ML20003F665

Criticizes NRC 810305 Decision to Permit Util to Proceed W/Facility Const.Unanswered Questions Exist on Need for Facility,Site Suitability & Evacuation Plans.Forwards 810113 Ltr to NRC Re Evacuation Plans

ML20003F665
Person / Time
Site:	Bailly
Issue date:	03/26/1981
From:	Schultz G AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:	Hendrie J NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
Shared Package
ML20003F666	List: ML20003F665 ML20003F668
References
NUDOCS 8104230309
Download: ML20003F665 (1)

Text

. O DOCKET NUM3ER g

PROD. & UTIL FAC.s. .,.

4

\ \. D j 4 i nen2 b =.

e.

7< 2 gg k t

\

i

% er s

.. . S' s N /i ny*S 4

CCCK W a g t.-

7 g APR1 5 WB1 ' .5 -

807 c. Coolspring B O!52 Cf ~38.%*" ~f March 26, City,

~

Michigan 1981 Indiana 46360 0:6tM ',:i 6:::. . g b

Mr. Joseph liendrie, Chairman O Nuclear Regulator Conunission Washington, D.C. .

Dear Mr. Hendrie:

The March 5th decision by the N.R.C. staff to permit NIPSCO to proceed with its construction of its Bailly I nuclear plant is appalling to me.

I have been involved with the litigation against Bailly, and I am well aware of the tremenJous number legitimate concerns and unanswered questions regard.ng the need for this plant, its safety, the site's suitability, evacuation plans, etc, etc. The N.R.C. has seemed to have chosen to ignore these matters, run roughshod over the public's concern and seems determined to have nuclear plants built no matter what the public's concerns are. 3 Enclosed is a letter I wrote months ago when my appeal was denied regarding my concerns about evacuation. I did not mail it then because since the N.R.C. 's own regional officials came out against the Bailly site I felt that the N.R.C. would make a reasonable decision.

l[

I am sadly disappointed, and my previous letter again seems relevant.

I have sent copies of this letter to the parties involved in litigation, Congressmen, and media, in hopes of stimulating an open discussion of a way to get a reasonable, peaceful solution to this issue.

^

.. (

l rg George E. Schult:

N