ML19347F781
| ML19347F781 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | University of Missouri-Rolla |
| Issue date: | 04/16/1981 |
| From: | Heishman R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19347F779 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-123-81-01, 50-123-81-1, NUDOCS 8105260288 | |
| Download: ML19347F781 (1) | |
Text
S 4
C/
Appendix A NOTICE OF VIOLATION The Curators of the University Docket No. 50-123 of Missouri - Rolla As a result of the inspection conducted on March 16-20, 1981, and in accordance with the Interim Enforcement Policy, 45 FR 66754 (October 7, 1980), the following violation was identified:
Code of Federal Regulations, 10 CFR 55.30(e) states:
"If a licensee has not been actively performing the functions of an operator or senior operator for a period of four months or lenger, he shall, prior to resuming activities licensed pursuant to this part, demonstrate to the Commission that his knowledge and understanding of facility operation and administration are satisfactory. The Commission may accept as evidence, a certification by an authorized representative of the facility licensee by which the licensee has been employed."
The licensee's approved Operator Requalification Program states, "The on-thejob training requirements shall be spread out over the calendar year such that at least two of the reactivity manipulations, one each of the process system startups and shutdowns, and one of the nuclear instrumentation checks is completed in each six month period."
Contrary to the above, no documentation in the reactor records could i
establish that the licensed Reactor Operator had performed the required manipulations between June 1980 and January 1981.
This is a Severity Level VI violation (Supplement 1.F).
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, University of Missouri - Rolla is hereby required to submit to this office within twenty-five days of the date of this Notice, a written statement or explanation in reply, includ-ing:
(1) admission or denial of the alleged item of noncompliance; (2) the reasons for the item of noncompliance if admitted; (3) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved; (4) corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further items of noncompliance; and (5) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Under the authority of Section 182 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, this response shall be submitted under oath or affirmation, s
APR 1819R1 Af Date R. F. Heishman, Acting Director Division of Resident and Project Inspection
_