ML19347C082

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requests Clarification of Proposed Revision 2 to Reg Guide 1.97 Requirements for Placement of Offsite Real Time Radiation Monitors
ML19347C082
Person / Time
Site: Rancho Seco
Issue date: 10/02/1980
From: Mattimoe J
SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
To: Reid R
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 8010160551
Download: ML19347C082 (1)


Text

6,snum SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT C 6201 S street, Box 15830, sacramento, California 95313; (916) 452-3211 October 2, 1980 Director of fluclear Reactor Regulation Attention:

Mr. Robert W. Reid, Chief Operating Reactors, Branch 4 U.S. fluclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.

20555 Docket No. 50-312 Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 1 Emergency Planning Offsite Real Time Radiation Monitors

Dear Mr. Reid:

The proposed Revision 2 of the flRC Regulatory Guide 1.97 recommends 16-20 locations for the environs radioactivity monitors (noble gas, halogens, particulates). The value "16" implies one monitor in each sector with the remainder located at other ereas of interest.

A cur ent California Senate Bill (CA SB 1184) is also requiring SMUD to place radiation dose rate monitors in the environs at locations in concurrence with the State Department of Health Services (Radiological Health Section) and County representatives. At present, meetings with the State and County have resulted in 32 proposed locations, eight of which are within the site boundary.

We are requesting clarification on NRC's concept regarding distribution of the Regulatory Guide 1.97 monitors so that this can be factored into the final placement of the devices.

Sincerely, 0r ]%WA w

' chn J. Mattimoe Assistant General Manager and Chief Engineer bO 3<' o 8 010 y e.056/

o w.~

m

.~.

a

, w.~ c v ::.,,.,

.