ML20003B298
| ML20003B298 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 02/02/1981 |
| From: | Kratky L, Kratky O AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| To: | Ahearne J NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8102100613 | |
| Download: ML20003B298 (1) | |
Text
Mr. L. A. & Mrs. C. Krchy
& ** ~'* *"" ? a sa,
p g~,
9g 357A Aveeve Cririna G f.
Laguno Hills, CA 72653 February 2,1981 i NI/fg
'?,
[&
C:
.- ?
Mr Ja=es F.Ahearne cheg,,%08/
~~
Chairman c,
3 US Huclear Regulatory Commission Fi C,
~ >r, y k
1717 H Street :TlI
'D Washington D.C.20555 Y
N/
e4
Dear Mr.Ahearne:
Re:Three "ile Is'2nd Unit 1.
You are certainly aware how much small investors suffered by the consequences of the TMI accident in March 1979
?le all understand that t':e public safety of the nuclear plants is the main objective of our regulatory measures.However,it is our opinion that also other aspects shculd be taken into consideation in each individual case.
Based on informat1%rirecei.ved..about CMI Unit 1 the decision to keep it closed is<-not jus:tified.'by'any of the just aforementionned respects.
(M The case of Unit 1 is different from Unit 2.It is now sven safer than it was before it closed for routine inspection and refueling way back in 1979.
In spite of this fact it is kept still. closed.
This decision is very expensive and unjustified. Cost of coal and all necessary to produce the lost. energy amount to several hundred thousand of dollars daily.And the chances l
for small investors to ge, at least sone sort' of compensatien I
for all the losces are consequently sonewhere in a nebulous l
future.
"that then are the reasons that. Unit 1 cannot restart l
operations? '. shat are the necessary steps to be'laken to l
achieve a positive action?
Perraps your reconsideration of the case will help.
Thank you very much, e,
<< A f*
,/
'
- gN 's(
s/,,
L.A.anc 0.Kratky.
c1
/
\\1 D
/
'k\\
/
/ M'I YN Q
f.~.G.Q b
~
c s, O. 9
~r
$0$
h.
kix -
s 1
Ng-6/d l
8102100 M3 g 'VNG
-> /
l