ML20005B206

Notice of Violation from Insp on 810622.Noncompliance Noted: No Full Calibr Measurement Performed During 780313-810622 & No Determination of Difference Between Measured Output & Anticipated Output Made from Aug-Nov 1980

ML20005B206
Person / Time
Issue date:	06/24/1981
From:	Sreniawski D NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20005B203	List: ML20005B202 ML20005B206
References
NUDOCS 8107060465
Download: ML20005B206 (1)

Text

, -.

A g

w Appendix A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Columbus Hospital License No. 12-00534-04 L

As a result of the inspection conducted on June 22, 1981, and in accordance with the Interim Enforcement Policy, 45 FR 66754 (October 7, 1980), the following violations were identified:

1.

10 CFR 35.21 states any licensee authorized to use teletherapy units

~

for treating humans shall perform full calibration measurements at in-tervals not exceeding one year.

Contrary to the above, a record review and statements made by a licensee representative indicate no full calibration measurement had been per-formed from March 13, 1978, to June 22, 1981, a period exceeding one

, year.

This is a Severity Level V vietation (Supplement VII).

2.

10 CFR 35.22(b)(5) states that monthly spot-check measurements shall include a determination of the difference between the measured output and the anticipated output expressed as a percentage of the anticipated output (i.e., the value obtained at last full calibration corrected mathematically for physical decay).

Contrary to the above, a review of monthly spot-check records show that no determination of the difference between the measured output and the anticipated output was made from August 1980, to November 1980.

This is a Severity Level V violation (Supplement VII).

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, you are required to submit to this office within thirty days of the date of this Notice a written statement or explanation in reply, including for each item of noncompliance:

(1) cor-rective action taken and the results achieved; (2) corrective action to be taken to avoid further noncompliance; and (3) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Under the authority of Section 182 of the-Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, this response shall be submitted under oath or affirmation.

Consideration may be given to extending your response time for good cause shown.

, Dated h

l D. J.

riniawski, Chief Materi Radiation Protection Section No. 2 8107060465 810625

' NMS LIC30 12-00534-04

@R

-