ML20002C182
| ML20002C182 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 11/20/1980 |
| From: | Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards |
| To: | Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards |
| References | |
| FRN-44FR70408, RULE-PR-60 ACRS-1783, NUDOCS 8101090544 | |
| Download: ML20002C182 (17) | |
Text
"
7.,
% :Je p
(:
93
/kTS- /70
$.S p a ;n; :) h;-
- j h*l
~d' If
/ e h[yc g
ISSUE DATE:
n/oc/wMINUTES OF THE ACRS SUBCOMMITTEE MEETI WASHINGTON, DC OCTOBER 3,1980 The ACRS Subcommittee on Waste Management held a meeting on October 3, 1980 in Room 1046, 1717 H St., NW, Washington, D.C.
The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the proposed rulemaking on the technical criteria for regulating geological disposal of high-level radioactive waste (PR-60) and the proposed rulemaking on the storage and disposal of nuclear waste (Waste Confidence Rule-The Subcommittee collected information on the status and making,PR-50,51).
schedule of these subjects in preparation for writing a future ACRS letter on waste management.
Notice of this meeting was published in the Federal Register on Thursday, September 18, 1980. A copy of this notice is included as Attachment A.
A list of attendees for this meeting is included as Attachment B, and the schedule for the meeting is included as Attachment C.
A complete set of handouts has been included in the ACRS files. There were no written statements from the public and only one request.for time to make an oral statement from the Natural Resources Defense Council.
A list of all reference material for the meeting is included as Attachment D.
The Designated Federal Employee for this meeting was Mr. John McKinley.
NRC Staff Presentation on Proposed Rulemaking (10 CFR 60)
Mr. Mike Bell of the NRC Staff outlined the history and schedule for the proposed rulemaking on technical criteria for geological disposal cf high-level waste (10 CFR 60). The schedule is for a proposed rule to be published in the Federal Register before the end of this year. The rule will have a 90-dey public com-ment period and will have public hearings only if the Commissior.ers decide it is necessary.
Mr. S. Coplan of the NRC Staff discussed the performance objectives of the pro-posed 10 CFR 60 rule.
He stated that EPA plans to issue numerical standards for radionuclide releases to the environment which NRC will then use in evalu-ating waste disposal site suitability. The EPA standards are scheduled to be published in November, 1980 for public comment and debate. The general per-formance objectives of the NRC for geological disposal are:
'81010905 6
WASTE MANAGEMENT October 3, 1980 Isolate waste in compliance with EPA standards.
Contain waste in waste packages for at least 1,000 years.
ionuclide release from the engineered system to less
- Limit rag /yr.
of the activity present at 1,000 years.
than 10-
- A ground water transport time of at least 1,000 years.
- Allow for retrievability of all waste until 50 years after emplacement.
Dr. S. Philbrick questioned the need for technical criteria on ground water since the best sites rre ay. Mr. L. White of the NRC Staff responded that the criteria were w.itten so that DOE could choose the best site.
Therefore, the rule sets limits for all known parameters (including ground water) such that DOE has flexibility in site selection.
Additionally, Dr. Philbrick asked why so much attention is given to the temperature effect of the waste on the host rock.
He stated that data from natural conditions (e.g., dikes in central New York) and coal mine fires should be sufficient to address the Mr. L. White answered that the existing data are useful temperature concern.
but not sufficient since the geological disposal sites will have excavation stresses plus thermal stresses plus foreign material (i.e., the waste and waste container) which may or may not respond like the existing data suggest.
Mr. S. Cromer pointed out that the volume of waste that could be deposited in a geological disposal site would be significantly larger for reprocessed waste than for spent fuel. The reason is that with certain isotopes removed, it would take more reprocessed waste to reach the established limit of 150 kw/ acre. Additionally, Mr. Coplan pointed out that it takes less time for reprocessed waste to reach the maximum mine temperature.
Mr. S. Coplan discussed the Untreated Dilution Index (a measure of toxicity) for various waste disposal.
He stated that it takes approximately 10,000 years for spent fuel to decay to a toxicity level equal to that of natural uranium ore, 2,000 years for reprocessed mixed-oxide waste, and 450 years for reprocessed 002 waste.
o' e
WASTE MANAGEMENT October 3, 1980 Dr. D. Moeller asked if curves were being developed for air pathway releases similar to the Untreated Dilution Index used for water pathway releases., Mr. S. Coplan answered that potential human exposure is dominated by the water pathway and the air pathway releases are therefore not being analyzed.
Mr. L. White discussed the rationale for the technical criteria. He stated The that each stage of the disposal project would be reviewed by the NRC.
stages include site selection, construction activities, design, waste em-The technical placement, verification of performance, and decommissioning.
criteria for design of engineered features cover thr. major components of the design but not the individual parts of the design. Therefore, the designer has'fLxibility in designing the package.
DOE Presentation on Proposed Rulemaking (10 CFR 60)
Dr. C. Heath of DOE discussed the role of DOE in geological disposal of high-level waste. He stated that in 1976, the DOE budget for waste isolation was Sincethen,ithasincreasedto$160millionin1980snd about $5 million.
$180 million in 1981. Therefore, DOE is working much harder in this area than ever before. Dr. Heath stated that DOE agrees with the basic philosophy behind the NRC criteria but not with establishing numerical limits before more actual field work is done.
Dr. W. Carbiener of Battelle, Office of Nuclear Waste Islation (ONWI), discussed the DOE activities related to waste isolation research and development. The schedules for completion of each stage of work are as follows:
Waste Package Final Design April 1987 i
Repository Design Completed March 1987 Initial Site Selection March 1987 Performance Assessment PSAR Completed January 1987 l
l l
l L.
WASTE MANAGEMENT October 3, 1980 Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) Comments Dr. T. Cochran of the NRDC made a public statement on the issue of waste disposal.
He indicated that he liked the NRC draft criteria as a first step and that it was a vast improvement over the EPA approach.
He stated that only dry sites, ones with no aquifers, should be considered. The NRC limit on groundwater should be set to fo.rce dry site selection. Dr. Cochran stated that the DOE site selection program is a disaster and all of their sites studied so far are terrible.
Dr. D. Moeller stated that he looked to the NRDC for use.ful input on controversial issues. However, when he read the NRDC comments on the waste confidence issue, he found them replete with errors. Dr. Moeller indicated that the reference to BEIR-I in the NRDC statement was used to serve the purpose of the critique, whereas BEIR-III, which has been out for some time, would not have served the NRDC purpose. Additionally, the NRDC statement speaks about the NRC repudia-tion of the WASH-1400 report even though this is a well recognized fallacy.
The NRDC statement also challenged DOE for not addressing the NRC criteria in draft 10 CFR 60 even though the NRC had not issued the draft in time for DOE to 6ddress it in their public cocments. Overall, Dr. Moeller stated that he was disappointed in the NRDC paper.
Dr. T. Cochran responded to Dr. Moeller's statement by saying that he has not received a copy of BEIR-III as yet and that it would be a waste of time to respond to the other comments.
NRC Staff Presentation on Waste Confidence Rulemaking (PR-50,51)
Mr. Sheldon Trubatch of the NRC Staff discussed the status of the Waste Con-fidence Rulemaking (PR-50,51). The public statements and cross-statements have been collected by the NRC working group on waste confidence. 'However, additional comments on how the proceedings might be handled are to be received by October 6, 1980. All comments will be reviewed and summarized for the Commissioners. The ACRS comments are needed before the Staff can finish summarizing the record, and therefore, the ACRS cannot be assisted by the NRC Staff in preparing comments on this issue. The Waste Confidence issue has been limited to spent fuel only, with no consideration to be given to reprocessed waste.
i.
WASTE MANAGEMENT October 3, T)80 Concluding Comments and Statements Mr. R. Foster stated that if the underlying basis for site acceptance is drinking water tolerance, then that should be stated clearly and emphatically.
Also, too much emphasis seems to be given to meeting EPA numbers when the real concern should be risk to the population from a waste disposal site.
Dr. M. Steindler stated that the problem of waste disposal is not technical but rather the definition of the levels of uncertainty in the modeling for predictive analysis. The NRC and DOE should focus on that concern in addition to collecting data by experimentation.
Dr. S. Lawroski indicated that he would like for the NRC Staff at the next Subcommittee, meeting to discuss the comparative risk of waste disposal in relation to other fuel r.ycle operations and reactor operation.
If the risk is very low relatively, then the tolerance in uncertainty in analysis could be large. However, if the risk is high relatively, then the uncertainty would have to be carefully studied and evaluated.
Dr. D. Orth stated that the NRC Staff should remove every superlative from the proposed 10 CFR 60 rule and the rationale document.
If words like best, most, least, optimize, or maximize are left in the regulation, then the licensing people will spend all of their time trying to prove to a judge what was meant by the regulation.
Mr. S. Cromer expressed a concern that disposal of spent fuel underground does not make sense. The spent fuel is a valuable and important energy source for the future. Therefore, above ground depositories would be l
much more practical. Additionally, reprocessed waste is easier to dis-pose of in undergound repositories.
Mr. J. Ray expressed his opinion that the schedule of the 1987 for building a waste disposal site is unnecessarily far away.
If the proper resources were applied to this problem, and work was done in parallel, the schedule could be cut materially.
Mr. W. Mathis agreed with Mr. Ray's statement. Additionally, Mr. Mathis stated that the Waste Conf'idence issue centers around satisfying the Com-mission that spent fuel can be safelv handled for the next 30 years or so.
v WASTE MANAGEMENT October 3, 1980 Since spent fuel has already been stored in pools for 30 years, the question has already been answered.
A Subcommittee meeting on the Waste Confidence Rulemaking and NRC's research program on waste management was tentatively scheduled for November 13 and 14, A Subcommittee meeting on 10 CFR 60 (technical criteria for geological 1980.
disposal of high-level radioactive waste) will be scheduled after the NRC Staff has issued the revised rule and published the NUREG on rationale for the rule.
The meeting was adjourned et 5:07 p.m.
For additional details, a complete transcript of the meeting is Note:
available in the NRC Public Document Room,1717 H St., NW, Washington, DC 20555 or from Alderson Reporters, 300 7th St., SW, Washington, DC (202) 554-2345.
I 1
I 9
I l
- 18. 1980 / Nstices Fedtral Register / Vol. 45 'No.183 / nursday. September
?.
~32236 changes in the NRC siting crfteria s >
and the time aUotted therefor can be consideration of Class-e Accider.a e f
and ucensing Appeal Board for tha obtained by a prepaid telephone call to emergency planning Notice of this apent fuel proceedmg the cognizant Designated Federal meeting was published September 9
' A).n s Rc. enthat chamnen Employee. Mr. lohn C. McKinley
- CrystolRsver Nuc/cor Power Pa Dr lohn H Buck (telephone 202/634-3265) between 8.15 Unit No. 3. September 26.19E Tliomas 5 Moore a.m. and 5300 p.m EDT.
(Tentative] Washington. DC.
l D
Deted September 12. tom Dated September t:.teeo CANnt i m. Notace of this meetir;
.i f,g, p;op{,
j
- he Augus L
C leaa Baabop.
[
secnrory ro che Appee/Boanf John C Ho>te.
- * 'g,,"
Advisory Committee Management Ofpcer.
- 2. October 3.1980. Weshington. DC.
ps om awmar rad em-no e u en!
ys om e-row e-tr.* **
- RESCHEDULED 'ID October 8.19M g suaso coes new-**
" CC** **
- Notice of this meetmg was pubbshi J August E g
Advisory Committee on Raeetor Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards, Subcommittee on Waste Safeguards, Proposed Meetings We on.
n Su te Management, Meeting discuss proposed rulemaking on the b
In order to proviJe advance storage and disposal of nuclear w The ACRS Subcommittee on Waste information regardmg pmpesed meetings of the ACRS Subcommittees (Weste Confidence Rulemaking PM i -
Management wiU hold a meeting on
'F.
SL, NW, Washington.DC Notice of this and Working Groups, and of the fuD
- 51) and proposed rulemaking on th 4
October 3.1980. in Room 1046.1717 H Committee, the following prehminary technical enteria for regulatmg geological disposal of high lesel ar.eetmg was pubhshed August 22 schedule reflecia the current situation.
.sut!med in the Federal Register on taking into account additional meetings rad 2oactive waste (PR-40). Notice o In accordance with the procedures 3
which have been scheduled and meeting appears elsewhere in tha in meetings which have been postponed or
- Reactor Opemtions. October 7.1c October 1.19~9 (44 FR 5640e). oral or members of the pubhc, recordmgs w1!!
cancelled since the last list of proposed Washington DC.ne Subcommitter s written statements may be paesented by
' (-
be permitted only during those portions meetmas publahed Aug M 1980[45FR review a draft of the NRC Propwd I tolmplement the Requirement of Su of the meeting when a transcript is beinS 86215) nose meetings which are l
kept ard questions may be asked only definitely scheduled have bad. or will 110 of the NRC FY-40 Authorizatite i have, an individual notice pubbebed in (ne Bingham Amendemnt) which c.
by memt.ers of the Subcommittee,its the Federal Register approximately 15 for the identification of each curr*-
consultants, and Staff. Persons destrir:J and regulation that the Com.ecn l
to make oral statements should noti')
days (or more) pnor to the meeting determines to be of particular the Designated Federal Employee as far nose Subcommittee and Working significance to the protection of the l
in ads ance as practicable so that Group meetings for which it is anticipated that there will be a portion pubbe health and safety, and to allow the necessary tune during the or aU of the meeting open to the public determination of the extent to wh9 appropriate arrangements can be made are indicated by an asterisk (*). It is each currently operating plant cor; with these identified rules and meeting for such statements.
expected that the sessions of the full regulations. Also,the Subcommittee ne entire meeting will be open to Committee meeting designated by an plans to address various ACRS gerc Pubhc attendance.
ne agenda for subject meeting shaU asterisk (') will be open in whole or in items assigned to it to monitor. Nm i
part to the p' bbc. ACRS full Committee this meeting was published August L l
be as foUows:
meetings be,> st 8.30 a.m.nd
- Dresden Nuclear Power Pfart. U Subcommittee and Woridng Group a30 o.m. Until the Conclusion of meetings ustaUy begin at a 30 a.m ne J. October 8 (r-scheduled from Oct Friday. October 3.1s80
/
i
).1980. Washington. DC.The
{
exact time when items listed on the Subcommittee will discuss: 1)The Business egends wiU be discussed ciuring full method proposed by Commonwes!P During the initial portion of the Committee meetings and whea Edison Company to decontaminate t!
meeting. the Subcommittee, along with Subcommittee and Working Group primary cooling system of Dresden it any of its consuftants who may be meetings will start will be pubt shed L 2)ne Canadian Deconteminatie present. will exchange preliminary prior to each meeting Informat,on as to Process (CAN-DECON Concept). 31 views regarding matters to be whether a meeting has been ficmly Adequacy of processing and dispoi r considered during the balance of the acheduled. cancelled or restieduled, or of the radioactive waste resulting in meeting.
whether changes have been inade in the chemical decontaminatfort 4) Com l
he Subcommittee will then bear
. agenda for the October 1980 ACRS full received from Federal Agencies and presentations by and hold discussions Committee meeting can be obtaIned by from the public relating to with representatives of the NRC Staff.
a prepaid telephone call to the Office of decontamination of Dresden Un their consultants. end other interested the Executive Director of the
- Regulatory Activities. October a persons regardmg proposed rulemakingCommittere (telephone 202/634-3287 1980. Washington. DC. RESCHEDLIJ on the storage and disposal of nuclear ATTN: Mary E. Vanderhotti between TO November 5. Notice of this mee waste (Weste Confidence Rulemaking 8:15 a.m. and 5:00 p.m EDT.
was published August 22 PR 50. 51). and proposed rulemaking on
- Sofety Philosophy. Technol0f.r er the technic 41 criteria for regulating ACRS Subcommittee Meetings Criterio. October 8.1980 (Morm geological disposal of high-level AdHoc ACRS Subcommittee.
Wasc. wn.DC.ne Subcommitter y September 19-20,1980. Wa shington. DC.review the Diablo Ccnyon Systems radioactive waste (PR-60).
Further information about topics to be ne Subcommittee will meet with Interaction Analysis and NRC l
discussed.whether the meeting has representatives of the Reactor Safety Commissioner Gilinsky's questions been cancelled or rescheduled. the Committee (RSK) of the Federal concerning the North Anna ECCS Chairman's ruling on requests for the Republic of Germany to discuss the design. Notice of cancellation of th op unit r sent o;il afstements design of the B&W NSSS proposed 1 Pa p
p t
I 0
ATTACRMENT A
g{gg 2 q..... -
October 3, 19R0 fsG DATE:
Radioactive este Panacement WJTTEE MEETING:
H St., N.W., Washinaton, D. C.
Roon 1046,1717
- l. ION:
ATTENDANCE LIST _
]
r.
. EASE
~
AFtlLIAiluli _
l PWINT liA1 lACAS
..O. M kiNLEY
!AcRS C
G#,u.v G. b ucr lACR.S S. lktonpsKt l ACAS Mott'.CL T).
- w. mam pens C. MRex Aces Ilh es %.~r fJ.
r Ls er,-
en kovsnmu
' v om Ac81 / *
- N 5
=
..$_.5m"14__ _ _
1.
- 1. F. AuvAuw C itom tNlt
- 2. S.
R. Fospre 3
KRAuskerF NH S S ' W M ra K.
N, le r>lm N
- 15. Sa i bW
/16
~c on LE
- e. s 0. ~~.-
S/2 w f W
/AA m
$S....---
l
.19.
3b 20.
I A I C i^ c J l
b'BC/ED
._21.Wh.+m
%f d -TTuschev l
Niit'
/ Alms 1 tr.
t s. J h n j f.3 f/? M n d l
nsoor Rem r~.,a_A,
October 3,1980 NETING DATE:
l Radioactive Waste Management
!gUB00W,ITTEE MEETING:
i Room 1006,1717 H St., N.W., Washinaton, D. C.
10tATION: --
-w l
j ATTENDANCE LIST _
CR6L N E k Tou Bnristth ^-osJuir N
l i l A w k = $ [ 'A 12 m e t L=,L rL~r.1,ge.
Cbeas 2
L n ec2 D, m.,
a~n
~
W MMI I5.9-3.
VEC-Lu bwi cr-E M ARTu VCF N Re - m wr h,2 2.
2 < sor.
dipy ra > l._R)ll6uo E..
ARC'U)WVT 3.
(Lic/le - Ow]
s.
% bt%s w.mu - omar
/ 1;f w
/ a,c w, w T/s6 Ernee/m Mana w
- s. Tn a W
%W f/
w n
7 Qy EffI Bob W i/fesel B A' O N h'/C!d f
kfh TE Mr.11 u.
~
Aroe.
12.
Je=10cs. /4/D/.
/dC lb
- 13. 3 (L W.C.
lAlor LMMA U(LC-whHT I
FET&P-h Rilr a
,e i.
y..
!"/
. /,i t ;.! r is
/-
N US. -
/2cco.ue 17.
butye _,
R Art,. v.
18.
l -
g
.19.
l 20.
21.
??,
l 23.
24.
.-,,_...v-
...--.---._,.-_-,,,,_-.-,,,.,..,,_-...,-_.----.y,,
MEETins ROOM' ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS NEETING ON PAD 10 ACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT October 3, 1980
,PLP
- I ATTENDEES PLEASE SIC': B E LO'.'
AFF1LIAT10';
BADCE 50.
N,etE Vt]
/,
nw a.
A f r%w lrssah l ws ll c -tw A (hiz.ima'er'--
lJC094 l Tu ma- -DUuT A
3 A. Om l wve l
HM 5 %.9# rcd 6-lTwey l MAS L
.<uM24 l r cen l /L-e r 1.
Zbv@'OR'M*^
l l
A df) 9.
[,t-d
///q <.-s.
l T c V6 V l 8< U //e - Ovwf l :rce s v l %rsz4 ewwr ct. //in1 b l k c'a c i
,s. tLds /LM l s ocs y l
AcRS
\\ n. %d/hWA&a' l cronc l Aces
( ja.
sbem (c4J/
lT 04st - l hw, Ah._
n wh <,s.
l l
n.
r m / w. W A & e/
l J o 4 rs' l E F la r 1s.-r k,rc & w 4c.J l Jo 470 l reza
[lL.ke.~
B Cl~-L lGOefffo l U Rhe[
it M a a h l ane I
h Nwe 11M 3 2/d S NC l dd97I l/h-ool A~a.~ MdiS le >
nN! wen Rs lToA G lIVUs CmN E. !
kalf I ra%S
.l 15fY 17' L h ), L Y C- 0 0 G 1 4
] J'o $sC l L CKMe.
I I.
a
kT'lACd M MI PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR OCTOBER 3,1980 ACRS SUBC0!IIITTEE MEETING ON WASTE MANAGEMENT RODM 1046, 1717 "H" St., N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C.
AFFROXIMATE TIME _
Introduction - (S. Lawroski, ACRS) 8:30 A.M. - 8:45 A.M.
Status of Rulemaking Action,10 CFR 60, 8:'S A.M. - 9:00 A.M.
Technical Criteria for Geological Disposal of High-Level Wastes (M. Bell, NMSS)
Regulatory Approach and Rationale for Performance 9:00 A.M. - 10:30 A.M.
Objectives,10CFR60(S.Coplan,NMSS)
BREAK 10:30 A.M. - 10:45 A.M.
Rationale for Technical Criteria, 10 CFR 60 10:45 A.fi. - 11:45 A.M.
(L. White, NMSS) 11:45 A.M. - 12:15 P.M.
Summary, 10 CFR 60 (M. Bell, NMSS)
LUNCH 12:15 P.M. - 1:15 P.M.
DOE Presentation on R&D Efforts Relative to 1:15 P.M. - 2:45 P.M.
Geological Disposal of High-level Wastes (C. Health, DOE)
BREAK 2:45 P.M. - 3:00 F.M.
i ubi ic 5 co se...en mTem ConneW 0:00 P.'t.
4.00 P....
Status o'f Waste Confidence Rulemaking j>:'0P.M.-Y: 30 P.M.
0 (S. Trubatch, OGC)
AiT W 0
WD N@ )g y pop oh Q &.bO ?ACpOM y.md ho W
h) A no e co).
9 iA-J uurd t
lh&, l(G FR 3/ 39.5, ditid /779 / 3, @80
~7.eAna.$ Of renur datul 74z(go,..ne upcw) skQ m I.
%g o dcuatedCe hty k%id.
t 2.
7eM JcLipsy
- 4. C DN findhd M GM dddQ $ 4/tij8o.
4/st /po.
- b. E U.S. A Cs M M & Q g
& W MllLf80.
C. $ ik f.
- d. $ fld5d dulcnd d Spad NM M cloDJ 4 fid/Eo.
h g g M JM 4 /is/so.
e.19 %
3 U3 A. s. u.k e.u.AA M A&J c /,i/eo.
- k. @ s.R. me % & A&&s,tateo.
i.53 Q g Q. % & JAdco/x./so j Lei b K. y cud Jotd c/x/eo.
bedeg% W M ckhdv/,o/eo.4 sub gN A. El OA3 J. @ u.s. b W $
d Tras.lso.
xn.05 s akJ 'na k d,. M. & Aair 7/8I/90*
9h, dt.
Jfw h N M A M A&d 7/<i/so.
o.E9 % mdwt
- 9. gG on alth.g
- J. LQ J da%) 7tnise.
Q. G dapr 2c4 & dotad 7 teleo.
%g & M 7/Isleo.
W '/'8/' -
.rt.$ hp M a.yg M e q$ am PQ 1 M n Q aQ Pian, n J A4d *l5'**-
- x. M MRomwn, % d G &,c m % d$d&befa,o t. v.m
- r. G P.Rae, % 9
/
nr. katy.9.?A, PM Q, & dotta G/s7 eo.
a I
-c' e.oN i.
c) d i. h6, VM Q,==e4 J&4 che90.
- z. %
a, cA A&a sissteo
.g. m a. $ m Ehd, te~D %, M A&L c.tafeo.
Q g.stJ,,seigo.
aa.. @ u.s. M Purut4 a p 7/
so.
bb.TitT R.E. M M actui W <E G.a 7tiv/so.
ee.giavJo. M %
dot. E Bah 71abd, Ac.. Q A&J pf,7/go,
ec. G5 MM TAchc cmp. M c9&d 7/<</so.
ff. E Eahd 7mlu *J 7a4 ch cQ JAd 7/ts/do.
J eloh:1 7/t4/eo.
W
- 88. M W %
l WQ
- 3. 4m to douted ntere daTt.d 8/5/Bo, "NRc. Ruyeaukh&
Ehp ad D3dpcod g71acht M 6e % hebsiudL odpoed g $- dwd Weit. CeR.
on L A6 & d&d 7/11/so.
- a. % u.s. h+M' q
%etJ M Jdid 7/81/Bo.
- b. Wil 5% $
M J&J 7/aile.
c.gD Q owtcvnm M J9d Kcned E. Med
- e. hJad Q mad, ys FR 3 3 3,J4EJ s /s3/so, f
to dawuda 7%w-eksted 8luuleo,"nne Pactn Y
d d i S k d M d *3
- q. y c M cJL cE h d fm %
en i% & a cre-cay.
RancLi e & ~
A % Rc a.2 D W =on--~tdi m
io a4 eo m.p 2 g ag.
k%id %A.
4 w44
- d. wAsa ra==A R %et, ' a n 34=4 nch tc#.
cas-n.P b. f:n m e =4 5
' I)
CeN1 P y c{ A E =
gjhd 9/2s/so "NRt d
g.y Wd N d "6 4 ~ M
- 5. Hg?
A W A C'P"
3 a.. E M g, g a ct d ut 7/x /so.
e' g um de-ph y ga efsf3,,
3a pg a 24 e/elav
- c. ED
' g gon) of,ileo.
g, g p Q w em q w % d..
ATTAc4M EN D W" >
lb~d (2 osah C&a W h ava aka to &J AA btd %/so, '+:as Mg ; Paped
- 1. t & n 4 s % p d a nd-g >w w uxt,"
r
- 2. Pluat t cdm Adle ddd 1/iggo,
- 3. M C Rbut g datJ if.,,fgo.
g & jn f 5 t]. W /NE - w7, "Q' m $ bpyp d @f z,3,og
- A'7*d E y
dg Mu AAt2 lAWk
} ", d&d apsi ts, tpeo.
- 5. )w & /wd 7xanc dahl ife(so, e u mag &Q sin ~A y :tk AJA".
6- - Oxdu N)t % 29,f M d w-LJ N iveo.
% pels, AaL clwA' M dafd 7/1tfeo, nec. Psepeac) n b
4 ek y~ta++ns w.
M 4.dul 6fn/so.
W &&
a. & %nk & q4 0w,1 cm.4.p.) stEbd d..il 7/8/e=
6 53 F M 48 Md 7/iteo t H1 s d oucl % y h % Csed w d' 5 h* NM 5Q CcAAAM 7[3/80
"' E T* % % sbb.A asAl 7/7/so
' ' E % =b W M ~9* 4 4.3a.J7trieo 4 CD E*3h g VM N W 7/7/ao ob M JAd 7/ itee l
h I!O Stda g M adnd 7/7 eo i - @ O M k k % is W iS@ ghyd M d.stid 7/7[ec Md g 3 N WM M,%
k- @ M TJL h d W Ef'd d J4th.A 7/7/8o I
bd M cm Nds% fe&AM LtIJ 7/8/so f d 7/e/so
- 1. M FW Gg M - @ q) h 4. M s~tEisw 4ef d a' E Adaaurt. W AS ~!/3/B0 y. & St>E 4 cic'fEsl 7 /a[Go c.d Stiitti e6
b co4T.
W M clifi.d 7/7/eo
- 9. E PMd M M.i. but 9 EC bh OM Ac.. M Adc.cl v/s/so
/
A % & b* L
, % % M Asti.d 7At90 h%cel % N J.et.cJ v/v/so 4 E W%
- t. M na%S Ruenca % wei.t m el&,;,jefee M SMh4 d.ot.J 7/7/so A.. GD st:di cg v- @ don be%at 4 m%1 Q q W da.fiJ,/wteo
" CD & % d ?cumLp gk Q M d RJ rInfa M Jofict 7fia/eo F. W ?!!ws J. Aw>W M O A 7/1/60 S QS %
t3 E 5'6" h, N. C Jattd 7/,,/so q, qw.o hua1oda 77tLmer $ 7l22{9o, "DRC hepa t
7th kk& Cm so, ct)'.
e f Rap ad m.C q oM Std nzJ dali) 7/v/so sut 9 a
a.
171& $ $ /ttswr Ac$ict 7/t*//20
,Sizt g Geta s M % ct.,; dstd 7/p/eo b.
a. AsQ y W4 cow % && &:.aA, A,e.. ditcl 7/%o e.
& M cl A d 7/7f80 c M Q cru do. DefMQ S. GiD had ha, suit #5 woc 6 C Jc&cl 7/8/80 mac p.nopea) %
t 8%oAl.mw dataJ e/5 /scMAar klMtn (PR-50
- 8. % >wg &chag.s a d D & Q' heby_of Ddpu
%N 6e Ra N M' cle.hl 7/22/so.
a.. @ Shdi,o acb> ped %
sishwk JAJ v/22/e=.
&c64 Pm b.@ A M Codf4mtC cbi.e.d 7/7/*o c.@.$youd F_hc%2. Compq lGAm S. qq o Ed 1%w. ddid a /2sleo. "NR.C. Pn0Pau bet Pe.-s e, s i)",
t W ahetd q Ecb4 Uniti. mt G4 M.toti.J e/s/so.
tin shp A. ' doe /N E -0007, Sepp.1, doe C Ae44 -O CBkgh l
- b. % MT
-)
CON i.
~~
~~-~~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - -
&J e/sfeo.
c.153cb4 m h,A w. h A
- d. E te be %c%. N A.&A ets/so.
VoLg % cw.c. W JAd p/s tso.
e.150 7-ym cm. sih A&J e/s/so.
n( %
F. CD 5%. g W cm. M AAJ e/.s/so.
3.GD cya %
L. CD % q nk~u%. Cm-stzLud-b&A sie(so.
L. GB sai. g oh cm. W dofi) 9/s /so.ha. rA 4 g%gtg, cm. h A&cl e/s/so.
- 4. g]
4,g 9
M td G % Caene h adbl9h/Bo.
.t. @ Om Juditii. g C cm.,ou L P A % M M, %
m yn M % m N @ S2h g A yea.,4 M L b a % q 6
an.%
e Ah 0>=. N d.3rd e/sIso.
" UE aEStsk %so t % cue. sh JAd 9/s/eo.
O% Echu Pewy cm. M cidd 3/to/eo.
@G MAok Croa.M A M) elsfeo.
0-
+. @ S.td.s. q
- g. ED M6 d.. G Crcno A Jdid e /n/ so,.
& a ?tu.ek PM d nD%.9 kmua a.%D w G Q
% C A p cua. M A &d sin /so.
J,rJL,td cm. C JM 3/ss/so.
4 G WA c4%%, h Ac. ce., d&d e/4 /eo Ed %
M g +M.8Q peidad sGhuJ AskJ sli/so.
C A-Skrb 13 b6 @ agbl e fu /so,
T-
, a&d oct.2s,1979
- 10. ho9 M TIAE, M. 44, no. 2os, G isr2.
I
- . *,