ML19352B315

Summary of 810501 Meeting W/Util Re Licensed Operator Training & Certification.Attendance List & Viewgraphs Encl

ML19352B315
Person / Time
Site:	Arkansas Nuclear
Issue date:	06/18/1981
From:	Boger B Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 8107020010
Download: ML19352B315 (19)

Text

_

f

~~

JUN 18 1981 fg gf,gVyJ. f Docket Nos. 50-3 68 jut! 2 9193;.

42 q

u.s.

m FACILITY: Arkansas Nuclear One (ANO), Units No.1 & 2 A.

LICENSEE: Arkansas Power and Light Company (AP&L)

SUMMARY

OF MEETING WITH APAL CONCERNING LICENSED OPERATOR TRAINING AND CERTIFICATION Introduction The purpose of the neeting held May 1,1931 was to discuss the training and certification of operator and senior operator licensee candidates at ANO.

The meeting was prompted by our concern that the ANO training program has been deficient in providing the requisite training for applicants and in determining whether an acceptable level of competence has been achieved.

The attendees are identified in Enclosure 1.

Discussion Results of recent ANO-1 and ANO-2 exans were reviewed. The staff noted deficiencies in the written exams, especially with respect to the inability to achieve the scores required under the new grading criteria.

In addition, a review of previous written exam g-ades at ANO showed that had the increased passing criteria been in effect, the denial rate would have been greater than 60%. Although such a comparison was not done for other utilities, results since the new criteria went into effect on i'ay 1,1980 show an industry wide denial rate for written exans of somewhat below 30".

At ANO, the dental rate for written exans since May 1,1980 has been 69% and 47% for Units 1 and 2 respectively. Specific weaknesses were observed by the staff in the ability to concletely answer cuestions and to address the specific point required by an exam question. The results of oral exans were also revi sed. The denial rate for oral exans at ANO was found to be at least equal to or less than the industry average.

The staff expressed concern because a eeeting was held in 1976 to discuss similar deficiencies. AP&L noted that this neeting had been held at their renuest.

The staff also connented on the inadequacy of training material provided to the staff for exan preparation.

AP&L stated that trainino naterial was beine revised. A subsecuent telephone conversation resulted in an AP4L connitrent to provide the staff with revised training naterial for the next exans, even if the material is still in draft form.

ca f. 4 *e o u t I V.

c yp;cu g p 5:3p 3 cgf v

w,.a, u..-

810 7 0 3 0 0c

n

~

l The results of the latest review (January 1980) of the requalification exam were also discussed by the staff. The SRO written exam content and grading was judged unsatisfactory. The staff noted that follow up audits should have been conducted on the requalification exams and that future exans will receive more attention.

AP&L personnel made the presentation outlined in Enclosure 2.

Long range training plans were discussed. These plans encompass the hiring, training, and certification of license candidates. Specifically, improvements were noted in the following areas:

i

- Training facilities, including a simulator for each unit, t

- Fomal classroom and on-the-job training.

- Instructor effectiveness.

- Training materials.

- Evaluation and certification of candidates.

Since it will take several years to complete the long range training progran, the staff requested infomation on the efforts taken by AP&L to upgrade license candidates in the near future.

In response, APal outlined several improvements I

that have been instituted to enhance candidate perfomance on future exams.

Conclusions It was agreed that AP&L would keep the staff posted on the progress of the revised training program.

In addition, based upon the improvements instituted to upnrade candidate perfomance, the staff agreed to accept APAL certification of license candidates for the exams scheduled in August 1981. Candidate perfomance on these exams will detemine the course of future exanination efferts.

Bruce A. Boger Operator Licensing Branch Division of Human Fa.: tors Safety i

Enclos7res:

1.

Attendance List DISTRIBUTION:

2.

AP%L Presentation OLB Rdg RPurpl e JKramer WDJohnson GZech Docket TNovak SHanauer NSIC JHeltemes NRC PDR RClark PCollins TERA L PDR JStolz BBoger ACRS-10 HDenton GVissing BWilson OELD ECase RMartin REaton RTedesco DEisenhut 0I&E Glainas

+

/Alh Ej "g

l OLS/

OLS uu>

l 5 *~' > BBog'er/bjl BN. i l son.

!. P.C -

, s.

e<O 6//L /81 6/j(/81

! 6/#81 I

. u: w ; e s e vo ""

CFFICI AL R ECOR O CC V

~

',[ ' "

l7:

m 4

f h

UNITED STATES

[

D y j yn j

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

p ^/y I

WASW NGTo N, D. C. 20555 s-j gv**"*

UUN 18 1981 Docket Mos. 50-313 368 FACILITY: Arkansas Nuclear One (ANO), Units No. 1 & 2 LICENSEE: Arkansas Power and Light Company (AP&L)

SUMMARY

OF MEETING WITH AP&L CONCERNING LICENSED OPERATOR TRAINING AND CERTIFICATION Introduction The purpose of the meetirig held May 1,1981 was to discuss the training and certification of operator and senior operator licensee candidates at ANO.

The meeting was prompted by our concern that the ANO training progran has been deficient in providing the requisite training for applicants and in determining whether an acceptable level of competence has been achieved.

The attendees are identified in Enclosure 1.

Discussion Results of recent ANO-1 and ANO-2 exams were reviewed.

The staff noted deficiencies in the written exams, especially with respect to the inability to achieve the scores required under the new grading criteria.

In addition, a review of previous written exam grades at ANO showed that had ^,he increased passing criteria been in effect, the denial rate would have been greater than 60%.

Although such a comparison was not done for other utilities, results since the new criteria went into effect on May 1,1980 show an industry wide denial rate for written exams of somewhat below 30%.

At ANO, the denial rate for written exams since May i,1980 has been 69f, and 47". for Units 1 and 2 respectively. Specific weaknesses were observed by the staff in the ability to completely answer questions and to address the specific point required by an exam question.

The results of oral exams were also reviewed. The denial rate for oral exams at ANO was found to be at least equal to or less than the industry average.

The staff expressed concern because a meeting was held in 1976 to discuss similar deficiencies.

AP1L noted that this meeting had been held at their request.

The staff also commented en the inadequacy of training material provided to the staff for exam preparation.

APSL stated that training material was being revised. A subsequent telephone conversation resulted in an AP&L ccanit. rent to provide the staff sith revised training material for the next exams, even if the material is still in draft form.

I EIAAIDRY DOCKET FiLECOPY n

l' s.

The results of the latest review (January 1980) of the requalification i

exam were also discussed by the staff.

The SR0 written exam content and i

grading was judged unsatisfactory.

The staff noted that follow up audits should have been conducted on the requalification exams and that future exams will receive more attention.

AP&L personnel made the presentation outlined in Enclosure 2.

Long range training plans were discussed. These plans encompass the hiring, training, and certification of licenst candidates. Specifically, improvements were noted in the following areas:

- Training facilities, including a simulator for each unit.

- Formal classrocm and on-the-job training.

- Instructor effectiveness.

- Trainir;g materials.

- Evaluation and certification of candidates.

Since it will take several years to complete the long range training program, the staff requested infonnation on the efforts taken by AP&l to upgrade license candidates in the near future.

In response, AP&L outlined several improvements that have been instituted to enhance candidate performance on future exams.

Conclusions It was agreed that AP&L would keep the staff posted on the progress of the revised training program.

In addition, based upon the improvements instituted to upgrade candidate performance, the staff agreed to accept AP&L certification of license candidates for the exams scheduled in August 1981.

Candidate performance on these exams will determine the course of future examination efforts.

N

/f&

Bruce A. Boger Operator Licensing Branch Division of Human Factors Safety Enclosures :

1.

Attendance List 2.

AP&L Presentation I

.e-

,M o

n a

EtiLLOSURE 1 ATTENDANCE LIST FOR MEETItlG WITH AP&L

- CONCER? LING OPERATOR EXAMINATI0ff & TRAINING, May 1, 1981 NGC

'AP&L' J. J. Kramer R. A. Roderick P.LF. Collins J. P. O'Hanlon B. A. Boger J. D. Vandergrift

8. A.. Wilson R. C. Evans J. Gagnon J. M. Griffin R. Eaton W. D. Johnson R. E. Martin G. Vissing t

. g i

E?; CLOSURE 2 I:liRODUCT10tl J. M. Gar.==I4 ARKAtlSAS NUCLEAR OtlE J. P. O'HAnt:N TRAINING OVERVIEW R. A. Rc:Eatcx

.LOE!G-T RM PLAN CHRONOLOGY CF EVENTS 0

LICENSE ExAMINArtons ExPeatENCEs J. D. VA.esaest.=T 0

CONTRIBUTING FACT 0as TO FAILURES 0

CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TRAIN!NG EVALUATICN PROCESS

3. Evans

SUMMARY

J. M. GatF=:n u i t

,'Q'

• nIi t d n$ ". lite r,k' h O O lJ [

f I

I n0 t.

i

's 0

I

g C

e J

- 3

- m m w

& 2 --

~

M<

H

=

3 n.,

ne h=-

W h

m en 2 O

h--

O W < Z

~

O W

O H

>- W O

! O O

s' J J W J

l C._

f.h Z M <

tJ CM O W

h s

en W

J F-Z W

L

~

W I C

m C

J W

k-(d 2 O m U E U CM w

y

- ~_,

O I,

O O

Z C.,.

C

~

~

N_

(

man V

6 e.

Q

• ^ :

mee

-. l, n

i

~

m

[-

Q Z

=

s I

4 l

~

v

~

I

/

l g

0 0

e I

i t

i O

W W,

_J Ci

^ *

>- J O

= '

e gW M

h

w

,1 D

E G D

l S

E t

A R S i

H 0

t l

I lE l

1 A A C

t T R E

I P 1 S L j

M S R

O K S T -

R O O E K F I

i 0 T A S W E l

F l

R O T R E E l

o I

i C R S

W S T l

l A E A9 R T t

tE E P L - 2 E A t

t S R O C P, }

O C C E

1 C

t 1

R C

S T lE R 0 O5 K F 1

O 1

R 1 -

E l

F l

N R l

I I

l

^

0 T A S

S E i I

E E L R S - K W S T l

A E A

E R

f Y P E P L 3 E 2 E A X

l i

W} O C C 1 E R O C 1 E

m )S C

l E

R rE S

l K

C L O x

I l

L i

t t

E F

O T r

I l

f E

E R A S E NI 0 N R IA r

T I

R S W T

E E 1

W S

E A

T R T Y P R

l E

A O P L 6 L

E A X

E r

I S

gg W C O C

(

O C C 1 E L

T A S h

G i

K S

I S

I' l

1 y

A C

El ND F

j t

C E

1 E

F L

l 1

S U

h l

/ C A

\\

g E

R T

)

1 l

r l

g I

r i

L E S S 1

M g K

E O

l' f

R R S

E E

S 0 A R E G

l I

g A O -

L E

}F h

l C

E i

G l

l I

S S F f

H E T A A W

l f

g i

l E

g L C l

l 1

D 1

)

'l f

I it 6

0 N

VI u

u g

C A iX I

l li - 1 1

I l

l l

y uE t

4

(

T A

C A M

R f

l l

A lt g

AE R

U I A C

l

~l I

lt 1

I g

E L

C A

u p

Y G )S V

23 1

t p

l R

t K D t

L 1

A O I

MNl I

K l

O N R g

t N

J T

i g

I A

S g

l R -

S E E I

I g

i

\\

X t A

T R T Y P t

l 6 J C A X

l l

O C C

}

E A O C

(

E G

)

K l

L E t

E A Y t

R O i

l E

l W

E L fA 4

l R.

I L

i

(

G L I

S.

)

E S

K L

P E

I I

S.

R C i l

W I

E C

t t

l I

i 8 i t

S l

K i

A u1 1

l l

l 1

(

S C i

{

)

l y

i f

L l

A I

E d

i A K f lG i

1

, ml I

l l

i Y

1 t

l K

t V

g A D C

l l

E i R A C A i

t g

f.

g S G M S l

l l

I

~

,y TRAINI?lG EVALUATI001 METHODS

- C0lJRSE WRITTE:l EXAMINATION

- OJT WRITTEN AND ORAL EXAMI:lATIO,'l 4

- STUDENT AllD SUPERVISOR l'.RITICUES

- I R..s I n,,I n,G - c,o,n.r'( c'01a. ur :'Rn.' i I u^n*r,s L ns e e c cca l i d,

r n

ct r 3c ra n

ve a s

QC AUDITS, !!RC CORRESP0 iDENCE, !hPO AilD SAFETY

'/IA A TRAINING REVIEW TASK FORCE

- EFFECTIVE'iESS E'/ALUATIOil CCMMITTEE C C Cti;XM L CII !c C F' 0'0Vh'iw'L

-s,-,,,

e--.

-c-

'c 5

l v

CU. n;c! 'n t._ n' !v!..D U.n o^ ! ? Q C Oi'."Iribr i

S n

1. sa l i

-o s

i I

r h

e

e e

t_,

l H

X I

- E CO Q

r-t U

m X

-Q O

-Z W>

af g X

W

-C i

c:: uJ l

U "o

=<

m cn x

x lx uJ

-M V

CA O

_..__------.-7 CC y

N Q

Q W

~4 L:

GC w

".4 l

X

^

~-

\\'

O

-E t

i

,~.i

,e

_ eie w

A w

f X

_l -

1 I

.i.O O >=

1 W<

H 1

cm-t i

e<e 1

X W L1

-Z

,O.

i

=w

'/)

UZ N

m.e l

m t*88 4'

,,W V

• i M

i N

h. mom f

g O

t w-l l

l X

X S

, S h3*

W

.A i

W W

y W

OC C L~\\

l,9

.~

P M

s a

t

- D u r-. n.

C p..., n s

o

• L i, v se w

.s i

C~i^.r_=.=_ c.Uev. n.'i i)nf 70 -

~ =..'. r 4..n =~ >' i = = n =

n'.'13:

r m

s.

--se v

v JAN 80 Mn, K: R CONM _. D s, i I n J, a-i 0, n.,,. r _.,.1 i d

.... n e :;. :..

v JAn 80 CONCE?T AP? ROVED 3Y MANAGEMENT AND -!=AININC

.. c u.

.c r i/

• n MU4..n

.r

n D a m, e::

.lLN:n3:

s..u 1.-,

w vs A

ls wN

--s ELEVEN Ly-.-clo t n n v~t. :.- J, -u g--.

q, v,I 1,,s-c.d,4 m

i:36 4 i vs -

acer,.

i

• c

.c n.. I.r.,l c.

2 0.n C. : A.u.

a r

1.. I 1

.s s.

A,PR c0 isICr.

a

u 0 0 n, i u.,

Cd,Us-ex,Y APR c0 cEGAN RArntNG CENTER CONSTRUCT!CN v u,u, - 2,0 T Lr..=. = m' = = D. s.= =_.=. - i v.=. = :=.= m.v n

sm -

It tu r $b

^

r.

3.0 3.l L s j T. y : :. t,r,

'#O l

^'l-v w. 4. p,, r - " : 3/ e.,. r ^ ; v. 0,

• i s

vj

...v4 f

ww.6-

-w

_v-.

,_.i

.' '. ; i. ' ~... e u

'39

.-?

- ~... -

---a,

,,,3 Uri.-c ;

3 0 il A.4 0 m.i.

e MUG 00 i.1 -, a t...

,3, - -. s.;. s a : <.'.' O,L i

fif r

i,

r e.: : : a...... : a.,.

• * : n. n,..,i t.. -

4

'. D ; f I.

." ; ( U M

.1O e,s. n. l-u th uL 0 U!DYdbO L. 'N N :r-- _--.r/:

mv i l y.3 0 iw p

g,jpy1 es. L..s0D

_......g, 6 1 mus.

w f

n

._m,OC._

F: Pal

" O a r. T P

..UC DV 9.~._:_

ebr:

. 's mqe- *. ~,. -

• ,L.Ji.4D m--..d.Ob;O e,

,,-r.,-

s.,n - -

y

-m sv Vi 1v*O

.4 q ^. ?

s., - ~. 0

-P"

~YN 0.(~0F.

. ~..

... w.+0j g;.-,

q.-f..

-.. i e...~,

..i.4.

^^

• 1...~...

0 0 + i e

n. i O Me".:s

i. -

. 6 5On...+c P. L O. V' iS:7...Gi I

e

Jt.

-7s-7^*

CP.1.0 L"t i tL nL i i uil 0.

a.x-+,Iae : m a, IJ a i

..n G wR0 9:emsaw a

c. r t em i t was -s

- e 1

w w.

i w

-w SIMULATCR SE?T 80 CoNTaACTED FoR.=ouR ccNSutTANTS To HELP OPERATOR TRAINING OCT 80 BEGAN TRAININC E..CECTIVENESS E'/ALUAT:ON COMMITTEE Il0v 80 COMPLETED PTA Nov 50 CONTRACTED DEVELOPMENT C.: 3.0 AND SRO n3

---.i.

M 6

e 4.

.s

' d dl L ODDV64 wd.s -.

w

.my D

O & C;% D IRAINING r.-ANUALS s e r n o,. I.2.n. --..t s Cr O

m. r t I u. a, i s J,

n, A

. run b C x,-

.,1 : a-eMN c1 c:

A

. :u m

c:- 21 3

eJp X n< I r 2,. ~ c z

u. :. 2. =.

wa. LL w..

i,ia n c-}

• '3%

0 ag l Ka t u t.-.,.... l u.

Diser

r. : '. L, - -

--a cucc:isi:D rox,

di

.(. glMD Ca'.O. 8 6A *. t

• g { ** M "".]'

4

't

- A g/ M lw

1. 4 M w'

' Ma s Q~w2 A'O L:asvd-o'M.I ne-ic w w c.

6:J 0-)

c u

i n. -n r

r Q*

}[

.~.O

' a n, T

.-.- 3 p.en

7..gl e.... i.e a ge...

I tM N v-s *nilaigni;3 917.0 w

'l Q C D Me4 b.1

'g,,'

] ..

Q

-. i.--. r 7.,-.4.

./0 5 i e i. J i*w e.

3, U. E b &.~

wt4 i

! M r.

a wM' 4wt w

q i.M.M Y *, - O, w.

w.

w.

I l

i== 07

?..-.y.-.

a s y-?%

3 - ~10

• bX F C ". 4 '.m a i ! 4.

~ -..

--.y.g..;-

l

.". r 3

1. i ; 1 *.

• 1 1 '

wM.4-.

P.

w-w.# S N d"* 6 '. f.

I NM 1 el A 9 4C Fwn$'

.y

..wev O

I I

3.*

Q1 3I.,?-

.w 41

& I4 NiWN Mvww.O i

• g.-

..., ;g

,==%

.,my,y.

-.m.

3 O.~.

O-U44 a v [*

." 6 8 *E e

6 4 w

• 2 ;' s. --*

e n n., iL.

I_ w-1. n.t

- c.,

i t i.-.,, q b,.t u-i yi s

r s,,

i

-.v IlAY 81 UNIT Ont st.9uLATOR PacxAGE TO AF?L's A r-R O L. L pO a,RD Or-O.3

.,iv,n d Cn,liRn.,Ci e

t.st run ui-t.G,/ t I.,1 i 0 o,,

. i ilA.( 81 i

-. r -

=,

i n n..,1 I.,! G r n.,..,ui ti/

JuL't 31 3E-GIa usING naw 'elCO T>AIaiNG MATERI AL

-: - u

: t.:. 1 a.n v.1

?,: - t. I

n. 4 5 : +t t :

1..

2 1

i.. r* t i e t. 4 L.

s V

r' U,

' u. :_ " : W n' O i n n' r. o" t ". c-

= e_n e. : A.a.

s i n. e. v y. t.e. : USI.".r i.

m T..10 : 1 A. U La, i v R a r cu I r-. Cn, i I c,l s-AUG 81 COM.3L-i: pJII i r

i vi c

AUG c1 a L 0 v,. K

.y, n,:-

d : y C 1D c.n a V i n n I a....,. - -, u P ine env u

n:c. c.l o

n

. L '. c c,.

^]

I.,,. r i. : c.. s - n : ^, av q:e-i e-.

6-c e

-a.

Qi

~~.m...,...

• /, g,,,

vu, O_

f,,., e. g = g.r_:i:,., / c-i c e.ii. g q =

fg-

• 7

,s ir i.e i.o

..n. 4 v s.

.t n.. :

l7*'{~

"1'"".of O.

.$ I.".4 l l l..

_,4 7. O,Q.

n' F O {.f i. Q. f - T p al c' % T

\\ lJ -.8 8. I *i

'l'9 ~ /.*"'.)

.u'. 4 i

- m i i i vi l

PgCGgG-60 I Cg]

2

-3=

, - m - e.,

., u v -au

_On=me. s un

...m

,rene.f,,g_

i.',

~;r

.r.n...

n : s-a1

..-.3,..,t.,._ :

...i.r

,....,.. :,i "n 4 :

.. _. 3 :,1.

,.. s J s

?*

'j.., **

my c..-:

-,,. J. J,.: ue a :C n....aJ c.U - - c,: _vv,

-: e t.1

.rn 04 mr;.

u. i.:. =

i..

F f

l T-I,

..e.-.

.-*. r ' ~.. t

)"O

.~ 7

.-.f-

-.N

.g.-

.1'.,. :AO

."*. c r,

.tt.

sr

..J

". ~.

i

r. P..*A ?.:. ~; : ',

O l

UNIT ONE EXAM RESULTS (PAST TWO YEARS) nunc., L i b,a U,r u d n i n o cea-n sn Dn,,-

Pn,as 0

a--

=

=

.n o

?!0VEMBER 1978 4/5 80%

.EBRUARY 1980 3/5 60%

• JANUARY 1981 2/7 29%

D 110.n s.0,: sci.a, :03r,u,0 mnt

.m u mmn m

u

-. 0 9_/^o

,277 1;;

• ILllV.

,o m

. r. L a,, c. - -,cn3;D."n3Dlitu Ln16;ntn - ad.: v/;F.nLL 3., n

.r r,

-cr g,,-

1:4

,s.--,

.y

-,3,,

V ! ".nn,,

LL Vnnu ; A.%'t BULL;;Q - / / i:

u I

t

,s-,

- -., s 1. -

,._.s.-.,

c.c-

<J.t b :JJ.b 6'..A li "v is;;hs 4

i. n. '. s s........~;siu].

c, w-

...s.

!,i i

..--s4..

> u.-.i.

... -. s

..V.".PeC:J T07 c/.'

t o.. T.

V

- u

$' C C C/L 00.:c s

l.i m r*

. i i.,

4--

G 0 Q T. Av y P"c m-_J MOO C/7

.t.i

-ss m v univy,sc.- u-gnu ou Qu_J s ac GU.IL5un7 7-Calve er go

(/C Lb,OL ACvllEir,6,

.uw-has C3 u

%00I t/h 086I 3N0r,

%00I E/E OS6I AEYDEE3d

%00I h/h 616I E3SW21d3S

%00I 5/5 616I ABYONVI sseg ;

sevd 10 E01VE3do'dO13Y32 (SEV3A OM1 ISVd) 1 0 q qu.a.n e u x lz. a, L' 0 8 _3.I I P.O O

t

.. -. -u--)

I.I n n,6, <e_

o _- s, l T o.,

1 r,-

w,,,.'

n--

--e L-i s

r u

a u,-

u

- L :. r C r,. i u-si4 D :_ r r-e i !,/ :.,.,: S

-INSimVCilCo.

m s

[NSTRUCTIONAL STA.:F ll0RXLCAD CuRRIuutua 3

....,:ai

r.,_ r. - - -., p -3 e.~m...-..s;,,,,..a s

2.

__. -1: :

SCHE:utING s

8 e

-p e

e C

X i

i o

I, N I m

a CC >

N I

CC 7

N C7 CC e-4 7

X e$.s m

X X

i 2

NCO L

O 7

Ni C

Q O

-1 O

CO C

CLJ C

N

=

l t

O O

+

m

=

X X

CC LLJ CC 7

Lu O

X E

e-4 7

l X

-4 i

O Z

l

~

CC 1

L L.!

--.2 lE*

CC

=

l O

L l

t_.2 i

=

7 X

X X

X L.)

V)

O O

2 N.

N, x

s l

• i

'A C

Oi Ol s

C l Cc \\

O en r

l f

C X

X X

C

~

O M

X

-s 7

I i O>

I I

Oc !

X I

2 6

7 k

~

N 8nm seem O

O

=

=

.l

cad crr-Cilv<ry SS I,lS~i nUC I t Lq.l.).L rrp 3 i 3

r t

ti c l

r t

a.s APIL INS RucTeas com.=LETED A 40-sour

! R a...l i.l G C O U n o :-

I N d i,UL.--,

t.

i vn IJ S g-1 :-,4 L S - -.l

3., n st s-ro in:/ nn: a:,/ -

a vi i

ELOPED, REVIEWED, AND APPROVED, (IMPROVE NSTRUCTOR AIDS) 1,1:- - I l'n :-

i :i n... ::!Nn-D =-..- 1

.w-n vwt,Ju4:

c n::

u T

0. F :-.2. n 1..u. s: 4, 2 :,/. e, d.

i n L 4l.. c..I os...

1.. w n

s.,

i vw.

s.

a me s s

L[r.r.3*3:-

F. : M' O. 3 p v* : ;_ ; Y. *3.

a l--

Jac JUn

.-e1. :s t w e a v L i m. l =i s n:7 - I.g y A

g 9 a n g.

qg

=m

.-m.

. i s,gvH.-

e I..sM l.Ly;a-: t A D be ad v, ; L t.; 4 i

a i l w-M' r*..*.i C :-. ' a C 0 0. v n.*,l

' ; a I.

.O..;

a " O. e i f= - : a :

a a...*-

a

-a,

. i.ww. s.T.,

,wai w

i.

6.7d, L C.

.n-..,7.

1:0i g-.

i.s I

I

-eqgAl e.

9. m -

., / I.+, =,

)

• m, I h; e i g

-- t.I j

4 & g i i.% v i.9 8 6 ft

. \\.\\ L.'

4%, j iit eis w

Val =iXMLi;J qs

=9r*

w w i.s a tJ t. =i m i.i - a q

aos m v 4. : 4 *i

• # t,* e t.

vVm t F.Q, O.

i - i.

6

,3m--n 37o f'

.". M i L s aXX&

1 i-O 6 A. s e

• Q

r,L D

,J.C r-,,ilun.,,L ur-3..-

N ne....,G s

e avi

..mi.

i

..4

( D6 6.vi ni:

10^^

r.r..T.vn o e :.. t 6 e,,...- -

-r-rmc V

..vdi id.V essa i.wier-w.

mN a t,. N l

.A...l. i l,.

A 6.f v.kl O k

0

.%. 0-n'.l* L'* 0., " O 9 90

~^ 70 I 'L l t 79

.... -- i - --

--w.

e Ol'SI4 J *...I I Y 9

k.. e* *i.

.I 0 I..). #,"4'."4

.U {$ ).

O Y l 'E.

.)s I

4

^~

• I

• I.

s 1

9.v ' t.:. LT T. *.,.p ' e

.O

. +

w I

i

e C CI'ed" 'l "j'l i n e s e {w w w v i*

W f.!C n-.

, s- : n TV i st 7 lw i x,.J i.. t p i -.,, -

q t.

n

.v i t i. c.,

-=-

m.3 g...

Q

't.L M O m, 3 0 s s W t m e t vil w.= l" ~. I I I M e 1.,I..s a 4 'J m i t.J s

---.i i-,e

-n Amq w i s'V b v i l ^ I N *

• 7. 0

\\d

• O\\

• D, m* *

• e * *. ! #+.J 0^X j 'm, 7.O..* ', f n) / '= l m'.',9. I ^

6.

..i7

. V s.sm..

e v

ii e

I % i ! ( 2..O/

l>U U..) e*/.,@w * '/ ' e /'*. ' *. w w

1. # I ',3 A C i,..

w a i I * *,

• T W

am is www w

6 4

me -.i.

-,m-==

eeg.-...

pgo av e

s.-

-s=.

a f e, e gg=

'. 'v i s a r* O

..e O n 4." i

!.m.

• ; i s '.: e

",u w ; s

"' M ; ;

i s

h I

O

..... r.s n

. C i i i _ -.,, L,.. tm i i

u.

,,v m.i..

1,.

..s

ERTIFICATION OF CANDIDATE 3

. 2 1

CVALUA:- ira!1 :-

ROGR- $ iH.0Uen.,U.

.H-Rn.r,Ii,e s

r

a v

i i e i n,.1 nv n: <! :,,.1

d. 0,: :., n i. C,. Le e

3. :-.2.o.,t e l 3 l.

r i,

..s t e e

3 n

7 CONDUCi

i. R i t i - N..mUDIt tXn.d.

..RLI:n, 20 :.... n D D r i,. n., A L nn o

I s.l G C v U, u, c-

c. a,,lD, L, C i,,, I

.a...: n.s nn:Ac.

RAIJs

-s i

0 3 -,P.m 6 c

- i

~

. r e,l O U r-

.3,,,l i :.s,, :.., i V viivU C i A. A...< -...,J : X..., -

)e J. :

i. P nc.

. Vi e

4--

• 7

-a L V. I n t t a -- * '.1

- -

• 7..' u a 1.y. -, n g iives 64 n L V i t. L,. i IV $dal aar wL::J Lei 15n. n e. i s O n.e'-d t's 1nl O:. -.). I. f.

Y.

. U. S.

I.k

.h.

n$

f 0

s.S' i

o n. e s..,.* 6.

f8 Msep g f. ;8,# :

• • .,]' - f.% 4,.*

."%5."4a

?

.*m, W

,e

.?.

• .$ O i.*I'...'.*i A

• A

-.g.

• '**t

-*4

.. Ij P:NOVeeln(

1.

• • e a

I 6 c~--

. 7 n.

74

- -... - ff.

3, 3

w V. *q -... j r., g P. s n i L b 4

..,3 Ya ni 6V.I

..q,.-.,

w N4 14" eb

.P.aeI

.e.

IW IM:

L. t e" w J

Msts

r. O Q T,6.T '/. ' i,*,

• C.7 ' * *i n e,

il h

I O