ML19347B447
| ML19347B447 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 07000734 |
| Issue date: | 09/19/1980 |
| From: | Burnett R NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS) |
| To: | Wellhouser H GENERAL ATOMICS (FORMERLY GA TECHNOLOGIES, INC./GENER |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8010150086 | |
| Download: ML19347B447 (2) | |
Text
__
DISTRIBUTION:
NMSS r/f (w/o encl)
SGPL r/f (w/o enc 1)
Case File Docket SGPL:RRR
$EP I D 1980 POR z
70-734 LPDR 6----
t-
.LCRouse Mr. H. N. Wellhouser, Director DWeiss Huclear Materials Control Division RLFonner General Atcmic'Coopany JGuibert P.O. Box-81608 RGPage i
San Diego,' California 92138 LLBush RRRentschler
Dear fir. Wellhouser:
SGML RFBurnett We have completed a review of your physical protection plan submitted by letter of August 21, 1980 and find that it needs extensive revision.
1 During your visit of July 15, 1980, you advised us that your initial plan would bolsomewhat conceptual in nature since at the tine you rc uncertain as to how long your facility would continue as a Category I uperation.
Unfortunately, the; plan that you did submit was so broad in nature and gen-erally devoid of detail that this Office is unable to conduct a meaningful licensing review. As I pointed out to you in my letter of August 20, 1980, we were then,'and are now, fully prepared to work with you in accommodating to the requirecients of the Upgrade Rule, especially in consideration of the uncertalpty that has'been connected with your continued operation. Now that a decision has been made that you will continue as a Category I facility, it is essential tilat priority action be afforded to revising your physical protection plap so that we can expedite necessary licensing activities.
Please.recallithat we discussed with you during your visit and pointed out in subseq' ent' letters the need to be orepared to institute any temporary or u
short-term measures that Af ght be needed to meet the level of protection required by the new rule within the tinfrare specified in that regulation.
I an attachini1'a list of sone major areas which ' require extensive revision in the reaccomplishrent of your physical protection plan. This list is not to be considered.all inclusive.
Yenbers of my staff are available to answer any questions that might arise and to visit your facility to provide assistance as nay be appropriate in connection 'with this matter.
Si nc.erely,
<f +.~ -
d QM
,,. Oh Robert F. Eurnett, Director 0g Division of Safeguards. H"SS
Enclosure:
0**D
- ]O YIk As statodi., g oj\\1 3.1 a
,m SGPQWL4 SGPLJ T SG
'/ //
SG SG fjO g
GWMcQ(pklb/pah RfiRe ts'c'hler WThI[er
'DRChpeIY' RFBurnett wa " $r 09/f//80-09/j/80-09/
80'
'09/A//80
097/p/80' o r c >,..
4RC FOnM )la'(9 76; NRCM c2 ao DU.E Gov tRNutN r pntN r1NG Of fICL-1919 ?S3 3G9
Ib
_w_
- ' ENCLOSURE l MA'J0R' AREAS' REQUIRING REVISION 01 - Blueprints need1to b'e provided..giving specifications for ~your new capital improvements.(e.g., CAS/SAS construction details).
- o. Blueprints shouldhincludeilocations of all alarm and fence systems, und the 'locapion: of CCTV: cameras.
o ' The facility contingency l Plan may need revisions to considerithe new
. design threat;(10 CFR 73.1) and new contingency events that may re-sultifrom newly-installed' systems (e.g.,~ card-key systems,. alarm sys-tems),
Part ;I '(' Chapters lLthrough' 17) must ' provide the necessary tech'nical
- o content which allows a ' determination of the' adequacy of the commit-ments;relatiye!to the requirements of ~the regulations.
For instance, Chapter.15 'should set forth the-design criteria which ensure the in-
- tegrity of the Tphysical ~ protection system. -
Part II, (Chapters 18 through '?3) must provide explicit.Jentifica-o tion' of components and measures so that performance may be evaluated
- against 'the. specific regulatory requirement.
t 9
s -
'1's {
t 4
8 %
k 9
e.
4 4
4 f
as ts -,
-r
--v
-,-e e
e-y-
+
m r--
4-s
+w=r r
-m-'r
-n e--
T-=
e-=e~+-+
,=m-r t-g w