ML20004F129

Requests Changes to Feb 1964 Sar,Mandating Physical Exam for Operators & Supervisors Every 24 Months,But at Intervals Not to Exceed 28 Months.Change Does Not Constitute Unreviewed Safety Question

ML20004F129
Person / Time
Site:	Berkeley Research Reactor
Issue date:	06/11/1981
From:	Kaplan S CALIFORNIA, UNIV. OF, BERKELEY, CA
To:	John Miller Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 8106160535
Download: ML20004F129 (2)

Text

-

f e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA. BERKELEY SANTA BARBARA

• SANTA CRt?Z BEREELEY

• DAVIS

• IRVINE

• LOS ANGELES

• RIVERSIDE

• SAN DEICO

• SAN FRANCISCO COLLECE OF ENGINEERLNC BEREELEY, CALIFORNIA 94720 DEPARTMENT OF NUCLEAR ENCINEERINC N  %

4 Docket No. 50-224 .{ l License No. R-101 g, ,

Mr. James A. Miller, Chief $jiJUN15 C4*g%;ggg,Qf W

Standardization and Special Project Branch C A Division of Licensing C #

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission //.

Washington, D.C. 20555 N'I *

Dear Mr. Miller:

We hereby request the following changes of the Safety Analysis Penort for the University of California Berkeley Research Reactor, February 1S%

lines 21, 22 and 23 on pages 6-8 and line 1 of pages 6-9 from:

All personnel working around the reactor will be part of the medical program which is administrated by Environmental Health and Safety.

This program calls for bi-annual physical examinations and alternate bi-annual clinical laboratory tests.

to:

! All persennel werking areund the reaeter will be part of the medieal

! pregram which is administrated by Envirenmental Health and Safety.

This pregram ealls l

All full time operators, full time senior operators, including the l 011ef Reactor Operator and Reactor Supervisor, and the full time Reactor Health Physicist, working around the reactor will have a physical examination every 24 renths but at intervals not to exceed 28 months.

These changes were reviewed by the Reactor Hazards Comittee, Environmental l

Health and Safety and the Reactor Staff.

This change does not constitute an unreviewed safety question in that:

(1) It does not increase the probability of occurrence of an accident analyzed in the Safety Analysis Report (2) It does not increase the consequences of an accident analyzed in the Safety Analysis Report t

l gY '

810e 3 c 05 35 'L 8' f

o .

i Safety Analysis Report June 11, 1981 -

(3) It does not create the possibility of occurrence of nuclear accident not previously analyzed in the Safety Analysis Report.

Sincerely yourr,-

/ /

/k' Selig N. Kaplan SNK: irs Reactor Administrator I

I I

' S i

e i

i 1

i I

,._,.,._....-.-,e.,-- .,n,-,,.,-,_.,-_.. ..n.-- , , . - - - , . _ , . , ,