ML19347C744
| ML19347C744 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Midland |
| Issue date: | 12/22/1980 |
| From: | Marshall W MAPLETON INTERVENORS |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY) |
| References | |
| ISSUANCES-OL, ISSUANCES-OM, NUDOCS 8101050358 | |
| Download: ML19347C744 (2) | |
Text
-
s,d'*
s y
zex m o
\\\\
usnan Ofc 2 3 % 3, 7
~
Mapleton Intervenors Route # 10
' 1"$ %**e 7 #33
/
Midland, Michigan 4864 December 22, 1980 Secretary of the Coannission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Co::nission Washington, D.C.
20555 Attn: Docketing and Service Branch I
In the Matter of
)'
Docket Nos. 50-329 OM
)
50-330 OM CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY
)
)
Docket Nos. 50-329 OL (Midland Plane., Units 1 and 2)
)
50-330 OL
Dear Sir:
With regard to your Order Setting Prehearing Conference, dated December 15, 1980, with regard to the captioned matter, and authorizing a pre-hearing conference to be held in the Midland County Court House on January 28 and j
29, 1981:
Please be advised that I intend to be present at this 1
pre-hearing conference, and that I desire to be heard l
with respect to this matter.
I have been accepted as a party to the OM Proceedings
~.1 as an Intervenor. I have been denied permission to intervene in OL Proceedings on technical grounds, and this denial is currently being appealed. In any event, certain aspects of the OL and OM procedings have been consolidated; and the coczmmication I have received -
with respect to this matter indicates that parties who have no present official position with regard to either
.f j
OL or OM may be heard at these sessions. Therefore,(my
.i current status with respect to the OL proceedings would appear to be moot.
It is my intention to oppose centinuation of construction of the Midland nue' ear plants, units # 1 and # 2, on j
ecological grounds. I propose to demonstrate that the subsoil upon which this facility is located is water-i saturated and unsafe for heavy construction, as has been manifested by the sinking of existing construction; that this facility is located within a floodplain area and that structures in this area are liable to be flooded periodically; that the proposed " filling" of this area in the interests of " safety" by Consumers will not and can not take the place of sound construction built upon satisfactory pilings, a procedure Consu=ers refuses to consider; and that there is a strong possibility that S
/ O
@101050 % %
- L.