ML20003G679
| ML20003G679 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Bailly |
| Issue date: | 04/20/1981 |
| From: | Whicher J PORTER COUNTY CHAPTER INTERVENORS, VOLLEN, R.J. & WHICHER, J.M. |
| To: | Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8104300514 | |
| Download: ML20003G679 (6) | |
Text
e.) hof S'L, -
RELATD C0KE.SPorDENCE l
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
~
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of
)
)
NORTHERN INDIANA PUBLIC
)
Docket No. 50-367 SERVICE COMPANY
)
(Construction Perm G
4 (Bailly Generating Station,
)
Extension) 9 g
Nuclear-1)
)
h
.6 /p'y k
)
e d
PORTER COUNTY CHAPTER INTERVENORS' l9
'J MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO FIRST M
j.,7 R 2 91981W SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO NIPSCO 11
'p
(,4 S (.,
g a,; g o'8 i
u s.
P r County Chapter Intervenors (PCCI)', by their 4c@ad.
ys, hereby move the Board, pursuant to 10 CFR 52.740(f)(1),
for an order compelling NIPSCO to answer interrogatories numbered 19, 20(a) and 20(c) of PCCI's First Set of Interrogatories to NIPSCO, for the reasons set forth below.
For the Board's conven-is set forth along with NIPSb's
~
ience, each Interrogatory
" answer" thereto:
INTERROGATORY:
"19.
Please describe NIPSCO's plans for re-routing of traffic, upgrading of the present road capacity, and
~
all other contemplated actions which it.will take to account for the anticipated increase in traffic due b to construction of the Bailly plant."
ANSWER:
"An estimate of the present average daily traffic patterns on the primary and secondary access roads surrounding the Bailly site.is shown on the attach-ment included in response to interrogatory nos 18, titled '1978 Average Daily Traffic'.
As indicated on this map, approximately 15,235 vehicles per day
, ~ > *
?F* L.
+
1
- 3
..:' "g
?
M ',. ;.
=
(r8104 30o g;q
~5
O
. use that portion of U.S. 12 directly west of the Bailly entrance and 10,915 vehicles per day use that portion of U.S.12 directly east of the Bailly -
entrance.
Assuming that one-half of the Bailly N-1 construction traffic went each way.cnt U.S.12, it would raise these figures to 16,035 and 11,715 or an increase of 5.3% and 7.3%, respectively, during the peak construction years.
The primary and secondary access roads surrounding the Bailly site and the traffic capacity in vehicles per hour for these roads are shown in the table attached to interrogatory no. 18, titled ' Routes and Capacities'.
We do not expect the capacities of these roads to be exceeded during the peak construction period (except for very short periods at shift change).
One procedure which NIPSCO will consider if temporary congestion becomes a problem is to stagger change times with Bethlehem Steel in order to minimize the effect of traffic delay and congestion surrounding the Bailly site."
NIPSCO's " answer" is non-responsive.
The only portion of the " answer" which relates to the interrogatory pesed is the last sentence, which describes "one procedure which NIPSCO will
~
consider."
The interrogatory requests NIPSCO's" plans, bet no plans are described.
If NIPSCO has no' plans, it should so state.
NIPSCO should be ordered to answer Interrogatory 19.
.r-,
\\
1 l
INTERROGATORY:
.....,,., g,3,g.
"20.
NIPSCO's 1980 Annual Report, at p. 26, states:
'A new cost estimate for the 1989 in-service date u-l will be completed in the spring of 1981.'
Please I
give the following information for that cost i
estimate:
(a) The date by which NIPSCO expects that cost s
estimate to be completed;"
- g. v...
t..
,s.
(..
o 4,, J
'r,
- i.
e f
i
?
' +i L
r
~
~~
, ANSWER:
"(a) NIPSCO expects that cost estimated to be co'mpleted in the spring of 1981."
NIPSCO's answer is non-responsive:
A date by which NIPSCO i.
" expects" to do an act is requested, and no date is giveu.
NIPSCO's description "in the spring o'f 1981" is wholly inadequate, and so vague and imprecise as to be of no use to PCCI for follow-up discovery.
NIPSCO should be ordered to specify the date raquested in the Interrogatory.
INTERROGATORY:
"20(c)
For each person who is or will be participating in preparing the cost estimate and who is not an employee of NIPSCO, the name, j ob title, and employer of that person."
ANSWER:
t-l
"(c)
Several departments of Sargent
& 'Lundy Engineers are involved in,s. preparation of a new cost l
estimate for Bailly.
The names and titles of the individuals responsible for such work in each in-volved department are:
D.L. Leone, Partner & Project Director C.W. Peterson, Proj ect Manager N.F. True, Head, Estimating Division W.G. Hegener, Manager, Mechanical Department J.M. McLaughlin, Manager, Structural Department D.C. McClintock, Manager, Electrical Department" NIPSCO's answer is non-responsive.
Instead of stating the name and job title of each person who is or will be participating in the cost estimate, NIPSCO has given the name and job title of those persons " responsible for such work in each involved l
..c" i cp,
3..~.
.., w
'e
^
G?.
i..___.-.
. department" of Sargent Lundy Engineers.
NIPSCO has failed to provide the information requested and it should ber ordered to do so.
l t
I I
i l CONCLUSION l
For the reasons set forth above, NIPSCO should be ordered to provide answers to Interrogatories 19, 20(a) and 20(c) of Porter County Chapter Intervenors' First Set of Interrog#atories 4
to NIPSCO.
l
- F.'. '
Respectfully submitted, DATED:
April 20, 1981 ;
I Robert J. Vollen l
Jane M. Whicher
'I O l
By: <= - T ' -
~
i Jane M. Whicher Attorneys for Porter County Chapter Intervenors Robert J. Vollen f
"~
Jane M. Whicher i
109 North Dearborn
~!,h Suite 1300 Chicago, Illinois 60602 (312) 641-5570 l
~
s-]
I vp
.. c:.
.y-3....
..k.
Uc t, 2, p
.7,
.,..,.s
e }D., -
%.,,'. ' ' 'Q
.~hM.' " i' ' A iri.#' $,,' f f?
- ;<' c ' ', '
- +c
..of or..
p.
-+-
,,-----g
~
+
l UNITED STA2S OF AMERICA
!l_
ITD coRRESPOEricz_
f NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
-- m BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of
)
)
NORTHERN INDIANA PC3LIC
)
Docket No. 50-367 SERVICE COMPANY
)
(Construction Permit (Bailly Generating
)
Extension)
Station, Nuclear-1)
)
)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I served copies of the Porter County Chapter Intervenors' Motion to Compel Anawers to First Set of Interrogatories to NIPSCO on all persons on the attache 8fService List, by causing them to be deposited in the U.S. mail, first class postage prepaid, on April 20, 1981.
Robert
. Vollen Jane M. Whicher
'n By:
N-AO W P.-.-.
JaneM.Whicher\\
Attorneys for Porter County Chapter Intervenors l
Robert J. Vollen Jane M. Whicher 109 North Dearborn g
Suite 1300 Chicago, Illinois 60602
.Q (312) 641-5570 v
i
- 8 nw i
4
SERVICE LIST Herbert Grossman, Esq.
George & Anna Srabowski Administrative Judge 7413 W. 136th Lane Atomic Safety & Licensing Cedar Lake, Indiana 46303 Board Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Dr.-George Schultz Commission 807'E. Coolspring Road Washington, D.C.
20555 Michigan City, Indiana 46360 i
Dr. Robert L. Holton Richard L. Robbins, Esq.
Administrative Judge Lak,e Michigan Federation School of Oceanography 53 W. Jackson Boulevard Oregon State University Chicago, Illinois 60604 Corvallis, Oregon 97331 Mr. Mike 01szanski Mr. Clifford Mezo Local 1010 - United Steelworkers Dr.'J. Venn Leeds of America Administrative Judge 3703 Euclid Avenue 10807 Atwell East Chicagd, Indiana 46312 Houston, Texas 77096 Steven C. Goldberg, Esq.
Office of the Executive Legal Director U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commissior Maurice Axelrad, Esq.
Washington, D.C.
20555 Kathleen H. Shea, Esq.
Lowenstein Newman, Reis, Anne Rapkin, is s t ' Attorney Genert Axelrad and Toll John Van Vrar. ken, Environmental 1025 Connecticut Ave., N.W.
Control Division
'fashington, D.C.
20036 188 W. Randolph - Suite 2315 Chicago, Illinois 60601 William H. Eichhorn, Esq.
Eichhorn, Eichhorn & Link Docketing & Service Section 5243 Hohman Avenue Office of the Secretary Hammond, Indiana 46320 U.S. Nuclear ~ Regulatory Commissior Washington, D.C.
20555 Diane B. Cohn, Esq.
l William P.
Schultz, Esq.
Stephen Laudig, Esq.
l Suite 700 21010 Cumberland Road 2000 P Street, N.W.
Noblesville, Indiana 46060 Washington, D.C.
20036 i
Atomic Safety & Licensing j
Board Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission l
Washington, D.C.
20555 Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 A
b e,
w
-*,~ev
,y
-w--wy,
- y
-r-
,-,m,,
cv-,,w
.,-3--y,
-+,-+---,-4 w
v-*,e-
---,,w------