ML19347C316

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Summary of 800709 Meeting W/Util Re Proposed Radiological Effluent Tec Specs.List of Attendees,Agenda,Applicant Summary of Meeting & marked-up Tech Specs for Limiting Combustible Gas Concentrations in Radwaste Sys Encl
ML19347C316
Person / Time
Site: Farley 
Issue date: 09/24/1980
From: Kintner L
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 8010170304
Download: ML19347C316 (11)
v • d • e


Text

'

recoq'o, l

c UNITED STATES N

8

NUCLEAR 3EGULATORY COMMISSION o

g

E WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 k...+,/

+

Docket No. 50-364 SEP 2 41980 APPLICANT: Alabama Power Company FACILITY:

Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant Unit No. 2

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

OF JULY 9,1980 MEETING REGARDING REVIEW 0F OPERATING LICENSE APPLICATION The staff met with the applicant, at its request, to discuss certain areas of the radiological effluent proposed technical specifications for Farley Unit No. 2.

A list of attendees is in Enclosure 1. is an agenda for the meeting. is applicant's sumary of the meeting. is the applicant's proposed specification for limiting combustible gas concentrations in the gaseous radwaste system.

The staff requested that the Offsite Dose Calculations Manual be revised to show methods for calculating set points Also the staff requested that the process control program for radwaste soiidification be provided. The applicant said it would provide current process control program, and said that it was revising the program to meet burial ground requirements.

The staff requested that the revised program be submitted, f

bi-L L. L. Kintner, Project Manager Licensing Branch #2 Division of Licensing

Enclosures:

1.

List of Attendees 2.

Meeting Agenda 3.

Applicant's Meeting Agenda 4.

Proposed Specifications for limiting Combustible Gas Concentrations in Gaseous Radwaste System j

cc w/ encl:

See next page 801017_0.30y

[{

=

Mr. F. L. Clayton, Jr., Senior Vice SEP 24 Iggp President Alabama Power Company Post Office Box 2641 Birmingham, Alabama 35291 l

cc: Mr. Alan R. Barton Executive Vice President Alabama Power Company Post Office Box 2641 Birmingham, Alabama 35291 Mr. Ruble A. Thomas Vice President Southern Company Services, Inc.

Post Office Box 2625 Birmingham, Alabama 35202 Mr. George F. Trowbridge Shaw, Pittman, Potts and Trowbridge 1800 ft Street, N. W.

Washington, D. C.

20036 Mr. W. Bradford NRC Resident Inspector P. O. Box 1814 Dothan, Alabama 36302 f

4 I

ENCLOSURE 1 i

1 1

LIST OF ATTENDEES MEETING WITH FARLEY UNIT NO. 2 J

JULY 9, 1980 RADIOLOGICAL TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS l

NRC L. L. Kintner

  • P. C. Wagner D. J. Vito i

J. Boegli C. Potel C. A. Willis t

Alabama Power 3

K. W. McCracken D. D. Kingsley, Jr.

1 C. D. Nesbitt M. Jackson T. N. Epps

{

Southern Co. Services j

J. N. McLeod l

E T. N. Epps 4

1 l

  • Part-time

ENCLOSURE 2 AGENDA RADIOLOGICAL / EFFLUENT TECH SPEC MEETING JULY 9, 1980 1.

Specification 3.3.310 -- Applicability and Action Statements 2.

Table 3.3-13, Table Notation Action 28 3.

Specification 3.3.3.11 -- Action Statement (Note:

This is similar to agenda item 1) l 4.

Table 4.3-14. Table Notation, Item (3), (4) i 5.

Specifications 3.11.1.1 and 3.11.2.1, Action Statements 6.

Specification 4.11.1.1.1 7.

Table 4.11-1, Table Notation (a) MDC Definition (b) APCo proposed not:t h 8.

Specification 3.11.1.2 9.

Table 4.11-2, Table Notation (a) MDC Definition (similar to item 7a)

(b) APCo proposed note h (similar to 7b)

(c) Notes b and d

10. Specification 3.11.2.2, New Parenthetic Expression
11. Specification 3.11.2.3 (similar to item 8)
12. Specification 3.11.2.5, Action b l
13. Specification 4.11.2.6 (and APCo proposed Specification 4.11.2.7) l l
14. Specification 4.12.3
15. Specification 6.5.1.2, 6.5.2.2, 6.5.3.1r ' 1. 2 Note: These specifications are affded by a separate submittal.
16. Specification 6.5.2.8, item o, and Specificatic.: 6.8.1, item i
17. Specification 6.9.1.7
18. Specification 6.9.1.9

.m.

i

{

s t

i 1-2-

4 4

j 19.

Specification 6.9.1.10 i

i

20. Specification 6.1.3.2, item 2 I

i

{

21. Specification 6.14.2, item 2 I

t i

22. Specification 6.15.1 t

1 i

i l

r I

s a

s 4

a P

1 3

1 l.

1 l

4 i,

4 i

A 1'

4 4

i.

1 1

J 3

4 1

1 4

f b.

N' 9

s-+.am-,-n_

=,me,-

.,e--

,,-.----m.-.e-.,,,,..,---,,

we---, -,..

,,m-e,

-wm

,w m,..,,,,-e

.- - -, -,.,.,e n,,.nr y,,-v w -w-m o r s-w e s m -

-s* www-m -w n

Intracompany Mr. Les Kintner ENCLOSURE 3 Correspondenca Alabama Power Summary of the Agreements and Open Items subject from the July 9 Meeting at the NRC Date July 21,1980 From Mr. T. N. Epps To File At Nucicar Ceneration The following is a summary of the agreements and open items from the July 9 meeting at the NRC.

t Agenda Item 1, Specification 3.3.3.10 (a) NRC will take undet advisement the APCo position on Applicability.

(b) NRC agreed to take under advisement the APCo Action C.

NRC indicated that out-of-service time necessitating a report may be changed to 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> rather than 14 days.

Agenda Item 2, Table 3.3-13, Table Notation

)

APCo submitted a new draft ACTION 28.

NRC accepted"the new draft (copy attached).

Agenda Item 3, Specification 3.3.3.11 (a) Same as Ib above.

Table 3.3-14, Table Notation This is the same as Agenda Item 2.

(This was not on the agenda.)

NRC agreed to insert APCo recommended ACTION 35.

Agenda Item 4, Table Notation, Items 3 and 4 NRC agreed to accept calibration in accordance with manufacturer's recommendation with zero and span gas.

This can be accomplished either by deleting footnotes or by changing notes to read,

" utilizing a zero gas and a span gas at the nominal concentration specification by manufacturer" to the exis, ting APCo submittal words.

Agenda Item 5, Specifications 3.11.1.1 and 3.11.2.1

-NRC rejected the APCo position.

Agenda Item 6. Specification 4.11.1.1.1 NRC agreed to accept APCo deletion of " prior to release".

Agenda Item 7 Table 4.11-1, Table Notation (a) MDC definition - APCo agreed to accept NRC position.

NRC will modify effluent bases to be similar to MDC discussion and environmental bases on Page B, 3/4,12-1.

l (b)

NRC agreed to accept APCo proposed note h.

Agenda Item 8, Specification 3.11.1.2 (a) APCo agreed to accept NRC wording of the Specification.

(b) NRC agreed to delete the parenthetic addition to ACTION a and footnote regarding drinking water.

Agenda Item 9, Table 4.11-2, Table Notation (a) Same as Agenda Item 7a.

(b)

NRC agreed to accept APCo proposed note h.

Same as Agenda Item 7b.

(c)

The APCo proposal on notes b and d will be considered by NRC. A sketch of effluent paths showing monitors will be provided by APCo to facilitate consideration by NRC.

Agenda Item 10. Specification 3.11.2.2 v-(a) APCo agreed to accept NRC wording of the specification.

(b)

NRC agreed to delete the parenthetic addition following paragraph b.

Agenda Item 11, Specification 3.11.2.3 APCo agreed to accept NRC position.

Agenda Item 12, Specification 3.11.2.5 APCo showed NRC a triaxial graph of explosive flammab e mixtures of H, 02 and N'j.

APCo will document the ac'c'u'r'scy of the graph.

2

~

The graph will taen be considered by NRC as a basis for setting H2 and 02 tech spec limits.

This revised specification and appropriate dccumentation will be submitted to NRC by AFCo.

j A2enda Item 13, Specification 4.11,'. 6 and APCo Proposed Specification 4.11.2.7 NRC accepted APCo position provided the tank is sampled daily when the inventory exceeds 20,000 curies. APCo accepted this change.

2

Table 4.12-1 This was not an agenda item. NRC agreed to delete the word

'hximum" from the table title.

Agenda Item 14, Specification 4.12.3 NRC accepted APCo deletion of the words "and in accordance with the ODCM".

I Agenda Item 15 i

This item was discussed for information only. NRC agreed that they do_not want conflicts between Unit 1 and Unit 2 specifications in Section 6.

Agenda Item 16, Specification 6.5.2.8 and 6.8.1 (a) NRC indicated that specified audits in Specification 6.5.2.8 must include all aspects of Regulatory Guide 4.15.

T This item was left open. NRC will provide clarification i

to APCo.

(b)

NRC agreed to consider APCo position on specification 6.8.1, but noted that the procedure must include all applicable portions of Regulatory Guide 4.15.

j' Agenda Item 17, Specification 6.9.1.7 l

\\

l NRC agreed to proposed change in Footnote 3 as it applies to annual environmental operating report.

Agenda Item 18, Specification 6.9.1.9 l

(a)

NRC agreed 'to consider APCo position on dose assessment to public within the site.

(b) APCo agreed to accept the paragraph on 40 CFR 190 compliance provided the last sentence is deleted. NRC stated that a statement of compliance in the radiological release report is sufficient to comply with the 40 CFR 190 report requirement stated here.

(c) APCo agreed to include unplanned releases in the effluent l

release report.

l 3

l 4

-Agenda Item 19, Specification 6.9.1.10 and Agenda Item 22, Specification 6.15.1 NRC stated that the requirement for reporting changes to radwaste systems was written because certain utilities have not performed proper 10 CFR 50.59 evaluations for such modifications. APCo agreed to submit an FSAR amendment listing technical issues to be considered in -

performing 10 CFR 50.59 reviews. NRC agreed that an FSAR amendment could provide sufficient assurance of proper review and reporting.

If the amendment is acceptable, NRC agreed that the tech specs can be revised to merely assure proper reporting of 50.59 modifications.

Agenda Items 20 and 21, Specifications 6.13.2 and 6.14.2 NRC accepted APCo positions.

ODCM The ODCM was discussed. NRC indicated that the ODCM must be expanded to include setpoint methods prior to tech specs approval. APCo agreed to provide a revised ODCM.

PCP mv NRC indicated that APCo must obtain approval of a Process Control Program for radwaste solidification prior to tech spec approval. APCo agreed to submit a PCP for the Chem-Nuclear System by the end of next week. APCo noted that a revised PCP may be forthcoming this fall when an upgraded solidification system is placed into service.

'A V

T. N. Epp l'

TNE:aw cc:

Mr. O. D. Kingsley, Jr.

Mr. K. W. McCracken Mr. C. Nesbitt Dr. W. M. Jackson Mr. J. N. McLeod NRC:

Mr. Charlie Willis Mr. Jack Boegli Mr. Les Kintner 4

Mr. Dave Vito Mr. Phil Wagner Mr.-Chandu Patel

ENCLOSURE 4 i-j

?R00!& BE COPY RADI0 ACTIVE EFFLUENTS EXPLOSIVE GAS MIXTURE LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION lsydr.ge.n.d nWr5ean 3.11.2.5 The concentration of oxygen in the GASE0US RADWASTE SYSTEM shall be s

limited to ' u "- : :p:! t; n-t,.o; _,

t.

en A of Cc rt 4. 11. 3 APPLICABILITY:

At all times.

ACTION:

kyArgen a 1 n. begt.n e

a.

With the concentration of oxygen in the GASEOUS RADWASTE SYSTEM f

;tc.

1.m..

L.,

~. _ m 6,

.....ereg;! " hy ='

,i'sr*iN 6 e4 1:,y m u 3, reduce the oxygen concentration to the above limits within 48 hours5.555556e-4 days <br />0.0133 hours <br />7.936508e-5 weeks <br />1.8264e-5 months <br />.

i b.

With the concentration of oxygen in the GASEOUS RADWASTE SYSTEM

.a re5 C.

8

=4 F.p n g.H.7 ;-"+-- t':

'.i

,.vui_,., immgte I*'gtgases to the system and -~:'

,1y suspend all additions ofthe concen qA ger y en S L --

;! n "Y g ;;' u-mi + u

--b, and GFa.-by I

4

% g wn Lune wi thi n 48 hours5.555556e-4 days <br />0.0133 hours <br />7.936508e-5 weeks <br />1.8264e-5 months <br />

" ^ ' ' '

^~-^di^^

'% L%we i

TheprovisionsofSpecificakions3.0.3and3.0.4arenotapplicable.

c.

i SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS l

4.11.2.5 The concentration of oxygen in the GASEOUS RADWASTE SYSTEM shall be determined to be within the above limits by continuously monitoring the waste gases in the GASEOUS RADWASTE SYSTEM with the oxygen monitors required i

OPERABLE by Table 3.3-14 of Specification 3.3.3.11.

1 1

l l

3.Y h

'T

.D "

]D D

A

=

,oemw DIABLO CANYON - UNIT 1 3/4 11-15 MAY 3 u d

P J

s, e,

  • Om

~.

I

.i ti.

w

. ~ :,

~,

v. r.

c.:.

~.

o

.,f u

l

. ' N; -

' Ja p

,.. s.

.s

. s',%

... x 0

g Y,r,g#

,J;Q',,, M' g', Qi '-"..2

'N Q 'sN 4 :s. N O

3 w.

e 4ts M'o, uj a

.'. ::~. 3 l.h'si!E. :

2

' 4:.s' :W+.:

w 4

.n :: ',,..* @ :...!.'.' si:

3

.,. ' c.

b_

in.

1

,g.,

e '.

. % +I;.'.g..,-.::.' Nm '?:~ E:.. ~-: <

- s, s

..;. '. i:, ~'.b~..h<;'$ '.,.4

' M-

.s s.-M y

i x.,.

.o s

..s

. ::..;,~:. '.:s.'~s:.<.'

., Ws u

o

=

&,n; 9".%,.

o e

z,

'.'v.

,j.-.

.. x

. sf

~'s'u.

e

,h.. N...-; x y' 1..f C;

.1, I ','. 9:' ' ". ::M.1 o

i

. w. : :...

c s

..:~

n r

I

' el'. ? j~. ~, :1

. %,..- l : :.,W ; p j : [ j ' ?:

l': Q' O

,o

.'h.Ql i * s:j's '. p <' N W

,%'i 'c 2'. -

s v

s, -

, 4...

o

..;s

.- s

.l

. )..,.

... ~

.s...;,,r,. ~

/-

i

.,, -,. s.

z a

/

~

p.

.., x.,.

o

,;t,.,

A.2,,..g,.....",

2-

. s~.:

,, y, s

. %...-..t

. : s. *,. --

,a

.w

s.

to -

... -.s; -

k.,

~.

u.

,s s;

N

\\,, -

3.

N,.,,.- n O

. ;s,;..-

, s...

-t,

    • /

"'W:

. g..

p'

.~ 1*N. y l.'Y ' p.., Nd

..N.,,,

% *.. :. /*,

  • ',,s ' e5

. c *..,'f. <.

$. '..y. * /'

.s

/

,s.'.

d

q.

.c

.,. y.,- (,

g

'P -

',3,

,, 4..,, ~ y 9

/A.,. q.

. g; -

.g p

s

. X.,g

,t

.... A.

3 4

so' 1,.m -

s

- W, W in,- h..:,'Nk

/ :' %

tQ e

, ;Nc.'

s:,,

.'),.2@

. E'. M 'n f

N'

,,,;-%. '% p-$y

.p '

,8 V

.O R

. s N'.%

th!

-h,

]

.~

%l.~.g:X y

u.

-i 3,

,/,2f% -

  • \\

4'

'b., *.

.e N

4 b*,

'n,'.' ;

e6, ', -

.q q

s

~

s-

.j t.

a a ~

og D

d r

l-w O

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML19347C316&oldid=4702945"