ML20003A890
| ML20003A890 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Zimmer |
| Issue date: | 02/03/1981 |
| From: | Woliver J AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED, LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF CLERMONT COUNTY, OH |
| To: | Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| References | |
| ISSUANCES-OL, NUDOCS 8102100004 | |
| Download: ML20003A890 (2) | |
Text
-.,
Mysy l%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 4
)w g
(g NllCl. EAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AlWild SAFETY AND LIChNSING BOARD Q
mg 1981 y :
?
. fry l0 Ce in Ihe Nat ter of v,
a i lft'R IC Docket No. 50-358-OL Till: C t hC I NiiATI GAS COMPANY, e't al.
G (km. h. Zionaer Nucle a Power g
St at ion) s toOG(( h Y G,
4s,&@> @S JPPF.AI, HY INTERVENOR DR. FANKHAUSER 198/
2 pf ORDER CRANTING SifMMARY_ DISPOSITION g
'4Q4gA@
h N
OF CONTENTION FIVE
}
Pursuant to 10 t,.l.R. Section 2.762 Intervenor Dr. Fankhauser submits to the Consnission the following exceptions to the Board's Order Cranting Sunanary Disposit ion of Cont ention 5.
1.
Dr. Funkhauser excepts to the above-referenced Board's ruling at par,e 9 which states: "we int erpret the recently amended provisions of 10 C.F.R. Part 73 as requiring licensees to prepare a plan for the physical protection of spent fuel shipments ayainst sabotage.
10 C.F.R. Section 73.37.
There is no requirement, however, that such a plan be submitted and reviewed prior to (and f
l as a condition of) tiie grant (sic) of an operating license."
Dr. Fankhauser stat es that this ruling is in violation of the following:
10 C.F.R. 550.40, 50.57; 42 U.S.C. 21'11, et. seq.; 42 U.S.C. 5841, g seq., and the Equal Protec-t ion clause of the Fourt eenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
l 2.
Dr. Fanth-auser further takes exception wiLh the foilowing ruling l
cont ained in the ahnv.- ieferenced order at page 12 which states: "thus we l
decline to consider s'ooi ent ion 5 in the cont ext of the generalized findings t
i U
. required by 10 C.F.H. g$30.40 and 50.51."
Dr. Fankhauser st ates that this ruling is in violat iam of the followiseg:
10 C.F.R. 150.40, 50.57 ; 4 2 1,l.S.C.
2131, el. seq.; 42 If.s.*
58'41, g seq., and the Equal Protection clause of the Fourt eer.t h Amendment to t he U.S. Const i t ut ion.
3.
Dr. Far.ht.,oser takes exception t o the above-referenced order and
~
ruling contained at p sge 13 which st ates: "our holding here will necessarily put the consideration of tiie adequacy of a plan for the transportation of spent fuel-submit ted under 10 C.F.H. 573.37 beyond the purview of this operating license proceeding.
In our %,.orandum and Order of July 14, 1980, we asked the parties whether there is any us.nerr procedure by which compliance with Part 73 can be questioned by member ot the public prior to the occurrence of a shipment.
Taking into the accous.: the limited, 7-day period for review of s' proposed plan, the answer is obviously negative." Dr. Fankhauser states that this ruling is in violation of the following:
10 C.F.R. 550.40,- 50.57; 42 U.S.C. 2131, g. seq.;
42 U.S.C. 5841, el syj., and the Equal Protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to t he !!.S. ( onst itut ion.
Respectfully submitted, 3
e
/
N; - -(
t (./WA.
fJohn Woliver f
Attorney for David Fankhauser
/
i Clermont County Legal Aid Society P.O. Box #47, 550 Kilgore Street Batavia, Ohio:
45103
~(513) 732-2422 CERTIFICATE OF' SERVICE I hereby cert ify that copies of the foregoing document were served upon' all parties to this' proce.rding by deposit in the United States mail this-hA d a y ;o f - i~a,w,s e[ ' i M 1. '
s ls'[ /Ol
' (.,Q. /
c John Woliver
..