ML20003G388
| ML20003G388 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 03/02/1981 |
| From: | Hunter V, Whitesell D NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20003G382 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900048 NUDOCS 8104290278 | |
| Download: ML20003G388 (6) | |
Text
..
U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY CO MISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT REGION IV Report No. 99900048/81-01 Program No. 51300 Company:
Anchor / Darling Valve Co.
24747 Clawiter Road Hayward, California 94545 Inspection Conducted:
February 9-12, 1981 Inspector:
fW f-Z 7 P/
V. H. Huriter, Contractor Inspector Date ComponentsSection I Vendor Inspection Branch
()
! j
,~
Approved by:T bid'
.;f/g[8/
- 0. E. Whitesell, Chief Date ComponentsSection I Vendor Inspection Branch Summary Inspection on February 9-12, 1981 (99900048/81-01)
Areas Inspected:
Implementation of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criteria and applicable codes and standards including Design Document Control, Special Process Control, and Procurement Control.
The inspection involved twenty-nine (29) inspector hours on site.
Results:
In the three (3) areas inspected, no nonconformances or unresolved items were identified.
8104 290 A%
2 DETAILS SECTION A.
Principal Persons Contacted
- D. P. Gilbert, Plant Manager
- J. J. Chappell, Quality Assurance Manager G. Rose, Manufacturing Manager B. J. Tillman, Quality Assurance Engineer L. G. Fortier, Welding Engineer J. T. Rose, Materials Manager
- Persons who attended the Exit meeting.
B.
Vendor Activities The Anchor / Darling Valve Company consists of fabricating facilities in Hayward, California (ADVH) and Williamsport, Pennsylvania, with Corporate Headquarters located in Bala CYNWYD, Pennsylvania.
The Hayward facility (ADVH) is comprised of approximately 42,000 square feet under cover within a total area of 4.3 acres and is self contained in that all ASME required services such as design, welding, machining, hydrostatic testing, NDE, and heat treating are provided.
ADVH holds ASME Certifications N-1742(N) for Class 1, 2, and 3 valves and N-1743(NPT) for Class 1, 2, and 3 valves and appurtenances.
These certifi-cates expire on May 20, 1983.
Principal products are 2.5" thru 5.4" gate, globe, and check valves with associated activators.
ADVH has supplied such products to most nuclear projects under construction and/or in operation.
The current distribution of workload is nuclear - 80%, government - 10%,
and commercial - 10%.
The Authorized Inspection Agency (AIA) is the Lumberman's Mutual Casualty i
Company.
An Authorized Nuclear Inspector is provided on an as needed basis.
C.
Design Document Control j
1.
Objectives The objectives of this area of the inspection were tc verify that procedures had been developed, approved, and properly implemented to control the review, approval, release anu issuance, of design documents in a manner consistent with NRC rules and regulations, and the ASME accepted Quality Assurance Program.
1
+
3 2.
Method of Accomplishment The objectives of this area of the inspection were accomplished by:
a.
Review of the ASME accepted QA Manual, Section 7.0 titled
" Design Control" to verify that the vendor had established a system for design document control.
b.
Review of the following design specifications:
(1) DC-400-32, revision 4.
(2) NMP-2-P303W, revision 1.
(3) S023-408-1 with addum 1 thru 10.
To verify that they hd been prepared by the designated authority, independently reviewed, and approved by the appropriate management.
c.
Review of S01-NEN-010, revision C, titled " Preparation and use of Engineering Drawings", to verify that it provided for identi-fication of personnel responsible for preparing, reviewing, approving, and issuing design documents; and that the review and approval of significant changes were performed by the same per-sonnel.
Also, to ascertain whether minor changes to design docu-ments, that do not require review and approval, are identified.
d.
Review of 16 engineering change notices, to verify that the distribution lists are current and that the proper documents are identified, available, and are being used.
e.
Interview of personnel to verify whether they are knowledgeable in the procedures applicable to design document control.
3.
Findings a.
Within this area of the inspection, there were no nonconformances er unresolved items identified.
D.
Control of Soecial Processes 1.
Ob ic.ctives The objectives of this area of the inspection were to determine if the special process procedures used by the vendor had been prepared, approved, qualified, and controlled in accordance with the appli-cable NRC regulation and the ASME accepted Quality Assurance Program.
L
4 2.
Method of Accomplishment The objectives of this area of the inspection were accomplished by:
a.
Review of the following sections of the ASME accepted QA manual; (1) Section 10.0 titled " Welding Control."
(2) Section 11.0 titled " Upgrading."
(3) Section 12.0 Litled " Process Control" to verify whether the vendor had established a system for the preparation, qualification, certification, distribution, and revision of special process procedures.
b.
Review of the following special process procedures; (1) Hardfacing - 1035-1, revision M.
(2) Welding, GMAW - 1816-1, revision 0.
(3) Penetrant 13-1, revision E.
(4) Hydrostatic - 2160-1, revision C.
l (5) Air seat - 2033-1, revision C.
(6) Postweld heat treat - 1372-1, revision G.
To verify that these procedures used by the vendor in fabrication had been prepared, qualified, and controlled in accordance with the applicable NRC regulations and the ASME accepted QA program.
c.
Observation of the following special processes; (1) Air-seat test of one (1) 20 inch, 900 lb. tilt disc check valve in accordance with procedure 2033-1, revision C.
(2) Penetrant test of one (1) 20 inch, 900 lb tilt disc check j
valve in accordance with procedure 14-13-1, revision E.
(3) Weld build-up of one (1) 6 inch, 900 lb. valve body in accordance with procedure 1352-1-J, addendum A, and drawing 6007-12-5.
i To verify that the procedure requirements were followed during the performance of the work.
l l
5 3.
Findings Within this area of the inspection, there were no nonconformances or unresolved items identified. -
E.
Procurement Control 1.
Objectives The objectives of this area of the inspection were to verify that procedures had been developed, approved, and properly implemented to control the review, approval, release, and issuance of procurement dccuments in a manner consistent with NRC regulations and the vendor's ASME accepted QA program.
2.
Method of Accomplishment The objectives of this area of the inspection were accomplished by:
a.
Review of the following sections of the ASME accepted QA manual; (1) Section 6.0 titled "Crder Planning."
(2) Section 9.0 titled " Procurement Control."
To verify that the vendor had established a system for the control of procurement and related documentation.
b.
Review of the following vendor standards; (1) NMA-003, revision G, titled " Purchase Order Preparation and Distribution."
l l
(2)' NMA-004, revision G, titled " Purchase Order Modifications" i
To verify that the vendor had developed adequate procedures l
to implement the system for the control of procurement and related documentation.
c.
Review of the following documents; j
(1) Purchase order 80118 and B0119 for casting upgrading services.
(2) Purchase order 81392 for the procurement of 24 inch, 900 lb tilt disc check valves.
(3) Approved vendors list for the months of January and February, 1981.
l I
6 To verify that technical requirements, such as special instruc-tions, including test and inspection Criteria were identified, and that the selected sub-tier suppliers had been surveyed and approved for procurement.
3.
Findings Within this area of the inspection, there were no nonconformances or unresolved items identified.
F.
Exit Meeting The inspector met with vendor management representatives at the conclusion of the inspection on February 12, 1981.
The inspector summarized the inspection scope and findings as outlined in this report.
Vendor manage-ment representatives acknowledged the inspector's comments regarding the scope and findings as presented.