ML19347C138

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards QA Program Insp Rept 99900361/80-01 on 800612-13 & Notice of Deviation
ML19347C138
Person / Time
Issue date: 07/21/1980
From: Potapovs U
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To: Craig C
G. DIKKERS & CO., N.V. THE NETHERLANDS
Shared Package
ML19347C133 List:
References
REF-QA-99900361 NUDOCS 8010160663
Download: ML19347C138 (2)


Text

,

[ps ae4 UNITED STATES j

'o, NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

's R EGION IV f

I i )DI 1 0

611 RY AN Pt.AZA oRIVE, SulTE 1000

%, vf al

's 45 ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76012 a, $2f

/

21 JUL 1980 i

1 1

i Docket No. 99900361/80-01

~~

4 G. Dikkers and Company N.V.

Attn:

Mr. C. S. Craig j

Chief Executive Industriestraat 15, P. O. Box 12 1

7550 AA Hengelo, Province of Overijssel THE NETHERLANDS Gentlemen:

This refers to the QA Program inspection conducted by Mr. I. Barnes of this 4

office on June 12-13, 1980, of your facility at Hengelo, The Netherlands, i

associated with the manufacture of nuclear safety relief valves and to the discussions of our findings with Mr. R. J. Howe and members of your staff at the conclusion of the inspection.

d This inspection was made to confirm that, in the areas inspected, your QA j

Program is being effectively implemented. The inspection effort is not designed to assure that unique quality requirements imposed by a customer are being implemented; nor to assure that a specific product, component or service provided by you to your customers, is of acceptable quality.

As you know, the NRC requires each of its licensees to assume full responsibility for the quality of specific products, components or services procured from others.

You should therefore not conclude that the NRC's inspection exempts you from inspections by an NRC licensee or his agents nor from taking eff'etive cor-receive action in response to their findings.

Areas examined and our findings are discussed in the enclosed report. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of an a-hation of procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observations by the j

inspector.

J During the inspection it was found that the implementation of your QA Program failed to meet certain NRC requirements.

The specific findings and references to the pertinent requirements are identified in the enclosures to this letter.

Please provide us within thirty (30) days of your receipt of this report a written statement containing, (1) a description of steps that have been or will be taken to correct these items, (2) a description of steps that have been or w'11 be taken to prevent. recurrence, and (3) the date your corrective actions and preventive measures were or will be completed.

$$10160h i

. ~.

G. Dikkers and Company N.V.

2 In accordance with Section 2.790 of the Comission's " Rules of Practice,"

Part 2, Iitle 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter with enclosure and your reply, together with the enclosed inspection report will be placed in the Commission's Public Document Room.

If this report contains any information that you believe to be proprietary, it is necessary that you make a written application within thirty (30) days to this office to withhold such information from public disclosure. Any such application sust include a full statement of the reasons on the basis of which it is clai=ed that the infor=a-j tion is proprietary, and should be prepared so that proprietary information identified in the application is contained in a separate part of the document.

If we do not hear from you in this regard within the specified period, the j

report will be placed in the Public Document Room.

'Shoul'd you have any questions concerning'this inspection, we v4'1 be pleased to discuss them with you.

I Sincerely, l

%/

/

V J

r Uldis Potapovs, Chief Vendor Inspection Branch

Enclosures:

1.

Notice of Deviation i

2.

Inspection Report No. 99900361/80-01 4

I i

i

-.