ML20002C479

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Documents Minor Variations from Fuel Description in Table 5.1 of Tech Specs,Due to Continuing Fuel R&D Program.Change Replaces Three Peripheral All U Fuel Rods in Assembly G-21 Zirconium Rods
ML20002C479
Person / Time
Site: Big Rock Point File:Consumers Energy icon.png
Issue date: 04/28/1976
From: Sewell R
CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.)
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 8101100355
Download: ML20002C479 (3)


Text

'

Regulato:

DocketSm e

y

[gQ$. d h

Consumcis h&

  1. '3 Qt POvlCr k, f b [9hj 2;

f j

Company

..m

o...., o, w. ~...,.c.omuc e.o., mo..... co..,7 7.

.o o so M

April 28, 1976 ca 4

W Jsqh3 1

/

//

6 60 I E b

v3

[o,,,,*,. gh 'O Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulati 5

,5 01 US Nuclear Regulatory Commission

\\\\

j go p

}

5-s Washington, DC 20555 O %s.*

g DOCKET 50-155, LICENSE DPR G BIG ROCK POINT PLANT Q

The purpose of this letter is to document a minor variation from the fuel description contained in Table 51 of the Big Rock Point Technical Specifi-cations. This minor variation is a result of the continuation of the fuel research and development program that has been conducted during plant opera-tion at the Big Rock Point Plant. This change has been reviewed in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 50 59 and it has been concluded that this change does not result in an unreviewed safety question.

It has been further i

concluded that no Technical Specifications change is required.

The change involves replacement of three of the peripheral all urania fuel rods in Assembly G-21 with three solid zirconium rods of the same configuration.

The purpose of removal of these rods is to gain additional information on pellet-clad interaction effects and to compare the performance of three differ-ent cladding types, all zircaloy, but annealed, highly ductile and standard slightly stress relieved. These rods will be destructively examined by Exxon Nuclear.

Table 5 1 states that there are 88 urania rods in a Reload G fuel assembly.

Following the rod swap in G-21 there vill be only 85 urania rods. As stated previously, the three removed all urania rods are being replaced with solid sirconium rods of the same configuration.

The safety evaluation performed pursuant to 10 CFR 50 59 shows that this modification does not result in any additional risk to the health and safety of the public.

The replacement of fuel rods with zircaloy rods has two separate effects on the thermal response of the fuel assembly to a postulated LOCA. First, the passive zircaloy rods act as a thermal radiation hett sink after core un-1 covering, tending to reduce the calculated peak cladding temperature (PCT).

Second, the local power distribution is altered, which could either in-crease or decrease the peak clad temperature. For the G-21 assembly, the

(

replacement rods are all on the bundle periphery, which results fn a power shift away from the rod that experiences the highest temperature during a 8101100 3 b wn F

a 2

I LOCA. Thus, the two effects of the replacement rods both tend to decrease the calculated PCT of the G-21 assembly with replaceu.et rods relative to that of i

the unmodified assembly operating at the same average planer linear heat gen-eration rate (APLHGR).

K. for G-21 prior to modification has been compared to the value after modifi-cation. The replacement of the three urania rods with solid zirenley rods results in a slight increase in K. (approximately 0.03% AK/K). This change is insignificant and is consistent with previous modi'ications made to Big Rock Point assemblies.

The replacement of the urania fuel rods with the solid zircaloy rods results in slight changes to the local peaking factors for th-G-21 assembly. The modi-fled assembly local peaking factors represent an. ncrease of 2-3% in the vicinity of the all zirconium rods and a 3% incret.se in the maximam local peaking factor. A decrease in the local peaking factor associated with the fuel assembly interior rods is noted. The resulting maximum local peaking factor is approximately 3% less than the maximum local peaking factor used in core physics calculational codes.

The effect of the modification on mechanical integrity has also been evaluated.

The solid zircaloy rods are essentially equal in length to the deload G-1 fuel rods. At each end they look like G fuel rods with end caps and thus can be satisfactorily accommodated within a fuel bundle cage assembly. Even though a solid rod's weight is different than that of a fuel rod, this is no problem as the spring at the upper end cap will hold the rods in position. Using axial growth rates from solid zircaloy for guide bars at Palisades, it has been determined that axial growth at these solid zircaloy rods should present no problem since there is more than adequate clearance for growth.

Thus, we have concluded that this change does not represent an unreviewed safety question and that the slight variation from the descriptive Table 51 does not require a Technical Specifications change.

/

dI jr' 624b )$secas.

Ralph B. Sewell Nuclear Licensing Administrator CC: JGKeppler, USNRC

(

l W

e U.s. NucLL An nicut Atony couusssoon occati nuv ot n Niic ronu 195

a. sos 50-155 N.}C DieTRIDUTION ron PART 50 DOCKET f.1ATERI AL TO:

NRC' FHOM: CPC DArc or oocuucNr Jackson, Mich. 49201 4-28-76 Ralph B. Sewell oATc nrctivco 4-30-76 EKtTre a ONOTOmtEo PnOP INPUT rOnM NUMU[n OF COPIES nECEIVE o 23taniciN AL M3vNcLAssirico J

Ocoey 1 signed 39 CC Es~cniPisON Ltr furn addl info in re to the fuel CNCLOsunC description contained in Table.5.1 of the I

Big Rock Tech Specs.....

.9

?

e..:5~.

{

g.

... 3 PLANT NAME:

Big Rock Pt.

SAFETY FOR ACTION /INFORMATION ENVIRO DHL 5-3-76 l ASSIGNED AD :

I ASSIGNED AD.'

URANCl! CHIEF :

[

_2,ggg LRA!JCll CHIEP :

f PROJECT 11ANAGER:

QQgg PROJECT 11ANAGER :

flXC. ASHT. :

Q _7; p g LIC. ASST. :

INTERNAL DISTRIBUTION l

Dif'G]D

__SY S'CEh!S_SAEETY PLuiT_ SYSTEM 9 twino_Trcn d NRC PDR IIEII[Etu{

TrnESCO E RNS_T g(_ I & E h SCHPSEDER BENARO?A P.ALLARD

/

Ogtp---

LAlgs SPANGLER COSSICK & STAFF ENGINEEEI!]G IPPOLITO J11PI MACCARy SITE TECll CASE KNIGHT OPERATI?0 REACTORS CAPl!ILL I!AMMIER SIsrJEIL STELLO STEPP llARLESS FAULICKI IlUlliAN OPERATING TECll l'l;0 JECT 11ANAGEMENT REACT 0'1 SAFETY t/1 EISENHirr SITE ANALYSIS BOYD ROSS g/ SHAO VOLiliER P.__ COLLINS NOVAK V

BAER BUNC11 Il0USTON ROSZTOCZY

/ SClrJENCER y' J. COI. LINS PETI:HSON CliECK a/

GRIMES KREGER MELTZ

~

!!El.TEMES AT & I SITE SAPETY & ENVJ.gf

[j SMOVi!OLT SALT;: AN ANAI.YSIS j

li iurrr.:::3c nENToN & nut.i.ER L

ExunNat utsunuunoN Corn not Nuant u

$_1.1lDR;ChAgLa Van'$, Mi(g,Idl. iin liR00KHAVEN NATL 1.AH p TIC 1:1:G. V-IC UtillKSON (ORNL)

[ 4341, M__NSIC LA PnR nae I

ASt.n CONSin.TAtrrS PIII FZACRS/[_M'?.;l;N t_ fo 1. /9 e l

-