ML19347D325
| ML19347D325 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Seabrook  |
| Issue date: | 03/13/1981 |
| From: | Lessy R NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD) |
| To: | Shotwell J MASSACHUSETTS, COMMONWEALTH OF |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8103170097 | |
| Download: ML19347D325 (3) | |
Text
i.p r8 cv
?,
UfJITED STAT Es
,e
!$,d 2,ElLf(si NUCLEAR REGULATORY CO'/. XSSION nuanocios, o c. m3s s. E.,t'pl n
March 13, 1981 13 N i.i V /7
'ec-b y
d Jo Ann Shotwell, Esq.
q g'\\
Assistant Attorney General INcN G,
gM Environmental Protection Division FTl
%'&US/
Cli!
4 9 fi The Commonwealth of Massachusetts b
My$A 4C John W. McConnack State Office t
Building
(\\
One Ashburton Place
'E':'d Boston, Massachusetts 02108 In the Matter of Public Service Company of New Hampshire, et al.
(Seabrook Station, Units 1 and 2)
Docket Nos. 50-443 and 50-444
Dear Ms. Shotwell:
Thi. is in response to your letter of February 4,1981 concerning "the sta'.' evaluation and rating of Public Service Company's Evacuation Time Estimates with respect to the Seabrook facility." A " staff evaluation" as requested does not exist, other than the information provided in the previous construction permit proceedings.
You are most likely referring to an " Evaluation of Evacuation Time Estimate" for Seabrook performed by Battelle, Pacific Northwest Laboratories and recently transmitted to the Staff. A copy of the Battelle " Evaluation" is enclosed.
Since-this was just received, it has not been evaluated by the Staff.
Although we are happy to provide this information, I again request that if further contact with the NRC Staff is desired as to this matter, that-you first contact either the undersigned or Stephen Burns, Esq. (matters relating to the pending 10 C.F.R. 5 2.206 request).
Sincerely, J) y Q
~
Roy P. Lessy Deputy Assistant Chief Hearing Counsel
(
Enclosure As Stated cc:
l Robert A. Backus, Esq.
l-Thonus Dignan, Esq.
f 81081700T7 G
~
EVALUATION OF EVACUATION TIME ESTIMATE Seabrook Item Excel.
Adeg.
. Poor None
~~
Background
A. Area Map X
X B. Assumptions C. Methodology X
~ Demand Estimation A. Permanent Population X
B. Transient Population X
C. Special Population X
Traffic Routing A. Map of Network X
B. Capacity of Segment X
' Analysis' A. Components Considered X
B. Adverse Condition Considered X
Overall X
e o
EVACUAT!0N TIME.ESTIPATES 8
J Seebrook V1 vs D
8 8
8 g
E.g -
c.,
Em i~- -
O
'G 1'
Em 2
R, 8
8 8
8 C
C
$.O b
to 4 0 Q.
4 O A
to C
O E 'D ED 8
&.2
&.2 "E
"?
3
~ E" ~E O
O C
a a
C; "A
8; 88
- 8 ER
% 'G ME
- 'a e%
ei em ei so do
&8 do b*
3 e
8 uo 8
no e-ew E
e-20 22 E'E E2 E'E SE P-E E
50 5"
Em -E 'C C
E U
a u
es As M s_
E Er r
ch ce s
- 3) 2%
- E
- S %
of EE E%
5 8"
EE M"
M2 EE EE NE NE E
E 5
5 WITHIN TWO HILES N
1935 645 10362 4.6 2.8 S
3960 1320 2362 3.4 3.1 WITHIN FIVE MILES
- NE 5769 1923 17198 4.6 2.3 SE 6552 2184 6861 4.1 3.3 SW 13182 4394 5598 3.9 3.4 O
NW 8082 2694 1003 O
3.6
- 3. 3 g
WITHIN TEN MILES Q,
NE 8769 2923 18969
- 2ll8 4.8 3.1
~-
4.1 4.4
-Z-SR 36819 12273 6306 3==
4.0 3.6 I""""
NW 34335[1445 2077 3.9 3.4 Notes:
- Assumes 15 minute warning-time.
- Adrarse conditions are for off-season populations onl y.
-