ML20005A160
| ML20005A160 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 06/23/1981 |
| From: | Felton J NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM) |
| To: | Reynolds N DEBEVOISE & LIBERMAN |
| References | |
| FOIA-81-97 NUDOCS 8106290462 | |
| Download: ML20005A160 (1) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:* 0\\il )(A a Laiu
- o UNITED STATES
~ E ~ ',, TW.4 4.l.> NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o p WASHINGTON. D. C. 20555 t a s.,,*****j June 23, 1981 Nicholas 5. Reynolds, Esquire Debevoise and Liberman 1200 Seventeenth Street, N.W. IN RESPONSE REFER Washington, DC 20036 TO F01A-81-97
Dear Mr. Reynolds:
This is in further response to your letter dated March 10, 1981 in which you requested, pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, copies of documents relating to 18 categories on CLI-80-21 regarding environmental qualification of safety-related electrical equipment. The NRC has completed its review and has no further documents subject to your request. This completes action on your request. Sincerely, '/ N J. M.f e ton, Director F Divi iod of Rules and Records Offic(e of Administration h to feel 0f[ty~,~ JU:; g 3 ggg, \\, "'Q,ygnoa '8 h'yN # $9 r
e
- k e,
4' LAW orrsCES Or D E D EVOI S E & LI G Eft M AN 1 00 S EVENTE ENTH STREET,N.W WASHINGTON. O C 20036 Tct cpHONc (rOr) osr-osoO March 10, 1981 J. M. Felton EBEEDOM OF INFORMATION Director - ACT REQUEST Division of Rules and Records [b7A -8/ QJ Office of Administration U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 4640 #d J ~/,j _ p/ Washington, D.C. 20555 Re: Freedom of Information 7t Request
Dear Mr. Felton:
Pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. $552) and NRC Regulations (10 C.F.R. Part 9), Debevoise & Liberman requests copies of all documents prepared by the NRC, its Staff and consultants relative to the following: 1. Any assessment (including, but not limited to, those generated by OELD and/or OGC) regarding the decision not to issue the draft "Fincl Rule," transmitted to Thomas R. Gibbon, Jr., by Howard Shapar on August 29, 1980, te codify re-quirements related to environmental qualifica-tions of safety-related electrical equipment, announced by the Commission in CLI-80-21 (May 30, 1980, 11 NRC 707, "CLI-80-21"). 2. The September 2, 1980 let ter from H. R. Denton to R. B. Minogue concerning "the advisability of developing in a broad single rulemaking action an amendment to 10 C.F.R. 50 which would include (1) the rulemaking directed by the Commission, on environmental qualification of electrical equipment (CLI-80-21), (2) the rulemaking proposed in the Commission paper from I&E (Secy-80-139), on inde-pendent verification and testing and inspection of equipment's environmental qualificatica, and (3) broadly assess the qualification of both electrical ),c 6 VL LT/"
J -{. [A J. M. Felton March 10, 1981 Page two and mechanical equipment... for seismic and dynamic loading conditions...", all responses thereto, any assessments thereof, and a list of persons to whom copies of the letter were sent. 3. The July 11, 1979 Commission briefing by the Staff concerning licensing responses to I&E 15ulle-tin 79-01 and any resulting documents. 4. The schedule for revising NUREG-0580 in response to any previously received public comments and any status reports concerning achievement of such schedule. 5. The basis for the assertion in II. R. Denton's August 24, 1979 memorandum to Commissioner Kennedy entitled "UCS Petition for Rulemaking" at p. II.3 that compliance with IEE STD 323-1974 could be demonstrated in three to four year 3 6. The basis for the assertion in ll.R. Denton's August 24, 1979 memorandum to Commissioner Kennedy enti-tied "UCS Petition for Reconsideration" at p. II.3 that there are adequate test facilities to enable affected NRC licensees to demonstrate compliance with IEE STD 323-1974. 7. All bi-monthly progress reports advising the Commission and public of the status of incomplete environmental. qualification of safety-related electrical equipment, along with corrective actions taken or planned, prepared pursuant to CLI-80-21 and/or all statements concerning the status of such progress reports if they were not prepared. 8. The basis for the statement on page 9 of CLI-80-21 that "some licensees did not meet the time dead-lines imposed and did not provide the information required by Bulletin 79-01, that others had un-qual!.fied equipment in their plants, that others did not have the documentation required to show qualification and that still others did not in-clude such documentation". 9. The basis for the statement in CLI-80-21 at page 12 that "by no later than June 30, 1982, all
r t .s; J. M. Felton March 10, 1981 Page three safety-related electrical Oquipment in all oper-ating plants shall be qualified to DOR Guidelines or NUREG-0588." 10. All Commission questions directed to the Staff in-cluding but not limited to those of October 6, December 6, and December 12, 1978 concerning issues raised by the UCS May 2, 1978 Petition for Recon-sideration. 11. The July 6, 1978 Staff responses to the June 27, 1978 Commission Order that the Staf f provided views on all issues raised by the UCS Petition for Recon-sideration submitted on May 2, 1978. 12. The October 26, 1978 Staff response to questions dire;ted to it by the Commission in response to issues raised in the May 2, 1978 UCS Petition for reconsideration. 13. The August 4, 1978 memorandum from Commissioner Bradford to the Staff requesting it to provide generic Staff responses to industry questions on the DOR Guidelines and NUREG-0588. 14. The August 24, 1979 Staff response to Commission questions raised by the May 2, 1978 UCS Petition for Reconsideration and the March 7, 1979 UCS Motion for Expedited Decision Making. 15. The August 31, 1978 Staff respcnse to the June 27, 1978 Commission request that the Staff provide its views on all issues raised by the UCS Petition for Reconsideration submitted on May 2, 1978. 16. The September 19, 1978 Staff clarification of its response to the June 27, 1978 Commission request that the Staff provide its views on all issues raised by the May 2, 1978 UCS Petition for Recon-sideration. 17. Any assessments, evaluations, or surveys regarding the ability of operating plant licensees to comply with the requirements for environmental qualifica-tion of safety-related electrical equipment by June 30, 1982 as required in the CLI-80-21.
.c..'r J. M. Felton March 10, 1981 Page four 18. Secy-80-370. Such documents should ine1ude any draf ts, supporting materials, studies, or other such reports, correspondence, .or testimony, regarding the aforementioned areas of interest. We would appreciate your prompt response to this request within the ten working day period afforded by 10 C.F.R. Part 9. h +4I'~f Sincer 1 4 .1cho1 ...yno1es ,u 4 i 1 I s}}