ML19346E775

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Summary of 940217 Meeting W/Numarc Re Implementation of Regulatory Review Group Recommendations Re Clarification of Decrease in Effectiveness as Used in 10CFR50.54(p)
ML19346E775
Person / Time
Issue date: 02/18/1994
From: Mckee P
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Congel F
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 9403010229
Download: ML19346E775 (6)


Text

4 February 18, 1994 MEMORANDUM FOR:

Frank J. Congel, Director Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FROM:

Phillip F. McKee, Chief Safeguards Branch Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

SUBJECT:

MINUTES OF MEETING WITH NUMARC ON 02/17/94 On February 17, 1994, members of the staff, NUMAPC, and other interested parties (see attached attendance roster) met to oiscuss the implementation of the Regulatory Review Group's (RRG) recommendations regarding clarification of

" decrease in effectiveness" as used in 10 CFR 50.54(p). The staff indicated that it was interested in any ideas concerning the approach and specific examples. There was also a discussion of the proposed milestones and schedule.

The staff provided a brief background regarding the 10 CFR 50.54(p) process and provided two handouts (attached) which contain a draft interpretation of the review criteria of 50.54(p) and several examples of that interpretation.

Most of the discussion revolved around the bandout which will eventually be published in some form of guidance. NUMARC was asked to assist the staff by providing additional examples.

NUMARC suggested that the examples be expanded to include more information regarding the decision-making philosophy and internal guidance documents used by the staff.

Discussion of the tasking of the staff to provide a draft document by June of this year and a completed document by December dictated the need to have NUMARC's input by mid-May and a public workshop in September. A concern was ttheexamplesbescreenegr"gegugsd"k#1tign"griorto r s g

e fr Phillip F. McKee, Chief Safeguards Branch Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Enclosure:

As stated rr e " "

~P 6? '

003007 Distribution:

nM.: ; 1 E m ;

t.

2 uk n Central FiJes D # 60A/

MMg7)") @;

NRC PDR /

L. Bush yff4 d'7

")

PSGB r/f R. Skelton

/ //4 7&f Av2

' p"h,4, E. Butcher fj. h.;/ m e e e p n h _.y 4

P. McKee

.(

R. Fonner l#WIw/

Office PSGB R @

PSGB:NRR BC:PSGB:NRR Name

[ARSketb LBu(h

[JI4cKee Date 2/f/94 2//JT94 2//1794 fi h '

9403010229 940218 CF SUBJ

4 03cM-6MTG CEN CF

?

a

'r MEETING ATTENDEES j

NR__C AND NUMARC j

2 Il 9 '1' l

D_ A TE

)

1.

l i

I NAME ORGANIZA TION

_ TELEPHONE

(

, pA c n IJuwn.et (20i) 872 -1280 i

l Iom 1

g s

f Deb LJ k[k e sd l

o, bM p

o

\\(

\\

SwHTL:. /.5Edsti hiEno GuoEY M.

uw vi MI-117 '88&3 f 3 *> I ) 2 T.%:s :c:,

i

c..

s u

l Fro w.

TAtGoI f1 L t / LPFn 30 ) - 3 Lc

% 3

  • i t

i

/

l t - c X L.'

A< no AM / /7A CJ 7e/- 9 Y-7"ry V l

f w

=

l b' l--

SV LTDO

/JdL //)t'ss BCi-%W B2C$

7 Quk

( l rs c i L fjl2 [L Yi){l S 5 3 0 J

_D 4 - /O _4 P

/

S b'r' 2 inn ck nAra tJilC f TsR G 3 01-504-p968 t

l.

n~/-.n F.:s Mx c/ Die s s 30i s o v - 1. 9 3 -

/

l:-

j l

l i

I l

l

._. _. ~., _ _ _ - _ _. _.. _...,,. _. _ _. _...

l 3

10 CFR 50.54 PLAN CHANGE GUIDANCE DIsiRID fHANGF; Re.f or e frnquercy of ratrols, rVRR[NT COMMITM[NT:

sitn conducts patrols of fhe protetted area ovnty Iwo hours at a minimum.

PROPOSED C0"MITMENT:

Patrol frequency would be reduced to a minimum of two pat rols per shif t (8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br />) or no less than one every four hours.

PEA 50N FOR THE CHANGE:

Savinas in nanpower resources.

IMPACT ON EFFECTIVENESS Of PLAN:

Minor. All employees as wall as security force members are trained to report any suspicious individuals or materials in protected area.

The patrols are not compensatory measures; all security equipment would havn t o operable or componsatory measures in plate.

BASIS FOR ACCEPTANCE:

NUP[G 0908, Acceptanco Critoria for the Evaluation of Nuclear Pownr Reactor Security Plans, a11ews for patrol frequency of at least once overy four hours.

i

o 10 CFR $0.54 PL AN CilANGr GillDANCE DiSIRID (Hayri Provido somo l a t i t into in performinq perioilir f ont f inns F UR RI N T C OF"f l_T MI N T :

Plan states have to be mot on or before tho particular dato.

PPOPOSfD.COMMITMrNT; Use a "toch spoc" formula to provide some flexibility in monting date commitmonts t.hange the " fixed" datos in tho plan to 4 or - datos. suc h as every 12 mont hs + or - 30 days.

REASON fOR THE CilANGE:

Allow more ficxibility in scheduling events and indirectly provide savings in costs and manpower.

IMPACT ON [fffCTIVfNE55 Of PIAN:

Nono BASIS FOR ACCEPTANCE:

McKee letter of Auqust 78 1990 to Regional safequards staff.

s

j 15 10 CTR 50.54 PLAN CHANGE GHIDANCE D[ 51(?! D [H ANG[

[ h a n ep",

to specific quarr! post a e,s i gnmen t s.

(UPPTNT COMMITMTNT:

Security officer pmted at extt turnstiles to rorover s i t o bailqos /rartD oy'.

PROPOSTD COMMITM[NT:

Discontinun quard post.

RfASON FOR THE CHANGE:

No lonunr rnquire badges to remain on site.

IMPACT _0N [F i f CT_IVf ME55 Of PL AN:

Nonn. Now access control and badying process provides higher assurance of positive idontification than manually i,steing hadnes.

Othor measures prevent exploit ation of badqns/cardkeys.

ItASIS FOR_ACC E PT ANr.E; Monts the regulatory rnquiremont as describe <f in 10 CFR 73.55 (a).

o

e e

e t

3 l

n f

i r

fn a

n r

y e

i h

s t

i o

e b

t l

ne h

a f

i n

w u

t lq i

n n

t s

e a

o t

h c

s i

a q

s n

n h

i o

t n

r i

i w

a o

r q

r i

I t

n e

C a

m f

A er r

r N

a 0

c y

u r

n 1

l a

b l

t I,

e s

r r

t I,

l e

e l

r t

u N

ne o

o n

a n

h f

s i

s o

r a

h s

N e

t i

s A

r r

l a

o ia P

n t

p o

s p

l i

e a

v 1

5 a

n o

q t

o o

i r

n n

w p

v p

i ri n

a l

e o

n e

e n

n p

w h

a o

R a

n t

r p

T e

o e

s C

w p

s o

s e

0 s

n t

n r

i c

e o

i u

1 e

r p

s g

t n

s n

t a

o s

e i

o h

p a

r h

t n

s e

s s

q r

t i

n a

a n

e u

m N

i n

a q

s a

A i

l n

l j

e t

m n

s l

P e

r u

t.

a c

l s

e h

a F

u i

f n

i 0

o e'

f.

a t

n f

l n

h n

5 o

f a

e 5

i o

e t

I t

v i

l i,

a, n

f o

N i

[

a n

T a

N p

I n

r h

f 1

u

'i A

V u

N o

N q

n iL_

i C

a s e

O s

l g

m A

C l

M n

i m

t r,

i N

e n

T u

h 1

q l

l r

t i

I a

r r,

u l

s 1

f i

a f

e r r

n l

r f

r e t

i r J

u o

T v

"n 0

h g

f p a A

a o

o o

s s

R e

o n

(

[

n r

e O

r r!

R_

f u f

t O

f q

'0 _.

o l

p y

p e i

F n

t T

f

[

i f

F.

at i

n N

i s

n N

r T

r t

o i

r o

o O

e f

r e S.

t n

l t

r S

c A

nt I

s h, A

t e

n o

A n

P n o n -

P i

U s

e l

o i r A

h r l

p U

l' U

U c

l.

M p i

i o t

r Il l