ML19347A845

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comments on Draft NRC Manual Chapter, Policy & Procedures for Peer Reviews, in Response to 800605 Request.Intent of Document Unclear.Distinction Should Be Made Between Peer Review for Technical Work & Review for Policy Issues
ML19347A845
Person / Time
Issue date: 06/16/1980
From: Berkow H
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Rehm T
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO)
Shared Package
ML19347A846 List:
References
NUDOCS 8009300392
Download: ML19347A845 (1)


Text

j

)

er n

^

ykn A

D

[G0 Q@JU l

l 9

D i

i WJ DISTRIBUTION:_

Central File BSnyder j

MAB Reading BGrimes HDenton RYollmer m 161980 ECase HBerkow l

DEisenhut AFerguson (NRR-4085)

Dross SHanauer s

i i

RMattson i

J T.~A. Rehn. Assistant for Operations j

letmANDLBt FOR:

Office of Executive Director for Operations -

x+

~ me v l

FMBk -

'i' % Norbert N.' Bertow. Chief A, '

Hanagement Analysis Branch.

9

.Piming & Pmgres Analysis Staff, Illut c

3

SUBJECT:

E: IRR WWENTS ON DRAFT P01. ICY AND PROCEDURES l

w

.rca Pest amEWE

. - a

~

w.1

;;; b.~ lt.y!q&. 4:

~ k..:

L Y

.c

... +

These,.a===ts respond.te year. request of June 5. 7

^

.v

s. t... c u.,...y m

The intent of this document is not clear. ~ It appears te suggest that peer' review is good and provides same broad guidance on the subject.

But it doesn't really require such review and leaves the extent of i

review to the judgement affindividual managers. If this bulletin is intended to.iecrease the use of peer reviews, it probably wn't.

~

l We suggest that a clearer' distinction be made between peer tuview fbr technical work and that for-policy issues. Peer review of technical work including that which forms the basis for policy decisions, is usefbl. Peer. review of policy issues.nornelly is 4

c ehtained through, sencerrance..whichishould be adequate.

t,a

.x y,

~w.g ww w,

.z.,,. u:,

~'m f

~

Abide frW these comM have'ne"dgnificant ' objection to' the

~

8 f.,.$~;1,,,

,c,.,...

.,/j O.. DMQ h, N 'q..

.. -,"..,v

~',I *, f..

J-

.4,.

,. m

.p.,,..

r.,, y%.Myiina.l. Signed be.G_ ~ ?n. _-

... (. Q g,, %- %,~.1 r..

o n

s._,

g

- emw.,

4 s.

m s.

g ':W SC..b.e:w+

1.
  • 3

~ f '.,..s;;,';

v....y.

73f, _

3.

. g ^^, 4

.;.j.j g, -

',,:,. s.../ W^ L g*.,K..; *,Jierbert. N. Berkov. g.

i.

+~_,q..<~.Q'.,

f,. w f.4

  • lmly +,.,a.. ' s.

/

.G

)

s A

>q '

m.

y ys -+ f.o

.-N c.

w.# " 's% Y:Y s W ~ ~W p. y'..;Q M*v R',n'1: ft ' *

' %; W+- g'p;_W.b. :rdih^bG.

J:

~

.. ~ J+ h,'..,

  • g, ',. ~s,;

? wit:.&

K h

4 No ief

' [N'

c.g-E(A.%g/J1anniAnnegament Analysts B

~. -

l W'..{,1 m,c

+

j

/"". *;Nfed'.g?if59;4.L-f. f.

.,,,
.t'$.,ng.4fregrarAnalysts, Staff. Ista "f

9iMl 5

W

,,g

. n. ? *-* *.g[:f'K*;,{\\,Q.;

\\

,~ f M

i e m

~

.y*

=q %}p.' & g: +&. --

Y.. _.

c.;* ' %,

'./.,gs; S.,..

i

%.(./<K 4%.g 7W i

  • *. s, a.y v.. A.:(j:',*%v'.

4

,n

;)%.K %q. J.-

i pf** * *T - } y, f W'.;*.p'.Q.

4 7.Q 4.,. '*Q. 5. p

. * ' ' ~

'5 a -J. :(@4 ( Q@~y*&;

, n.; Q g. y

.g.p4;. y,...,

"' ~

d-

.f

.~

c f

-e 'nW*><,:qaz;mgy,..:. "

D n?-

.:s y; g:';$T &JQ

. Q Qw p[4il *p' b% ]sli' 4. & 3 :."QNg.'r** *

w. 4.,,,q.y,Q.. _ v _ g.. g qm

.,, - ? ? [g.. y h:[p:'N

  • Q

,,, :.. y

_',4 4[,

['s5.j,f,~..*:Q

. :. s ;l(f, g%,.QGr's C y, y'Yvmy. s f>s_'.p':g

  • v t

,- ; J, i s:. 2.Q: y ;..&-

.? yo.

_ s w

-r*<>:

...h

  • u. '.
. ~a

,,1

<c s os.e

+.g.s -

. p

. N...,4..sc.;. {p / ',

pe%

~c

s. ?

- i

+u re 3 s o g 0 0 9 3 0 0,,$. < p

,L ; M,4

. p.

1.g.. m ;,g ji y.,e l.w ;,g.

J

,4

~.

y h,w.

  • _.-vis

+,

,. ~

i w

_u

,,, s. y, ;.,

, e.

s r_

J"'

7

_ g,

,e

,s

'.-n

^

' OFFICE h....

.q

.............].7-.'.

...H.B. e..r.k.(o.i L

SURNAMEp

. 6./... I.v.../. 8. 0..

Oaru

  1. U 1979 289 369 -

N tc FORM 318 (946) NRCM 0240

? *'.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICES s.~..

.,,..,,.As_

"'-~.4"'

A...--

v

._; e w

. - - -.