ML20003F665
| ML20003F665 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Bailly |
| Issue date: | 03/26/1981 |
| From: | Schultz G AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| To: | Hendrie J NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20003F666 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8104230309 | |
| Download: ML20003F665 (1) | |
Text
O DOCKET NUM3ER g PROD. & UTIL FAC.s..,
4
\\ \\.
D 4
i j
nen2 b =.
7<
2 gg k t e.
i
\\
% er s
S' N
/i ny*S s
4 CCCK W a
g t.-
7 g
APR1 5 WB1 '.5 807 c. Coolspring B
O!52 Cf ~38.%*" ~f Michigan City, Indiana 46360 0:6tM ',:i
~
March 26, 1981 6:::..
g b
O Mr. Joseph liendrie, Chairman Nuclear Regulator Conunission Washington, D.C.
Dear Mr. Hendrie:
The March 5th decision by the N.R.C. staff to permit NIPSCO to proceed with its construction of its Bailly I nuclear plant is appalling to me.
I have been involved with the litigation against Bailly, and I am well aware of the tremenJous number legitimate concerns and unanswered questions regard.ng the need for this plant, its safety, the site's suitability, evacuation plans, etc, etc.
The N.R.C. has seemed to have chosen to ignore these matters, run roughshod over the public's concern and seems determined to have nuclear plants built no matter what the public's concerns are.
3 Enclosed is a letter I wrote months ago when my appeal was denied l[
regarding my concerns about evacuation.
I did not mail it then because since the N.R.C. 's own regional officials came out against the Bailly site I felt that the N.R.C. would make a reasonable decision.
I am sadly disappointed, and my previous letter again seems relevant.
I have sent copies of this letter to the parties involved in litigation, Congressmen, and media, in hopes of stimulating an open discussion of a way to get a reasonable, peaceful solution to this issue.
^
(
l rg George E. Schult:
N