ML20003D212
| ML20003D212 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 02/03/1981 |
| From: | Chwastyk J AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| To: | Ahearne J NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
| References | |
| ISSUANCES-SP, NUDOCS 8103190590 | |
| Download: ML20003D212 (1) | |
Text
.....
. % M.w..].d %
."G.
- 9..R...
~~
i n
a
" SU3 JECT: Docket 50-289SP e/ pt-
~~ February 3, 1981
~
TMI-Unit I, Middletown, Pay '
4
/
' 's:7' *.,
f j' ~,4
/
A
Dear Mr. Ahearne,
C Cf As a supporter of nuclear power, an 'dne wn
. 19 s
.; I and II are being persecuted withcut justificati 1., I wou to express my views.
/
The hearings of Unit I (which I have at
'. (d)W s be of some value in assessing the management of Unit I and the plants safety regulations.
Also the hearings may help te assure some " lay-people" who were, er are now, frightened of nuclear power.
However, as a resident living with-in twenty miles of TMI, and an advocate of nuclear power, I =ust say, "enough is enough".
For these reasons:
1.
there was no 9.ccident at Unit I 2.
other 3&W plants nationwide are operating withcut benefit of hearings (o.k., perhaps they were required to install
@ g g ',
some new procedures and/or safety equipment.) That's quite
@A different from what has been required of TMI.
.[
(
'G
.':y 3
'"~d i
>$3 financial aspect - the cost of hearings, legal council, N > * *i not to mention loss of money involved by not permitting
-~~
m i..-
l Unit I to produce power.
Also customers expense of having C :, a
.M :n c.7.C /
to pay for power purchased from outside utilities.
- ::.uc, 4 2.in A
-s
' ('d Y
S'N h.
time realm - the hearings of Unit I did not even begin V' /
until nineteen months after the accident at Unit II, with
/ *,. I g no dead-line established.
I consider the "repetative implications" of the lack of knowledge of the Met. Ed. staff unjust.
Who created the " stress, near panic and fear"?
Not Met. Ed. peccle, the NRC did a great job in that area.
Then proceeded to try and capltali::e on " false-hood" and look like heroes, by way of "Mr. Harold Denton's" ?
Sor~/, my opinion is that " covering-up" at somecne else's expense is cruel and foolish.
I would rather the NRC spent time (which in-directly, being a tax-payer I pay your salary, thus for your time) getting "back to business".
Your job is to regulate nuclear pr.:nts, and may-be if you do that cor-ectly we will all be better off.
As it is, the NRC has impeded the nuclear indus enough-stopbeforeyouputtheUnitedStatesbacksofarwe'llnevercate}.,
(
up.
Unit I I.et It Run Expediate clean-up of Unit )
carbon copy to
. Sincerely,
'\\
f_,
h Friends and Family of TMI 1
., \\ i 0 w '-
g (Yes. ) Janice Chwastyk]
P.O. 3cx 82 Hizhstire, Pa. 1703h e--.;- -9809 Bellows Drive
~
Cang Hill, pa. 17011
$!f N $ ife 8108190 S9o W