ML19351D822
| ML19351D822 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Byron  |
| Issue date: | 10/15/1980 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19351D820 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-454-80-18, 50-455-80-17, NUDOCS 8011200076 | |
| Download: ML19351D822 (1) | |
Text
.
i Appendix A i
4.
Commonwealth Edison Company Docket No. 50-454
~
Docket No. 50-455 j
Based on the inspection conducted on September 15-16, 19, and 22-23, 1980, it appears that certain of your activities were in noncompliance with NRC require-ments and the conditions of your Construction Permits CPPR-130 and CPPR-131 as i
noted below. These' items are categorized as deficiencies.
s 1.
Section 3.E.2 of Construction Permits CPPR-130 and CPPR-131 requires, in part, that a control program shall be established by the applicant to pro-i vide for a periodic review of all construction activities to assure that those activities conform to the environn. ental conditions set forth in this permit. The control program, " Finalized (Revised 4-21-76) Onsite Environ-mental Monitoring Program," requires, in part, that the onsite coordinator or his designated representative shall conduct daily, weekly, and monthly checks of construction activities on the plant site using the check lists included in this procedure. The completed check lists shall be forwarded to the Site Project Superintendent for his approval and then forwarded to Quality Assurance for approval and filing to become part of the permanent documentation.
2 4
Contary to these requirements, no daily check lists were filed in the a.
permanent records for the dates of November 7, 1978; September 7, 1979; and September 10, 1979.
b.
Contrary to these requirements, the October 26, 1979 monthly check list, the July 10,'1980 check list, and the July 6, 1979 check list were all incompletely filled out with sections left blank as to whether or-not they were checked.
}
c.
Contrary to these requirements, the July 1979 and August 1979 monthly check lists were marked indicating no groundwater samples were collected in area C, when in fact samples had been collected and analyzed.
i
[
2.
Section 3.E.1.. of Construction Permits CPPR-130 and CPPR-131 requires, in part, that the applicant shall take the necessary mitigating action, includ-ing those summarized in Section 4.5 of the Final Environmental Statement, during construction of the station and associated transmission lines to avoid unnecessary adverse environmental impacts from construction activities.
Commitment 12 of Section 4.5.1 of tra Final Environmental Statement requires, in part, that upon completion of construction, the pipeline trench will be backfilled and regraded; the entire corridor will be replanted and the land will be disturbed no further. All ruts or depressions deeper than six inches will be graded immediately, and any plowing or disking required will be carried out before reseeding.
Contrary to these requirements, an area of erosion approximately two_ feet deep was observed near the northwest corner of the site, near the sewage outfall in the pipeline corridor and no attempt had been made to prevent-it by grading the area.
i
.8011200
. 07G
-