ML19345C058
| ML19345C058 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Hatch  |
| Issue date: | 10/23/1980 |
| From: | Widner W GEORGIA POWER CO. |
| To: | James O'Reilly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8012030817 | |
| Download: ML19345C058 (1) | |
Text
/
...p Georg.a Power Company
,,. g 230 Peachtree street 6
- EW8 Post C%2 Box 4543 i
Artera Georp 30302 Te:ephone 404 522 6060 October 23, 1980 g
,{,...,
GeorgiaPower
- w. A w wner J
- b. P l l $ h Vce Aescent and Generai Vanager Nuclear Genera!cn the sotAherrt escrc system United States Nuclear Regulatory Comission Office of Inspection and Enforcement
REFERENCE:
Region II - Suite 3100 RII: WAD n
101 Marietta Street, NW
- 21/80-28 o Atlanta, Georgia 30303 50-366/80-
- 3 1..
M
=
ATTENTION: Mr. James P. O'Reilly
~
.3 TO Gentlemen:
b Z
M M
=5
^ ' '
Attached is a copy of our October 15, 1980, lettertotheiDirecto.y of Nuclear Reactor Regulation requesting approval of exceptions taken to certain ANSI standards. These exemptions were requested pursuant to correction of infractions discussed in Mr. J. H. Miller's letter to you dated September 23, 1980.
If you have questions in this regard, please contact this office.
Very truly yours, W. A. Widner WEB /mb Attachment-xc:
M. Manry R. F. Rogers. III J
1 i CWICL'.L CGY' S 01f?080 lb
i n
-k October 15, 1980 as
. t... w,,
GeorgiaPower
.,,,3 me scun e-c. men United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Washington, D. C.
20555 NRC DOCKETS 50-321, 50-366 OPERATING LICENSES OPR-57, NPF-5 EDWIN I. HATCH NUCLEAR PLANT UNITS 1, 2 PROPOSED CHANGE TO UNIT 2 FSAR COMMITMENTS Gentlemen:
A recent inspection by the Region II Office of Inspection and Enforcement recorted by the regional director's letter of August 22, 1980, noted a failure to comply with certain portions of ANSI 45.2.2-1972 and storage of safety-relate.1 materials and ANSI 45.2.13 concerning theconcerning handling of requisitions for such materials.
In Appendix A and Section 17.2 of the Unit 2 Final Saisty Analysis Report (FSAR) Georgia Power Company committed, without excepticn, to comply with these standards.
That comit-ment was intended to apply only to safety-related equipment and is clari-fled in the proposed revision to indicate this intent.
In the case of inspections upon receipt (Section 5.2.1 of ANSI 45.2.2) however, a quality control inspection detailed in plant procedures requires a
.more stringent inspection and provides superior assurance of quality in safety-related equipment than a receipt inspection.
No material is taken from the site warehouse and released for use in a safety-related function without this QC inspection.
The receipt inspection thus provides only assurance of compliance with commerical terms on the part of the vendor and should not be subject to the requirements of ANSI standerd.
to pipe ends, etc., which may occur during storage, will be d equipment will be eliminated from use in safety-related systems.
Use of pipe protective devices is thereby similarly reduced to a consideration of economics and should not be considered as a safety concern and conducted under the requirements of ANSI 45.2.2 Sections 3.5.1 and 6.4.2' of a "reouisition" as that word is used in plant procedures.The com A Plant Hatch requisition is not a " procurement document" in the sense of the ANSI standard and should not be
---"'--d
' --- * ^ ^ e t =4 = "'4 ' e ="i r-n to 8 08 The change to Section 17.2 c '
'h this f
DUPLICATE DOCUMENT i
l H
I i
A timely reso l
requested so thai Entire document previously dients is entered into system under-4:he present
,.( 1l j ANO ___ $Oltlh M 6'h_Q
.j No. of pages: _S
' En 't u
.w
,,[
?
y
.