ML20005A658

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 810512.Noncompliance Noted: Failure to Perform Monthly Linearity Tests on Dose Calibrator & to Keep Records of Leak Test Results in Uci Units
ML20005A658
Person / Time
Issue date: 05/27/1981
From: Sreniawski D
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20005A650 List:
References
NUDOCS 8106300555
Download: ML20005A658 (2)


Text

_[

~

~

~

.a.

l p

9 3,.

Appendix A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Raymond Sneider, D.O.

License No. 21-17099-01 As a result of the inspection conducted on May 12, 1981, and in accordance with the Interim Enforcement Policy, 45 FR 66754 (October 7, 1980), the follcwing violan. ions were identified:

1.

Licerse Condition No. 13 requires that licensed material be possessed and used fu accordance with statements, representations, and procedures contaised in application dated July 6, 1976.

Item No. 11 of the above referenced application states the capintec CRC-4 dose calibrator will be checked monthly for linearity.

Contrary to the above requirement, it was determined through review of records that this condition is not being met.

Specifically, a linearity test was performed on November 6, 1980, and February 3, 1981, to the date of this inspection. These intervals exceed the monthly requirement.

This is a Severity Level V violation (Supplemant VII).

4 2.

10 CFR 35.14(d)(2) requires records of leak test results to be kept in units of microcuries.

Contrary to the above, it was determined through a review of leak test records that this requirement is not being met.

Specifically, leak test results of the cesium-137 clibration source are being l

maintained in units other than micr..ctries.

This is a Severity Level VI violation (Supplement VII).

3.

License Condition No. 13 requires that licensed material be possessed and used in accordance with statements, representations, and procedures contained in application dated July 6, 1976.

J Item No. 15 of the above referenced application states disposal records will be maintained to indicate a complete history of the radionuclide including its ultimate disposal.

Contrary to the-above requirement, it was determined through statements by licensee representatives and the NRC inspectors review of records that this condition is not being met. Specifically, a licensee representative stated records are not being maintained for the disposal of byproduct material.

This is a Severity Level VI violation (Supplement VII).

-8106300 6

[o=

./

' Pursuant to.the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, you are required to submit to this office within twenty-five days of the date of this Notice a written statement or explanation in reply, including for each item of noncompliance:

(1) corrective action taken and the results achieved; (2) corrective action to be taken to avoid further noncompliance; and (3) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Under the authority of Section 182 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, this response shall be suositted under oath or affirmation.

\\ rD. \\4 Yb k-D. J. Efeniawski, Chief

()I Hateri(ion 2 Dated 1s Radiation Protection Sect

_ _..