ML19350D914
| ML19350D914 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Yellow Creek  |
| Issue date: | 03/31/1981 |
| From: | TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19350D913 | List: |
| References | |
| YCNP-SMR-5, NUDOCS 8105260423 | |
| Download: ML19350D914 (36) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:..
'h i ~ i i, -;
g TZNNESSEE VALLEY NJTHORITY'- 1-
- \-
YELLOW CREEK NUCLEAR PLANT SOCIOECONOMIC MONITORING AND MITIGATION REPORT
- YCNP -'SMR-5' June 30, 1980 Knoxville, Tennessee March 1981
.s 6
81052608/1 s
o
. m , ,
CONTENTS
.- Page Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .'. . . . .- . . . - . . . . .. . _1 i .
I. Monitoring Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . '1,
~
II. Functidnal Area Impacts and Mitigation Actions . .. .. . .. ..- . 14 lIl'. - Summary of Mitigation Expenditures . .. . 1 . . . . . . , _. 17. Tables . Table 1. Es'timates of Population and Population Change for
'Alcorn and Tishomingo Counties, Mississippi,'and Hardin County, Tennessee, for Monitoring Secondary Socioeconomic Impacts of Yellow Creek Nuclear Plant Construction June 30,1977 ' - June 30,1980 . . 7 Table 2. Traffic Evaluation . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .- . . . 16 Table 3. Summary of Mitigation Expenditures as'of June 30, 1980. . . . . . . . . - . . . . . . .. . . . . l17 Appendixes a
Table A- 1. Town of Current Residence . . . . . . .- . . . . . 19 Table A- 2. Source and Location of Construction Employees . . 21 Table A- 3. Distribution of Movers and Associated Population by County and Community . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 Table A- 4. Comparison of Survey Results with Projections and Selected Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 Table A- 5. Mover Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 ( Table A- 6. Alcorn - Employees Living Within the County . . . 25 Table A- 7. Tishomingo - Employees Living Within the County . 26 Table A- 8. Hardin - Employees Living Within the County . . . 27 Table A- 9. Corinth - Employees Living Within the City
- Limits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28' j Table A-10. Iuka - Employees Living Within the City Limits . 29 j Table A-ll. Savannah - Employees Living Within the City l Limits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 Appendix B - Definition Level of Service D . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
! Appendix C Employee-Questionnaire. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 l Appendix C Follow-up Questionnaire . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 Appendix D - Socioeconomic Monitoring Cycle. . . . . . . . . . . . 34
, EXHIBIT l
[ Figure 1. Towns Containing Construction Employees . . . . . . . . . 35 s I d
YELLOW CREEK NUCLEAR PLANT SOCIOECONOMIC MONITORING AND MITIGATION REPORT s
-JUNE 1980 i BACKGROUND This. is the fif ti in a series of reports desc ribing the monitoring and
~
mitigation of socioeconomic impacts which result from the construction
~
-of the Yellow Creek Nuclear Plant. This reporting period began January 1, 1980, and ended June 30, 1980. These semiannual reports are prepared -
to fulfill.a commitment made by.TVA in the; construction permits hearings. c The impact area is defined as portions of'Alcorn and Tishominge Counties, ; Mississippi, and Hardin County, Tennessee. This area was selected because it was projected to receive a significant population influx due : to the project. However, the impact area may be redefined if significant . impacts are identified elsewhere. ' I. Monitoring Results In August 1980 TVA conducted a survey of all TVA employees at Yellow Creek as of June 30, 1980. The timelag between employment and survey gives the employees who moved an opportunity to make personal adjustments and should provide a better view of employee " distribution, family characteristics, and housing choice. The employment level was 3,060, and the information.was available for 72 percent (2,211). Based on that information, 390, or 18 percent, indicated that they moved into the area to work at the project (movers). Of the total 390, 220 located in the impact area. Local employees (nonmovers) commute to the project from a widespread-area, but 37 percent of the total work force consists of residents of the impact communities.
k The information ebtained with respect to :the distribution of movers and nonmovers is contained in tables A-1 and A-2 as well as figure 1. , Additional information on the distribution,' family characteristics, and housing choice of movers is contained in tables A-3 through A- l l'. Table A-1 lists the towns of current residence of alli employees. It is' basically a." mailing address"' location rather than a jurisdictional location since all employees must provide a place name even though they may not= live within any municipal limits. Figure 1 is based on this table. At the county level and above, both the origin and locatior. of all employees are contained in table A-2.- The diagonal line of the "From-To" tabulation shows resident employees (nonmovers). For , example, resident employees from Alcorn County are found by locating Alcorn County in the "From" column and going across the tnble to ' *' the "To" column which also reads Alcorn County. In this survey 135 residents of Alcorn ::ounty were employed at the end of Jone. Movers are shown by all other information in the table. For example, 32 employees moved from "Other Tennessee Counties" to Tishomingo County, Mississippi. 1 Table A-3 provides er.trapolated data for the impact area including the number of movers within the city limits for the-three primary impact communities. Tc compare the survey results with projections, selected parameters from the Socioeconomic Impacts section (revision 4, dated June 16, 1978, of the Yellow Creek Nuclear Plant Environmental a , Report) were applied to the number of employees surveyed. The
results of this comparison are found in' table'A-4. : No mover rate was projected' except for peak employment. However, the family characteristics, housing ~ choice, and location pattern can be compared. LSurveyed employee characteristics are similar to those projected. Sixty percent were expected to bring their- families. This survey found that 71 percent did. The remaining 29 percent did not have-families in the impact area. Projections indicated one school-age-
, child per family, and the survey results were close to the projec-tions (0.9). The average family size was larger than projected at 3.4 compared with the projected 3.0. As a result of all of these-
~
factors, the total population influx found in the survey was 1,438 compared to a projected 1,188. 4 s The housing choice of movers is continuing to vary considerably from projections which were made only for peak employment. Fifty-five percent of the movers chose houses, and 26 percent chose mobile homes. The peak projections were that 35 percent would . choose houses, and 45 percent would choose mobile homes. The projections (20 percent) and survey results (19 percent) were close for those choosing apartments, sleeping rooms, and other accommoda-1 tions. The "other" category includes tents, campers, and recreational vehicles. The largest and most significant variation from the projections is in the mover distribution to-the Corinth area and to areas outside the impact area. Some 50 percent of the movers were projected to a 4 _ ~ _ , . . . _
. ~ . . _ - - _ .- __. . . - __ . . , . , . - _ , , _ _ _ - ,
locate in the Corinth area, but only 12 percent of the movers have located there. - In~ contrast. no movers were projected ~ to locate ' outside the impact area, and in fact 44 percent located ~octside the~ i impact area. While there is no real explanation for the Corinth result, the location of. movers outside the impact area is not unexpected. Based on past survey results, about 20 to 30 percent of the movers were expected to locate outside-the impact area. Howeve , in order tc prepare for the maximum numbers of movers, the total influx was allocated to the impact area as basis for estimating impacts. Of the towns outside the impact area, Florence, Alabama, has received the largest number of movers (31) . Florence has a population of about 36,000; so the additional movers would not create a significant adverse impact. The Irojections (40 percent) , and survey results (34 percent) were close ivt the Burnsville and luka areas of Tishomingo County, Mississippi. The projections (10 percent) and survey results (11 percent) were also close for the Savannah and Counce areas of Hardin County, Tennessee. Detailed data on family status and characteristics and housing choice of surveyed movers for the whole project are found in table A-5. The same information for the impact counties is found in tables A-6 through A-8, while tables A-9 through A-ll present the information on movers within the city limits of the impact communities. II. Functional Area Impacts and Mitigation Actions o Secondary Employment--Secondary employment impact is defined as a
temporary increase in the trade- and service-related resident population which can be attributed to the Yellow Creek project. If: i the population increase in a. county is greater than that arising directly from the project or from other primary employment increases,- we would conclude that the possibility of secondary employment exists. Since the project began, Alcorn and Hardin Counties have - experienced increases in population exceeding any increases which can be explained by project-related influx and change in population associated with other primary employment (see table 1). Due to the small number of movers in these counties, it does not seem rearonable that this population growth could result from project-related secondary employment. It could result from normal' error in the estimating process.
, Education--TVA, the Mississippi and Tennessee Departments of Education, and the affected school districts are cooperating in efforts to ensure that the influx of project-related students will not impair the ability of local schools to maintain a quality educational environment. In October 1978, all school districts approved formal agreements to accomplish this objective. Under the agreement, TVA is providing financial assistance to four local school districts in Mississippi and one in Tennessee for the acquisition of needed schoolbuses to serve the needs of inmoving students. Additional Federal financial assistance is being provided to local school districts to allow them to meet inmover demands.
Approximately $1.5 million will come from the U.S. Office of Education for appropriations under Public Law 81-815 for facility construction.
This provides assistance to local school districts temporarily-impacted by Federal programs for the building of classrooms needed . to house children of Federal employees. Planning and other technical assistance are provided-by the appropriate State' agencies. Public Law 81-874 assistance was~available to offset additional operating costs. TVA mitigation assistance is provided yearly based on information gathered by the school systems each December. The employee monitoring does not indicate any substantial change which would warrant a mid-year adjustment. Therefore, no additional education expenditures were made during tae period of January 1, 1980 through June 30,- 1980. The following table summarizes TVA's cumulative education , mitigation payments through June 30, 1980. TVA EDUCATION MlTIGATION PAYMENTS 1 Through June 30, 1980 Alcorn $ 31,702-Corinth 15,777 Hardin 36,000 Iuka 35,276 Tishomingo 15,448 TOTAL $134,203
- 1. Additional Federal financial assistance is being provided to local schools under Public Laws 81-815 and 81-874 to allow them to meet inmover demands.
Local Recruitment and Training--The training center facility construction began in January 1980 and was completed in May 1980 , f D d w- - , -- .w ,-, m , - - . ..-4,.~g-- -
+- ---,4 y p--, .,.g . g w -,,, ,.
r ,, + .e
- . . . . . . - + .
7 i 4 Table 1 ESTIMATES OF POPULATION' AND 'POPUI.ATION_ CHANCE, FOR ALCORN AND TISH0HINCO COUNTIES. MISSISSIPPI. AND HARGiN COUNTY. TENNESSET POR MONITORING SECONDARY SOCIOECONOMIC IMPACTS OF YEL11%i CREEK NUC1. EAR Pl. ANT CONSTRUCTION JUNE 30,1977 - Jt'NE 30.1980 4 Remainder of Population Population Change in. Change in Project . Nonproject Related Change in Population i
' Estimate Estimate Population Estimate Related Population' Population as of Ch:inRe in 6/30/77 6/30/80 Possible from Other Population 6/30/77 - 6/30/80 6/30/77 - 6/30/80 6/30/80 Primary Employment Unexpl.11ned' Alcorn County 29,900 32,470' 2.570 203 2,367- '1,965- 402 Tishomingo County 16,500 18,489 1,989 472 1,517 4,101' 0 Hardin County 20,700 22,478 1,778 195
. 1,583 297 1,286 1 Sources: U.S. Bureau of the Census, Current Population Reports, Series P-25 and P-26, " Population Estimates." Community Economics Projects Group. 4 4 Community Economics Projects Group 2/9/81
- g. -
~f
at a cost of $380,000. In'May 1980, two full-time day pregrams-
~
(carpenter and equipment mechanics) began with 25' students each. -. All participants _are residents of.the local recruitment area established for Yellow Creek Nuclear Plant. During the period . January through June 1980, 22 apprentices began training,-bringing the total at the Yellow Creek project to 198 in training and 9 skilled craf t programs. All apprentices were recruited from the established recruitment area for the Yellow Creek project. To help meet the demand for boilermakers' manpower s6ortage and to reduce TVA's construction mover impact, special emphasis has been given to a training program in the recruitment area. The boiler-maker training program has an enrollment of 22 students who are - scheduled to graduate in November 1980. Sixteen students have graduated and have entered the TVA work force. The graduates of the boilermaker training program are from the three-county recruitment area. The apprenticeship program consists of 178 members. The majority of the apprenticeship program members are from within the three-county impact area. TVA has a special Intensified Craft Training Program which consists of 25 carpenter and 25 equipment mechanic trainees. Upon completion of this training, the trainees may qualify for an advanced apprenticeship position, provided they gain employment at TVA. These combined training and apprenticeship programs are designed to reduce mover impacts by qualifying the local populations for skilled craf t employment. w
Housing--During this reporting period, the impact area housing supply has been sufficient to' accommodate the reistively small increasen in construction employment. Slight increases in mover B< population were found in both Alcorn and Hardin Counties; but in Tishomingo County where the most movers have located, population influx remained almost the same as reported'in the Decenber 30, 1979, survey. Both Alcorn and Hardin Counties have in the past . received less pressure on their housing markets than Tishomingo County and are better able to accommodate the increases in mover population without creating a housing shortage. Tight money and high interest rates continue to affect housing
. supply, not only in the impact area, but throughout the Nation. In spite or the financial situation, there appears to have been a
sufficient housing, in both mobile and' conventionally built units, to accommodate the inmoving population. With the exception of a concentration in and around luka, the fairly even distribution of movers throughout the impact area and j surrounding counties has served to diffuse the impacts throughout the impact area. The large number of movers choosing residential location in the quad-cities area has also contributed to a reduction . in housing impact in the three-county area. l Local Government Budgets--Monitoring of project impacts on local governments is an ongoing process 'aandled by the program coordinator. e I I l
i
-10 . ]
The coordinator is11ocated in the local area and maintains L.atinuous communications with~ local government officials. The following'is a' ' summary of actions and payments made to mitigate the impacts on local government budgets during this period. Work on the countywide emergency response systems for all three-impact counties continued. The completed plans for each county were reviewed by the respective' counties and TVA'; and agreements were prepared to provide necessary assistance from-TVA which, in combination with local resources, would accomplish the planned programs. Agreements with all three counties.were approved by TVA during this period, and implementation began. Work in Tishomingo and Alcorn Counties was directed at developing. the interlocal agreements and getting organized to begin implemen-
- tation. A $3,000 a :istance grant was made to the Yellow Creek Watershed Authority for planning assistance to aid the counties in developing their programs. In Hardin County, the interlocal plans were completed; and equipment procurement began. A payment of
$62,167 was made to Hardin County as reimbursement of expenses incurred in equipment procurement to date. Total commitment to the '
counties under the agreements approved by TVA are Tishomingo County,,
$155,000; Alcorn County, $140,000; and Hardin County, $187,500. In addition, agreement was reached with the town of Iuka for TVA to provide assistance in the amount of $24,750 toward the completion ,
of a new fire hall which would be utilized i'n the Tishomingo County system. TVA's total commitment to date to the emergency b
response program amounts to $510,250.- Plans for a joint training center- for the impact area counties were also being formulated and reviewed. Agreement on this project has not been reached to date. Assistance to local governments for law enforcement continued during this period. A new contract became effective April 1 to provide additional assistance to the town of Iuka up to an addi-tional $38,500. 'Ta s assistance is for the purpose of continuing the two additional patrolmen and operating the car purchased under the original contract. TVA's total commitment to the town of Iuka to date amounts to $69,000. As of June 30, payments in the amount of $37,550 had been made. An additional contra.ct was also executed with Tishomingo County. This contract continued assistance for an additional sanitation worker and increased TVA's law enforcement assistance to include the salaries of three deputies, the addition of a patrol car, and operational expenses of the two cars purchased through TVA assistance. l l This additional contract committed TVA up to an additional $84,000 making TVA's total commitment to Tishomingo County to date $121,800. Payments made to Tishomingo County through June 30 amounted to
$35,340.
A payment of $6,547 was made to Burnsville under contract with the town to provide law enforcement assistance for additional personnel and equipment expenses. 4
~ . . _ , -
_ ~ ,
-; No.l additional assistance Yas provided during thisfperiod for roadg ,
~
r imaintenance. . Construction of. a ~ new ' access' road to the proj ect'L - H
.' continued.during this perio'd which'is expectedfto reduce 1 traffic '[
v imp' acts in the area aroun'd the project.: 3p
~>
3. Assistance to the town of. Savannah,: Tennessee, to c_mputerize'some o
'of its clerical functions continued during- this : period. InstallAhion:- e of the computer system was completed with technical assistance from: -
j;, HMS, Inc. 'A payment.of_approximatel'y $3,000 was made'to the town k '
~
of Savannah covering.the computer services for the city priorHto the installation of the~miniccaputer.1 In addition,' payments;were;
"~
made to HMS, Inc., amounting to $4,341 during'this period. Employee Transportation--At the end of June 1980,.39 percent of the , work force at Yellow Creek' was riding. vans or~ buses, keeping approxi- 4 mately-488 cars off the roads. There was a 13 percent increase.in' ridership during this period.: . Eighteen buses were in operation-with.an average ridership of 28.8 persons.. Thirty-three. vans were in operation with an average ridership of 9.6 persons. The largest concentration >f vans (10) and buses (4) serves the quad-cities. Alabama area. 'TVA's expenditure for the employee transportation program this period was $307,324. Health and Medical Services--Ninety percent of the employees continue to report no need to travel for primary medical services. Specialty care, when needed, was readily available at Tupelo, o Mississippi; Muscle Shoals, Alabama; Birmingham, Alabama;-and Nashville, Tennessee. .
During'this period, TVA provided $5,300 to Alcorn County, Mississippi,
~
~
for the salary of a school nurse / health educator. ;The nurse. divides her time equally between the county and city school systems and the Alcorn County Health Department. While several other-contracts are outstanding in'the. Yellow Creek area,-no other funds l were expended. During this reporting period, a_ contract.for a i . school nurse / educator for Tishomingo County was executed; but no voucher for reimbursement was received by'TVA. . Negotiations.for a sanitarian to s,erve both Alcorn and Tishomingo Counties continued, but a finalized contract has not been agreed upon. Recreation--TVA staff continued to work with local officials to 4
, monitor community recreation impacts in the three-county impact area. A field inspection.was conducted to review progress on.
existing park improvement projects and to assess the level of TVA impacts affecting local recreation resources. TVA executed a contract with the city of Corinth to provide up to $8,000 to assist in the development of a new athletic field. The facility will be used primarily to support the local soccer program which serves a large portion of Alcorn County. TVA also. approved a six-menth extension to a previous contract with Tishomingo County to allow coapletion of several ongoing recreation projects. The contract, executed in May 1979, provides $35,000 to help implement a wide variety of recreation facility improvemints throughout.the county. No requests for payments were received during the reporting period from the city of Savannah on a $50,000 contract executed in December ! 1979 to assist in development of needed recreation facilities. The
'l following table lists TVA's contractual commitments for recreation mitigation payments in the Yellow Creek Project area through June .
30, 1980. TVA RECREATION MITIGATION CONTRACTS July _1, 1978, through June 30, 1980 Tishomingo' County $35,000 City of Corinth 8,000 City of Savannah _ 50,000'
$93,000 Water and Sewer--The Short Coleman Park Water Association continued to have difficulty in supplying sufficient potable water to meet the contracted demands at the nuclear plant construction site and to its users in the area. Planned water system expansion continued to be delayed due to the declared. bankruptcy'of the contractor and delays by the bonding company in securing another contractor to complete the work. In addition, old equipment at_che association's existing well periodically malfunctioned due to age and improper maintenance. As a result, the water system has been unable to-provide adequate and reliable water service. It does not appear at~
this time that the new well being drilled as part of the expansion will develop nearly as much water as had been anticipated. As a result, the association will continue to have inadequate capability. Due to these unanticipated problems, it does not appear than the association has resources neiessary to take corrective action to repair the old equipment and drill an additional well to develop adequate capability. Because of this, TVA feels it is necessary to provide assistance to the association. TVA has agreed to provide , financial assistance up to $95,000 which is expected to be adequate
to accomplish the work required. Contracts for this work are in:
. the process of being prepared. > TVA will continue to evaluate the water and sewage treatment systems in the impact counties to assess additional future mover impacts as they occur.
Traffic--In December 1978, the Mississippi State Highway Department began supplying TVA with traffic counts for 11 locations on a semiannual basis. To supplement these counts, TVA began in 1979 taking intersection counts at four intersections near the site on - the same semiannual basis. With approximately 3,000 employees, a total of about 820 commuter vehicles are used in the transportation of the peak shift employees. Peak hour volumes and hourly volumes during the peak TVA commuting hour for 10 key highway segments are shown in table 2. The hourly. volumes indicated level of servic. J, or better operation is provided on all the key highway segments (see appendix B). 9 L
l
-w .
-l l
TABLE 2 . TRAFFIC EVALUATIOI: (January 1980'to June 1980) Peak Hour Volume ~ During . During Peak TVA -TVA Commuter Daily Peak Shift Change ' Traffic Volume lukt-Red Sulphur Springs Road 860 860 -780. North of Patrick Church Road SR-25 North of U.S. 72 Junction 1,100* 1,000 540 Iuka-Red Sulphur Springs Road 480 480 440 (Project 1001) between Patrick Church Road and SR-25 . U.S. 72 West of Alabama State Line 480 480 330 d SR-25 South of SR-365 Junction 370 370 220 SR-25 South of Tennessee State Line 310 310 110 SR-365 Southwest of SR-25 Junction 150* -130 110 SR-25 South of Iuka 700 700 90 U.S. 72 West of SR-365 Junction 710 710 60 SR-25 midway between Patrick Road 260 250 30 and Iuka-Red Sulphur Springs Road
*Because of the shif t schedule at the project, the peak TVA commuting traffic occurs during an hour other than the peak hour for some of the highway segments being monitored (see Table 2).
- i e
a
i I 1
-l j
III. Summary of Mitigation Expenditures TVA's mitigation expenditures this period tctaled $626,807; and' the major expenditures this period were for employee transportation, local recruitment and training, and local government budgets. Tabla 3 Summary of Mitigation Expenditures as of June 30, 1980 Expenditures Expenditures This Period To Date Education -
$ 134,203 Employee Transportation $307,324 _623,489 Health & Medical Services 5,300 18,400 Locsl Government Budgets 94,468 124,083 Local Recruitment & Training 206,354 380,000 Recreation 13,361 39,640 Water and Sewer -
17,089
$626,807 $1,336,904 '
I l A
v. s Appendixes O e 6
, ,-y - y,-.-..- . ._- . , _ - . , _-_y _ , ,, -
19 TABLE A-1 F CLLCh LP 50RVEY TCaN 05 CUPRENT RF SIDENCE AUN DATE 11/18/80 YELL % CFEEN f.U C LE A R PLANY E MPLOYEES Ru'd TIME 090852 ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 06-30-80 RE PORT 2 POVED TO ALREACY YehN TCd9 IN T0hN - TOTAL PODULATION CHIR 0KEE AL 10 63 73 1.484 FLORENCE AL 31 213 2 44 36,000 KILL 14 At 7 32 39 663 Wil5C L'd SHa AL S AL 16 55 71 6,907 RUisLLVILL: AL 6 44 50 7.814. SPEFFIELD AL 16 53 69- 12.000 TUSCU"EI A AL 16 97 113 8,828 BCONEVILLE F5 5 33 38 ' 5.895 00*N5v!LL8 M5 8 59 63 784 CORINTP PS 46 124 170 10,900 1U<4 F5 118 325 443 2.389 2 TISHaw!NGC F5 7 48 55 410 S A va*lN AM TN 26 145 171 5.576 CruNCE TN 15 33 48 600 SUBT1TAL 327 1320 1647 ATHENS AL 2 17 19 13,637 COURTLAND AL 0 5 5 547 LEIGHTCN AL 4 37 41 1.231 LE XI NG TCN AL 2 7 9 278 PHIL C AMPBELL AL 0 5 5 1.230 RF9 8AY AL 1 10 11 2.464 P9GC R $v! LL E AL 2 17 19 950 T C wN CEFEk AL 0 14 14 1,203 WATERLCO AL 1 10 11 262 BALJdVN M5' O 5 5 2.366 BELMCNT #5 4 19 23 1.237 F UL TCN MS 1 7 8 2,899 PIENZI MS 1 7 8 363 5ALTILLO M5 0 5 5 836 CEN115 >$ 1 10 11 125 ACAM59:LLF TN 2 13 15 1,344 BETHEL $ PA INGS TN 0 5 5 842 CL is tan TA 0 5 5 737 LE XI NG TON TN 1 6 7 5.024 LOAE TTO TN O 13 13 1.557
'ICHIE TA 3 17 20 569 PA850NS TN 1 7 8 2.167 5 AMER TN O 9 9 451 SE L** E R TA 0 18 18 3.495 97 JOSEPH TN 0 6 6 637 WAYNFSBORO TN 0 17 17 1,983 CRUMP TN O 5 5 350 e
4
- , < w
-20 i
TABLE A-1 (Continued) FCLLCW UP . SupVE Y . . TObN OF CLR8 ENT RES10ENCE AVN DATE 11/18/80 vfLLOW CpEEA NUCLFa4 PLANT EMPLOYES$ RUN TIME 090352 ACTIvf frPLCY'FS 06-30-40 AEPORT 2 KNED TO ALREADY TO hN 70w4 IN Town TOTAL POPU L AT ION CYPRES $ 1*J% TH 0 5- 5 300 ' LUTTS TN 0 8 8 200
'C893 5 CH APFL TA 0 8 6 120 4
$HIL OH ?N O 11 'll l $UST0TAL 26 328 354 CTHER 37 173 210 TOTAL PFSPCNSES 390 1521 '2211 I
YCNP WORKFCRCE 'OTAL 3060
- C6-30-20 a
i 1 s
- , . , - - - , . . , . . , . . - . .n, , _ , . ,
21 TABLE A-2 FOLLOW UP SURVEY SOURCE AND LOC ATIJN OF CONSTRUCTION EMPLOYEES RUN DATE 11/1S/80 YFLL0d CREEK NUCLE AR PLANT RUN TISE 39J922 ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 06-30-80 REPORT 4 OTHER OTHER OTHER Oi HE k
= ---! MP AC T CO UNT I E S------- REC. ALABAMA MISS. T34%.
'FRCM --- YO ALCOR N TISHOMINGO HARDIN COUNTIES CCUNTIES COUNTIES C0JNTIkS OTHER 843 ALCORN (1) 135 4 1 140 TISHOMINGC t il 6 478 5 12 1 532 HARDIN til 1 200 .3 1 205 OTHER RECRUITING CCUk (21 7 42 9 1062 1 1 2 1 1125 OTHE e AL. COLN TIES ( 3) 10 28 5 23 11 77 OTFER 4155. COUNTIES (31 2 16 2 5 1 1 27 OTHER TN. COLNTIES (3) IT 32 16 18 5 es ARxANSAS 1 1 G3CRGIA 1 1 2 KENTOCKY 2 I 3 N. C ARCLINA 2 1 1 4 CTHER STATES 5 9 7 12 1 4 37 TOTAL 184 612 245 1139 12 3 6 8 2211 NOTE DATA GN DIAGONAL INDICATE NCNM0". 4, WITH THE EXCEPE13N DF N3vES WITHIN A COUNTY. ALL OTHER DATA INDICATE MOVERS. til RECRUITING COUNTY (2) ALABAMA COUNTIES: COLBERT, CULLM AN, FRANKLIN, L AJ3f R3 AL E, L AW9 ENCE , LIMESTONE, MARION NI SSIS$!PPI COUNTIES: SENTON, DESOTA, ITAWAMBA, LAF Ar E T TE , LEE, M AR SH AL L, P ON TOT OC , PRENTISS, TIPPAH, UNION TENNESSEE COUNTIES: CHESTER, DECATUR, F AYETTE, GILES,1 A A DEMAN, HAYWOOD, HENDE RSON, LAWRENCE, LEWIS, MADISON, MCNAlkY, PihMY, SHEL8Y, WAYNE (3) Att COUNTIES IN AL&dAMA, MISSISSIPPI, AN3 TENNESSEE JTHER T HAN RECRUITING COUNTIES (4) "0THER* INCLUDES N3N-RESPONSES OR ERR 0NE005 RESPONSES F3R CURRENT ADDRESS.
22 Table A-3 YELLOW CREEK NUCLEAR PLANT DISTRIBUTION OF MOVERS AND ASSOCIATED # POPULATION BY COUNTY AND COMMUNITY JUNE 30, 1980 Numberl Percent 2 of Population InfluxI County of Movers Movers School Age Total Alcorn, MS 13 69 47 203 rishomingo, MS 37 198 109 472 liardin, TN 12 62 SJ 195 other Counties 2 211 147 568 Total 100 _540 360 1,438' Community 3 Corinth, MS 4 24 8 48 Iuka, MS 9 48 24 112 , Savannah, TN 3 14 7 40 16 86 39 200
- 1. Numbers extrapolated.
- 2. Percentages may not add to 100 because of rounding.
- 3. Within municipal limits.
s
23 Tdble A-4
, YELLOW CREEK NUCLEAR' PLANT COMPARISON OF SURVEY RESULTS WITH '
PROJECTIONS FOR SELECTED PARAMETERS- _ EMPLOYMENT LEVEL - 3.060 MOVER LEVEL - 540 Projected- Surveyed
- Percent Number -Percent Number-.
Movers with Families 60- .324- '71 381 Movers without Families 40 ~216. ' 29- 159 School-Age Children -- 324 --- 360 School-Age Children per Family ---
.1 --
10.9 Total Population Influx --- 1,188 --- .1,438 j .- i . Percent Number Percent Number 4 Housing Choice Houses 35 189 55 298 Mobile Homes 45 243 26 140' Apartments, Sleeping Rooms, and
. Other 20 108 19- 102 ' 2 2 Total 100 540 100 540 Percent Number Percent- Number
- Distribution by County
} J. Alcorn, MS - Corinth Area 50 270 12 64 Tishomingo, MS - Iuka and i Burnsville Areas 40 216 34 '184 Hardin, TN - Savannah and Counce Areas 10 54~ 11- '57 Other Areas 0 -- 44- 235- - 2 2^ Total 100 540 100 540 I g
- 1. Numbers extrapolated.
- 2. Percentages may not add to-100 because of rounding..
t
24 TABLE A-5 ' F CL L OW UP SURVCY WORKERS WHO w0Vr0 INT 3 VfLLOW CHEEE MUCL54R PLANT AREA PAGE 010 RUN DATE 11/18/80 move s suwMaty x5PCs7 1F ACT IVE 5 wPLOYE:S 06-30-89 RUN TlwE C90839-WITH TOTAL CHILD *EN CHILDREN MOVEES ( F ILOR EN MUwSER IN IN WCyt E S h1TH IN OF GR ADE HicH dtTHCUT -TOTAL F AMILY SC F"0L CHILOACN SCHOOL SCHOCL FAw!LY MOVERS AuuAL E*PLCYF85 H"LSE 0=NED 74 41 114 60 15 4 7E H"USE 4ENTED 16 5 14 7 4 9 25 AFARTwENT E'NTED 9 4 7 3 3 12 21 POSILE HCwE FENTED 1 0 1 0 0 2 3 FCBIL7 HC"" ChNED E 2 9 3 1 9 17 SL EF P A NG E tr w 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 wrv5L CTHcR C 0 0 0 0 2 2 , TCTAL 10 e 52 145- 73 23 39 147 HrURLY EMPLOYE?S McLSF OdNED 44 27 68 38 11 3 47 Heute RENTED 49 31 74 44 13 1s 65 APARTwcNT PRATE 0 10 1 5 1 1 13 23 MnBILE HCME PEATED 11 6 17 7 2 12 23 "CDILC HCwE CWNES 43 24 56 31 11 15 *6 SLEFPING RC0w 1 0 0 0 0 2 3 MC?EL OTHEo S 3 9 5 0 15 24 TCTAL 167 92 229 126 38 76 243 ALL EMPLCVEE! HCUSF 0W NE D 118 en 182 98 26 7 125 HCUSS RENTED e5 36 68 51 17 25 90 AP AD TM EN T RENTE0 19 5 12 4 4 25 44 MCBIL* HCwc FFNTCO 12 6 18 7 2 14 26 MOBILE HCwE CWNEJ 51 26 65 34 12 24 75 SLEEPING RCow 1 0 0 0 0 3 4 M"TE L OTHER 9 3 9 5 0 17 26 TOTAL 275 144 374 199 61 115 390-b
12 5 < l l TABLE A-6 sCttrw ur SURVEY WORKFRS WHO POVE0 INT' YELLCW CaiEN NUCLE AR PL ANT AREA P AGE 004 ALCCAN RUN DATE 11/18/80 EMPLOYEc5 LIVING WITHIN THE COUNTY TOTAL REPORT 18 ACTIVF f
- PLOY 8E S 06-30-80 RUN TIME 090839
-WITH TOTAL CHILDREN CHILDREN MCVEPS CHI LDR EN NU M BE R IN IN MOVER $
WITH [M OF GRADE HIGH WITHOUT TC TAL F SM ILY SC H?P L . CHIL OR EN SCHOOL S CHOO L FAMILY POVEPS U.*UAL ErrLn)EES HOUSE OWNED 22 11 41 14 8 0 22 HCbSE RENTED 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 A PARTMENT RFNTFD 2 0 0 0 0 3 5 MOBILE HCPE RENTED "CBILE PCME CWNc0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 SLEEPING RDnw , MOTEL CTFrc TCTal 25 11 41 14 8 5 30 HOURLY FPPLOVEE S HCUSr OdNFD 2 1 2 1 1 1 3 HCL 55 RE NTED 5 3 5 2 1 0 5 APAR TMENT RENTED 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 "CBIL7 HCME RENTED 2 2 3 2 0 1 3 NOBILE HCME CWP:ED 3 3 7 5 0 2 5 SLEEPING FCPP MCTFL OTHcR 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 TOTAL 14 9 17 10 2 6 20 ALL EMPLCVEF S HOUSC OhNED 24 12 43 15 9 1 25 HOUSF RENTED e 3 5 2 1 1 7 APARTMENT RcNTFD 3 0 0 0 0 4 7 MCBILE HCME FENTfD 2 2 3 2 0 1 3 PCRILE HCPC CWNc0 3 3 7 5 0 3 6 SLFFPING RCCM MOTEL OTHFa 1 0 0' O O 1 2 TOTAL 39 20 58 24 to 11 50 a
\
s B. ,__.- , , . _ _ . -
k
'26 F
TABLE A-7 F CLLCw UP SuevEY WORKERS WHO *cVFD JNTO YFLLOW CAEEK NUCL'AR PLANT AREA PAGE 005 TISH7MINGO RUN D ATE 11/18/80 E"PLOYFES LIVING wITHIN THE COUNTY TOT AL REPORT 18 AtT!vE CMPLOYres 06-30-80 RUN TIwE 090839 WITH TO T AL CHILO9EN CHILOREN "CVtRS CHILDdEN NUu8ER IN IN MOVERS hf7H IN OF GR ADE HIGH WITHCUT TOTAL FAMILY SCHOOL CHILDREN SCHOOL SCHOCL FAMILY MOVERS ANAUAL F*FLOYEfS HCUSE 0=NED 17 9 20 14 3 2 19 HCUSS RENTER 7 1 4 2 0 2 9_ APARTMENT RFATF3 1 1 2 c' 1 4 5 MCBILE HCME # ENTE 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1
*CSILE HCFE ChNED 5 1 5 1 1 8 13 SLEEPING R00w C 0 0 0 0 1 1 i 4CTFL +
OTHE R 10TAL 31 12 32 17 5 17 48 en t' 8 '_ T E MPLO YE E S ' HOLSF OwAE0 10 5 10 6 2 0 10 POUSE RENTED le 12 27 18 8 6 24 APART"ENT RS%TED 5 1 4 1 1 5 10 "CBILc HEME peNTr0 5 1 3- 1 0 4 9 PCBILE HCME ChNED 20 9 21 9 8 .12 32 SLEEPING RCOP O 0 0 0 0 1 1 MO TE L OTHFR 6 2 6 3 0 3 9 TOTAL 64 30 71 38 19 31 95 f ALL EMPLCYEES HCUSE OWFlED 27 14 30 20 5 2 29 HCUS* RE ATfD 25 13 31 20 8 8 33 AP AoTHENT RFNTF9 e 2 6 1 2 9 15 MCBILE Herr srNTED e 1 6 1 0 4 10 Moe!Le HC"E rwNEO 25 10 26 10 9 20 45 SLE80!NG pocu 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 un T5. L OTHER f 2 6 3 0 3 9 TOTAL 95 42 103 55 24 48 143 e t
b. 27 I i TABLE A-8 FDLLOw UP $URVEY. gacKER$ bHO WOvFO INTO VSLLOW CREEK NUCLEAR PL ANT ARE A PAGE 006 HARDIN RUN DATE 11/18/80 E*PlaYE25 LIVING WITHIN THE COUN'Y TCTAL REPORT IS AC TIVF TMPLOYFe$ 00-30-80 AUN-TIME C90839-W ITH TOTAL CHILDREk CHILDREN MOV E8 5 C HILun EN NUwSER IN IN MOVER $ alTH IN CF GRADE HIGh WITHOUT TOTAL F AMILY $C HOO L CHILDREN SCHOOL S C HSQL F AMIL Y pcVERS AhhUAL EMPLotEES HOLSE OWNED 17 9 24 tc 3 0 17 HOUSE RENTED 2 2 4 3 1 1 3 APART *4ENT Rahlko 1 1 2 1 0 0 1 MOBILE HCHE REN*ED 0 0 0 0 0 2 2
* "CGILE HCME ChNED 1 1 2 2 0 0
$LrppIn:G ROCp 1 MOTEL QTHFD 10ftL 21 13 32 16 4
, 3 24 HOURLY E MPLO)rES
. HCUSE OwNE D ! 5 8 5 3 0 5 HCU$C RF.NTED ! ' 7 5 0 1 6 APAPTMENT RFNTED C 0 0 0 0 1 1 MCBILc HCME GFNTED ? 3 9 4 2 3 6 MOBILE HCME CWNED ! 1 3 0 2 0 3 SLEEPihG POON MCTFL OTFFR total le 13 27 14 7 5 21 ALL EMPLCYrr $
HOUSE OwhED 22 14 32 15 6 0 22 HOUSE RENTED 7 6 11 8 1 2 9 APARTMENT RchTED 1 1 2 1 0 1 2 MOBILE HCME PENTED 2 3 9 4 2 5 8 kCBILE HCPE rwN*n 4 2 5 2 2 0 4 SLEEPIAG PCOW HrTEL OTHE8 TOTAL 37 2e 59 30 11 8 45
.w ,r--
l
-28 1 I
l I
- I l
-TABLE A-9 F CLlow 'iP $UAVEY WOoKEPS hM1 >0Vf0 INTO YELLO 4 CREEK NUCLFA8 PLANT AREA P AG E 101
' CORINTH RUN DATE b /18/8C EMPlerEES LIVING w!THI's THE CITY LIMITS REPCGT 1A ACTIVr CNPLOYSFS C6-30-60 kUN TIME 090039 l w !TH TOTAL CHILORCN CHILDAE%
*CVtSS- CHILDEEN NJwdER IN . IN MOVER $
wlTH IN OF GRADE HIGH-F aM ILY h!THOUT TOTAL 5CFOOL CHILDREN SCHOOL S C HCO L ' F AMIL Y MCVERS 1AAUAL EPPLOVEES HOLSE ChNED 2 1 4 1 0 0 2 HCUSE REN'ED APARTMENT RCNTCO 1 0 0 0 MOBILE HEMg pegyp3 0 2 3 wCSILE HCME CmNFD C 0 0 0 0 1 ~* SLEr PING RCON 1 MCTrt OTHER T17AL 3 1 4 1 0 3 6' - HOURLY EMPLOyrps i HCLSE 0'AED w 1 1 1 1 l- 1 1 2 HCLSE REATE9 2 1 1 1 0 APAR TMENT RENTE0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 MC8ILE HCME SE A TFD 1 1 2 1 2 1 0 WCBILE HCME ChNFO 1 1 2 1 1 0 SLEEPING ROOW 1 2 3 MCTEL DTHFR ICTAL e 4 5 4 1 5 11 ALL EMFLCVEES HOLSF QwNFD 3 2 5 2 1 1 4 ' H005F REATE0 2 1 1 1 0 0 2 APARTMENT RFNTED 2 0 0 0 0 3 5 NCBILE HCME RENTFD 1 1 2 1 0 ' MCRILE HCME ChNCO 1 1 1 2 l 1 1 0 3 4 SLsrPING RCCr i MCTEL OTPER TOTAL 5 5 9 l 5 1 8 17 I l l l
l 29 l TABLE A-10 FCLL OW UP SURVEY wo*KE*5 WHO PnvE3 ThT? YELLOW CREEK NUCLEAR PL ANT AREA PAGE 002 IUKA Rb4 UATE 11/1E/uC ' EMPLGYEES LIVING WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS REP 0pf 1A ACTIVE E M PL3YE E S 06-30-80 'RUN TIPF 090839 w!TH TOTAL CHILOREN CHIL DR EN MOV FE. S CHILDEEN NUM BER IN IN M3vER S WITH IN OF GRADE HIGH WITHCUT TOTAL FAMILY S C t*JO L CHILDREN SCHOOL SC HOOL FAMILY mrVERS AANUAL E* PLOY 5f5 HCUSE LWNED 7 3 8 4 2 0 7 HCUSE RENTED 2 0 1 0 0 1 3 APAb TMENT REATFD 1 1 2 0 1 3 4 NOBILE HCME REN'E3 MCe!LE HOME OwNc0 1 0 1 0 0 2 3 SLFEDING PCOw MGTEL OTHE# TOTAL 11 4 12 4 3 6 17 HOURLY EMPLOYEES HCOSE ChNFO HOUSE RCNTED 3 2 4 0 3 1 4 APADTMENT RENTED 2 1 4 1 1 2 5
*0 BILE HCME PENTFD 2 0 0 0 0 1 3 MOBILE bCME ChNED 1 1 4 1 2 3 SLEEPING ROOM 0 0 0 0 J 1 1 MCTCL OTHER 1 1 1 1 0 1 2 TOTAL 10 5 13 3 7 8 18 ALL FMPLCYEF S HOUSE OWNED 7 3 8 4 2 0 7 HCOSC RENTE9
- 2 5 0 3 2 7 APARTMENT "ENTED 4 2 6 1 2 5 9 MCBILE HCME REN'ED 2 0 0 0 0 1 3 PCBILF HCM5 OwNFO 2 1 5 .1 3 4 6 SLFEPING hC0" 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 MO T F.L O THF t 1 1 1 1 0 1 2 TaitL 21 9 25 7 to 14 35 1
4
30 I l l l
- l I
.1 er TABLE A-11
? FCLLOW UP SURVEY WnRKERS kho MnVFD INTO YELLOW CREEK NUCLEAe PL ANT ARE A P AGE 00 3 S4VANNAH RUN DATE 11/18/80 EMPLOVFe5 L IVING WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS RfPORT 1A AC T!vE EMPLJYEES 06-30-60 RUN TIME 090639 W IT H TOT &L CH!LDREN CHILDPEN
*CVEPS CHILDREN NUMBEF IN IN MOVERS hlTH IN OF GRADE HIGH WITh00T TrTAL F 4M IL Y SCHOOL CHILDREN SCHCOL SCH"JGL F AM IL Y MCVEPS ANAUAL EMPLOYEES HCUSC OWNFD 5 1 6 1 0 0 5 HCUSE REA'E0 A P AR TMENT RCATen MCRILE HC"E A*ATTO O D 0 0 0 1 1 MCBILE HCME ChNED ,
SLCE PI AG Rf'10*
'8 0 T
- L OTHER TOTAL 5 1 6 1 0 1 6 HOUELY EMPLOY 8ES HCOSF OWNED HCUSE RcNTED 3 3 5 4 0 0 3 APARTMENT RENTED 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 MOBILE HCME CFATED WCBIL9 HCME CWNCD
$LEEPING RCOM "CTEL CTFFR INTAL 3 3 5 4 0 1 4 ALL EMPLCYEES McLSF OhNeo 5 1 6 1 0 0 $
HOUSE RENTED 3 3 5 4 0 0 3 APARTMENT RENTFD 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 "0 BILE HC"E FE ATFD 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 FCBILE HCME rwNED SLCE PING HC0" "OTFL OTHER , TOTAL 8 4 11 5 0 2 10 t
31 Appendix B TRAFFIC LEVEL DEFINED Level of Service D Level of service D approaches unstable flow, with tolerable operating speeds being maintained though considerably affected by changes in operating conditions. Fluctuations in volume and temporary restrictions to flow may cause substantial drops in operating speeds. Drivers have little freedom to maneuver, and' comfort and convenience are low, but conditions can be tolerated for short periods of time. L 1 Source: Highway Capacity Manual, Highway'Research Board Spect.a1 Report 87, 1965. i 4 4 t F 0 9
, , , _ , , . ~ - - - - - . . - - - - -
APPENDIX C-1 EMPLOYEE QUESTIONNAIRE 32 NAME SOCIAL SECURITY NO. LAST FIRST . 1. WHERE DID YOU LIVE BEFORE BEGINNING WORK ON THIS PROJECT? _ CITY _ COUNTY _ STATE
- 2. WHERE ARE YOU NOW LIVING DURING THE WORK WEEK?
STREET ADDRESS CITY COUNTY ST' ATE
- 3. DO YOU LIVE INSIDE THE CITY LIMITS? YES NO 4
IN WHAT TYPE OF RESIDENCE IN THE PROJECT AREA DO YOU LIVE?
- 1. BOARDING OR SLEEPING ROOM 4. MOBILE HOME
- 2. MOTEL 5. HOUSE
- 3. APARTMENT
- 6. OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY)
- 5. IF YOU LIVE IN A HOUSE OR MOBILE HOME IN THE PROJECT AREA, DO YOU OWN IT?
YES NO
- 6. IN THE PROJECT AREA,WITH WHOM DO YOU LIVE?
- 1. BY MYSELF 3. WITH ROOMMATES,
- 2. WITH MY FAMILY ^
- 4. OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY) 7.
HOW MANY CHILDREN LIVE WITH YOU IN THE PROJECT AREA DURING THE WORK WEEK? OF THESE, HOW MANY GO TO GRADE SCHOOL? , OF THESE, HOW MANY GO TO HIGH SCHOOL?
- 8. HAVE YOU LIVED AT YOUR PRESENT ADDRESS MORE THAN SIX MONTHS? YES NO
' THANK YOU FOR COOPERATING IN THIS SURVEY.
YELLOW CREEK NUCLEAR PLANT NEW EMPLOYEE SURVEY
APPENDIX C-2 FOLLOW-UP. QUESTIONN AIRE 33 YES. IF SO, SKIP TO QUESTION 2. NO. IF NOT, PLEASE ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS:
- WlERE ARE YOU NOW LIVING DURING THE WORK WEEK 7 STREET ADDRESS 4
CITY COUNTY STATE DO YOU LIVE INSIDE TIE CITY LIMITS? YES NO CHECK WHICH TYPE RESIDENCE IN THE PROJECT AREA YOU LIVE IN
- 1. BOARDING OR SLEEPING ROOM
- 2. MOIEL
- 3. AP.JMENT
- 4. MOBILE HOME
- 5. HOUSE
- 6. MIER (PLEASE SPECIFY)
- 2. IF YOU LIVE IN A HOUSE OR MOBILE HOME IN THE PROJECT APEA, DO YOU OWN IT?
YES NO 3 IN THE PROJECT AREA, CHECK WITH WHOM YOU NOW LIVE:
- 1. BY MYSELF
- 2. WITH MY FAMILY '
3 WITH ROOMMAT?S. HOW MANY? 4 OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY) 4 HOW MANY CHILDREN MVE WITH YOU.IN TIE PROJECT AREA? OF THESE, HOW MAM GO TO GRADE SCH00Lt OF THESE, HOW MANY GO TO HIGH SCHOOL?
- 5. HAVE YOU LIVED AT YOUR PRESENT ADDRESS MORE THAN SIX MONTHS? YES _NO
- 6. HAVE.YOU OR ANY OF YOUR FAMILY LIVING WITH YOU IN THE PROJECT AREA HAD AK.
DIFFICULTY OBTAINING IEALTH TREATMENT? YES. IF SO, CHECK THOSE WHICH YOU HAD DIFFICULTY OBTAINING 7 DOCTOR (NOT EMERGENCY) t DENTIST ENERGENCY MEDICAL TREATMSNT HOSPITALIZATION OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY) NO
- 7. HAVE YOU OR ANY OF YOUR 7AMILY LIVING WITH YOU IN THE PROJECT AREA HAD TO TRAVEL OUISIDE YOUR PRESENT COUNTY TO OBIAIN IEALTH TREATMENT?
YES. IF SO, WHAT WAS TIE SERVICE AND WHERE DID YOU HAVE TO GO? NO 4 THANK YOU FOR COOPERATING IN THIS SURVEY. . YELIDW CREEK NUCLEAR PLANT
34 Appendix D
. Socioeconomic Monitoring Cycle Time Required
. from Official Survey Date* ' Activity
- i. 2 weeks Allow for personnel paperwork-3 weeks - Print address labels, survey forms and mail to
' proj ec t.
3 weeks Conduct survey and return forms. 2 weeks Code forms, update files, produce tables, and send-tables to coordinator. 4 weeks Contingency time for reproduction, mail, or. project site-problems. , 2 weeks Prepate first two sections of report and send to functional staff.** 3 weeks Functional staffs draf t sections and submit - them. Y 4 weeks Prepare and distribute draft report and. receive comments.
- 2 weeks Incorporate comments and send final report to reproduction.
i 2 weeks Printing. 2 weeks Contingency time for mail, typing, or other delaya. I week Distribute reports. ' l *The survey date for each project is the last day a person can be hired and still be surveyed. ,
** Functional staff are those dealing with spa.ific areas such as education or health, i
b
P00R ORIGIM
^
yo< a 5,,, g jw u y y wp, ; gg , ,
...p .1
.,. -.,- (
p g_,,. g y-,:- g . .=-
.e j <..,..,. . . ........ ~ :.,.1,,f Y. - _ Q W 0N y .
,&j _
,, \, cot
.._ _ l,
/ A8 ~'? '\y~1 A r~: o / Y ,d f&SVLL-S kw (" j v,. t 3 j -( Ii . i, ./ /.(.../
~~~J'~'..r rua 1 . .~ ' -, n...-..,L---- %
y7, 1 g,..\ 4.> a r~. j\ w/cf ESTJD d LE K
. . ..y
- e. 7 f.fl ",;;a.,,,, , , , , ,
hM
.? ._ h f h -
...., \' [ ****-~ -
'~
~'
ch -[,w m' .a.~.
/'
'"' n ,../( w .
g;
,,j a
j } T, m"\v a'\_. e ' . ~ 3
-f\ d. s 7
.f.'....... .__...
c =., _ _, , ( fg,./~ %, , ) y,- l
,f,-
j' x
\
Q. -.
,, \
~,.3g,~q . -
, asm n n ,f;. >
.e m .L, / -
y y, u a a o e v'd;, 3 = ..
, ,/ ,
'- ~a4
\ gi } % % g\/
I [ n.
~.4 .)1{,p,.A X..._.c -
c ; y
.~.p.. .. j %s-.= . .. .....g )
1: m ij .< \ .;,.an. __, o y, , : b "N ._, := \ _ - _.. m (y*N l j\n - s" j f . . _
/g-~ j g
r... .
/c' , p\..* :.7; y> V. )M. L:Nf . .
8 -. ,
'l l -
,fj ,,,,,,( \. .f p
/
.. ..,,,,, "'~;. ,,ev,-.,,,Wl \.:, m.c nie3." r. ,y 0%....T,.4...-. - -... . .. ,79 , ,, .
} _f . , \ g,
..... ,, g ; r- 'N ...., .I 1 i cp. ,' l,u/~~~ ,
~~ ^ y I g; q *~_;y Aj
-- pm , ..- . .w4 w
.. .. . .. u .. ;,,...,_
_p- y
' - - - .. ... c m,n ,,,g" ,;
f ~.
.[T . ...... j - : 1].w+ s, . ,,) p#.. corinin } qw . y ,
l c ... I , , ~1 ~a. ~ - - . l .. Q, 3 .. *(4... ,/'~ .
%. . . . . a.
- .- .~. ,l
,,. N, :
3 h, ', /cc. . ; e r, E t e. r
/ .., ,_
./ a N l .u L-}./.4 g
\
* ~ . -
,s' ,,
-~
e g7
-_3 1 f
4 99.,. .,,
" l ps , },._ j, g ,
3,,,, bn
. . , _ . . , r t,,,,,
<x4 % ,-~ Lt gm
,,-} % -. Q
<u , 6 ..
..M y s- / , . . ~ . ~
' UP F^H 1;sud%r... 19 E. (s~ g %,,,, yzg,[
-{,..
l cM.$pNFLOREN y e --.. . l
^C. 7 1 NTSVithE) yj:
.ew,yg
} g;, -
j f J %.sss.,,..wg,,_.c.q g 7 ::!g gA 4 ,H U j ,.
"W gc Q g Q a y yl',L ; i M .
Q ... Rl . - . . ! gg.: L.:) yP
- i. - - - - - - - - - - . ~ _ g
_ ,--._. slr y s m
*~* N w g
-. . v gf 1
. 8 y! . .- -~s i .
- m. ~
i ...* ~=- /_ . ... ; ,
' .* 'u DECMT1JR' t W h./[ - -
, gm .k ,, /l c ~, c- "-~ ~ ~ T' ,N.~ t /. ',r--~~.AM'.,Cl +.... . r- O_5 1
..i .-
- t..... A<( y %< % Q.-,,...n.,,,,
, 3 . 6 m .,,
m
/ N.a/ .,, 9, N. ,
JI. '"%fn(t .l , a
.. ....).--'
,r_.
-S ,'--. -- ...t,,- t f_ h 3},,g." N. ; ,,.< ,
I i FIGURE 1
.. .- y"" . ,
YELLOW CREEK NUCLEAR PLANT
- l. s, - /- .. t
. -J ..~./.,
x\ ,,q,,p.a"%""T r e dkk . :OWNS ".--. CONTAINING CONSTRUCTION EMPLOYEES L [' . . g i [, 7 *y s
,-,,_-_,,,.,,m ~~~
j ,
, ., , ,,m KN ]' /Y'AvfA ,, A PLA N T SITE n o( :I'W c..e/' Q......
> ~y"~ ) [lI %T"..~.~.
N./: w.w. ",',,""'". p$(g"! c p".~...% u wl " t e .,.-.-. s f: i o JUNE 1980 is 30
- -_ _.,.s '
A. 'yd gl / '
.'J.---
,b
( n 'N
.[i.,"qk--.wpt,
. _ , .l. - .
^
.x ,
__ % b scAtt or uites NOTE' TOWNS UNDERLINED CO NTAIN EMPLOYEES
.}}