ML20004D959
| ML20004D959 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 05/26/1981 |
| From: | Cotter B Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| To: | Bradford P, Gilinsky V, Hendrie J NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20004D957 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-10CFR9.7 NUDOCS 8106100409 | |
| Download: ML20004D959 (4) | |
Text
1., -
~;c nouq n.
f 5
UNITED STATES 4
i E
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
{
ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD PANEL gf..... j#
WASHIN GTON, D.C. 20555 May 26,1981 MEMORANDUM TO:
Chairmar, Hendrie Commissioner Gilinsky Commiss'ioner Ahearne Commissioner Bradford y
FROM:
B. Paul Cotter, Jr., Chairman i Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
SUBJECT:
ASLBP MODEL HEARING SCHEDULE Attached is a Model Hearing Schedule over a 10-month time frame, as you requested.
Enclosure:
As stated cc w/enci!
L. Bickwit, 0GC S. Chilk, SECY J. Fitzgerald, OGC A. Rosenthal, ASLAP H. Shapar, OELD-810610 e 4 0 9 i
.. ~..
ASLBP MODEL HEARING SCHEDULE (Final Hearing Before Initial Decision In Contested CP and OL Proceedings)
DAY EVENT COMMENT 1.
O LAST SSER FILED.
Last SSER relevant to hearing issues.
Date received by parties.
2.
12 NEW CONTENTIONS' FILED.
Based on new SSER information.
3.
DISCOVERY BEGINS.
Principally against staff on new SSER material bearing on admitted conten-tions.
4.
DISCOVERY MOTIONS FILED.
Requests for additional interroga-tories if needed.
5.
24 RESPONSES TO REVISED FiledwithBoard.O CONTENTIONS.
6.
27 PREHEARING CONFERENCE First post SSER conference on
("PHC") BEGINS.
day 12 filings.
Board (a) hears oral Staff response; (b) rules orally if possible; and (c) subsequently serves Order on parties.
7.
BOARD SCHEDULES PARTY NEGOTIATIONS.
8.
32 PHC ORDER OBJECTIONS.
Parties other than staff file.
9.
37 STAFF PHC OBJECTIONS.
Filed with Board.
l 10.
ADDITIONAL INTERROGATORIES.
Filed with Board, 11.
50 BOARD ORDER ON PHC Issued to parties.
- 12. 57 INTERR0GATORY ANSWERS.
Filed with Board.
13.
59 PARTIES COMPLETE SCHEDULED Report results to Boards.
NEGOTIATIONS.
Request assistance if needed.
14.
69 MOTIONS TO COMPEL.
Filed with Board.
-*/
All filings with the Board contemplate same day service on parties.
Page 1 of 2
.~;
o DAY EVENT COMMENT 15.
69 MOTIONS FOR
SUMMARY
Filed with Board.
DISPOSITION.
16.
79 ANSWERS TO MOTIONS TO Filed with Board.
COMPEL.
17.
89 ORDER ON MOTION TO COMPEL.
Issued by Board.
18.
ANSWERS TO MOTIONS FOR Filed with Board.
SUMMARY
DISPOSITION.
19.
99 RESPONSE TO ANSWERS TO Filed with Board.
MOTIONS FOR
SUMMARY
DISPOSITION.
20.
103 DISCOVERY COMPLETE.
21.
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE.
Items 21 and 22 can be held seriatim beginning on day 103.
22.
FINAL PREHEARING CONFERENCE.
23.
118 TESTIMONY FILED.
Parties and Board study testimony and prepare for hearing.
24.
128
SUMMARY
DISPOSITION ORDER.
Board issues ruling on
~
~ ~ ~ ~
sunnary disposition motions.
l 25.
138 HEARING COMMENCES.
I 26.
178 RECORD CLOSES.
l 27.
208 APPLICANT'S PROPOSED Filed with Board.
FINDINGS 28, 218 INTERVEN0R'S PROPOSED Filed with Board.
l FINDINGS.
29.
228 STAFF'S PROPOSED FINDINGS.
Filed with Board.
I 30.
233 APPLICANT'S REPLY FINDINGS.
Filed with Board.
l 31.
298 INITIAL DECISION.
Issued by Board.
Page 2 of 2 l
l l
flay 24,1981 Commissioner Ahearne's additional views on Secy-81-311.(to. be printei in the Federal Register):
Commissioner Ahearne would also like comments on the following:
In 52.714(b), number the Commission's proposed change (b)(1) and add:
(2) A contention shall not be admitted for hearing if the documents and other information' submitted fail to demonstrate that there is a genuine issue of material fact to be heard.
In particular, failure to make such a submission or vagueness of the contention is sufficient ground for rejection.
(3)
In making the decision as to whether a genuine issue of material fact exists, the technical numbers of the Boards may use their technical knowledge to judge the merit of the contention.
l (4) A contention raising only an issue of law shall be decided on the basis of briefs or oral argument in accordance with procedures to be established by the Board.
(5) A contention shall not be admitted if the facts asserted are legally insufficient to support the contention or if the contention is immaterial or irrelevant to the proposed action which is before :e Board.
\\
l