ML20004A007
| ML20004A007 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | La Crosse File:Dairyland Power Cooperative icon.png |
| Issue date: | 04/20/1981 |
| From: | Linder F DAIRYLAND POWER COOPERATIVE |
| To: | Heishman R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20004A008 | List: |
| References | |
| LAC-7481, NUDOCS 8105110563 | |
| Download: ML20004A007 (2) | |
Text
f
(~').
D DA/RYLAND h
[k COOPERAT/VE
- PO BOX 817
- 2615 EAST AV SOUTH + LA CROSSE wtSCONSIN 54601 -
(608) 788 4 000 April 20, 1981 In reply, please refer to LAC-7481 DOCKET NO. 50-409 Mr.
R.
F.
Heishman Chief, Reactor Operations and Nuclear Support Branch U.
S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission Directorate of Regulatory Operations Region III 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, IL 60137
SUBJECT:
DAIRYLAND POWER COOPERATIVE LA CROSSE BOILING WATER REACTOR (LACBWR)
PROVISIONAL OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-45 IE INSPECTION REPORT NO. 50-409/80-13
REFERENCES:
(1)
NRC Letter, Heishman to Linder, Dated March 5, 1981.
(2)
NRC Letter, Heishman to Linder, Dated December 12, 1980.
(3)
DPC Letter LAC-7307, Linder to Heishman, Dated January 6, 1981.
Dear Mr. Heishman:
This letter constitutes the reply to your letter (Reference 1) in which you requested we further identify our corrective actions in response to IE Inspection Report No. 80-13 (Reference 2), Item 2, which we answered in Reference (3).
Reference (2) stated that LACBWR was cited:
"... for the failure to perform sufficient tours of the area by plant supervisory personnel, to keep plant management properly appraised of work activities (personnel performance),
and conditions inside of containment.
This is contrary to your Administrative Control Procedures 2. 3 and 2. 4. "
N l 8105110 5O
v4 i
Mr.
R. F. Heish=an i
Chief, Reactor Operations and LAC-7481 Nuclear Support Branch April 20, 1981 As stated in Reference (3), ACP's 2.3 and 2.4 have been revised.
In addition, the LACBWR Plant Superintendent issued a =e=0 cove ring inspection guidelines to Supervisory Personnel and Shift Technical Advisors on January 23, 1981,-providing clarification of the i
procedural responsibilities for plant tours.
The =e=o recc__ ends, as a mini =u= that the Contain=ent Building should be entered by a Shift Supervisor at least once per day.
The =e=o also expanded en the require = eat for STA'.s to make randoc2 backshift and weekend inspections.
It reiterated that there is no =andate for the STA to enter containment while en duty.
An inportant consideration in our response to the discussions concerning plant tours is the fact that plant managenent,. s upe rvisory,
and technical personnel other than the Shift Supervisor and Shif t Technical Adviser frequently visit the Centainment and Turbine Buildings during the normal work day.
Therefore, nu=erous oppo**" 4 " es are presented for feedback on work activities. and j
conditions throughout the plant.
The date full compliance was achieved was January 24, 1981, the day following the Plant Superintendent's =eco.
If you have any questions, please contact us.
Very truly yours, DAIRYLA'.'D P74ER COOPE?ATIVE LlcL4 A Frank Linder, General Manager FL: LSG: abs CC:
NRC Office of Inspection and Enforcenent Division of Reactor Operations Inspection Washingtcn, D.
C.
20555 Resident Inspectors l