ML20003H623

Reviews Proposed Response to Memo Re Union Carbide Fee Schedule.Concurs That No Conflict Between License SNM-639 & Matls & Plant Protection Amend.Reduction Below Schedule Id Appropriate

ML20003H623
Person / Time
Site:	07000687
Issue date:	02/13/1981
From:	Mccorkle G NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS)
To:	Rouse L NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS)
Shared Package
ML20003H620	List: ML20003H619 ML20003H623
References
NUDOCS 8105060518
Download: ML20003H623 (1)

Text

ne:e o,,

UNITED STATES

,2, NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION n

,Ej

,E wAsmNGTON, D. C. 20556

%,...../

FEB 131981 NOTE TO:

Lee Rouse, FCAF

SUBJECT:

UNION CARBIDE (LICENSE NO SNM-639) FEE SCHEDULE We have reviewed your proposed response to Bill Miller's memo on the above subject and agree that there is no conflict between the ~I.icense SNM-639 and the Materials and Plant Protection Amendment.

We believe that the SG amende nt bars Union Carbide from activities normally conducted by licensees subject to Schedule ID fees. Areductionbelopthe1D rate would, therefore, seem appropriate.

.m George W. McCorkl, Chief Physical Security Licensing Branch Division of Safeguards, NMSS 1

l l

T J "5060 515 L