ML19350D072
| ML19350D072 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 04/08/1981 |
| From: | Felton J NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM) |
| To: | Reynolds N DEBEVOISE & LIBERMAN |
| References | |
| FOIA-80-556 IEB-79-01B, IEB-79-1B, NUDOCS 8104130250 | |
| Download: ML19350D072 (3) | |
Text
0 epiccaft ey b w
./
o UNITED STATES
[
/g e
g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
( RL(A ',t gj@
t o E WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 g
f*j c
80
- o
+*
[
?O h4 April 8, 1981 u,f0 3
QgA'do Nicholas S. Reynolds, Esquire Debevoise & Liberman 9
1200 Seventeenth Street, N.W.
IN RESPONSE REFER
~s Washington, DC 20036 TO F01A-80-556
Dear Mr. Reynolds:
This is in response to your March 17, 1981 letter in which you state that copies of " previous drafts," identified as appendix item 30 of ny December 15, 1981 letter, were not enclosed.
In response to your request the documents listed on the appendix are enclosed.
The charge for reproducing records located in the NRC Public Document Room (PDR) is ($0.05) per page for documents and cost ($2.00/ft2) for drawings as specified in 10 CFR 9.14(a). Accordingly, the cost of reproducing the 488 pages and 1 drawing is $32.40.
Please send a check made payable to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission i' the amount of $32.40 along 5:ith a copy of this letter to the Director, Fivision of Rules and Records, Room MNBB-4210 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555.
Sincerel
/
- %y, sf g
/
J. M. Felton, Director 4N Division of Rules and Records
/
Of fice of Administration
Enclosures:
As stated l
l 810.418046O
g*
Re: F01A-80-556 APPENDIX 8006170709 Memorandus & order,on UCS 771104 oetition for remedfel relief.re fire protection of electrical cables & environ qualification of electrical comoonents, Reaffirms Commission 780413. decision.re nossiole shutdown of operatina reactors.
CHILK,S.J.
3f,f, ice of the Secretary of the Commission.
CLI-30-21 80/05/23.
25so.
05392:129 8007280084 Memorandun E.ordor affirping orIor decision to deny UCS requested relief in view of addl imorovement o.f fire safety.
CHILK,S.J.
O f,f,i c e o f the Secretary of the Commission.
CLI-80-21 80/05/23.
25oo.
06005: 002.
8012110441 Cp3 firms 901023-29 conversations re util 801014 oetition for exemotion from emergency & remedial action.No need for equioment qualification since, facility is not ooerational.
LIEBERVAN,J.
Rulemakina & Enforcement Divisio.n.
80/11/12 lo.
03772:255, 80060200S9 Memorandum & order denyino motion to.cuash IE 800502 subooenas directe.d to six util emoloyees to oive testimony on 800520-21 re 5 articular knowledge pf 790328 incident.
CHILk,S.J.
3.ffice of the Secretary of the Commission.
80/05/23 900 05374: 320 t
8007170555 Notilies that intake structure basement areas at facilities have.neen s e l e c,t e d as possible test subj to conduct tests on fire orotection sys in rescorse,to NRC 800523 order.
Requests eareement,to particioate.{n program.
EISENMJT,3.G.
Division of Licensino.
80/07/08 3oo.
05832:055.
8011040312 Forwards results of review o f. N'JRE G-05 3 8,
" Environ Qualification of Safety-Related Electrical Eautoment," &
licensino reautrements for co.noliance w/800523 memorandum &
order (CLI-SO-21),
SYLVIA,B.R.
Virainia Electric & Poder Co.
CLI-30-21 80/10/31 4500o.
l 1
I l
Re:
F0!A-80-556 e
APPENDIX j
8008200176 Resdonse in.od5osition to fX Association o'f Community Ornanizatiogs for,Refs.+i Now 800804. motion requesting submittal of briefs on CLE-S0-21 effects.0bjects to untimely amend to Contention 11'. Certificate of Svc enc 1.
REYNOLOS,N.S.
Texas Utilities Generat.ing Co.
i3RINad.A.
Debevoise
& Liberman.
CLT-50-21 S0/03/14 7oo.
I 1
8008280207 Resdonse in oo$osition to TX Association of Co?munity l
Organizations for Refor? Now A00800 motion seeking briefs on CLI-80-21 & admission of Contention 11.Rulemaking on environ qualificati.n addresses issue.N/ Certificate of Sve.
ROTHSCHILO,4.0.
fearina 3 ranch 1 CLI-80-21 S0/08/25 70o.
l l
i l
1.
~
law OF FIC E S OF DEDEVOISE & 1.lBERMAN
- 200 S tvtNTE E N T H S18s E C T. N w W ASHING TON, O C,2003 6 icttawoNc (zoa) eso esOO November 7, 1980 Mr. J.M. Felton FREEDOM OF INFORMATION Director ACT REQUEST Division of Rules and Records Office of Administration-
[O[8 OO" N b U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission g gg //-/2-pd Washington, D.C.
20555 Re:
Freedom of Information Act Request
Dear Mr. Felton:
Pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C.
S552) and NRC Regulations (10 C.F.R. Part 9), Debevoise &
Liberman requests copies of all documents prepared by the NRC, its Staff and consultants relative to the following:
1.
NRR and I & E reports to the Commissioners and/or their staffs regarding the implementation of the Commission's May 23, 1980 Memorandum and Order (CLI-80-21) pertaining to environmental qualifi-cation of safety-related electrical equipment and instrumentation, including, but not limited to, communications between NRR, I & E, and Commissioner Bradford's Legal Staff Assistant, Thomas R. Gibbon.
i 2.
The need and the basis for issuance of Supplement 2 to I & E Bulletin 79-OlB.
3.
Any assessment of the legal implications, signi-ficance, rationale for and/or impact on operating plant licensees of Question and Answer No. 17 in Supplement No. 2 to I & E Bulletin 79-OlB.
i 4.
Any assessment of the impact of Supplement No. 2 i
to I & E Bulletin 79-OlB on the ability of operating plant licensees to comply with the new license requirement established in the September l
19, 1980 Orders for Modification of Licenses which i
l
1 Mr. J.M.
Pelton 11/7/80 require "information which fully and completely recponds to the staff's request as specified in I& E Bulletin 79-OlB.
5.
Any assessment (including, but not limited to, those generated by OELD and/or OGC) regarding the legal and practical implications of utilizing Supplement 2 to I & E Bulletin 79-OlB to modify or alter the nature and substance of the requests for information contained in the September 19, 1980 Orders for Podification of Licenses which require "information which fully and completely responds to the staff's request as specified in I & E Bulletin 79-01B.
6.
Any assessment of the impact on power reactor licensees and the motivation and/or cause for the issuance of Supplement No. 2 to I & E Bulletin 79-01B.
7.
Any assessment of the ability of nuclear industry vendors to currently provide replacement parts for safety-related electrical instrumentation and con-trol equipment in accordance with the requirements of NUREG-0588, as required by the Conmission's May 23, 1980 Memorandum and Order.
8.
Any assessment of the potential economic impacts, including the potential for power reactor shutdowns, that would accrue from the implementation of the mandate set forth in the Commission's May 23, 1980 Memorandum and Order to install only replacement parts that conform to the requirements of NUREG-0588.
9.
Any assessment of the impact of utilizing the
.sssumptions, computer codes and models required by NUREG-0588 for developing environmental qualifica-tions profiles on other existing design criteria and licensing bases with respect to other safety-related systems, structures and components of operating nuclear power plants.
10.
The appropriateness of and/or need for formal issuance of the DOR Environmental Qualification Guidelines, via Federal Register _ notice, for public comment and review.
1 Mr. J. M.
Felton 3
11/7/80 11.
The schedule-for the incorporation of previously submitted public comments in a revision to NUREG-0588.
12.
The extent of technical conflicts and/or techni-cal inconsistencies between the DOR Environmental Qualification Guidelines and NUREG-0588, the schedule and Staff plan for resolution of such conflicts and/or inconsistencies, and any assessment of the potential impact of the reso-lution process on the utility reporting and response requirements under I & F: Bulletin 79-OlB.
13.. The basis for the implementation deadline of June 30, 1982 contained in the thy 23, 1980 Commission Memorandum and Order on Environmental Qualification, including, but not limited to, any assessment of the time required by utilities and component vendors for qualification testing, procurement, installation, and preoperational testing of items the Staff might require to be backfitted in response to the Memorandum and Order.
14.
Any consideration of the need for a detailed Value/ Impact Analysis, an Environmental Impact Statement and/or a Negative Declaration regarding the need for an EIS for the actions taken by the l
Commission in its May 23, 1980 Memorandum and order.
15.
Internal NRC Staff review or comments en prepublication f
drafts of NUREG-0588 and the DOR Environmental Qualification Guidelines.
Such documents chould include any drafts, supporting materials,studias, or other such reports, correspondence, or-testimony, regarding the aforementioned areas of interest.
I We would appreciate your prompt response to this request within the ten working day period affor -
by 10 C.F.R. Part 9.
Sincer 1 l
J JL i
Nicho:.th E.
Reynolds NSR/cis bV
[
. - - - -