ML19350E467
| ML19350E467 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Midland |
| Issue date: | 06/17/1981 |
| From: | Jackie Cook CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.) |
| To: | Harold Denton Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| 12779, NUDOCS 8106230126 | |
| Download: ML19350E467 (2) | |
Text
I e
James W Cook m
Vice President - Mjects, Engsneenng and Constmetion oeneral officas: 1948 West Pernett Road, Jockeon, MI 49201 * (51H 78&O453 d _ %<, g June 17, 1981 j//(32N
, (j JUN 2 21981 Harold R Denton, Director p
,,,,,,,,,cunen c 7/
Office Nuclear Reactor Regui scion 1A cceN' f'
US Nuciear Regulatory Commission i
7920 Norfolk Ave qq /.
Bethesda, MD 20014 N1, MIDLAND PROJECT DOCKET NOS 50-329, 50-330 MIDLAND SITE SPECIFIC RESPONSE SPECTRA ADDENDUM TO PART I 0F THE FINAL REPORT FILE:
2.5.2, 0505.802 UFI:
42*05*22*01, 70*01*10*02 SERIAL:
12779 ENCLOSURE: SITE SPECIFIC RESPONSE SPECTRA ADDENDUM TO PART I: RESPONSE SI'ECTRA ORIGINAL GROUND SURFACE We are forwarding forty (40) copies of the Addendum to Part I of the three-part report entitled " Site Specific Response Spectra, Midland Plant - Unirs 1 and 2: Response Spectra - Original Ground Surface."
The Addendum to Part I of the three part report responds to requests for information and sensitivity studies in the NRC's letter from R L Tedesco to J W Cook dated May 6, 1981.
In addition, per the NRC staff's verbal request, this addendum also contains discussions of material presented at the April 16 meeting between the Consumers Power Company and the NRC staff.
The extensive sensitivity studies performed for Part I of the report should also be able to address similar concerns in Part II of the report. The results of various sensitivity studies are discussed in detail in the Addendum to Part I, and therefore unless specifically requested by the NRC rraff, there may not be a need for a meeting to discuss the contents of the addendum.
0'
,9
]
YO oc0681-0333a100 4
810 a 23 01%
t
e 2
We believe that, the site specific response spectrum submitted for Midland in Part I of the report has adequately accounted for magnitude, distance anc site characteristics through the proper selection of strong motion recordings We therefore, request approval of the proposed site specific response spectra in order that all the project activities related to this data can proceed in support of the plant licensing schedule.
JVC/TRT/cr CC RJCook, Midland Resident Inspector l
1 oc0681-0333a100 8
l s.
-