ML20004C662
| ML20004C662 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 04/16/1981 |
| From: | Brenner L Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| To: | Weiss E HARMON & WEISS |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8106040433 | |
| Download: ML20004C662 (3) | |
Text
_ _ _
e
- ! *.'. :. ".', ~ ~,',
j.3 -,[. A d *.-.'.%g.g f...d i
~~
c,s* # *%,,
o, UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
! 'T'. 'J
J i
WASm NGTON. D. C. 20555
'o,,Abbf'!
%, ". ? /
April 16, 1981 M-
<W%
/
N/
9-
. z;-
- ten
~-
7 A.:9 2 0 :'d;. __,
Ellyn R. Weiss, Esq.
N, -
.b
- C Harmon & Weiss s
t' 1725 I Street, N. W., Suite 506
's e
~
Washington, D. C.
20006 x.: _
In re:
Metropolitan Edison Company (Three Mile Island, Unit No. 1)
Docket No. 50-289 (Restart)
Dear Ms. Weiss:
I am enclosing for your information a copy of transcript pages 18,957-958, which confirms our telephone conversation of April 15, 1981 regarding the opportunity for UCS to reply to the responses filed by other parties to UCS' Motion for*
Board Order on PORV Block Valve Test Results.
Sincerely yours, e
9,,
j,J A Y h)' (f?
.d
'i-Lawrence Brenner bl.
-N# L-Legal Advisor ASLBP 3
\\ c ), '?o o
,h')
i _.
f cc w/ encl:
Docketing and Servicet
...s-
\\s
'< U, fs*(N (For service on all parties)
~..s.
bSo1 T,!/
/
l l
8106040633 G-
'4 F
7, 18,957
- l!
-li" y
i' I
i concerns about nuclear 1 major emphasis resided with the l,'
2 fuel.
Being a metallurgical engineer I have always f elt d interests in that side of l
an 3 more comfortable with concerns i
4 the plant.
."! ; i 5
Q Where did you receive your B.S. or 5.A. degrees
, I,,',
p'.'
6 from?
- f h 7
A (HITNESS ADLER)
By Ba :helor of Metallurgical
': )
t New York University, and h' [
Engineering degree was received,
3 8
Master of Business Administrat ion also at New York g'"
h 9 my to University.
11 Q
Is this the first time rou have ever prepared E
12 testimony regarding emergency plar ning ?
tlf'
{
13 A
(WITNESS ADLER)
Yes.
s' (Counsel for ANGPY conferring.)
I 14 MS. GAIL BRADFORD:
Sir, could I have a few 15 16 minutes to conf er with Mr. Cunningtam?
i CHAIBMAN SMITH:
let's tase our mid-morning break.
17 NS. GAIL BRADFORD:
Thank you.
y 18 (Recess.)
'L 19 CHAIRMAN SMITH Before we go back to the I'
20 I
Kr. Brenner made a telephone call 21 testinony, at my request j
)"-
22 to Ellen Weiss of the Union of Concerned Scientists Mr. Brenner stated tha t l'! !.
23 regarding the block valve tests.
24 UCS could have an opportunity to reply to their initial
.fr 25 motion, and 'Is. Weiss said they wished to do so.
They vill y
nh i
M1 i
g a
i 4
t
\\
ALDERSON REPORTING CCMP ANY,INC, l
18,958 file a. response by Wednesday, April 22, and if possible vill 1
their response on l
attempt to better this time and provide 2
April 20 to my office in Bethesda.
3 Monday, Er. Brenner stated that in addition to whatever 4
it would be usef ul if ther indicated 5 UCS' vanted to say, whether UCS still wanted to have testimony developed on the 6
block valve tests, and if so, on what points in light of the 7
pleadings and affidavits fided by the,other parties.
8 ranscript had a misspelling of He noted that the t 9
The last name was misspelled.
to Mrs. Georgiana Nyce's name.
he 11 sited appearer was Mrs.
For the record it should be t
11 T
12 Georgiana Nyce, N-y-c-e, of 1124 Prince Street, Harrisburg, 13 Pennsylvania.
Ms. Bradford or Mr. Cunningham, whoever wishes to 14 i
l 15 address the motion.
i (Counsel for ANGPY conferring.)
I.
16
%S. GAIL BRADFORD4 I would like to ask Mr.
i 17 18 Pavicvski how familiar he is with the TEI plans in f
19 particular.
CHAIRHAN SMITH:
A 1 right.
That is fine, but 20 bstantive -- we are trying to 21 doesn't that get into the su t
l 1
the objections to the 22 still address your motion on 23 testimony.
Now, you are goir g to have other opportunities of the testimony if the 24 to inquire into the substance 25 testimony is admitted over y sur objections, unless you are l,
ALDER $oN REPORTING COMPANY. INC.
aaa mamma avs t w WASHfNGTCN. O C. 20024 (202) 554 2345 m.m
-e,,w,,,
- -,,. -