ML19345D592
| ML19345D592 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Yellow Creek  |
| Issue date: | 10/31/1980 |
| From: | TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19345D590 | List: |
| References | |
| YCNP-SMR-4, NUDOCS 8012160152 | |
| Download: ML19345D592 (35) | |
Text
-.
sw x,
\\,,,,/
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY YELLOW CREEK STCLEAR PLA's~r SOCIOECONOMIC MONITORING A'O MITICATION REPORT YCNP - SMR 4 s
December 30, 1979 i
Knoxville, Tennessee October 1980 l
l 801216015 2
CONTENTS PaFe 1
Background.......
1 I.
Monitoring Results.
II.
Functional Area Impacts and Mitigation Actions.
5 III.
Summary of Mitigation Expenditures 17 Tables Table 1.
Estimate; of Population and Population Change for Alcorn a nd Tishomingo Counties, Mississippi, and Hardin County, Tennessee, for Monitoring Secondary Socioeconomic Impacts of Yellow Creek Nuclear Plant Construction June 30, 1977 - December 30, 1979 6
Table 2.
School Systems' Report of Yellow Creek Nuclear Plant December 1979................
7 Table 3.
TVA Education Mitigation Payments through December 30, 1979 8
Table 4.
TVA Recreation Mitigation Payments through December 30, 1979 11 Table 5.
Traffic Evaluation.
13 Table 6.
Summary of Mitigation Expenditures as of December. 30, 1979 17 Appendixes Table A-1.
Town of Current Residence 18 Table A-2.
Source and Location of Construction Employees.
19 Table A-3.
Distribution of Movers and Associated Population by County and Community.
20 Table A-4.
Comparison of Survey Results with Projections and Selected Parameters.
21 Table A-5.
Mover Summary.
22 Table A-6.
Alcorn - Employees Living Within the County.
23 Table A-7.
Tishomingo - Employees Living Within the County.
24 Table A-8.
Hardin - Employees Living Within the C.~2nty.
25 Table A-9.
Corinth - Employees Living Within the City Limits 26 Table A-10.
Iuka - Employees Living Within the City Limits 27 Table A-11.
Savannah - Employees Living Within the City Limits 28
4 YELOW CREEK NUCLEAR PLANT l
SOCIOECONOMIC MONITORING AND MITIGATION REPORT DECEMBER 1979 l
BACKGROUND l
r This is the fourth in a series of reports describing the monitoring and mitigation of socioeconomic impacts which result from the construction 4
of the Yellow Creek Nuclear Plant. This reporting period began July 1, 1979, and ended December 30, 1979. These semiannual reports are prepared to fulfill a commitment made by TVA in the construction permits hearings.
The impact area is defined as portions of Alcorn and Tishomingo Counties, Mississippi, and Hardin County, Tennessee. This area was selected 1
because it was projected to receive a significant population influx due to the project. However, the impact area may be redefined if significant l
impacts are identified elsewhere.
e
- 1. Monitoring Results In February 1980 TVA conducted a survey of all TVA employees at Yellow Creek as of December 30, 1979. The timelag between employ-I ment and survey gives the employees who moved an opportunity-to L
make personal adjustments and should provide a better view of employee distribution, family characteristics, and housirg choice.
The employment level was 2,834, and the information was available for 72 percent (2,043). Bated on that information, 355, or 17 j
percent, said that they moved into the area to work at the project (movers). Of the total 355, 211 said they located in the impact area.
Local employees (nonmovers) commute to the project from a 4
I
,,-,_,,-_,,ev
= _,, -. -,..... -.. - -.,, - _ - _..
4
-.. ~,.
selected parameters from the Socioeconomic Imp 2 cts section (revision
- , dated June 16, 1978, of the Yellow Creek Nuclear Plant Environ-mental Report) were applied to the number of employees surveyed.
The results of this comparison are found in table A-4.
No cove.
i rate was projected for early in the project, so the survey rate is used. However, the family characteristics, housing choice, and location pattern can be compared.
Surveyed employee characteristics are similar to those projected.
Sixty percent were expected to bring their families, and this survey found that 70 percent did. The remaining 30 percent did not have families in the impact area.
Projectione indicated one school-age child per f auily and the survey results were close. a the proj ections (0.9). The average family size was larger than projected at 3. 5 compared with the proj ec ted 3.0.
As a result of all of these factors, the total population influx found in the survey was 1,345 compared to a projected 1,082.
The housing choice of movers is continuing to vary considerably from projections which were made only for peak employment.
Fifty-five percent of the movers chose houses, and 28 percent chose mobile homes. The peak projections were that 35 percent would choose houses and 45 percent would choose mobile homes. The projections (20 percent) and survey results (17 percent) were f airly close for those choosing apartments, sleeping rooms, and other accommodations.
The "other" category includes tents, campers, and recreational vehicles.,
~.
II. Functional Area Impacts and Mitigation Actior.s Secondary Employment--Secondary employment impact is defined as a temporary increase in the trade-and service-related resident popu-lation which can be attributed to the Yellow Creek project.
If the i
population increase in a county is greater than that arising directly from the project or from other primary employment increases, we would conclude that t possibility of secondary employment exists.
During the reporting period our estimating procedure revealei population increases of 20 persons in Tishomingo County and
_37 persons in Hardin County which could not be explained by project-related influx or change in porslation associated with other primary employment (see Table 1).
Both Hardin and Tishomingo Counties experienced a decline in resident employ =ent.
The total population unexplained in Tishomingo County (20) is very small relative to base population and is well within the error of the estimate. Due to the small number of movers in Hardin County it does not seem reasonable that this growth could result from project-related secondary employment as in the previous report.
l I
l l
Education--Monitoring direct impact on education occurs primarily through reports from the five impacted school districts.
School districts submit reports to TVA annually showing the names of all students whose parents are employed et the Yellow Creek Nuclear Plant, the school previously attended, school and grade in which l
enrolled, and essential attendance and transportation information.
l M
l !
The construction employee monitoring program yields more aggregated data by counties for cross-referencing with the school districts reports. The initial reports submitted by the school districts have indicated that all of the school dis:ricts have fewer direct impact students compared to TVA estimates.* Summary data from the school systems report are shown in the following table.
A census conducted using Public Law 81-874 guid; lines yields most of the data school systems need for reporting purposes.
Table 2 School Systems' Report of y Yellow Creek Nuclear Plant December 1979 Number of Children Number of Children School System of Local Residents of Movers Total Alcorn County 84 33 117 Corinth Separate 11 6
17 Hardin County 149 23 17 luka Separate 78 131 209 Iishomingo County 270 88 358 Total 592 281 873 1The number of students of inmovers may not agree with the school systems' report because some employees did not complete the survey form and several reports included the Tennessee Tombigbee Waterway impact as being TVA.
- ln the June 1979 socioeconomic monitoring report, the Iuka Separate was reported to have exceeded projection in error. This was because the school systems' report included the Tennessee Tombigbee Waterway construction report.
TVA, the Mississippi and Tennessee Departments of Education, and the five local school districts have entered into formal agreements for alleviating impacts on local school districts. Under these agreements, TVA has provided funds for schoolbus transportation. TVA has expended a joint TVA and local educational institutioral training center at the project. TVA has committed approximately $400,000 for the construction of the cent-ich when completed, will train local people; thus reducing the impacts as well as establishing a stable workforce for the future. To date $80,000 has been expended on the construction of the training center and $51,146 has been utilized in training boilermakers to qualify for the TVA workforce.
To help meet the demand for boilermaker manpower shortage and to reduce TVA's construction mover impact, special emphasis has been given to a training program in the recruitment area. The boilermaker training program has graduated 16 students who have entered the TVA workforce. The graduates of the boilermaker training program are from the three-county recruitment area.
The apprenticeship program consiats of 177 members. The majority of tta apprenticeship program members are from within the three-count; impact area. The following is a membership breakdown according to the craft of the apprenticeship program at the Ye.llow Creek Nuclear Plant: 64 carpenters, 4 equipment mechanics, 7 grade and paving workers, 7 operating engineers, 36 steamfitters, 35 fron workers, and 24 electricians.
Housing--Conditions in the local housing market are generally the same as indicated in the last report.
response _7 stem for Alcorn and Tishomingo Counties. Design and implementation of the system is progressing. Negotiations are currently underway for a sanitarian for Alcorn and Tishomingo Counties.
Recreation--Community recreation impacts were monitored through local contacts and field review. Technical assistance was provided to several co=munities for site design and prrgram consultation.
A contract was executed in December 1979 with the City of Savannah for
$50,000 to assist in the development of needed recreation facilities and to hire additional program staff. No requests for payment on the contract were received during the reporting period. Payments were made, however, on a previous contract with Tishomingo County for $35,000. The contract, executed in May 1979, was to help implement a wide variety of recreation facility improvements throughout the county. 7ne following table lists TVA's recreation mitigation payments to Tishomingo County through December 30, 1979.
Table 4 TVA Recreation itigation Payments Tishomingo County July 1, 1979, through December 30, 1979 1
City of Belmont S 7,500 City of Burnsville 7,993 City of Iuka 10,786 Total
$26,279 Recreation mitigation assistance is also anticipated for the city of Corinth to help in the development of a needed athletic field. No contract has been initiated pending additional evaluation of TVA-related
'.mpa c t s.
t i
_11_
i
'w a
c
_a.
_.ch2 m
l s
i Table 5 TRAFFIC EVALUATION (June 1979 to December 1979) i I
Peak Hour Volume During During Peak TVA TVA Commuter Daily Peak Shift Changes Traffic Volume Iuka-Red Sulpher Springs Road North of Patrick Church Road 830 830 750 i
SR-25 North of U.S. 72 Junction 820 820 520 Iuka-Red Sulphur Spring Road j
(Proj ect 1001) between Patrick Church Road and SR-25 460 460 430 U.S. 72 West of Alabama State Line 520 520 310 SR-25 South of SR-365 Junction 360*
330 220 f
SR-25 South of Tennessee i
State Line 320 320 110 i
SR-365 Southwest of SR-25 Junction 150 150 110 SR-25 South of Iuka 720 720 90 U.S. 72 West of SR-365 Junction 700 700 60 i
SR-25 midway. between Patrick Road and luka-Red Sulphur 260*
230 30
)
Spring Road 1
- Daily peak-hour volume occurs at a time other than peak TVA shif t change.
As indicated in table 5, the peak.TVA commuting traffic occurs during' l
an hour other than the peak hour for some of the highway segments being _
This can be attributed to the fact that the shifts are scheduled monitored.
such that'the majority of the TVA commuter traffic does not coincide with the-i 1
current Ieak hours.
f i
from TVI.
Agreements are in the process of being completed for TVA to assist the counties in !.mplementing these countywide emergency systems.
i These systens will provide rural fire protection, emergency medical backup capability, and general emergency communications and response capability.
i The second major area of mitigation assistance to local governments has been in the area of law enforcement. A contract remains in effect with the town of Iuka for adding personnel and equipment to be used in law enforcement. As of December 31, 1979, payments of $22,344 had been made out of the total commitment of $30,500.
This A similar contract with Tishomingo-County also remains in effect.
contract covers assistance to the sanitation service in addition to law enforcement. Total payments of $22,589 have been made out of the total commitment of $37,800.
A contract with Burnsville, Mississippi,was also executed during this period for law enforcement assistance. This contract for $7,000 covers additional personnel expenses and equipment.
As of the The third major area of assistance was for road maintenance.
end of the period, contracts totaling $194,600 have been executed with Tishomingo County to correct problems on access roads to the project.
Payments under the contracts have totaled $136,944 by the end of the period.
f I
l I
I 5
l l
APPENDICES r
I
Table 6 Summary of Mitigation Expenditures as or December 30, 1979 Expenditures Exp endit'.res This Period To Date Education
$ 35,872
$134,'03 Employee Transportation 188,812 316,165 Health red Medical Services 8,300 13,100 Local Government Budgets 29,615 Local Recruitment and Training 131,146 173,646 Recreation 26,279 26,279 k'ater and Sewer 17,089 Total 390,409 710,097 This includes a $16,300 payment to Iuka, Mississippi School System on March 13, 1979, but not included in the last report.
i 17-i j
'P"r v
,.w..
Table A-1 7 0LLOW UP $URWET TOWN OF CUPRINI RtSICENCE RUN DAll 05/05/80 YELLUh (REEn NUCL 1 AD PL ANT EMPLOYEE 5 RUN T imE 132355 ACIlyt ( NPL OT t E 5 12-31-79 REPORT 2
POVED TO AlkEADY TOWN 10mh IN TOW 4 10TAL 41PULATID4 CHEROKEE At 10 54 64 1.484 FLORENCE AL 24 203 227 36.000 MU5CLE SHOALS AL 13 48 61 6.907 RU55f LLvlLLE AL 5
39 44 7.814 5HEFFIELO AL 16 41 63 12.003 TUSCUMEIA AL 15 97 112 8.828 BURN 5VILLE M5 6
56 62 784 CORINTH M5 39 114 153 10.900 IUKA MS 126 324 450 2.369 TISHOMINGO MS 1
47 54 410 5AVARNAH TM 29 141 170 5.576 COUNCE TN 11 29 40 60)
SUBTOTAL 331 1199 1500 ATHER5 AL 2
20 22 13.637 COURTLAND AL 0
8 8
547 KILLIN AL 3
26 29 683 LilCHTON AL 3
32 35 1,231 LEXIMGTON AL 1
6 7
278 RED EST AL 1
9 10 2464 ROGER $VILLE AL 1
17 18 950 TOWh CREEK AL 0
11 11 1.263 kATEPLOO AL 0
8 8
262 BELMONT M5 2
16 18 1.231 500kEVILLE MS 3
29 32 5.895 FULTON M5 1
5 6
7.d99 4
RIEN21 M5 0
9 9
363 i
DENNIS M5 1
9 10 125 i
ADAM 5VILLE IN 2
12 14 1.344 LEXINGTON IN 1
6 7
5.024 LORETTO Th 0
10 10 1.557 MICHIE TN 2
16 18 569 RAMfF TN O
9 9
451 5fLMin TN O
16 16 3.495 ST JOSEPH IN O
5 5
637 WATNE5 BORO TN O
12 12 1.983 LUTIS Th 0
1 7
20 0 MORRIS CHAPit th 0
8 8
120 5HILCH TN 1
Il 12
$UBTOTAL 24 31T 341 OTHtt ID 172 202 1DTAL Rt3PON5t5 355 1688 2043 TChP h0$K7 0RCf TOTAL 2834 12-31-79 t
[}
> - l r b eJunSJu\\.fu
_1g_
k N
_ ~
4
.e _
a
_i__
~
i _.
e
__. _ _.z._._...
_.. s.
_I
~
.4
.s i
i c - t. -
,e n.,. ~j m, - o
.osi,
.4
. y o
~4
~
k
-,i f
- L a N '.}
I.
. ~
\\
v Table A-4 YELLOW CREEK NUCLEAR PIRT COM'PARISON OF SURVEY RESULTS LITH
~
PROJECTIONS FOR SELECTED PARAMETERS EMPLOYMENT LEVEL - 2,834 i
MOVER LEVEL - 492
]
1 I
Prolected Surveyed l
Percent Number Percent Number i
Movers with Families 60 295 70 347 l
Movers without. Families 40 197 30 145 326 295' School-Age Children 0.9 1
j School-Age Children per Family 1,345
.1,082 Total Population Influx i
Percent Number _
Percent Number 4
Housing Choice E
35 172 55 270 l
Houses 45 222 28 140 Mobile Homes Apartments, Sleeping Rooms, and 20 98 17 82 j
Other Total
~100 492 100 492 i
N rcent Number Percent
. Number Distribution by County i
Alcorn, MS - Corinth Area 50 246 11 54 Tishomingo, MS - Iuka and 40 197 37 183 Burnsville Areas l
Hardin, TN - Savannah and 10 49 11 55 Counce treas i,
41 200 0
Other Areas
?
i 2
i 100 492 100" 492 Total 1.
Numbers extrapolated.
2.
Percentages may not add to 100 because of rounding.
l b
.-21_
=
Table A-6 FOLLOW UP SUR YE T WOR KE RS WHO MOVE D 1410 YELLOW Ekttk quttEna PLANT A nt A PAGE 004 ELCOSk RUN D AT E 35/ 05 /8 0 EMPLOYE ES L IVik; Wi1Hl4 T H'E COUNTY TOTAt REFORT le AC TIVI EPPLOYtE5 12-31-T9 RUN TIME 10234 7 WITM 10 int CHI LDRE N CHILOREN MOVERS CHjtDRE4 NLMBER IN IN M3VE R 5 WITH IN OF GR ADE HIGH WITHOUT T OT AL FAMILf SCNCOL CHILDR E N S CH OUL SCHOOL FAMIL1 M OV E R 5 ANNunt EMPL3 vet 5 HDU5E DWNED 20 10 39 12 7
0 20 HOUSE RENTED AFARTMENT RE NTED I
O O
O O
1 2
MOBILE HOME REkTED MOBILE HOME DdNED 0
0 3
0 0
1 1
SLEEPING ROCH MOTEL TOTAL 21 10 39 12 7
2 23 0THE R HOURLV EMPLOYEE 5 HOUSE OWNED 2
1 2
1 1
1 3
HOUSE REPff 0 3
2 3
2 0
0 3
APARTMENT RENTED 0
0 3
0 0
1 1
MOBILE HOME RENTED 3
1 3
1 D
1 4
MOBILE HOME OWNED 3
3 7
5 0
1 4
SLEEPING RDOM DTHEt 0
0 3
0 0
2 2
MOTEL TOTAL 11 7
15 9
1 6
IT ALL EMPLOYEE 5 H005E OWhED 22 II 41 13 8
1 23 HOUSE RENTED 3
2 1
2 0
0 3
APARTMENI DENit0 1
0 3
0 0
2 3
MOBILE HOME RENTED 3
1 3
1 0
1 4
MOBILE HOME DWNED 3
3 7
5 0
2 5
5LEEPING ROOM MOTE L OTHER O
O 3
0 0
2 2
TOTAL 32 IT 54 21 8
8 40 Table A-8 DCLLOW UP sua VE Y W0a EE R 5 WHO MOVE D 1h10 TELLUb EttEK 1JCLit4 PLANT ARE A PAGE 306 H&RDIN RUN C&lE 35/05/80 EMPLOVE t 5 L IVING WI THI4 THE COUhi1 TOTAL RFPORT 18 ACTIVI f4PLOYtt5 12-31-79 RUN TIME 132347 WITH T014 L CdI LD8E N CHILDREN MOVER 5 CHILDR14 NLMB E R IN IN 43VER5 WITH lh DF GR ADE HILH WITH03T TCTAL FAMILY SCHOOL CH ILDR t h S CHCDL
$CHOOL FAMILY M CV ER $
ANNULL EMPLOYEE 5 HOUSE QWHED 14 4
19 5
3 1
15 HCUSE RENTEL 1
1 2
1 0
0 1
APAeTMENT RENTED 0
0 3
0 0
1 1
MOBILE HCME SENTED 0
0 3
0 0
2 2
MOBILE HOME OWNED 2
2 4
3 0
0 2
SLEEPING ROOM 0
0 3
0 0
1 1
MOTEL OTHEa TOTat 17 7
25 9
3 5
22 N0l!R L T t>PLOYEE 5 NCUSE CWWID 4
4 13 7
3 C
4 HCUSE BENTED 6
5 5
6 0
1 7
APARTutMT RENTED 0
0 3
0 0
1 1
MCPILE HOME RENTED 1
1 2
1 1
2 3
MCBILE HOME OWNEC 5
3 9
1 4
0 5
SLEEPING 900M MOTEL DTHEA TOTAL 16 13
?i 15 8
6 2C ALL EMPLOYst$
Ht'.U5E OWNED le P
21 12 6
1 19 H]USE RENTED 7
6 13 7
0 1
P AFAR TMENT s t MT E D 0
0 0
0 0
2 2
MCEILE HOME KtNTED 1
1 2
1 1
4 5
MutILE HOME QWNED 7
5 13 4
4 0
7 SLEEPING RDom 0
0 3
0 0
1 1
MOTEL 01HER TOTAL 33 20 56 24 11 9
42 4 - -
b-Table A-10 FULL OW UP $Ut vE Y WORKIR5 kHO MOVE D IN10 YE LL0h f atin NUCLita PL ANT A8IA PAGE 032 IUPA EUN CA T E 35/ 05 /8 0 EMPLDTE f1 LlvlNS WilHI% THE Cliv LIMITS REPORT la AC TIVE EMPLOYtt5 12-31-79 EUM TIME 132347 W11H 10TLL CHIL DEE N CHILDREN MOVERS CHILDRtt tiUMSEE IN IN M3VE45 WITH 1A 0F GR ADE HIGH WI1H0Ji 1 0iAL FAMILY SCHCOL (HILD4EN S CH DDL SCHOOL f4 MILT M0V ER 5 ANhUAL EMPLOYEE 5 HOU5E OWNED 9
3 5
4 2
0 9
HOUSE RENTED 2
0 1
0 0
0 2
AP ARTMENT RE NTE0 0
0 3
0 0
2 2
MOBILE HOME RENTED MOBILE HOME DdhED 1
0 1
0 0
1 2
SLEEPIMG R00M M01EL 01HE R TOTAL 12 3
13 4
2 3
15 HOURLY EMPLOYEE 5 HOUSE CwNED 1
1 1
1 0
1 2
HCU3! FfNTED 1
1 1
0 1
0 1
APARTMENT RENTfD 3
1 6
I 1
1 4
MOBILE HCME RENTED 1
0 3
0 0
5 6
MOBILE HOME DWN; 5
2 13 3
3 1
6 SLEE PlHG SUDM 0
0 0
0 0
2 2
MuiEL f
01HEt 1
1 1
1 0
1 2
TOTAL 12 t
IT e
5 21 23 l
ALL EMPLOTEE 5 HOUSE DWNIC 10 4
9 5
2 1
11 HOUSE RENTEC 3
1 2
0 1
0 3
1 I
1 3
6 MOBILE HOME EENTED 1
0 0
0 0
5 6
MCBILE HOME OWNtt 6
2 11 3
3 2
6 SLEEPING B005 0
0 1
0 0
2 2
MDIEL OTHE8 1
1 1
1 0
1 2
TOTAL 24 9
21 10 7
14 3P
.i f '
Appendix B TRAFFIC LEVEL DEFINED Level of Service D Level of service D approaches unstable flow, with tolerable operating speeds being maintained though considerably affected by changes in Fluctuations in volume and temporary restrictions operating conditions.
Drivers have to flow may cause substantial drops in operating speeds.
little freedom to maneuver, and comfort and convenience are low, but conditions can be tolerated for short periods of time.
Source:
Highway Capacity Manual, Highway Research Board Special Report 87, 1965.
5 _.
~
f Appendix C-2 i
1 Follow-up Questionnaire 4
s YES. IT So, SKIP TO QUESTION 2.
NO.
IF NOT, PLEASE ANSWER TE FCLIiMING QUESTIONS:
WHERE ARE YOU NCW LIVING OURIN3 THE WORK WEEK 7 STREET ADDFISS CITY g
COUNTY STATE DO YOU LIVE INSIEE TE CITY LIMITS 7
,YES NO CECK WHICH TYPE RESILE'.'CE IN TE PROJECT ArJ4 YOU LIVE IN 1.
BOARDINO OR SLEEFING ROOM 2.
MUTEL 3 AFARTMENT 4
MOBILE }OME I
5 HOUSE 6.
CINER (FLEASE SPECIFY) 2.
IF YOU LIVE IN A HOUCE OR MOBILE HOME IN THE PROJEC'1 AFIA, DO YOU OWN IT7 YES NO 3 IN TE PROJECT AREA, CHECK WITH kHOM YOU NOW LIVE:
1.
BY MYSELF j
2.
WITH MY FAMILY 3 WITH B00PMATES. HOW MAST 7 4
OTHER (FLEASE SPECIFY) t Is. HOW MANY CHILDREN LIVE 'aTfH YOU IN THE PROJECT AREAT OF TESE, HOW MANY GO TO ORADE SCHOCL7 CF TESE, HOW Flay GO To HIGH SCHOOL?
5 HAVE YCU LIVED AT YOUR PRESENT ADDRESS MOPI THAN SIX M0hTHST YES NO 6.
HAVE YOU OR AYY CF YOUR FAMILY LIVUG WITH YOU IN TE PROSCT AREA HAD AhT DIFFICULTY CHIAININ3 HEAL"3 TREAmi?
YES. IF SO, CHECK THOSE VHICH YOU HAD DIFFICULTY CBIAINING7 DOCTOR (NOT EMEP.0EN0Y)
DENTIST DERGENCY MEDICAL TPIATMENT HOSPITALIZATION OTER (FLEASE SPECIFY)
NO 7.
RAVE YOU OR ANY CF YOUR FAMILY LIVINO WITH YOU IN TE FROJECT AREA HAD TO TRAVEL OUTSIDE YOUR PRESENT COUNTY TO OBTAIN HEALTH TREATMEhi?
YES. IF So, WHAT WAS TE SERVICE AND kHERE DID YOU HAVE TO G07 I
g THANK YOU FCR COOPERATING IN THIS SURVEY.
YELMW CREDC NUCLEtJt PU4T i
l l
P,
i v+,--u.
y
-. - - _. -.-m_,
@M f Nfllk
~
W @ % M k @W M J/i b f4 y E l.= $y t,y.nk,'"$r.-.
~
mr, c
- "~~- J '1.'
(-p
'1
- 'u
....\\
's
. QQ, t... gN.T
,:~ %, jd
- Ly^
r 1.y e[~...
~
m isQ w.2
,7 w
9<
2
. **~* /
Co u w,..
f
%)]
W,. -. lb,. M C_K S O Nr
- r.
k,," *
..y-g.- 1 s -u<,yg.
j
.y._;f
(
n
\\g w...~. ~7' fi s T o n f )
tag" y ' 8s y
/
y t
.y.
g f,
ba..-.-~~--%
/
5 l
LI g._
4..
,,, ',, j j
f.a e
f w,, Hest-A wf -... /* *"* *'*
C i
,'j p[".-.
g-0,,,[.',)
N
. d k
^
.. e,u.
,, ~
a '.
. m1 a.
p......
A
[
\\
u
-~
/.'*-
..,k n
n.
g (s.
J.a_- --
... ~. -
j
,, uj,g.,
s f
fl '
e J
l
' * ~ ' " '
' T
/
s.w.
t m.
J/
f t
,,,,.......J i
fir " ~ ~ ~ * - - -
r'**~~~'.
M u
,f s
- ~".
i gA.
- 7n, s
/
'S
)
i WAY af i A R DIN Mc, h nAphrd
~--
L.-r.ac.no,
)
/
f
- u sr
[
'.a
- . ' ~.
..,. y, 1
"r*" h.
3 e.--- -
a l
j 4'
' * * ~
y)1...g/Uy l6
/
56H a# #
m l
9,
,I l
,.y Q),
4 M: t ^
l j
/
{
\\/
At n.-
-l o/ ~ 3.
h~.
- t --,
- p. r - - ]= e ".y b.w :y7---
,.2, b"
t y gj W.. ].
.f. ',
...(,b :
c,,,.h
[f
_.a
-'N.p.i.
3
... p i
.2.
l l
w- - l~.- Pr 7 ~ " j.n... i
-]
t
...y IL>,.,nthq.
M w. i.n. m i...t.
J.
9-.
no f.
}i
..~.-
l...-.. J ' -- /~
f-1FCor i
7
~~
?
+ -n.., %
- ,o u ~~,,
i
,e gA.<
l e..-.
."m &,
^
ii A
i,1 A.t
./
m-t
,.Q.,. q
,,{-
N.g y
/
[
{,
y
\\
s.
f '
".,,,_ L _ ljg AI s
/
y g
7 7g 4
A N-y '. ' j1--a~M.n Q,\\e o)m }
=--
N.l g-
.. 1 -
- - -. ~
' m'^ g>- x..
~
M.
^) N n
d VLOREN TIi DAH S'
r
.......%.sh f f. g[
q.p\\ >
j,J,4,_jm...., g. h*".
d ya.g.
.H y Y f*5 V it i
.q f
-- C1-yl-,.c ~.nw..N J.
t,f. _,... p, %.w<n
%.,g....d s \\,
(._
e p <:=.
y.........
..;;! \\
m 9
. m p. Q,,=-
,.,,;. (.
s p
. s...-..;
5~~ N,p,j 4f l
,4gln- -
D EC M.._U R.)...h
'e $
.I,..,,,. }.1 i
1 9
- '.j,' s
.e
__j g p
-('
h,.
.a
<9.
t N~%.
~= w-
,.. 7',, 1
< u.
<,.., g v) -['.,(,m. y p. ]..J..
.,...( <
i rt%r, c
.c 5 **
o 1
,/
/
.{
k
, '*k y ~.r N
M99 t
g y~..
' '/*
FIGURE I Vfg'.
I L
r'
- - -/ ' T
%.tp",...O.1
-.,.. t<
YELLOW CREEK NUCLEAR PL ANT f
e w.y _--' g,-
< :7., u y
.a
,/ (.
g=ar.
E
,yf 6. n,
q... 4..
'[
(..,
l TOWNS CONTAINf NG CONSTRUCTION EMPLOYEES C. 'v D_.o~
t\\, ~.....
- - -- k..Lu A PL ANT StTE
-*~ %
Q x4y 4
\\ {s DECEMBER 1979 n'
Q.4 T"PJ o,,
,f.
- - - - -.--.i N 4 "t ;;., :.-
p. up*'"c*-
\\u jI Lcc
-.4...
4 a
s -
0 15 30 w
r
. a r.
c w. g6,,-e_.--._
..i t
s q..n
, w..
s T -~ s b -~
p SCALE OF MILES x.*'-,
)
l
[..
- ~ ~
,.y ' -
4 l
3 T
NOTE: TOWNS UNDERLINED CONTAIN EMPLOYEES
~-
. O-*,,, n \\
i /f
.3 n,