ML19351C788
| ML19351C788 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 08/15/1980 |
| From: | Barnes I, Roberds H NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19351C787 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900063 NUDOCS 8010080068 | |
| Download: ML19351C788 (5) | |
Text
.
U.S. NUCLEAR REGUI.ATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT ll)
REGION IV Report No. 99900063/80-01 Program No. 51300 Company:
Pacific Pumps Division Dresser Industries Inc.
5715 Bickett Street Huntington Park, California 90255 Inspection Conducted:
August 4-8, 1980 Inspector: _/ //
4 mr
/ /Date H. W. Roberds, Contractor Inspector f
Compone.ntsSection II Vendor Inspection Branch 9//f/#C Approved by:
w I. Barnes, Chief Date ComponentsSection II Vendor Inspection Branch Summarv i
Inspection on August 4-8, 1980 (99900063/80-01)
Areas Inspected:
Implementation of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, criteria and applicable codes and standards including actions on previous inspection findings, nondestructive examination (liquid penetrant), aondestructive examination (magnetic particle), special processes personnel qualification (nondestructive examination) and manufacturing process control.
The inspec-tion involved twenty-eight (28) inspector hours on site by one (1) NRC inspector.
Results:
In the five (5) areas inspected, no apparent deviations or unresolved items were identified.
q 8 010080 $
~
g
2 DETAIL SECTION A.
Persons Contacted
- R.
M. Ettington, Executive Vice President
- D. J. Moyer, Quality Assurance Manager S. R. Grajenda, Welding Engineer D. Ausman, Welding General Foreman
- W.
R. Karp, Level III Examiner, Nondestrictive Examination
- J. C. Patton, General Mfg. Manager
- Attended exit aceting.
B.
Action on Previous Inspection Findings 1.
(Closed) Deviation (Item A, Notice of Deviation, Report No. 79-02) 5/32 and 3/16 coated electrodes were mixed in one compartment in a holding oven.
The inspector verified, from records,that additional instructions had been given to the weld material crib attendants, relative to the importance of the segregation of weld material and examination of three (3) holding ovens for coated electrodes did not reveal a similar discrepancy.
2.
(Closed) Deviation (Item B, Notice of Deviation, Report No. 79-02)
Welding had been accomplished although the Summary of Processes whien defines the welding procedure had not been released.
The inspector verified, from records, that instructions had been given to shop foremen to apply procedures to routings frem Sammary of Processes that have been officially issued to them.
j C.
Nondestructive Examination (Liquid Penetrant) 1.
Objectives The objectives of this area of the inspection were to verify that:
a.
Nondestructive examination is performed in accordance with approved written procedures.
b.
Nondestructive examination procedures meet the requirements l
of Section V of the ASME Code.
3 c.
Examinations are performed and results are interpreted by appropriate qualified personnel.
2.
Method of Accomplishment The preceding objectives were accomplished by:
4 a.
Review of the Quality Assurance Manual, Chapter 9.
" Examination, Test and Inspection."
b.
Review of Procedure No. 023-0-0077-1, " Liquid Penetrant Examin-ation" revision 1.
c.
Inspection of penetrant materials and review of the manufacture's certification relative to sulphur and halogen content.
d.
Observation of penetrant examination of Order No. BN 50851, Item No. A002.
3.
Findings Within this area of the inspection, ao deviations from commitments or unresolved items wers identified.
D.
Nondestructive Examination (Magnetic Particle) 1.
Objectives The objectives of this area of the inspection were to verify that:
a.
Nondestructive examination is performed in accordance with approved procedures.
b.
Nondestructive examination procedures meet the requirements of Section V of the ASME Code.
c.
Examinations are performed and results are interpreted by appropriate qualified personnel.
2.
Method of Accomplishment a.
Review of the Quality Assurance Manual, Chapter 9, " Examination, Test and Inspection."
b.
Review of Procedure No. 021-0-0077-0, " Magnetic Particle Examination."
c.
Review of the log of bath concentration test results (wet method)
a 4
d.
Observation of calibration status of sagnetic particle test equipment.
3.
Findings Within this area of the inspection, no deviations from commitments or unresolved items were identified.
?..
Special Processes Personnel Qualification (Nondestructive Examination) 1.
Objectives The objectives of this area of the inspection were to verify that:
a.
The employer, Pacific Pump has developed a written practice for control and administration of NDE personnel training, examination, and certification in accordance with applicable NRC and ASME Code requirements.
b.
Personnel records are complete and are current.
c.
Personnel performing condestructive examinations are qualified for the method used and have current eye examinations as defined in SNT-TC-1A.
2.
Method of Accomplishment The preceding objectives were accomplished by:
a.
Review of the Quality Assurance Manual, Chapter 9, " Examination, Test, and Inspection."
b.
Review of Procedure No. 113-1-0001-5 " Training, Examination, and Certification of NDE Personnel."
c.
Review of six (6) personnel qualification and certification record packages including results of eye examinations.
3.
Findings Within this area of the inspection, no deviations from commitments or unresolved items were identified.
F.
Manufacturing Process Control 1.
Objectives l
The objectives of this area of the inspection were to verify that:
i
5 a.
Manufacturing is performed under a controlled system.
b.
Certain processes are accomplished by qualified personnel using approved procedures.
c.
Results of specific operations are reported.
2.
Method of Accomplishment The preceding objectives were accomplished by:
a.
Review of Chapters 5, 7, and 9 of the Quality Assurance Manual.
b.
Review of six (6) job order packages.
c.
Observation of work in progress on five (5) routing sheets at various stages of fabrication.
d.
Interviews with cognizant personnel.
3.
Findings Within this area of the inspection, no deviations from commitments or unresolved items were identified.
G.
Exit Meeting A post inspection meeting was held on August 8, 1980, with the management representatives denoted in paragraph A. above.
The inspector summarized the scope of the inspection and informed management that there were no adverse findings.
Management had no comments.
I