ML20003F610
| ML20003F610 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 03/14/1981 |
| From: | Schleehauf M AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| To: | Ahearne J NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
| References | |
| ISSUANCES-SP, NUDOCS 8104230184 | |
| Download: ML20003F610 (1) | |
Text
_
i
/
e 0 ~ ' n, oc::tz;;;..:::.'
O,'
fROD. & 071! FAC.M.S E 3...__
ll 3
y, C
2315 Surrey Lane I";
f.UR 2*n1ggI> u Apartnent # 151 E.
- Q McKeesport,
h pennsylvania 15135
- . m y'
, Q. r"'I er/
Ct J
March 11+,1961 i
- /
19
[NY g
Mr. Jchn F. Ahea=e, Chairman
- ,9 $ '.- \\
I 0
-n; U.S. Regulatory Ccamission c~\\
<s r-
~
c t' Ne 1717 H Street, NW f
.f Cl Washington, t
p p #/
- n District of Col =bia 20535
/
Sir:
Energ is expensive enough. I see no reason to prolcng the startup cf TMI-Unit 1 (NBC docket number 50-2S95p). This reacter has been ready to produce electricity for a 1cng tine. Why is the startup taws so leng?!
3ecause this energ source is cet being used, Metrcpolitan Edison x.:st buy replacenent pcwer. The utilities that supply the replacement pcwer use coal, nuclear, and oil. This power costs censuners 'm* cns of dollars a month. We are already paying too nuch for oil without increasing the dema-A because no one is taking the respcesibility to start up TMI-1.
The do nancy of the t-d==="ed TMI-1 reacter does not fit in with what I 1
l have heard about ener y policy. Ecw could anycne let such a fertile energy I
source go w.used?!
please start up the ed===M TXI-1 reactor now! It was not danged when the Unit 2 reactor experienecd the accident. The two =its were desi :ed to operate independently. There is no reason to keep cne 6
reacter frca operating because the other is damaged. '"he scener TMI-1 can be restarted, the happier people who are ccncerned about energ T).50'$
resources will be. 'D ark you.
M 7 yeurs, j
/
h 6*5 ?. h N jj Q :)
Martin W. Schleehauf
/
/Q 8104230 h M
-e,-
,