of the plant are also presented in Table 310.02B. It can be seen from this figure that many of the jurisdictions in the vicinity of the plant are growing rather slowly. According to the Lake County Planning Commission, this slow growth will continue in the Perry area in the foreseeable future, particularly (-] if only limited sewer lines are added. G' Of the three counties within the 10-mile radius of the PNPP, Ashtabula has the most recent officially adopted land-use plan. This plan was adopted by the County Council in 1977 and covers all unincorperated areas of the County, including Geneva, Harpers-field, and Trumbull Townships, portions of which fall within 10 miles of the plant. However, there is no requirement that township policies or resolutions be consistent with the plan, and conversations with local planning officials indicate that l the townships generally do not give much consideration to the plan. Lake County officially adopted its lend-use plan in 1960. As with Ashtabula County and all other Ohio Counties, the Lake County Council does not have jurisdiction over the townships, and the townships have the right to pass zoning resolutions which are not consonant with this plan. If a township proposes t PNPP ER/OL, Sup. 2 Q&R 2.1-12 9/1/81 l

an ordinance that the County Planning commission considers incon-() sistent with the County Plan, the Commission notifies the town-ship. The township is required to inform the public of this finding at a public hearing but need not modify the ordinance. Figure 2.1-20 of the ER/OL, Proje'cted Land Use Within 5 Miles of the PNPP, is not taken from the 1960 Lake County Plan but is the part of the regional 208 Plan developed by the county for the North East Ohio Areawide Coordinating Agency (NOACA, the 208 planning agency for the region). The 208 Plan is not intended for official adoption and, therefore, does not represent county policy, but is simply a projection of the extent and location of future growth. The projections contained in the 208 Plan have not been changed. Lake County has developed new plans for certain townships but none have been adopted. Thus, the only official county plan in the county is the 1960 Plan, much of which is currently out of date. In Geauga County (where Thompson Township falls within the 10-mile radius of the plant) a land-use plan was developed in the 1960's but never officially adopted by the county. It is now out of date, according to the Geauga County Planning Commission. Thus, no changes have occured in the plans of Lake, Ashtabula, ot Geauga Counties since 'he ER/OL was written. The area remains predominantly rural and growth has been rather slow. Planning officials expect that this pattern of growth will continue in the foreseeable future. l O PNPP ER/OL, Sup. 2 Q&R 2.1-13 9/1/81

References 1. Personal conversation between David Gilmer (Lake County Planning Commission and Louis DiMento (NUS Corporation) (5/9/81; 7/17/81) 2. Personal conversation between Raymond Shore (Ashtabula County Planning Commission) and Louis DiMento (NUS Corporation) (7/17/81) 3. Personal conversation between Greg Parress (Geauga County Planning Commission and Louis DiMento (NUS Corporation) (6/5/81) 4. Personal conversation between David Crecelius (Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Resource Analysis Section) and Louis DiMento (NUS Corporation) (6/9/81) O 5. Personal conversation between Mitchell Mize (Northeast Ohio Areawide Coordinating Agency) and aouis DiMento (NUS Corporation) (6/25/81) l O PNPP ER/OL, Sup. 2 Q&R 2.1-14 9/1/81

Table 310.02A Land Uses Within 10 Miles of the (]) Perry Nuclear Power Plant

  • Acres Percent Residential 7,820 8.04 Commercial and Services 1,447 1.49 Industrial 1,205 1.24 Transportation, Communications, and Utilities 2,654 2.73 Mixed Urban or Built-Up Land 1,336 1.37 Other Urban or Built-Up Land 1,985 2.01 Cropland and Pasture 61,258 63.05 Orchards, Groves, Vineyards, Nurseries, and Other Horticultural Areas 472 0.49 Confined Feeding Operations 17,893 18.39 Deciduous Forest Land 260 0.27 Evergreen Forest Land 60 0.06 O

Mixed Forest Land 12 0.08 Lakes 12 0.01 Reservoirs 161 0.17 Strip Mines, Quarries, and Gravel Pits 320 0.33 Transitional Areas 302 0.31 97,315 99.99 I

  • Excluding 102,257 acres of Lake Erie O

PNPP ER/OL, Sup. 2 Q&R 2.1-15 9/1/81 .. ~ - ~

l Table 310.02B Population and Number of Housing Units for the Jursidictions in the vicinity of the Perry Nuclear Power Plant, 1970 and 1980, and Percent Changes, 1970 to 1980 Housing Units Percent 1980 1970 Change Lake County 75,166 57,485 30.8 Concord Township 3,341 1,552 115.3 Eastlake City 7,310 5,678 28.7 Fairport Harbor Village 1,403 1,335 5.1 Grand River Village 155 187 -17.1 Kirtland City 1,988 1,544 28.8 Kirtland Hills Village 167 124 34.7 Lakeline Village 90 66 36.4 Leroy Township 816 494 65.2 Madison Township 5,214 4,201 24.1 Madison Village 779 508 53.3 Mentor City 14,147 10,404 36.0 Mentor-on-the-Lake City 2,557 1,761 45.2 North Perry Village 280 249 12.4 Painesville City 6,509 5,502 18.3 O-Painesville Township 4,512 4,753 -5.1 Perry Township 1,662 1,305 27.4 Perry Village 300 245 22.4 Timberlake Village 300 243 23.5 Waite Hill Villag? 190 159 19.5 Wickliffe City 5,540 5,525 0.3 l Willoughby City 7,749 6,013 28.9 Willoughby Hills City 3,989 1,937 105.9 Willowwick City 6,168 5,730 7.6 Ashtabula County 40,528 33,835 19.8 Geneva City 2,341 1,979 18.3 Geneva-on-the-Lake City 1,337 1,063 25.8 Geneva Township 1,481 1,277 16.0 Harpersfield Township 867 516 68.0 Trumbull Township 450 303 48.5 Geauga County 24,252 17,878 35.7 Thompson Township 683 530 28.9 l l l PNPP ER/OL, Sup. 2 Q&R 2.1-16 9/1/81

a_ a s__ m3 a I. e--- 44 0X00--**COOO----~~>

gg.g-QQ--

-..pg>= qq----....4-....-------...S---- .-.qqqq-O-------- 3-------- g-( 3---- --g---------_-O----- gg_--- ---.------g--

.--g--

i f -;eee-----------------3----------- g

~~-------

"""_ p-----------------------g>.----... ' -.--ggg--gg-------------

gg--.

g=--g->>---

-.--qq.. Y---g>

.-.----g

---g.gg.ge--------- g. " " ~ 7 --- - - g - - --. - - --O - g. - Z y g > -- --- 4 4 - - q 4 4 4 4 --,----------------g.---g-----.444-4g4g44; - ~~c---------------------g--gg--4g_ g.----l OO------O----------....m---.--.4--..--- 70-------------------- s---.--e---4.>--- ^ - ~~---------gg--g----g--g--..--g-g--->--- g [ 7ee-----g...--g-------g--g.--g--------- ~ ce-------4..--r--- ---m--..------**--- C,ew- --...*--x---r---o--. ",te a u d - mO-------ggg--g--- ---g--ggg------------ ~7-------44.--X----KO-e---------On----- ^ 70-----C .*--L---12--o---------------- ^ ~ ~ "O-----O--g--gg--ggEgy3

g--------:

~

  • OO--O--g-y---g xzz-me-- --4.--------;Q--C-- -I-----.c-C-4.gg==-..--------,

m---O----g---g-- ---.w..---g w a s O--o--..s-----<.-OC--o- = m---....------ CoQew ..r--------c---..-- ------C---m---....------- OcOO-

; g
OO---

__ __-- _-..O----e--..-._-----.' NOOMO--- -O---es-.

a

.--O--_-e-g a y-

a 30----

O.-q.4 ---..---'

Q-.e--O-----g-

c-

^ ^ _~.; --O--- qq=3g-----.---i "~ ' _ ~ q

g

~ --C--- -g.4=g-.----4-- -O---_--_ ___...-...___-._.o _ a ; _ ; ; 1 4, --..----._.o = --- __-- _----..--se--_-_m _---*--.

; ; m a d 2 1 s q2 x

.e._.-_-; . -- a _y- = i a ; ga r----4.----g-----------gge- -..---=g--------------..-- SS- ~ d ? " d d

  1. 1 4 u

= 4 4 d e a u ; ; ; 5 .e.l Z [ ~ 1--< ---O --l ~ = ~ s a a s a i-l- a i a i a:- s

C------

-.--.._s ^- --d = sad d d i-a d d s a d a 1 1 a i d i c a . a a 1 1 a d a d-1 da 1 1 -2 4 1 ..--.a\\ 1 1P s de

O

---O

..e---M 1 4% 1 1 5 d d

2 E 1 1 1 d 2 1 4 1 J J 3 1 1 1 5 -1 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 i i l 1Nq g--------------------g.3-.s A-g i s a -..----O-P2-3Ja d

r -

- - - 2 4 1-2 s 1d a s a a d- ---C--C-------- ad sy ..---C--O------

...I

^ ^ d 1 s a d 1 m s ss- =4 m a a l aa-mp' 1d s a s a 2 d-p----O--------------g..- s ~

.-.es..M

^~ ~ ~ - ' ~ 3 1 J aa 2 3 '1 d j e ;= d 's 1

, a e -

- 2 1 2-g .a 1 43 1 m a y d d s s e d d s m a d sr - _- -_---c-- _--_-...- _sa J. s m / o d a a s dd r 2 4 2 1 d 2 2 2 --CC_-- -...__- o m a d 1 = 1 d a a s a m a d d -4d d

. dd

- a 1 T d 2 d d 2 y h -_*-----DO---O--. _-..-O f: 1, 1 d 1 a 2 2 d 4 2 .-----OC---COO-- ...c A2 ~ 2 d 3 1 d J 1 d e d -t.4.----OC-DOO.3---CC-.C 1d d 1 3 2 1 2 J I J 2 Tdd s J f O S.----OCC-0 -..-C-C WW ~1 d d d d J J d 2J 4

)

~ ~ ~ d a d d d 3 d d d d 16 14 u 2 5 2 s d a d 1 a a s s a a s a a d a } )- - a a s a.s a id 1 1d a 2d s ase

e=O--O--..-O--c d s a

--_-.CC_-C--.._--.c Ow-.3 O..< ~ ^ ^ = a a a ? ' A' dd a n ta M 2 5 1 2d Gd 1 24 lb 0 + _ _- _ _E.n n. w-C C - - w _ w e. c -1 a 1 =- -= .= = _--------SO-DO-OCWWO C 3 d 1 J d a d d d J d 21G 1 d 1 1 d 21t2 1 1 2 1 T'T 2 1 2 2 2d f 2 3rTd 21 2 1 d I T g s --C----canggwCCwwc C ww g 2=----=QCw0--=Ow3.OC( 2 3 2 3 2~ 2~ 1 2~ 1 1 1's 1 r2 212 1 1 1 3 1 4 1'4 " e 4 2 4 * " " d 1 4"

  • 14 1 2 1 1~

4 % u G" ~ 1 2~ d ~dOOOOnnmatann ..Q...d " COB-CM-889--. e = e " ~ ~ ~ _" l T - ~ ~ 1 : 2 5u d 1 4 5 d 2 14 d 1 3 1 * * " - ^ 1 ^ = G s 59****WeOwww.CTCC W-wwwe>SCeme. ^ 01C3 = 2 E J- "d -****wsCmwwCC2-- 2 4 2d 1 2 2 3 2J J 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 2 d"J d J~ 1 1 T~5d d 2 2 2 iG~ a d Id t - e " ~ ~ 3d id ~ 2 3 d 2 Wd~d~d G 3~d~ 1 1 1 4 1 4'3 3 1 1~ G s ~ a G 3 1 2d 2 3 d 2 =64+6M9COMO3DL==a d ~ r J qpd d5#+*MCBCwCCD1wCc e 2.-. E - ~ ' A 2 d = T i d 2~ d- ~ ~1 1 2d d 'T 2 2 dT T Ed d d @@OMMOSOww3DOOCC TL2d T dd 3 - T T d d 2 2 d T T ~

2d 2 5d dddda n***+#CCwwC-CCCCC

+++HWQ3CEO-DCO=G id = = ^ ^ ~ ^

3 2 d d 1 3 3 1 G 1 3~

2 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 d 5 41-1 2 4 eeenng.wge-CCCgC ~ age

  • nn a

m i 2'1 2 1d Tr1 2 1 T 1 2 id .i i 1^ O # # 3 empeup w A @O-- S C'- 1 r ^ = a J~ G G e G

  • d J 2

i.i" G1)EJ ef 1>1\\Gd G 14-d a

CON 9wC-Gente-8EC m,

G= ^ i d _i 1 1 1 1 45 1d 1 1 1 14 3 1 1 5 23 1 1 5 1 1ww3Onuw-=-w+8-=a n,eegeoecc--gag..e = e ~ ~.= 2 dan sa na I T + " ~ i a d I__ _d rT 3 J I 1 7 1 1 T

  1. # 4
  • e ww CC = = B S., --

Zd e J W.a e.e a.a g - - - g win n

== met .* mnd wa S5--S. ,2E#C.S.S.eSSSD e a 5 3 m a 't 1 't 3 d 1a i siG 2 r1 T 't 1 T 2 if 2 1 i i ? = r a dd d 2 d EE ad c 1 1 a d a 3^ ~ 3 2 1 d a 1 2.1 1 i i d a -J

I
1 J 1 I EIZ ndOw&..--ee 1 1 e

~ = - u da s. anu G duna J 2 1 \\MkKG cam.--- m m nv ^ 4d G 1 5 11 1 1 1 1 2 6 1 - _ r.Op = DO Ad1 6 G 1 6 d 4 1 3

  • 4

~ w e.. Tdd d d 2 d d d 11 d T T d I d 4 T d T 1 1 5 T d I T'2 1 5 1d 1 30 >1 a b d h d $1 d n wer 1 J u da ;ae 5 1 dd 3 d 7- _1,d 3 t2 LIl dd 1 a

UCITIDIiUn & &Tl 4 4 4 83TTTa m aa l i I a s i i i i i i a e i i a s c i s e s ec- # o c a i i i a i i c a rTuam. 00nco004&ll&&&44&llacal 46444184All4&la4411lllll14Alaalleill4&lil&&All 000c44tll144441110144441144144A11444444&ll1111111111tilll4&&lllill U001111114444100111144111144141111114441611111111111111WM8118ll c4&lu00l44100111111111 111111111114&&l111111 1&&l11111111111 111 f1010004 4 4 4 41111111118 4 4111 l l 118 4 4 l l 11 l l 11411111 l l l e = 1 1000044444444444441114411111$ll844411111114111144411 &444411114&&&444811444111414444444lll1111&l19444 00114&4&&&&& llilll&414414&441144&lllll4&ll &&amel&&ollilllllleill4&ollll44tl114 sel44&llllllOlllililletililli 41111111111U16411 STATE nf OHIO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES OHIO CAPARILIty ANALYSIS pRnGRAH e oe/17/81 e e L EGEN O e CELL *!DTH(FT): 1040 CELL HLIGRT(>T): 120 a reqR rw OATA "Ap CunE NUMBER PERCENT OF CODE SvdMOL DESCRIPTION OF CELLS STUDY AREA A RE A ( A C rF.3 ) x 100 2 78 5 11 00 RESTOENTIAL 239 3 88 12 Et COMMERCIAL AND SLRv!CE S se Q 72 4 L4 13 ft INDUSTRIAL 37 o 60 L20 14 se TRANSPORTATION, Cnm=UNICATIONS, AND UTILItidS 145 1 32 a 4 16 Hw mixF0 URBAN UR Sul T-uP LAND 43 J 66 L e 17 OTMFH URBAN UR Rot T-UP LAND 62 0 99 4 21 11 CRUPLAND AND PASTU E 2020 31 36 63 6 22 YT ORCHIPDS, GROVES, VINEVAROS, NURSERIES, AND URN. HilR T. ARFAS 15 0 23 7 17e v} 9 23 FF CONFINED FtFDING OPERATIONS 0 0 01 ul OFCIOUUUS FOREST LANo 573 8 59 42 AA EVERGREEN FOREST LAND 8 0 13 26 43 AA mixFL rDREST LAND 2 0 03 06 9 52 ee LAKES U 0 01 0 1 Z 53 DESERvoIRS 6 0 08 6 Su gg Boys AND ESTUARIES 3298 50.78 1020., 6 STRIP MINES, CUARRIFS, aND r. RAVEL PITb 11 0.16 p.2 75

== m 76 wW TRANSITIONAL AwEAS 9 0.15 .0 EsTOTAL 17 6514 100.00 20!3.7 O M -w r g5 a a: Hm 2 hC 2 5E E 5"E g 8 E Gr! ? !!!I!! <a wy&= o Fho RE,ER 7 m = o= a 'J C T U O' 5 =5 w ? w N O g e I =

s ig mZ T trJ

D N

O ,M 4 Cf3 Lete Erie Tw, North N Perry / Village Painsville Tnp. Farport Village Grand Arver Village U"" \\ 'j Village I9' [ Lake County g N Painamnlla Twp. f e N Perry Test g 1 N Me 44-the-Laa. j Painesville H City 3 [ Gamuse County l / Leroy Twp. Mentor Crty Timbertake Villai,e Concord Ten Lakelig Village pY Kirtland Md!s A Walowick Willoughby CitV Village City Was Hill Wieline City Vdlase e 5 .N CO Wdloughby Hills City Kirtland Cay JURISDICTIONS IN THE VICINITY OF THE PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT 1 & 2 THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY FIGURE 310.028

310.03 Identify any places where traffic congestion or problems (]} (2.1) of interference with patterns of local traffic might be anticipated due to plant operation or maintenance. Traffic counts of major access roads to the plant site would be useful to support your position.

Response

Construction of the PNPP has caused substantial congestion at a number of points in the area. The heaviest congestion occurs on Center Road between U.S. 20 and the plant, on Parmley Road between Perry Park Road and the plant, and on Middle Ridge Road, east and west of Center Road. As Figure 310.03A indicates, average daily traffic (ADT) on Center road north of U.S. 20 increased from just over 700 in 1972 to about 4000 in 1980. Much of this increase can be attributed to the Perry Plant, which employed over 3000 workers in 1980. On Parmley Road between Perry Park Road and Center Road, traffic increased over 100 ) percent between 1972 and 1980. ADT on Middle Ridge Road east and west of Center Road experienced a similar increase as drivers are using the road to avoid congestion elsewhere. The data in Figure 310.03A is a summary of information mainly obtained from Douglas T. Harrison, Lake County Engineer I I' who notes in his letter that examination of the data suggests that about "three-fourths of Center Road traffic can be attributed to Nuclear Plant Construction and ancilliary activities." Although the State of Ohio does not have road capacity data, Mr. Harrison notes that "in the absence of capacity data, Level of Service 'E' would appear to be descriptive of that traffic situation." Level E is defined as follows: Extremely heavy flow and relatively low speeds. It is the condition under which the largest number of vehicles could be accommodated by the street or roadway. The traffic ) flow is unstable and short stoppages may occur. PNPP ER/OL, Sup. 2 Q&R 2.1 19 9/1/81

The number of workers currently (August 1981) onsite is 3678, (]) and this figure is expected to increase to about 3900 by May 1982, one year before the fuel load is installed in Unit 1. About 313 of these will be operating employees and the remainder will be construction workers. After 1982, employment will gradually increase until it reaches 4000 in May 1986, one year before the fuel loading for the second unit. At this time, there will be about 399 operating workers, and the construction work force will begin to decrease until it drops to zero in 1988. After this, the 399 operating workers will be present throughout the plant's life. Thus, the congestion on Center, Parmley, and Middle Ridge Roads will continue and increase slightly until 1986. During this year, as the construction work force begins to decline, congestion will abate. In 1989, when only operating workers are present at the plant, congestion should decrease dramatically. It will remain at a low level throughout the rest of the plant's opera-tion. 1 l l l PNPP ER/OL, Sup. 2 Q&R 2.1-20 9/1/81 . ~... .. _ _ _ -. _.,.. _ _. - ~.

References O 1. Personal conversation between Gary Bammerlin (Ohio Department of Transportation, District 12 Office) and Louis DiMento (NUS Corporation) (6/10/81) 2. Personal conversation between Douglas T. Harrison (Lake County Engineer, Traffic Engineering Department) and Louis DiMento (NUS Corporation) (6/10/81) 3. Personal conversation between Mr. Robson (Ohio Department of Transportation, Bureau of Technical Services) and Louis DiMento (NUS Corporation) (6/10/81) 4. Personal conversation between Dorothy Smith (Ohio Departm.ent of Transportation, Bureau of Technical Services) and Louis DiMento (NUS Corporation) (7/13/81) O ( PNPP ER/OL, Sup. 2 Q&R 2.1-21 9/1/81

/ O e Lake Erie Y Xd } D D 1 l u O b / Clarks Rd.\\ C'. ( =w \\ \\5 = O' Middle Ridge 0 8 2 E b U.S. ' @ H ~h 75 5 20 S N \\ Manchester l \\ / E / / A5 %)% - 'l Narrows Rd. O

d. # ^

On M 1980 1979 1977 1972 A - Center Rd. N of U.S. 20 3860 3640 2190 718 B - Center Rd. S of Parmley 4070 717 C-Center Rd.S of Middle Ridge 1850 1285 740 D - Center Rd. N of Middle Ridge 2050 1235 1754 E - Parmley Rd.W of Center Rd. 1083 525 1530 F - Parmley Rd. E of Perry Park Rd. 980 389 ) G - Middle Ridge Rd.W of Center Rd. 1J30 1545 982 1 H - Middle Ridge Rd. E of Center Rd. 2300 1770 1303 1 - U.S. 20 W of Center Rd. 18E50 J - U.S. 20 E of Center Rd. 1S 470 Sources: Lake County Engineers,Traf fic Engineering Department. Ohio Department of Transportation. Bureau of Transportation Technical Services. TRAFFIC COUNTS ON ROADS MOST AFFECTED BY THE PNPP PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY FIGURE 310.03A PNPP ER/OL, Sup. 2 Q&R 2.1-22 9/1/81

310.04 Tables 2.6-1 and 2.6-2 in the ER-OL describe the cultural () (2.6) resources within the area of the PNPP site listed in the National Ragisters of National Landmarks and of Historical Places. Provide such a list of resources within 2 km of the transmission corridors. Include in the listing eftsa nominated for the Register.

Response

Figure 310.04A is a map of the area in which the site and the proposed transmission lines are located. The two proposed transmis-sion lines, Perry-Han.a (PH) (preferred and alternate) and Perry-Macedonia (PM), are indicated on the figure. Also indicateo on the map are th0 National Register Historic Sites and Natural Landmarka which are near these lines. Historic sites are labeled "H" and Natural Lu'dmarks "N." Those along the Perry-Macedonia Line have the subscript "A" followed by a number and those along the Perry-Hanna Line have the subscript "B" followed by a number. [} In the description which follows, if a resource near a transmission line is within 2 km of the line, the estimated distance is given; otherwise it is indicated to be greater than 2 km aaay. The letters "P" and "A" following the PH refer to preferred and 1 alternate routes. There is only one proposed route for the PM line. It is the same as the PH alternate from the start ) at Nerth Perry Until just north of the Geauga County-Lake 7 aunty line where the lines split. From this point, PM goes southeast and PH (P and A) goes south (see Figure 310.04A). A. Historic Sites 4 All sites are on the Natinal Register; no new sitea have been nominated for the National Register in the area, v PNPP ER/OL, Sup. 2 Q&R 2.6-1 9/1/81

A.1 Sites located along the combined corridor for both lines: ( l Along this section, the PM line is coterminous with the PHA line and so references to PHA below also apply to PM. Lake County 1A,B Perry, Green, Lucius, House, 4160 Main St. (7-12-76), (PHP, 1.3 km W; PHA 1.3 km W) 2A,B South Leroy Meetinghouse (NE of Painesville at OH 86 and Brakeman Road (5/9/79) (PHP, 0.4 km E; PHA, 0.4 km E) A.2 Sites located along the Perry-Macedonia Line Geauga County: 1A Chardon, Chardon Courthouse Square District, Public Green, "N roughly bounded by Main and Center Sts. (10-18-74) (>2 km SE) Summit County: 2A Twinsburg, Twinsburg Congregatinal Church, Twinsburg Public Sq. (5-3-74) ( > 2 km S) 3A Twinsburg, Twinsburg Institute, 8996 Darrow Rd. (1-1-76) ( > 2 km S) 4A Twinsburg vicinity, Herrick, Johnathan House, 8327 Darrow Rd. (7-18-74) ( > 2 km S). This site has been dismantled and removed. O PNPP ER/OL, Sup. 2 Q&R 2.6-2 9/1/81

Cuyahoga County: } 5A Oakwood, Drake, Alonzo, House, 24262 Broadway (11-28-78) (1.6 km N) A.3 Sites located along the Perry-Hanna Line Geauga County: 1B Claridon, Claridon Congregational Church, U.S. 322 (8 74) (PHP, > 2 km W; PHA, > 2 km W) 2B East Claridon, Hathaway, Lot, House, 12236 Old State Rd. (10-16-74) (PHP, 1.6 km W; PHA, > 2 km W) 3B Burton, Domestic Arts Hall and Flower Hall, N. Cheshire St. (8-24-79); (PHP, > 2 km W, PHA > 2 km W) (~S 4B Burton, Burton Village Historic District, Surrounding Public Sq. (11-20-74) (PHP, > 2 km W; PHA > 2 km W) SB Burton, Goodwin, Dr. Erastus House, 14485 Main St. (8 75) (PHP, > 2 km W; PHA, > 2 km W) 6B Auburn Corners, Free Will Baptist Church of Auburn, 14742 E. Washington St. (5-28-76) (PHP, > 2 km w; PHA > 2 km W) l Portage County: 7B Hiram, Garfield, James A. House, 6825 Hinsdale St. (1 76) (PHP, 1.3 km E; PHA, 2.0 km E) 8B Hiram, Young, Thomas F House, Wakefield and Garfield Sts. (10-22-76) (PHP, 1.6 km E; PHA 1.8 km W) PNPP ER/OL, Sup. 2 Q&R 2.6-3 9/1/81

i 9B Hiram vicinity, Johnson, John Farm, 6203 Pioneer Trail () (12-12-76) (PHP, 0.9 km E; PHA, > 2 km W) 10B Mantua, Mantua Station Brick Commercial District, Main and Prospect Sts. (12-24-74) (PHP, > 2 km W; PHA, > 2 km W) llB Mantua, Hine, Horace L. House, 4624 W. Prospect St. (12-12-76) (PHP, > 2 km W; PHA, > 2 km W) 12B Ravenna, Riddle Block, Public Sq., Chestnut and Main Sts. (3-17-76) (PHP, > 2 km W; PHA, > 2 km W) 13B Garrettsville vicinity, Ellenwood House, NW of Garretsville on OH 82 (6-20-75) (PHP, > 2 km E; PHA, 0.6 km E) B. Natural Landmarks } The National Register Natural Landmarks in the general area are provided in the folloiwng list. One site, Kimbal Woods, has been nominated as a potential National Register site, but has not yet been designated. B.1 Sites located along the_ combined route for both lines Lake County: l 1A,B Mentor Marsh - Near Painesville. The 'i*.e consists of marsh vegetation, aquatic plants, swamp and bottomland forest, and upland forest. A migration stopover and year-round habitat for birds and mammals, the site is a rarity in heavily population northern Ohio. (October 1964) Owner: State, Municipal ( > 2 km W) O j PNPP ER/OL, Sup. 2 Q&R 2.6-4 9/1/81 l

2A,B Kimball's Woods - Potential Natural Landmark, located in () the southwest corner of Madison. The site consists of 57 acres of "near virgin" hardwood forest and 41 acres of oldfield, second-growth elm, swamp woods, and abandoned vineyard ( > 2 km E) B.2 Sites located along the Perry-Macedonia Line Geauga County: 1A Holden Natural Areas (extends into Lake County) - 30 miles east of Cleveland. A complex of three natural areas: Steblins Gulch, possessing geological formations of Chardon, Brea sandstone, Bedford and Cleveland iypes; Bole Forest, a northern hardwood virgin forest; and Hanging Rock Farm, a stand of natural northern hardwoods. The three areas serve as a unique control to arboretum lands abutting this landmark. (November 1967) Owner: Private (1.0 km S) () Cuyahoga County: 2A Arthur B. Williams Memorial Woods - Within Mayfield. The site contains a remarkably pristine remnant beech-maple forest, among the finest timber stands remaining in the state of Ohio. (December 1974) Owner: Municipal ( > 2 km NE) 3A Tinkers Creek Gorge - 12 miles southeast of Cleveland. Oak-hickory and beech-maple-hemlock predominate in this virgin forest. (November 1967) Owner: Municipal ( > 2 km S) G PNPP ER/OL, Sup. 2 Q&R 2.6-5 9/1/81

B.3 Sites located along the Perry-Hanna Line O Geauga County: 1B White Pine Bog Forest - Three miles south-southwest of Burton. The only remaining near virgin remnant white pine boreal bog in Ohio. (January 1976) Owner: Municipal, Private (PHP, > 2 km W; PHA, > 2 km W) Portage County: 2B Mantua Swamp - At the southeastern edge of Mantua. The area contains many different wetland communities, including a floodplain swamp forest, cattail marshes, a beaver pond, and relict boreal bog. (January 1976) Owner: State, Private (PHP, adjacent; PHA, 2.0 km W) Review and recommendatins concerning the impact of the transmission { lines on the Historic Sites and Natural Landmarks have been requested from the State Historic Preservation Officer and the Department of Natural Resources (see response to Question 310.05. O l PNPP ER/OL, Sup. 2 Q&R 2.6-6 9/1/81

_ ~ L E N AO 0 1 2 3 4 5 mdes t 01 23456 7 8 kilometers I s "~w. v-8 '[ Legend: .{ * %* Madison 1 -*- 6- .. - f,- , g (. . q Ge on the Lake g ' * * ~ - .i " ~ 3I lv -

  • H

.t: ,,__{ - Historic Sites ~ g Nonhl j - db l i i 1 i g o.nna, e Natural Landmarks l,i y-tr . Ceneve ~s ?} =. Jg, s -> >. a, b . n , J ['. si ,o e i [ - 2 Kilometer distance on either s.' O a4 4[9 d,,,,,, .v y unloa.wi s side of the Transmission Line (

  • 8E

. [,Y v.+,on hj-T"*r [ I % - Dismantled and Removed f ' j,--- W ( [..W- ?'- y.p,.l+- U H ,,,4 e u.c,k.a.ci p

  • u

.., n w. W Pa y..,.,. / @.. 1 r_

c..

.ar ~. > ; n. g --.,,s.,. y.~.1 y. s. 9 (sw, M _' ',, f ? y y,,.,..

  • g g

,3 u.aroren-net.6. ' t:.' i.,. - e ,rA-- - m .m . :::;r.- . =, "z 1 r ..,9..gJc,, 3 ~. .e , i m i,. n Thor,psoi+ A 4 Ls. ' [".',, '[ ' l'. a- ,;,y h, M 'I~ k.. A,. s i

  • en,-

'y '.; i ' ',' { u, I Eastlake j ig='aj' nt0f , A,,h$ ~ %,,[," i .a, -..~l**.*--<- a 1 ,,,,,pp Knu.#,* ; 'c , 0 se.r< s .. LAKE _4g> i. A8 . jw y - a, i.+-- Trumb. 7* <"7 * *, M'f't 1sif asW8 3m. i3 E Q c-g) - 1.,, d 3

  • a W,lllOWICk..r,-.. '

u ,% -t./r ,,y at m,um um6......i >,{- ,,.2.... < g. o g -,.

t.. /. \\-.

,t v 6 g#. m, Willo,u,[ 3

T % e*o

,,,,i,,,,. e s' ~- _ G E A U'G A,.. - y- .f ,. /.- .l. 4.- g x j _' u '= >\\ --4', '. "i "- EUCf1d "e, ~1 <e' 9, - ; .(9) . s,9.,,.. '/y - *i m$ **?s.?. # -;g 1 I i e oaeva ! la - +- i J,,,';" ' ',,e.' ', / v ~ "s~, n.ns, _ %,t wicknete ' n -' 4, /.~- ~*- ~ ** *T. 'T I ., s,' '-- .r. ) '," 63) 4.$}8 - a s- ' i 1 8 ~- ( h*rr on 3 7 = user,,' W Q :. *i ' c M Willoughb # t4 j I P-- s,' l ~ -- m o ~s

  • ' v' - l iHills me-

~ "m f ,,,,,.L'. -s: .M, f-S j h" r ond 3. g' He9h d,\\ g , \\ua.n, I ' s .g m ,s I, I rh*' I. Y % rat.nahl, 7

g.. Lq y.,----- r,;- ~. .. se od ! Erclidm ', H e'thts c, ',m .)' -'*~~-----"-'*-"#~~ 0'" ns ~ Cley*1 g T

  • e,v>'

~ m.u ,os Dwe " p y, ,d w\\- . ' '. ' r-3.-,./

  • . -;'-/

~ ' Y', .i eights -=glVnd ~ ' ~ ' ;(.;; 3 e and'"* T;- i V't , unia i'.5' A* r-- 1 1 . h. " 3'- 1 5 3 * * "* -- #o ~ f j Heights . "T* gm j M ".>-a h, ,,.,,,.(. g e

  • " } = ~ ~ a.,,

,'kt Q g g,,gg y ', p,,pp,, u,,, i' f u etx w s-s

  • n,.- s 8 -

-,e s-Huntirg ;-- s

    • 'Be'

) 1-a . ' N. hts - g I se p, m/j v y{ g g,,3 .) 3 ! Heig wood.., pa, v.ii., j _ A s, im,, 7,y 9'. ;I ,, - r w w g ./ .I- 'f1 a. -,- < >~.-. ~ --.c,agon . [ -y, ;,; m g+' u;e? e, eld .N'*-*-.. venomaam.a m,,, . Warrensville .2 s. t-d ,8 's g m' Hei his. 9 v Yis. se f" - or" - m' ' g e 9 N04th ' " g v Forange ~ s 3 c. hts / (o g Mor land ? M ~' e - -j 5 I .,. h - '1 'l,.= - *"lT,A t - - t e .,all ' "*s'"% hlaple %> E--* j .N.. -m'

    • ""**W.

r* O Ranrf m. I.,* H ills, a'- , y s , c J'.,, South Russell = y, ,~ c.;y;'.,h G f.ie car e. -e a,, n,*s >t

  • '**'a la y

.g ** C % +t-g... -o ! Hesg ts. 9 hts * - ' 4 ^ 5."a voa w" r .H^ "g 't ','.'~.'1 -4 m., 4 s.. u +

n n

?*_. ,Bedford Bedfo 8 4.a'-; -( - g(~w _' m-g,, a

  • En W

1 m ir. j

  • g,- a,w an e.

.a ,4) r. -n g, t, s ,, u _,. i;Watton **f.,, fp'(Li.-.g}

  • S0lon: -

'a __ ( ---r--~g ~s; st:tead - .-e.--., Mce l- 'R, , -fp @] \\(*,",,', a 6 man D"N H ~ <d m [**' i, ,1 ,8 B'l1 S l l{ I Valfey 6 c ., Meae s p j - y,,, ,1 H a.-;

i u

e M !, ~ ;;

  • s
s. Ca'a*'.

, HirtsiK->cd c no= l 1 1*a."J I. "~- ,y". .c., s p h, m I ^ GEAUGA et.- ' =. t --. \\ *, - )., - ~~ .A in na naa.. G"", 9 " 6 ~' 1 ~ ~,i sr<o as -( . uw, ,;i. Hit..PERRNGACEBO.,N.IA ~ . n,,'o., PORhhGE Y IdM. i I '- N'."T , Br die 1 c,,,n, y , 7. ' c~n s, i. @ g">.; ,.NsTnIns. i j i ~- ~.Ac.* Bg. hra y,,,, p

  • c s,'

j,, bt e 2 = ,.3, g 4 x, <._ ..~.c -. w. ,, _\\ g n ._ r I Macedosis_ M ay c. saa ( e* , Northfield g 'y,,,, g, l.1. * - sm-,\\+,q,m

/

~,"R.,a. . j .. H = Center l, fw-.u., y t. (.- m q ,.c .,, 1; Dehght's t .n. 3 g l / 6-+- ,,- 9, .v. g c, ,,,,.n, ' r H waritua j j*j, 3 3A. 4 s%s

  • >a; s

e O Mi % 7 Boston 6M 09 d ,J + -'[, Heght,s .g,8p" [ _, ' 5= g { . v %n.ng .,s N [ F$ z ' '=.- a [" ~ s. "" '~ '"'"""""""'""mm ~~" N!,,' es'u'" 4 .o ' 8' % y g., g n "[,',N ". D.fr_ A Hudson

  • m-

,,s, t s_ boro , swerinne leavittsbut + \\ ' -an= re. >-. ~,"7 w.c.o. .. A a ,m = g n_ a w - ..m e z... <l '* !,9}, m., O > m

  • s es.:

/ 8 <O

  • 9"cu5h i

gm m S g; m > m., 4. g;..p ~ J

  • 4,,6. **

s e 3 s g./ p. " ' ' $ ""~' Eg <:D

4. m z r-s-

I '"',,N",.. -t. Frecoom. ? / w : a 8y y z h y * ' ;(5 M ; h, -- 3,,,,o, E$~,.;; ; o z y M ' '*i., l ..T,", I s I a R e eaa. A..a 1 i y t ' ** " O g, o ' m > g * **:"8'rPjl. J,/. , ';< ',. ~"~. I Y, _ 0 } 3, \\ > :D z -4 sh om r- ,5 sa, p ,s ~ se, s p >0 m -4 3 o m Pe. ' " < W~M car 7 i,w- -+ Stow. Ug.yQ"*a-r,,,,, ,., ( , Q.,- 7 Newtoa = e. 4 z.: :o > , silver. r-w,i.n# s8 24 E D -a Fog Y. Egg l:;q ' ;(. 5 g.qtem Cvf -' ;; ".j,<ey..' 1 : A l y'"- A 3 F 5

s yn"o w,

o

=: = o.

h C,. & _ _, w y 'Ke. nt. m ,;, i r h. e> cn '-N-Rav.. -- + i enna s -- 1,, 'r a- -m ? ' Mu nroe'. '- ' "l.'*. ~ ye*, 1 b,'I q n m mO>m i' f! O r

- s'y.

8To L,r, 5 '.p F8'.15 ~#e-a - 5... ! 'b 3

D

_' M % ~ t "D'at " ~~ z>zw p " J. "" -m',.A.N** '9.,,, ozoo a ~ c- = r- . / s /. d.

  • t

- - -k+.J.' l".;.".Md ::. i .;_ s-- 4e -.-y m . t.. := :%c@r:Talim 4 -f - -w m a;-- su ' /$,. 2 !: >.r ~ - 9 1 ~~"*N 4m 5 ca g g mg~ m e. w,,:.g,y g ~ P "7 T A"""" 7 T ~ 7 # c 9-@f" 4 - t' ) 810N k.JTN'" 'E.w -T da -A-L,. g ws. I < m o on t m - -- =

310.05 Please provide documentation of any communication () (2.6) you have had with the State Historical Preservation Officer (SHPO) and with local historical and archeological groups concerning impacts of the site and transmission corridors.

Response

The information presented in the response to question 310.04 regarding historic sites was discussed by phone with Mr. Eric Johannesen of the Western Reserve Historical Socity; a letter has been Lant to Mr. Johannesen requesting confirmation of the data with the understanding that his review will also be sent to the State Historic Preservation Officer; his comments have been incorporated into the response to question 310.04. Similarly, the information on natural landmarks was discussed with Mr. Richard Mosely of the Ohio Department of Natural Resources for his re:riew. This correspondence will be provided to NRC under () separate cover. O PNPP ER/OL, Sup. 2 C&R 2.6-8 9/1/81 ,.,__ -,..~.- --.., _ ..,.,._.,,-,--.my,--. ,,_,.,...-.--__.__.m

290.09 In addition to responses to other specifically requested () (3.4) information provide a summary and brief discussion in table form, by section, of differences between i currently projected environmental effects of the nuclear power station (including those that would degrade, and those that would enhance environmental conditions) and the effects discussed in the environmental report Eubmitted at the construction stage.

Response

The major design changes that result in changes in potential environmental impacts are those related to the revision in the cooling system from open-cycle to closed-cycle cooling. These changes are outlined in the following table. O o PNPP ER/OL, Sup. 2 Q&R 3.4-1 9/8/81

() PNPF MAJOR DESIGN CHANGES l Open-Cycle Cooling

  • Closed-Cycle Cooling **

Intake Flow (GPM) 1,150,000 69,400 Discharge Flow (GPM) 1,150,000 46,000 (average) Overall T ( F) 29.1 18.1 (average) Intake Structure 12 PODS 2 PODS (each 35.5' in diameter) (each 36' in diameter) Discharge Structure 6 PORTS 3 NOZZLE (each 4' in diameter) (3' in diameter) Heat Rejection to 280 7 (average) (} Lake Erie (x 10 BTU / min) Pumphouses 2 4 one combination circulating one service water, one and service water, and one emergency service water,. emergency service water and two circolating water (one for each unit) Heat Sink 100% to Lake Erie 97% to atmosphere 3% to Lake Erie

  • From ER-CP: Information based on normal operation of both units
    • From ER-OL: Information based o normal operation of both units O

PNPP ER/OL, Sup. 2 Q&R 3.4-2 9/8/81

290.08 Provide an assessment of the effects of transmission () (5.5) line maintenance procedures on the spotted turtle (Clemmys quttata). Indicate whether herbicides will be used along any portions of the Perry transmission lines.

Response

i It is not the policy of CEI to use herbicides fr vegetation control along the Perry transmission lines. CEI cuts the vegetation periodically with a bush hog. To date, there have not been apparent effects on the spotted turtle. O O PNPP ER/OL, Sup. 2 Q&R 5.5-3 9/1/81

l 290.07 Update the ER-OL with respect to Cleveland Electric () (6.2) Illuminating Company's proposed confirmatory monitoring (if any) of offsite noise levels during Perry Nuclear Power Plant operation.

Response

The applicant plans to conduct a confirmatory survey of off-site noise levels during the Perry Nuclear Power Plant operational phase. O O PNPP ER/OL, Sup. 2 6.2-2 9/1/81 _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _}}

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20005B809&oldid=4668453"