ML20004C294
| ML20004C294 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fermi  |
| Issue date: | 10/13/1977 |
| From: | Drake M AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| To: | NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20004C270 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8106020512 | |
| Download: ML20004C294 (20) | |
Text
,; ..
- UR h.am--
Attachment 6 JLEAR REGUI.ATORY COMM.
y O In the matter of application )
of Oetroit Edison to amend )
Docket 50-341 their license to build Ferri II ) .
to include Northern Michigan )
Electric, Inc. , and Wolverine /
Electric, Inc. )
Notice to Chief, Anti-trust and Indemnity Group: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Wa s hington, D.C. 20555 PETITION OF MARTEa BAKE TO INTERVENE IN TLE ANTI-TRUST ASPECTS OF THIS Ph0CE3 DING PURSUANT TO Nhc dULES 2:101, SECTION 5a AND OTHERS, AND STATES:
4 IDENTIFICATION OF PETIrIONER AMD Hid 1NTERESTS TO BE AFFE0TED MarthaCGrake, Petoskey, Michigan, is a member of Top O' Michigan rural electric retail cooperatives and a rate payer at two locations in Emcet County. Top O' Michigan buys all of its electricity from horthern E ichigan Electric, Inc., one of the
( parties to the amendad licensing.
PETITIONIRS I3 tents 1S TO 3E ADVERSELY AFFECTED My interests may be adversely affected by this license because my contract with Top O' Michigan allows no purchase of other electricity, Top O' Michigan's contract with Northern Michigan Electric allows no purchase of other electricity, and Northern Michigan's contract with Detroit Edison commits them to paying 11% of the costs and expenses of Fermi II which may be very expensive.
STATEMENT 7F CONTENTIONS A. The contract between Top O! Michigan and myself violates anti-trust laws because it prohibits the purchase by myself of electricity from an) other source.
3 The contract between Top O' Michigan Rural Electric Co. and Northern Michigan Electric , Inc. , prlhlbits purchase of electricity from any other source and thereby violates.. anti-trust laws.
C. The contract between Northern Michigan Electric, Inc., and Detroit Edison, Inc., calls for NME to pay for 11% of the costs of Fermi II and have control of 11% of its power. As this triples the capacity of NME it precludes the purchase of cheaper cower unless they can sell the more expensive power that Fermi II pay l turn out to produce. This violates anti-trust laws.
R spectfully submitted, Oct. 3, 1977 81060206@,,. I)) Lu Cigd e p.,_
,- Attachment 6 1,.
I cer:,1f:/ toe fore.ioins petition waa served by placing it in ene U.s. nail, first class postade prepaid, to:-
sugene E. Snary, Esq. dudene d. Tnom.is, Jr. Esq.
.. arn e r , Norcross ana Judd LeEoeuf, Lamo, Leiby a 1lacRai Old Kent sank claf. 1757 3. Street .: . .l .
Grand Rapid.s Ilienigan !*9503 4=snington, D.C. 2003o dural Electrification administration Peter 4* Marquardt, Esq.
Department of agriculture The Detroit Edison Co.
/;asnington , D. C. 20555 2000 second Ave.
Detroit, 1lienign gd22o Chief, Anti-Trust and Inde.nnity Group U. J. Nuclear Re gulatory Commis sion
.la snington , D. O. 20555 , e Oct. 13, 197'l lbe,,_,D._ 0dM_
Martna G. Drake 23J Fairview Petoskey, hien. h9'/ /0 On :nis 13tn da:. of October, 19 77, cefore me, a ;Iotary Public in and for i~ net Ocunt 7, personally appeared hartna G. Drake, to me
,cnown to ce One person describe in tne foregoing instrumer.t, anc scknowledged tnit sne executed One same as ner free act anc deed.
1-:y commission expires:
v?~. r, /92 7 d , 2%
i l dotary Public, Emmet County, 111cnig.in CAROL L JOHNSON Notary .'ci:. Emm:! County. Mi:'a.
i My Commissica L.;::es N:rt. 5. Zi2 l
.-- . __ ,.m ---.. _ . , . , _ .
' . 1 b'
Attachment 7 .
s' BEFORE THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE DETROIT EDISON COMPANY Docket No. 50-341 ENRICO FERMI UNIT 2 l
l INFORMATION FOR ANTITRUST REVIEW t OF THE OPERATING LICENSE APPLICATION l
l L
i April 1980 l
1 l
-. , - . ~ . < , - --., . , . . - - , . . , . ., - . . - _ , , - , , . - , . . . , _ . , . - _ . _ . . , .
Attachment 7
/ INTRODUCTION On September 26, 1972, the Commission issued Applicant
+ in this Docket a cons *.ruction permit containing language which satisfied Applicant's commitment to the Justice Department. The condition in the construction permit is as follows:
" Applicant agrees to abide by the agreements and interpretations between it and the Department of Justice relating to Article I, paragraph 8 of the Electric Power Pool Agreement between t'.:e Applicant and Consumers Power Company as specified in a letter from Applicant to the Director of l Regulation dated August 13, 1971, and the letter from Richard W. McLaren, Assistant Attorney General, l Antitrust Division, U.S. Department of Justice, to Bertram H. Schur, Associated General Counsel, Atomic l
Energy Commission, dated August 16, 1971. (Copies of the Letters are attached)
On May 1, 1973, an agreement was executed between Consumers Power Company and The Detroit Edison Company called the
! " Electric Coordination Agreement between Consumers Power Company I
and The Detroit Edison Company". This agreement per Article XIV cancels and supersedes the " Electric Power Pooling Agreement" l
dated December 22, 1962. This agreement further states under Article 1, paragraph 6 " Connections with Others" as follows:
"This Agreement shall be revised, amended, modified or replaced in order to admit third parties, having public utility functions and responsibilities, to this or an amended, revised, modified or new agreement. To be eligible, the applicant third party must have the:
(a) Ability to meet the installed reserve capability responsibility criteria then i
applicable to the parties hereto (without prejudice to the right of the parties hereto, upon the entry of an applicant, to propose such changes, if any, in the l
terms and conditions of said participa-tion as may be necessary to allocate equitably all costs and benefits of said participation between the applicant and the parties hereto) ;
(b) Ability to participate in the interconnection and grid line responsibilities; (c) Ability to have its system be dispatched by the central control center of the parties hereto:
I l
- Attachm:nt 7 d
k .' (d) Ability to provide representation on the five standing committees of this Agreement; (e) Ability to comply with the other terms and conditions of this Agreement; and 4
(f) Ability to have sufficient financial stand-ing so as to reasonably assure that it can perform fully the various provisions of this Agreement."
The new co-ordination agreement was reviewed by the U. S. Department of Justice in Dockets 50-452A and 50-453A (Greenwood Units 2 and 3) and found to be in compliance with Enrico Fermi Unit 2 construction permit condition.
On January 5, 1976 a new agreement was executed between Consumers Power Company and The Detroit Edison Company called the " Electric Coordination Agreement between Consumers Power Company and The Detroit Edison Company". This Agreement per Article XIV cancels and supersedes the May 1, 1973 Agreement Article 1, paragraph 4, " Connections with Others", omits the eligibility referred to:
"(f) ability to have sufficient financial standing so as to reasonably assure that it can perform fully the various provisions of this Agreement."
. ANSWERS TO REGULATORY GUIDE 9.3 1 (a). In the initial filing, Enrico Fermi Unit 2 was scheduled for operation in 1974. Four units, two fossil-fired at 800 MW each and two nuclear at 1150 MW each, were scheduled to follow Enrico Fermi Unit 2 starting in 1977 and running through 1980. However, lower growth rate projections coupled with slippages and changes in generation expansion plans, resulted in the addition of one fossil-fired (800 MW) unit that went into commercial operation in 1979. No other unit i additions are planned prior to Enrico Fermi No. 2.
Following the Fermi 2 unit, two coal fired units (650 MW each) are authorized for commercial operation, one in 1984 and the other in 1985. Present pro]ected reserves appear to be adecuate unti.' the late 1980s when capacity and energy purchases : rom other utilities may be necessary to supplement projected retroit Edison
, reserves (See attached revised Load Forecast Tables 1 and 2).
Attachment 7 1 (b). The Detroit Edison Company has amended or replaced in whole the following agreements with other electric utilities, since the initial' filing of Fermi 2:
A new Inter-Utility Power Interchange Agreement between The City of Detroit and The Detroit Edison Company went into effect October 1, 1978. (1)
A new Electric Coordination Agreement between Consumers Power Company and The Detroit Edison l Company became effective January 5, 1976. (1)
A new Interconnection Agreement between Consumers Power Company, The Detroit Edison Company and Ontario Hydro went into effect January 1, 1975.
Amendment No. 2 went into effect July 1, 1979. (1)
The Inter-Utility Power Interchange Agreement between the City of Wyandotte and The Detroit Edison Company was amended effective March 1, 1978. (1) l A new " Interconnection Agreement" between the Ford Motor Company and The Detroit Edison Company went into effect September 5, 1979. (2)
The Operating Agreement among Consumers Power
! Company, The Detroit Edison Company and Indiana and Michigan Electric Company now has sixteen amendments, the latest of which was filed January 30, 1980. (1)
As a result of conferences held with representatives of the Anti-trust Division of the U. S. Department of j
Justice in the filing of construction permits for the
< Enrico Fermi and Greenwood nuclear units, The Detroit Edison Company agreed to accept certain conditions pro-l posed by the Justice Department. In conformance to those l conditions, the Censumers Power Electric Coordination Agreement was consumated.
l The new agreements with Ford Motor Company, the City of Wyandotte and the City of Detroit was primarily a format change to be more uniform with'tne other interchange agreements.,
(1) On file with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (2) In process for filing with the Michigan Public Service Commission
. . ATTACHMENT 7 1 (b). The new amendments with Ontario Hydro, as well as -
(Cont'd) the amendments to the Operating Agreement with Consumers Power Company, Indiana and Michigan Electric Company and Toledo Edison Company were basically price changes.
l A new agreement between The Detroit Edison Company and Northern Indiana Public Service Corporation became ~
effective May 1, 1979. This agreement is similar to the one with Indiana and Michigan Electric Company.
1 (c). The following changes to transmission in respect to:
(1) the nuclear unit, (2) interconnections, or (3) connec-tions to wholesale customers, have been made since the initial filing for Enrico Fermi Unit 2.
(1) The original Enrico Fermi Unit 2 transmission included four 345 KV circuits. These circuits were part of the planned transmission for two units (Enrico Fermi Unit 2 and Enrico Fermi Unit 3) . Due to the indefinite deferment of Enrico Fermi Unit 3, two of the transmission l circuits have been deferred.
(2) Original plans called for four 345 KV circuits interconnecting Detroit Edison with Toledo Edison. These included two circuits from Detroit Edison's Lulu Station. That station is now deferred and there now exists a single tap to Toledo Edison from a double cir-cuit Detroit Edison line. This results in a total of only three interconnections between Detroit Edison and Toledo Edison.
(3) Transmission to the City of Pontiac, City of Croswell, and the Thumb Electric Co-op has been strengthened. The City of Sebewaing now has a 40 kV interconnection with Detroit Edison. Automatic throw-over of the circuit to the Southeastern Michigan Rural Electric Co-op has been added to improve power supply
~
reliability.
1 (d). In the Fall of 1974, representatives from the Rural Electric Ascociation Northern Michigan Electric Coopera-tive, Inc., and Wolverine Electric Cooperative, Inc. met with Detroit Edison to discuss the possibility of their purchasing Detroit Edison existing generation as well as generation still under construction. Their proposal would
, provide a source of funds to aid Detroit Edison to resume
! its construction on new generation. The proposal resulted l in an agreement, signed in February, 1977 whereby The l
Detroit Edison Company sold an undivided ownership of i 20 percent of the Enrico Fermi No. 2 Unit to Northern
. . _ . - ~ . _ - _ _ _
Michican Electric Coooerative. Inc. s7d Wolverine Electric
. _ _ ~ _ . . _ _ . . _ . _ _ - . _ _ . _ .
Attachm: int 7 1 (e). Two basic changes were made in the Wholesale for Resale rate structure.
- 1. The valley hours were increased to exclude only the period of 1100 hours0.0127 days <br />0.306 hours <br />0.00182 weeks <br />4.1855e-4 months <br /> to 1900 hours0.022 days <br />0.528 hours <br />0.00314 weeks <br />7.2295e-4 months <br /> Monday through Friday. This change was made to coincide with the Michigan jurisdictional rates and thereby avoid any possible pricing conflict.
- 2. The rate structure for Consumers Power was changed at their request. See attached Schedule No. 5.
Copies of the latest rate schedules are attached.
1 (f). The Village of Sebewaing and the Michigan Minicipal Co-operative Power Pool have been added as new wholesale customers. There have been no changes concerning parts
! (2), (3) and (4) of the question.
1 (g). The following units are presently scheduled for operation after the Enrico Fermi 2 unit. No power output allocations have been made for any of these units. As l
the company agreed in the Greenwood Units 2 and 3 Dockets I (50-452A and 50-453A) the right of participation was offered to entities in southeastern Michigan. No entity agreed to participate with Detroit Edison in the units as either owners or purchasers of power output from these l units. However, as a result of the offer the Michigan i Municipal Co-operative Power Pool commenced negotiation with the company and was taken on as a new wholesale for resale customer.
Unit Size (MW) Tyce Year Belle River 1 664 Fossil 1984 Belle River 2 664 Fossil 1985 l
1 (h). As was mentioned in the initial Enrico Fermi Unit 2 filing, negotiations were underway between the Public Lighting Commission of the City of Detroit and The Detroit Edison Company regarding a proposed revised interconnection agreement. The new agreement became effective October 1, 1971. It provided for mutual emergency and standby assistance, economy energy interchange and the sale or purchase of capacity and energy between the parties.
A new agreement with expanded provisions including trans-mission services became effective October 1, 1978.
The Village of Sebewaing has been generating all of its own requirements, utilizing low-cost interruptible-rate gas as its primary fuel and oil as its backup fuel.
. Attachment 7 1 (h). Due to the shortage of these fossil fuels, it approached (Cont'd) The Detroit Edison Company and a contract for the sale by 1 The Detroit Edison Company te the Village of Sebewaing for 2,500 kW was negotiated. On November 15, 1973, a 40 kV Interconnection was placed in service between the parties.
In the Summer of 19'i4, The Detroit Edison Company was cpproached by the Michigan Municipal Co-operative Power Pool concerning a capacity and energy purchase.
An agreement was negotiated.wherein Detroit Edison sold 20 megawatts of capacity at a 100 percent load factor to the Michigan Municipal Co-operative Power Pool, beginning l
September 1,1974, and running for at least two. years.
Charges for this capacity and energy are at Detroit Edison's wholesale for resale rate. At the request of the Co-operatives, on two occasions the sale was increased l from 20 to 30 megawatts.
l In March of 1979, the Company offered the Michigan
[
Public Power Agency and the City of Lansing up to 200
! megawatt ownership in Enrico Fermi No. 2, and the Belle River Plant, Units 1 and 2. Discussions between the
! parties are still underway, l
Wabash Valley Rural Electric Cooperative (Indiana) approached the Company in 1979 regarding their possible interest in purchasing a part of Greenwood No 1, an .
oil-fired generating unit that Detroit Edison placed in service in July of 1979, Negotiations are still underway.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The Detroit Edison Company.has caused its name to be hereunto signed by Harry Tauber, its Vice President -
Engineering and Construction, this 30th day of April, 1980.
l THE DETROIT EDISON COMPANY BY:
i Harry Tauber Vice President - Engineering and Construction I
-.e_...-,, - .,--.-+w,-.w,-..-w, ---_-,,,..-.y...m---.,,,,...,-r.,, -- ,--#-, , - - , , - , , - , , , , . ..,.,o, ,.,,..q,.,w-. .,--,,.-,-.,,,--,.,.,v,.- -m. ,--.r,.- , e-
~
Attachment 7 o
STATE OF MICHIGAN )
) SS.
COUNTY OF WAYNE )
Harry Tauber,, being first duly sworn, deposes and says: That he is Vice President - Engineering and Construction of The Detroit Edison Company, the Applicant for licenses hereunder; that he has read the foregoing Application for Licenses and knows the contents thereof; and that the same are true to the best of his knowledge and belief.
1 Subscribed and sworn to before me this 30 day of April, 1980.
Attachment 7 O
THE DETIWIT EDISON (D PANY F.E.R.CS Electric Tariff, volume No. I Third Revised Sheet No. 4 g (Supersedes Second Revised Sheet No. 4~.
Rate Seneaule No. 2 RATE SCHEDULE,0OVERNING SERVICE TO:
City of Croswell RATE PER MONTH:
l A Custacor Charge of:
5150.00 por montn A Facilities Charge of:
51,500.00 per montn ;
L A Demand Oiarge of:
58.56 per kilowatt of billing demenc per montn An Energy Charge of:
2.14 per Allowatthour applied to I.04 times the motorec quantity FUEL ADJUSTMENT AM) PLJt04ASED POWER ADJUSTWiT: The Energy Qiergo in tne atowe eate is suojeet to the provisions of Tariff Paragraph 3.3.
LATE PAYMENT CHARGE: See Tariff Paragraph 2.5 of the Comoany's Tariff.
i SPECIAL FACILITIES CHARGE: See Tarif f Paragraph 7.1 of the Company's Tarif f.
l l
MINIMUM CHARGE: Customer Charge plus the Facilities Charge plus the Demanc Charge as statec above.
MonthIy Bii1ing Demond The daily demand is the highest 60-einuto integrated reading of the demand meter in each day, excluding valley hours. The montnly billing demand is the nignost caily comano estantisnec during tne billing period plus one-thled of the amount by which it is exceecec by the n ignest demanc occurring during valley hours on the same calencer cay. In no event will the montney billing demand be less than 655 of tne nignost sonthly billing comanc curing calencer montns of June, July, August, Septemoer and October of the preceding eleven calencar montns nor less than 505 of tne contract capacity. Demanos are to be based on 1.0 times tne meter 6c quantity.
VALLEY HOUR USE: See Tarif f Paasgraph 3.8 cf tne Company's Tari f f.
power FACTOR CLAUSE: See Tariff Paragraon 3.2 of the Company's Tariff.
EXPERIMENTAL INTERRLFTI8LE CPTION: if service Is elected in accordance witn Paragraph 3.4 cf tne Compa ny 's Tar i f f , the geman d charge w i l l be reduced by 52.40 per nilo att per montr..
6 e
Issues By: E. L. Greve, Jr. III*811 8 4 fil 1* 1980 under auther&ty of Letter Vice Chairman of the Board Order of the Federal Energy segulaterv comission dated January 17, 1980 1.n case
?"**_** ' ?I. El W . - ..-.. - .-- . - . , . - - - - - . - - . - - - - -
Attachment 7 THE DCm0iT EDISON Cl3PANY F.E.R.C. Electric Terif f , Veline No.1 Third Revised Shest No. 5 f (Supersedes Second Revised Sheet No. 51 Rate Schedule No. 4 RATE SO4EDULE GDfERNING SERVICE TO:
The Thumb EIectrIc Cooperative RATE PER aONTH.
A Customer Charge of:
1750.00 por montn A Demand Charge of : *
$9.72 per kilowatt of billing demand per month An Energy Charge of:
, 2.1( per kilowattnour For service at less than 40 kilovolts Energy Charges are to be appliec to 1.01 times the metered quantity.
FUEL ADJUSTMENT A)c PtstCHASED POWER ADJUSTMENT: The Energy Charge in tne above rate is suoject to the provisions of Tarif f Faragraph 3.3 of the Compe. .*/'s Taritf.
LATE PAYMENT CNARGE: See Terif f Paragrapn 2.5 of the Compeny's Terif f.
SPECIAL FACILITIES CHARGE: See Tarif f Paragraph 7.1 of the Company's Tarif f.
MINIMLN CHARGE: Customer Charge plus the Facilities Charge plus tne Demand Charge as statec !
soove.
ll Monthly Billing Demanc The daily demenc is the highest 60*ninute Integrated reading of the demanc meter in each day.
excluding valley hours. The monthly billing demand is the hignost caily demano estaolisnea curing the billing period plus one-third of the amount by which it is encoeded by the h ighest demand occurring during valley hours on the same calendar day. In no event oils tne montnly billing demand be less than 655 of tne highest monthly billing demano during calendar months of June, July, August, September and October of the precocing eleven calencar montns nor less than 505 of tne contract capacity. For service at less than 40,000 volts, demands are to be based on 1.01 times the metered quantity.
VALLEY HOlR USE: See Tariff Paragrap 3.1 of the Company's Tariff.
power FACTOR CLAUSE: See Tarif f Paragraph 3.2 of the Company's Tarif f.
EXPERIMENTAL INTERRtPTIBLE OPTION: If service is elected in accordance with Paragrap9 3.4 of the Company's Tari f f , the demand enarge vill be reduced by 52.40 per milocatt per montn.
y[ce che rune o the seard sffectives April 1.1980 under authorsty Of latter Orser of the Teeeral Energy segulatory 1seued Cat April 1. 1 pac Wastos dated January 1h 1980 in case Ms. tano.100
AttaChmCnt 7 d
Tit DET1 WIT EDISON CDFANT
[ F.E.R.C. Electric Tariff, Veline No. I Third Revised Sheet No. 6 (Supersedes Second Itevised Sheet No. 6)
Rate Schedule No. 5 RATE SO4EDULE GOVEIDilNG SERVICE TO:
Consumers Power Company at PantIac, michIgon RATE PER MONTH:
A Customer Q arge of:
32,500.00 per month A Domend Charge of: ,
16.95 per kw of on-peak billing demand plus:
51.75 per kW of maximum demand for service at subtransmission levels 11.15 per kw of maximme demand for service at transmission levels Tne maximum demano shall be the highest 30 minute demand created during tne previous 12 billing months, including the current month, but not less than 50% of contract capac ay.
Energy Charges:
2.254 per kilowatthour f or all kilowatthours used curing the on-peak perioc.
1.954 per kilowatthour for all kilowatthours used during the of f-peak perloc.
For service at less than 120,000 volts, energy and demand charges are to be app a isc to 1.01 times the meterec quantity.
FUEL ADJUSTIENT Ape PtmCHASED power ADJUSTENT: The Energy Charge in the aeovo rate is subject to the provisions of Tarif f Paragraph 3.3 of the Company's Tari f f.
LATE PAYMENT CHARGE: See Tarif f Paragraph 2.5 of the Company's Tarif f.
SPECI AL FACILITIES OtARGE: See Tarif f Paragraph 7.1 of the Company's Tari f f.
MINIMUM 04ARGE: Customer Charge plus the Demand Charge as stated above.
power FACTOR CLAUSE: See Tariff Paragraph 3.2 of Company's Tariff.
EXPERIMENTAL INTERRUPTIBLE OPTION: If service is elected in accoccance witn Paragraph 3.4 of the Company's Tarif f , the demana charge will be reduced by 12.40 per kilowatt per montn.
enthsy On-8eak BIIIIng Demanc The monthly on-peak billing demano shall be the average of the 4 weekly hignost 30-minute integrated readings of the demand meter during the on-peak hours of the billing period. In no event siis the monthly on-peak billing demard be less than 655 of the hignost montnsy on-pea.
billing deaand curing the calender months of June, July, August, SeptemDer, anc October of the proceding eleven calender months, nor less than 505 of contract capacity.
(Continued On Next Page) laeued sy: 1. L. creve. Jr. Effeettve April 1. 19a0 under eucaorsty of latter Vice Chatrone of the seerd oreer of the Federal Energy angulatory Ceemission dated January 17,196C in Case
...,,- -- ? ?. N
i Attachment 7 6
r I
l M DGW.T EDISON CX3PANY Third Revised Sheet No. O F.E.R.C. Electric Tarif'e Vel me No. I (Supersedes Second Revised Sheet No. 6 Senedule of On-Peak Mours On-peak hours are those hours between 1100 hours0.0127 days <br />0.306 hours <br />0.00182 weeks <br />4.1855e-4 months <br /> and 1900 hours0.022 days <br />0.528 hours <br />0.00314 weeks <br />7.2295e-4 months <br /> each day, Monday throug*
Friday, legal holidays excluded.
The following will be considered legal holidays for the purpose of applying this senedule:
New Year's Day, Good Friday, Memerial Day, independence Day, La bor Da y, Thanksgiving Oay, Christmas Dey, " Monday" holidays, where legally recognized, will be recognizoc in place of the
" traditional" holidays.
F l
!aeved ay: s. L. creve. Jr. gffective: Aeral 1. 1960 eder autmersey of ' stter VLee matemas of the Seard Order of the Federal Emergy negwlatory Camsetoe dated Janury 17. 1981 at CA8 laeued on: April 1. 19so me t.aao.10C
Attachment 7 i
d I THE DETR0lT EDISOd CDPANY Third Revised Sheet No. 7
( F.E.R.C. Electric Teelff Volme No. I (Supersedes Second movised Sheet ho 7)
Rate Schoeule No. 6 lute SDeEDULE 80VDW!NG SERvlCE TO:
Village of Cllaton l
l RATE PER MONTH:
A Customer Charge of:
5150.00 per month A Facilities Charge of:
52,000.00 per month A Demand Charge of:
59.39 per kiiouatt of bIIIIng denend per month An Energy Charge of:
2.14 per kilowatthour applied to 1.01 times the metered quantity.
FUEL ADJUSTMENT AE Pt#O4ASED POWER ADJUSTENT: The Energy Charge in the above rate is sucject to tne provisions of Tarif f Paragraph 3.3 of the Company's Tarif f.
I LATE PAYMENT CHARGE: See Tarif f Paragraph 2.5 of the Company's Tarif f.
SPECIAL FACILITIES CHARGE: See Tarif f Paragraph 7.I of the Company's Tari f f.
MINIMUM CHARGE: Customer Charge plus the Facilities Charge plus the Gesand Charge as statec aoove.
Montnay 8ieiing Domenc The daily demand is the highest 60mminute integrated reading of the demand meter in each day, excluding valley hours. The monthly billing demand is the highest daily demand establishec during the billing period plus one-third of the amount by which it is exceeded Dy the h ighest demand occurring during valley hours on the same calender day. In no event will the montnly Dilling demand be less than 655 of the hignost monthly billing demand during calendar montns of June, July, August, September and October of the proceding eleven calendar months nor less than 505 of the contract capacity. Demands are to be based on 1.01 times the meterec quantity.
VALLEY HOUR USE: See Tariff Perageaph 3.1 of the Company's Tariff.
PowCR FACTOR CLAUSE: See Tari f f Paragraph 3.2 of the Company's Tari f f.
EXPERIMENTAL INTERRuPTIBLE OPTl0N: If service is elected in accordance sitt Paragraph 3.4 of the Company's Tarif f, the demand charge will be reduced by 12.40 per kilowatt per montn.
Issues By: E. L. crove. Jr. Ef fec tive : April 1.19a0 uneve auti.orsty of :.cttc Mce Chairman of the Seere Order of the Federal Emersy Aegulatory commission dated January 17, 1980 2 Case taeued On: April 1,19ac so. E380-100
- Attachmtnt 7 I
M DETROIT SISDN Cl3 PANT *. h ird Revised Sheet No. 3 F.E.it.C. Electric Tarif f, volime No. I (Supersedes second Revised Sheef me. 31
(
l Itate Schedule No.14 RATE SOtEDULE GOWDWING SDtvlCE T0:
The Southeastern Michtgen Rural Electric Cooperative l
I RATE PDt MONTH:
l l A Customer Charge of:
5250.00 per month A Demand Qierge of:
19.03 per kilowatt of billing demand per month An Energy Charge of:
2.1( per kiiovatthour FUEL ADJUSTENT AfC Pl#lCHASED POWDt ADJUSTW: The Energy Charge in the above rate is subject to the provisions of Tarif f Paragraph 3.3. of the Company's Tarif f.
LATE PAYMENT CHARGE: See Tarif f Paragraph 2.5 of the Company's Tarif f.
SPECIAL FACILITIES 04ARGE: See Tarif f Paragraph 7.1 of the Company's Tari f f.
MINIM M CHARGE: Customer Charge plus the Demand Charge as stated above.
1 MonthIy BIIIIng Demond j
The daily demand is the highest 60-einu?e Integrated reading of the demand motor in each day.
u cluding valley hours. The monthly billing demand is the hignost dally demand estanilshed l
during the billing period plus one-third of the amount by whlen it is exceeded by tne h ighest demand occurring during valley hours on the same calender day. In no event will the monthly billing demand be less than 655 of the highest monthly billing demand during calender months of June. July, August. September and October of the preceding eleven calendar montns nor less than 505 of the contract capacity.
VALLEY HOUR USE: See Teriff Paragrsph 3.1 of the Company's Tariff.
power FACTOR CLAUSE: See Tariff Paragesph 3.2 of the Company's Tariff.
l k
!aeued tm s. L. Gewee. Jr. strective: April 1.1980 under authority of letter i
Vlag Oietream of the seerd order of the Feders: Leergy hegulatory Comuussion dated January 17, 1940 La Case 14eued on: Aeral 1. 19a0 se, sa80-100
i l
Attachment 7 l
I i
TIE DETIWIT EDISON 23PANY F.E.R.C. Electric Tarif f, Veliano No.1 Third Revid5d Sheet No. 9 (Supersedes Second Revised Sheet No. 9' Rate Schedule No.- 18 RATE SO4EDULE GOVERNING SERylCE To:
Vlifeg ,,
RATE PER IGNTH:
A Custcuner Charge of:
5t50.00 per month A Facilities Charge of:
51,250.00 per month A Demand Charge of:
510.04 per kilowatt of billing demand por montn An Energy Charge of:
2.14 per kilowattr.our applied to 1.01 times the metered quantity i
FUEL ADJUST)ENT A80 Ptst04ASED POWER ADJUSTIENT: The Energy Charge in the above rate is sueject to the provisions of Tarif f Paragraph 3.3 of the Company's Tarif f.
LATE PAYMENT 04ARGE: See Tari f f Paragraph 2.5 of the Compa.,y's Tarif f.
SPECIAL FACILITIES O WtGE: See Tarif f Paragraph T.I of the Ccenpany's Tarif f.
MINIMUst 04ARGE:
Customer Charge plus the Facilities Charge plus the Demanc Charge as statec above.
Montney Billing Demand The daily demand is the highest 60-minute Integrated reading of the demana meter in each day, excluding valley hours. The monthly billing canand is the hignost daily demand estaclisned i
during the billing period plus one-third of the amount by which it is encoedoc oy the n ignost demand occurring during valley hours on the same calendar day. In no event wil' monthly billing demand be less than 655 of the highest sonthly billing demand during c .c. .., ,, montns of June, July, August, September and October of the proceding eleven calencer montns nor less than 505 of tne contract capacity. Demands are to be based on 1.01 times tne meterec quantity.
yALLEY HOUR USE: See Tarif f Paragraph 3.1 of the Company's Tari f f.
power FACT (Nt CLAUSE: See Tarif f Paragesph 3.2 of the Conpany's Tarif f.
OPERl8 ENTAL INTERRt.PTISLE (PTION: if service is elected in accordance with Paragraon 3.4 of tne
- Company's Tari f f , the Demand Charge will be reduced by 52.40 per kilowatt per montn.
l l
14euse sy: E. L. Grove, Jr. Effective April 1,1980 under authority of utter vtce esstruse of the a rs oreer of ene reseral enersy nesulat:n
. , - - . . _. -_ . - - . T-: "l ' " " ' - : : : :.L *: : ?L -
~
Attachment 7 d
THE DETROIT EDISON ID PANY F.E.R.C. Electric Tariff, vet a e No. I Third Revised Sheet No.10 (Supersedes Second Revised Sheet No. 10),
Rate Schedule No. 20 RATE SO4EDULE GOWDDelles SGtVICE 70:
The Mie fgan Municipal Cooperative Power Pool i
RATE PER IONTH:
A Customer Diarge of:
$150.00 per month A Demand Otarge of: i'
$9.00 per kilowatt of billing demand per month li An Energy Charge of:
2.05( per kilowatthour FUEL ADJUSTENT Apc PLMO4ASED POWER ADJUSTENT: The Energy Charge in the above rate is subject to the provisions of Tarif f Paragraph 3.3 of the Company's Tarif f. )
LATE PAYMENT O WIGE: See Tariff Parageaph 2.5 of the Company's Tariff.
MINIMLM OWtGE: Customer Charge plus the Demand Charge as stated above.
Monthly Billing Demand The sonthly billing demand Is the contract capacity.
( Issued Syr t. L. creve. Jr. gfiec etw: April 1.1980 under authortcy of Latter vice chairman ei the Board creer of the Federal tsorgy angulatory Issued on: April 1. 1980 Coumissten dated .'anuary 17, 1980 &n Case an. taso.100
_____ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - - ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ' " ~ ~ " " ' ~ ' - " " " ~ ~ ~ ~ " " ' " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
AttachmInt 7 TABLE 1 DETROIT EDISON ANNUAL PEAK DEMAND AND ENERGY PROJECTIONS ANNUAL ENE'GY A ANNUAL' PEAK REQUIREMENTS YEAR LOAD (MW) kWh x 106 1963 3,281 18,632 1964 3 , 6 1'6 20,375 1965 3,975 22,375 1966 4,273 24,704 1967 4,422 25,611 1968 4,835 28,171 1969 5,201 30,303 1970 5,465 31,158 1971 5,986 33,062 1972 6,049 35,616 1973 6,935 37,798 1974 6,614 35,826 1975 6,467 35,034 1976 6,613 38,046 ;
1977 7,381 39,238 l 1978 - 7,312 39,930 1979 6,829 39,593 I 1980 7,105 37.842 1981 7,382 39,704 1982 7,533 40,566 1983 7,904 42,406 1984 8,212 44,174 1985 8,536 45,656 1986 8,863 47,240 1987 9,173 48,683 1988 9,475 50,426 1989 9,792 51,810 1990 10,108 53,289 April 1980
- ' - Attachment 7 o
TABLE 2 COMBINED SYSTEMS OF DETROIT EDISON AND CONSUMERS POWER ANNUAL PEAX DEMAND AND ENERGY PROJECTIONS COMBINED SYSTEMS COMBINED SYSTEMS ANNUAL ENERGY COINCIDENT PEAK REQUIREMENTS YEAR LOAD (MW) (kWh x 106) 1963 5,476 30,899 1964 5,966 33,535 1965 6,526 36,913 1966 7,099 40,595 1967 7,280 42,276 1968 7,846 46,286 1969 8,435 49,738 1970 8,751 51,253 1971 9,573 54,571 1972 9,743 ,
58,946 1973 11,265 63,010 1974 10,723 60,452 1975 10,601 59,316 1976 10,798 64,041 1977 11,657 66,068 1978 11,912 67,422 1979 11,224 67,499 1980 11,925 66,757 1981 12,322 69,318 1982 12,753 71,877 1983 13,284 74,690 1984 13,702 77,114 1985 14,176 79,514 1986 14,663 82,071 1987 15,143 84,486 1988 15,615 87,289 1389 16,032 89,253 1990 16,448 91,333
. . . _ _ . _ . _ . . _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ . . _ _ __ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ . . _ . _.__._^~.
_ _P . _ _ ,_
Attachment 8 Detroit Ecison Erie!"- ?u" E__ '
February 20, 1981 EF2- 52,480 Mr. Jerome Sal tzman, Chief Utility Flaance Branch Divis ion of Engineering Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555
Dear Mr. Saltzman:
In response to your February 5,1931 letter requesting the current status of our negotiations with the Michigan Pubile Power Agency, the City of Lansing, and the Wabash Valley Rural Electric Cooperative regarding their Interest in purchasing a part of Detroit Edison's generation, we submit the following:
The Wabash Valley Rural Electric Cooperativa (Indiana) has withdrawn its interest in the potential part;cipation in our Greenwood No.1 Unit.
The Michigan Public Power Agency and the City of Lansing Board of Water and Light have withdrawn their interest in our Enrico Fermi No. 2 Unit. However, the Michigan Publ ic Power Agency has expressed a continuing interest in possible ownership of a portion of our Belle River Plant.
A letter of intent was drafted and forwarded to them in
! the sumer of 1980 and is now under consideration.
l The City of Lansing Board of Water and Light has Indicated that they will probably build to meet their own fue.ure generation requirements.
l If you have any questions or require any addltlonal info rmat ion ,
i please contact me at your convenience.
Sincerely, On hb>
8/D1%Dd7
- 3
_, Attachment 9 ARTICIE I (Contd) l principles and procedures to be followed in coordinated plannina shall be foranslated by the Planning Committee and approved by the Administra-tive Committee.
4 Subject to the other provisions of this Agreement, the parties hereto also agree that, insofar as is reasonably practicable, the operation and maintenance of the electric generating and transmission facilities of the parties hereto shall be coordinated in such a way as to provide the lowest practicable operating and maintenance costs consistent with a high degree of reliability. Minimum criteria for assuring reliable system operation are set forth in Supplement A. Coordinated operating practices out14nina the general principles and procedures to be followed in the coordinated operation and maintenance of the electric generating i and transmicsion facilities shall be' formulated by the Operating Committee and approved by the Aaministrative Connittee.
Connections With Others
- 5. The parties hereto agree that the costs and benefits i associated with any existing, new or revised agreement which is jointly executed by the parties hereto with any third party shall be shared as equal.W as practicable by the parties hereto.
- 6. This Agreement shall be revised, amended, modified or replaced in order to admit third parties, having public utility functions and respon-sibilities , to this or an amended, revised, modified or new agreement. To be eligible, the applicant third party must have the:
I _. _ _ _ , _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _
j -
15
- Attachment 9 u
ARTICLE I (Contd)
(a) Ability to meet ths installed reserve capabiH ty ree-ponsibility criteria then applicable to the parties 1
hereto (without prejudice to the right of the parties hereto, upon the entry of an applicant, to propose such changes, if any, in the terms and conditions of
! said participation as may be necessary to allocate equitably all costs and benefits of said participation between the applicant and the parties hereto);
(b) Ability to participate in interconnection and grid line responsibilities; (c) Ability to have its system be dispatched by the central control center of the parties hereto; (d) Ability to provide representation on the five st=_ar14 na consnittees of this Agreement; (e) Ability to comply with the other terms and conditions of this Agreement; and (f) Ability to have sufficient financial standing so as to reasonably assure that it can perform fully the various provisions of this Agreement.
- 7. Without agreement of the other party, future interconnee-tions or new or revised agreements may ex*r* or may be made by either party with any third party whose electric system operations are wholly j or partly outside the State of Michigan; provided, however, that the party undertmHng to make any such interconnection or agreement shall give the other party hereto written notice thereof, and such interconnection t
g Attachm nt 9 '
l _ *.
\ ....
ARTICIE I (Contd) i or agreement shall not be made until such other party has determined l 1
whether or not to exercise its option and right to share in the costs 1 l and benefits associated with such interconnection or agreement, as set forth in this Paragraph 7 Such written notice shan fuuy disclose the nature and terms of such interconnection or agreement and the identity of the third party involved. Upon receipt of such written notice, such other party shan have the option and right to $ hare in the costs insi benefits associated with such interconnection or age M . Within 90 days fonowing receipt of such notice, such other party shall give l i
written notice to the party undertaking to make such interconnection or l agreement stating whe N r or not it elects to share in such costs and 1
benefits. If such other party elects to share in such costs and benefits, the same shan be shared as equany as practicable between the parties hereto; and if such other party elects not to share in such costs and 1
benefits, such other party shan not share in any way in such costs and I benefits.
- 8. Without agreement of the other party, future interconnec-tions or new or revised agreements may exist or may be made by either party with any third party whose electric system operations are wheny within the State of Michigan.
- control of Each Party's Plants and Facilities l
- 9. The parties hereto also agree that neither party hereby l
abridges, disperses, or relinquishes any of its rights, privileges, res-pensibilities, and obligations to unilaterally control engineering, design, construction, operation and maintenance of its generating units )
l and transmission facilities. I l
i
- - _ - - . . ------- - - - - - - ------- - - -