ML19350B454

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 801210-11 & 810122
ML19350B454
Person / Time
Site: Zion  File:ZionSolutions icon.png
Issue date: 02/07/1981
From: Fiorelli G
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML19350B453 List:
References
50-295-80-24, 50-304-80-26, NUDOCS 8103200568
Download: ML19350B454 (1)


Text

__

O Appendix A N0'1 CE OF VIOLATION Commonwealth Edison Comps y Docket No. 50-295 Docket No. 50-304 As a result of the anspection conducted on December 10-11, 1980 and in accordance with the Interim Enforcement Policy, 45 FR 66754 (October 7, 1980), the following violation was identified:

10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVIII, states, in part, that "A comprehensive system of planned and periodic audits shall be carried out to verify compliance with all aspects of the quality assurance program and to determine the effec-tiveness of the program."

Commonwealth Edison Company topical report CE-1-A, " Quality Assurance Program for Nuclear Generating Stations," Revision 14, dated September 9, 1980, states in Section 18 that " Audits will be performed by Commonwealth Edison Company and/or its contractors, subcontractors, and vendors to verify the implementation and effectiveness of quality programs under their cognizance", and " Audits will be performed selectively at various stages of contracts on a varying frequency, based on the nature and safety significance of the work being done to verify compliance and determine the effectiveness of procedures, inspections, tests, process controls, and documentation."

Contrary to the above, the licensee audit of SWEC appeared to be inadequate in that it did not identify that SWEC management was exempting personnel from required training without written justification.

This is a Severity Level V violation (Supplement II).

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, you are required to submit to this office within twnety-five days of the date of this Notice = written statement or explanation in reply, including for each item of noncompliance:

(1) corrective action taken and the results achieved; (2) corrective action to be taken to avoid further noncompliance; and (3) the date when full com-pliance will be achieved. Under the authority of Section 182 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, this response shall be submitted under oath or affirmation.

Dated 7

/

/[

. F Yrelli, Chief Reactor Construction and Engineering Support Branch 8103200$@

..